Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Solution in IraqFollow

#77 May 07 2004 at 7:11 PM Rating: Excellent
I'm not out to win a non existent popularity contest on a gaming forum. The purpose for me coming here is purely entertainment value and one part of the entertainment is finding gullible people like you to believe everything stated should be taken at face value as fact. Would you believe that some statements are purposefully made just to get a rise out of people? Believe it, cause you see it in print and accept it on blind faith.


p.s. I have never cared nor ever will care about others opinions of me on this forum. But I did tell you a while ago that you are on the short list, and that list has not changed.
#78 May 07 2004 at 7:55 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
I'm not out to win a non existent popularity contest on a gaming forum.


What do you mean non-existant, that's why I am here!

Quote:
But I did tell you a while ago that you are on the short list, and that list has not changed.


Am I on this list? ...or have we come to an understanding?
#79 May 07 2004 at 7:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
stok wrote:
p.s. I have never cared nor ever will care about others opinions of me on this forum. But I did tell you a while ago that you are on the short list, and that list has not changed.


then we have something in common..you were on the short bus IIRC.
#80 May 08 2004 at 4:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Am I on this list? ...or have we come to an understanding?


It takes a lot to get on the short list and you have a long way to go.

empire just doesn't know when to give up or to keep his mouth shut. Especially when he argues religion or topics he knows nothing about like real life.
#81 May 09 2004 at 11:14 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
Quote:
empire just doesn't know when to give up or to keep his mouth shut. Especially when he argues religion or topics he knows nothing about like real life.


your a product of your own hate. look at you...you can't even stand it unless you've got the last word in. the true fact is that you don't have a clue about me and never will. saying you have a clue at all is really reaching for straws as well.

put me all over your short list. put on lipstick and fondle your sniper rifle and sing mary had a little lamb while jerking off with the other hand too.

btw, your posts are quite amusing...and i have to tell you that more than one person behind my computer screen get quite a chuckle reading them...you and smash make us feel really good about ourselves.
#82 May 10 2004 at 12:23 AM Rating: Decent
*
135 posts
Have you ever thought of just NOT saying something? It seems to me that it wouldn't cross your mind; seems you like listening to yourself talk, rather than taking an amiable stance so others would listen as well instead of jumping on your back and getting completely off topic.

not that I don't enjoy watching, of course...
#83 May 10 2004 at 6:18 AM Rating: Decent
lol as I said before reminds me of Katie no matter how over matched he just keep responding.

Or maybe its the energizer bunny I am thinking of =P
#84 May 10 2004 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
wait..did i miss something? is this still a messageboard? you know..one of those places where you post, someone responds, you respond, etc. rinse repeat blah blah blah.

oh i get it...some of you think this is actually a conversation..you know, a RL thing. how sad and pathetic. (I have my sympathetic face on now...really i do)
#85 May 10 2004 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
*
135 posts
That's exactly what I thought it was, because, that's exactly what it is. This, my friend, is a conversation. Although it may be through a message board, you are still conversing through the written/typed word. It isn't sad and pathetic that some treat this thread as a conversation, because it is, essentially, just that. Were it not a conversation, there would be no feeling in any posts, just simple statement of fact with no interpersonal action/reaction as there is now. That, Empyre, is a posting thread; just bits of information with no real feeling.

This, is a conversation, where people are expressing their opinion and REACTING to one another. If this were not a conversation, you would probably only have 211 out of your 1211 posts, though, as I browse through these boards, I see you are more of a REACTION type than an ACTION type as I have YET to see you begin a thread. So, in seeing that, I am lead to believe that you really have nothing to say, lest it be reaction from what someone else has said. Which in my mind, leads me to also believe you have no sense of original thought, less it be in reaction to something already stated. But, that's just my opinion, I could just be conversting with a computer.

Pleh.
#86 May 10 2004 at 1:30 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
then your wrong and speaking totally out of your ***** you are right about one thing..i like to respond more than start...thats one of the choices i have in posting here.

your original post to me was about not responding...and to say that *I* took this off topic just displays your inability to read, despite your assertive attempts to try and prove you do.

