This is simply a poll.
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
a) Yes
b) No
2. Is it right to harbor terrorist?
a) Yes
b) No
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
a) Yes
b) No
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
a) Yes
b) No
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
a) No, never
b) Yes, if it involves the liberation of a country (meaning soveirnty is being handed over to the people of the country)
c) Yes, under any circumstances
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
a) No
b) Yes, the Holocaust (SP?) had to be stopped
c) Yes, Hitler/Mussolini/etc had to be stopped
d) Yes, both b and c
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
a) No, it sucked
b) Yes, but it was handled VERY badly
c) Yes
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
a) NO
b) No, accept for the Us and other Allied nations
c) Yes, anyone
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
a) NO
b) No, accept for the Us and other Allied nations
c) Yes, anyone
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be disbanded
a) No
b) Yes if they don't shape up
c) Just the CIA
d) Just the FBI
e) Yes
EDIT: What was the greatest fromm the 50s to the 70s?
Insert your own
EDIT: Tryed to clarify questions 5 and 10
Edited, Thu Apr 15 17:24:43 2004 by SplinterCellDude
Edited, Thu Apr 15 19:53:40 2004 by SplinterCellDude
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- SCD's Poll: Terrorism, war, and WMDs
SCD's Poll: Terrorism, war, and WMDsFollow
Here's my response:
1. b
2. b
3. b
4. b
5. b
6. d
7. a ( I still don't get it..., why did we help THE FRENCH!)
8. b
9. b
10. b
THE BEATLES!
1. b
2. b
3. b
4. b
5. b
6. d
7. a ( I still don't get it..., why did we help THE FRENCH!)
8. b
9. b
10. b
THE BEATLES!
Yes, I am a spelling and grammar ****: F'king spell check your **** or at least reread it. Damn, just because you think you can write great prose doesn’t make it so. People won’t take you seriously when it’s this f'ked up. The post becomes a joke and a thread started this way gets ignored or trolled (case in point).
I cringe when I read half the posts on this board now. I know not all of you illiterate idiots have dyslexia; ADD maybe, brain damage certainly but not dyslexia.
Edit: I need to listen to my own suggestions
Edited, Thu Apr 15 17:54:38 2004 by GitSlayer
I cringe when I read half the posts on this board now. I know not all of you illiterate idiots have dyslexia; ADD maybe, brain damage certainly but not dyslexia.
Edit: I need to listen to my own suggestions
Edited, Thu Apr 15 17:54:38 2004 by GitSlayer
GitSlayer wrote:
Edit: I need to listen to my own suggestions
I couldn't agree more, Git. Speelin' rulz.
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
Yes, of course it is. That's one of the perqs of being a Dictator, Tyranical Despot or Evil Overlord. But its not right for Benevolent Monarchs to rape and kill their subjects.
2. Is it right to harbor terrorist?
That depends on whose terrorists they are. The Founding Fathers of this country were labeled terrorists at one point. So this is really a matter of opinion.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
See #2
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
Right or wrong its sometimes necessary.
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
At what point does the occupier stop being an occupying force and start being the native people? The "English" have been in Northern Ireland for over 800 years. Are they Irish yet? What about here in the states? We've only been here for a few centuries, are we Americans or still the invading European (or what have you) hordes? At some point the conquerors have the right to what they've conquered.
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
In whose eyes and for what conditions? Some people didn't have a choice in the matter, they had the war thrust upon them.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Necessary for what? If you really want to decsontruct things I don't think any war is necessary. But someone must have felt reasonably passionate about it. Are you asking 'should the US have gotten involved in the Vietnam war'? That's an entirely different question.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Anyone that wants to strike their enemies a long way away should.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
Anyone who wants to nuke their foes from afar would be well advised to do so.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be allowed to continue
Continue to what? Exist? Yes.
EDIT: What was the greatest fromm the 50s to the 70s?
Insert your own
Since you already put The Beatles as your answer, I'll assume you neglected to put the phrase "Liverpudlian quartet of moptop rock and rollers" in your question. And yes, they were.
It would be nice if so many complex issues could be viewed strictly in black and white, but it's really not that easy.
Yes, of course it is. That's one of the perqs of being a Dictator, Tyranical Despot or Evil Overlord. But its not right for Benevolent Monarchs to rape and kill their subjects.
2. Is it right to harbor terrorist?
That depends on whose terrorists they are. The Founding Fathers of this country were labeled terrorists at one point. So this is really a matter of opinion.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
See #2
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
Right or wrong its sometimes necessary.
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
At what point does the occupier stop being an occupying force and start being the native people? The "English" have been in Northern Ireland for over 800 years. Are they Irish yet? What about here in the states? We've only been here for a few centuries, are we Americans or still the invading European (or what have you) hordes? At some point the conquerors have the right to what they've conquered.
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
In whose eyes and for what conditions? Some people didn't have a choice in the matter, they had the war thrust upon them.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Necessary for what? If you really want to decsontruct things I don't think any war is necessary. But someone must have felt reasonably passionate about it. Are you asking 'should the US have gotten involved in the Vietnam war'? That's an entirely different question.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Anyone that wants to strike their enemies a long way away should.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
Anyone who wants to nuke their foes from afar would be well advised to do so.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be allowed to continue
Continue to what? Exist? Yes.
EDIT: What was the greatest fromm the 50s to the 70s?
Insert your own
Since you already put The Beatles as your answer, I'll assume you neglected to put the phrase "Liverpudlian quartet of moptop rock and rollers" in your question. And yes, they were.
It would be nice if so many complex issues could be viewed strictly in black and white, but it's really not that easy.
(1) Absolutely not. Dictators should assign underlings to raping and murdering and leave more time for themselves to discover superweapons.
