More evidence that Bin Laden wants Bush to win.Follow

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3692079.stm

NO bounty for Bush, Bin Laden needs him healthy and able to win the election to ensure the future of Al Queda.

Because killing him wouldn't help Bush get elected. Even Bin Laden realizes it's Bush against himself this election and that it could be Micheal Jackson running against him for all it matters.

Bin Laden will be so upset when Kerry wins. All terrorists will realize that the party is over then.

No, it'll be exponentially more difficult for them to recruit, and raise funds without the intense hatred of Bush on the Arab street. Cleary, I don't see how you can possibly argue that point. When Bush looses, the moderates in the Arab world almost instantly have much more power.


I'm sure the Baath party will be in controll long before then. We've allready almost turned the desert sand into glass from the friction of how quickly were back peadeling and re-intalling Saddam era leaders into power in Iraq. Do some research before you make yourself look like an *** by speculating that the "evil liberals" will do something your people are presently engaged in.

So sad.

Edited, Thu May 6 22:14:19 2004 by Smasharoo

Nahhh...you're only a terrorist if you smoke marijuana. Because the money you buy it with goes through like 12 degrees of separation and eventually ends up in terrorists' hands.

Legalize, and the government will make the money, instead of the terrorists!

I can see the logic behind saying Bush is a good hate target and recruiting point for terrorists. But to use this as an excuse to not vote for him is ludicris. If terrorists hate Bush then I say he is doing his job. I am not going to remove my champion because my enemy doesnt like him. And to say the terrorsits wont have any reason to dislike kerry is dumb too. They hate americans not just Bush. They hate any religion not their own and any race not their own. They hate Bush because he is our leader, the figurehead of America. They would hate Kerry too. And Kerry would have to react just as Bush had to react to 9 11. So any ground this post has in my opinion is very thin. Its just illogical and trying to use vague reasons for Bush bashing. If you want to Bash him go after his politics on economy and taxes or education. Comment on his inability to sound intelligent in foreign matters. But dont say "terrorists hate him and only attack us because of this" thats just dumb. One could even argue that voting for Kerry is dumb due to the fact that the terrorists will test him when he comes into office to see how far he can be pushed. So to avoid such violent testing we should stick with Bush, even if he is a bad president. The logic behind that can seem good but is truthfully very flawed. Vote for who you think is best for our country. Hell just vote. I am sick of how many people in our country protest and have strong opinions one way or another and then don't even vote. I am personally a liberterian and tend to vote republican and will most likely vote for Bush...but that is just me.

You're right. Bush has obligingly provided us with a multitude of reasons to not vote for him.

I find it amusing that, according to people here, everyone hates Bush, and he does such a bad job...

And the best you all can come up with is KERRY?!

Holy Christ! Has the Demoncratic party fallen so low that the best candidate they can come up with is a pathological liar that has no stand on absolutely any topic?

When you win a Silver Star, give me a call, and then you can attempt to criticize a man who's shown more bravery and dedication to this country than you or the current president could possibly comprehend. If you're stupid enough to buy the Republican smear campaign against him that John McCain andother Republicans have even spoken out against being wrong, that's fine.

When you don't care about the character of the man you vote for you end up voting for the guys who did everything they could to acoid sewrving their country instead of the man who risked his life for it.

What an amazingly pathetic cowwardly thing to do. Not only are you guaranteeing more Bin Ladens, you're an uniformed ***** as well. Congratulations.

Shameful, I love how people dis Bush for being a great president. When he gets elected I hope the War comtinues, and you know what? If Kerry wins, there goes America, just like when Clinton was here

Indeed. That was a terrible time. Unemployment below what was considered the technical bottom limit, booming economy, no one flying planes into large buildings in the US, a budget surplus, record numbers of children going to college.

Terrible I tell you. I'd hate to have to return to that after four years of terrorist attack on US soil, ,bungling forieng ploicy and ressecion.

Yes. And that attack also occured before Bush had made any significant changes to the US foreign policy on terrorism and the middle east.

Bush's policy changes came *after* 9/11, not before. You can argue all you want about whether those policy changes were the right ones, or whether or not they've made things better or worse in the long run, but you absolutely cannot imply that Islamic fundamentalists hate us only because of Bush and his policies.

It's quite obvious to everyone that they hated us enough to fly planes into the WTC before Bush started his "war on terror". Um... Isn't that bad enough? Are you saying that if we vote out Bush and elect Kerry as president, the hatred the terrorists feel for us will subside back down to the level at which they'll blow up buildings with 3000 people inside? Wow! I feel safer already! Where do I vote?...





Again. Are you seriously suggesting that the 9/11 attacks occured because of Bush? Please back this up? The people involved were in country taking flying lessons well before Bush taking office. They attacked us because of a long history of US policy in the middle east. Policy which can't be blamed on a single party, and certainly cannnot be blamed on Bush Jr. Uless Kerry has a plan that is different then Bush's yet also different then the policies that brought about 9/11, then he isn't offering us a solution, is he?

Turning back the clock to the same political sitation that resulted in 9/11 is hardly something I'm looking forward to. Find me something better. Bush's plan may be bad. It may be good. But at least it addresses the very real fact that doing things the same way we've done them for 30+ years is not working. He's doing "something". Until someone else comes up with an alternative that is more then just ignoring terrorists and hoping they'll leave us alone, then you really can't say that Bush is "wrong".