I was actually the first to respond to Jokero civilly..and *gasp* in response to his post which *double gasp* had everything to do with this thread. Learn to read CORRECTLY and THOROUGHLY and then come back and talk to me. Until then, your just contributing to the madness your accusing...theres hundreds of you in the online community.

Edited, Mon May 10 14:31:13 2004 by Empyre
#87 May 10 2004 at 2:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Shut up Empyre! Your flames lack style, so much so, that it pains me to read them.
#88 May 10 2004 at 2:36 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
your a little late and definately lacking any sort of originality with that approach ****. oh..and do a little spring cleaning in your own backyard before you go knocking on the neighbors doors won't ya little buddy?
#89 May 10 2004 at 2:37 PM Rating: Excellent
That is it, I was trying to think of who you reminde me of, and now I've got it.

Empyre = Cliff Clavin

"Heyyy, that's Mr. Weenie to you pal!"

"Actually, it is a little known fact that Michael Jackson..."

#90 May 10 2004 at 2:39 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
wtf are you talking about? do you practice laughing at yourself in the mirror before you talk or do you just wing it?

EDIT: nevermind, asking a question just ensures that i'm going to be forced to endure another one of your enlightening posts. so spare the post population, please.

Edited, Mon May 10 15:41:01 2004 by Empyre
#91 May 10 2004 at 2:43 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
If you want to flame each other do it over the phone, or in person, or through email. All you are doing is making distractions and spamming over the intelligent things that people have to say.

Yes I am aware that this post is not, in fact, related to the thread subject.
#92 May 10 2004 at 2:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
wtf are you talking about? do you practice laughing at yourself in the mirror before you talk or do you just wing it?


Cliff Clavin, he was the mailman on Cheers!

I'll link you a picture, one sec....

http://cheers.tvheaven.com/cliff.html

There we are!
#93 May 10 2004 at 2:47 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
Quote:
If you want to flame each other do it over the phone, or in person, or through email.


yeah...cause i have all those. If you haven't noticed, flaming is an embedded function in this forum. don't make the same mistake I did and assume that it will ever be any different.
#94 May 10 2004 at 2:49 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
Correct Empyre, flames are embedded in the forum and always will be, but can we please keep the flames about what is posted, rather than getting personal?
#95 May 10 2004 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
you really need to take a trip down memory lane and start reading past posts. i can't explain it to you anymore than that.

Quote:
Cliff Clavin, he was the mailman on Cheers!


no sh[b][/b]it sherlock. that still doesn't mean you are making nor have a lick of sense.

Edited, Mon May 10 15:53:07 2004 by Empyre
#96 May 10 2004 at 2:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Correct Empyre, flames are embedded in the forum and always will be, but can we please keep the flames about what is posted, rather than getting personal?


Krogsbrew, is this a new rule you have imposed on the asylum?

Look up at the top!

Quote:
No holds barred forum for deep OOT discourse. Not for the faint of heart.


No holds barred! I rest my case. You can get as personal as you like. Perhaps, "The Sandbox" would be more suited for you.

#97 May 10 2004 at 2:56 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
How can we have thread after thread about how the government needs to change, but when someone posts about making changes in the forum the response is an inevitable remark about how they are a newb and need to check past posts?

#98 May 10 2004 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
i never called you a n00b, but am sure someone will soon enough.
#99 May 10 2004 at 2:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
no **** sherlock. that still doesn't mean you are making nor have a lick of sense.


I think I may have touched a nerve! Am I not the first to have said this, Cliffy-boy?
#100 May 10 2004 at 3:02 PM Rating: Good
***
1,817 posts
Quote:
I think I may have touched a nerve!


you will never, EVER touch my nerve. don't be ghey sparky.

Quote:
Am I not the first to have said this, Cliffy-boy?


maybe you are...i don't recall, but your definately not the first to act like a complete lamer.
#101 May 10 2004 at 3:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,980 posts
I know that Empyre. If you actually called me a n00b i would have quoted you. My statement is in reference to many other flames with a slight jab at your remark.

edited for grammer

Edited, Mon May 10 16:03:01 2004 by Krogsbrew
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 335 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (335)