(2) Who's terrorists?
(3) See (2)
(4) Only if you come out ahead
(5) Isn't "occupied liberated country" an oxymoron?
(6) Yes, otherwise we'd still be calling WWI the Great War.
(7) It was if you like Rambo movies.
(8) Just me.
(9) Once you build the Manhatten Project wonder, all nations with rocketry have the capacity to build nuclear weapons. It's in the rules.
(10) Continue doing what?
(2) Who's terrorists?
(3) See (2)
(4) Only if you come out ahead
(5) Isn't "occupied liberated country" an oxymoron?
(6) Yes, otherwise we'd still be calling WWI the Great War.
(7) It was if you like Rambo movies.
(8) Just me.
(9) Once you build the Manhatten Project wonder, all nations with rocketry have the capacity to build nuclear weapons. It's in the rules.
(10) Continue doing what?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
This is simply a poll.
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
Rape - No, Kill - Yes. Just want to get this on the record before I take over another country
2. Is it right to harbour terrorist?
Sure, A few concrete boots, some blood in the water, pick a known shark infested area. Oh, I'd make an exception to rule number 1 for terrorists. Let "bubba" be their interrogation method at the local prison.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
No. What kind of a stupid-assed question is that?
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
No. It never works. I prefer the "the fifth element" method of negotiation with terrorists
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
Yes. If the U.S. can maintain the political will to
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
Yes. The japanese hit our navy, we had to respond or risk looking like an international pushover. That and having hitlar in direct control of 60 percent of the habitable landmass of the world would have been a really messed up situation.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Yes, but only on a political front.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Yes, anyone who can build them and doesn't mind having our missiles pointed at them in return.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
Ideally no, but since the atomic genie is already out of the lamp, Yes, anyone not identified by the allied powers as being a rogue state willing and capable of launching a nuclear strike. I personally don't like the idea that India, Pakistan, and Israel have Nukes, much less North Koreas probable nuke arsinal.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be disbanded
No. because that would be stupid.
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
Rape - No, Kill - Yes. Just want to get this on the record before I take over another country
2. Is it right to harbour terrorist?
Sure, A few concrete boots, some blood in the water, pick a known shark infested area. Oh, I'd make an exception to rule number 1 for terrorists. Let "bubba" be their interrogation method at the local prison.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
No. What kind of a stupid-assed question is that?
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
No. It never works. I prefer the "the fifth element" method of negotiation with terrorists
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
Yes. If the U.S. can maintain the political will to
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
Yes. The japanese hit our navy, we had to respond or risk looking like an international pushover. That and having hitlar in direct control of 60 percent of the habitable landmass of the world would have been a really messed up situation.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Yes, but only on a political front.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Yes, anyone who can build them and doesn't mind having our missiles pointed at them in return.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
Ideally no, but since the atomic genie is already out of the lamp, Yes, anyone not identified by the allied powers as being a rogue state willing and capable of launching a nuclear strike. I personally don't like the idea that India, Pakistan, and Israel have Nukes, much less North Koreas probable nuke arsinal.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be disbanded
No. because that would be stupid.
Were the multiple choice selections really nessicary?
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
No, it's not right for the Saudi fammily to enage in this. It's wrong of them.
2. Is it right to harbor terrorist?
No, it's wrong for the Saudis to do this with stunning regularity.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
No, the US shouldn't have spent so much money and time training Bin Laden and freinds in Afganistan in the late 80's. It was wrong.
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
No. We shouldn't be doing it in Iraq right now and we DEFINATLEY shouldn't be allowing an Iranian representative to negoiate for our side. That's negoating with terroirsts...with a terroirst.
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
Of course it is. When you're an imperialist state looking to further your influence or land in the world.
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
Of course it was, contrary to what the Republican Party preached at the time.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Of course it was. We needed to save the world from Communism.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Should? No, of course not. The world *should* be a place where no one would ever need long range missles. It should also be a place where supermodels line up kneeling in my driveway each morning fighting over who gets to service me orrally before my magic carpet comes and takes me to work.
Things aren't allways as they should be though.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
See the above answer.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be disbanded
No, but they should have to put on a Drag Queen show to get funded. You know, like in the old JEH days.
1. Is it right for a dictator to rape and kill his people?
No, it's not right for the Saudi fammily to enage in this. It's wrong of them.
2. Is it right to harbor terrorist?
No, it's wrong for the Saudis to do this with stunning regularity.
3. Is it right to fund terrorist?
No, the US shouldn't have spent so much money and time training Bin Laden and freinds in Afganistan in the late 80's. It was wrong.
4. Is it right to negotiate with terrorist?
No. We shouldn't be doing it in Iraq right now and we DEFINATLEY shouldn't be allowing an Iranian representative to negoiate for our side. That's negoating with terroirsts...with a terroirst.
5. Is occupation okay under certain circumstances?
Of course it is. When you're an imperialist state looking to further your influence or land in the world.
6. Was WW II a necessary war?
Of course it was, contrary to what the Republican Party preached at the time.
7. Was Veitnam a necessary war?
Of course it was. We needed to save the world from Communism.
8. Should anone have possession of long-range missiles?
Should? No, of course not. The world *should* be a place where no one would ever need long range missles. It should also be a place where supermodels line up kneeling in my driveway each morning fighting over who gets to service me orrally before my magic carpet comes and takes me to work.
Things aren't allways as they should be though.
9. Should anyone be allowed ot equip these missiles with nuclear warheads?
See the above answer.
10. Should the CIA and the FBI be disbanded
No, but they should have to put on a Drag Queen show to get funded. You know, like in the old JEH days.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Recent Visitors: 266
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (266)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- SCD's Poll: Terrorism, war, and WMDs
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC