Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Motorcycle...ing?Follow

#27 Apr 10 2004 at 1:20 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,291 posts
Quote:
There simply isn't need for 180+ horsepower (at the crank) for riding on the street.


Isn't that the point? Get yourself one of these bad boys otherwise. Born to be wild!


____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#28 Apr 11 2004 at 8:52 PM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Quote:
Bullsh*t


There really is no appreciable difference between a 180hp bike and a 165hp bike in the same class, as far as riding on the streets is concerned.

Can a person really tell the difference between going 0-60 in 2.9 seconds and 2.8 seconds? Or running a quarter mile at 139.6mph instead of 140.2? How often are people stupid enough to actually run a bike up to its top speed? And, will the 4mph difference that extra 15hp provide actually appease you?

And, the nature of a lot of these bikes, like the new R1 for example, requires that the bike be doing in excess of twice the allowable maximum speed on the freeway before the Ram Air has sufficient oxygen being pumped into the engine to deliver maximum horsepower. How often are you really going to use that?

In my opinion, manufacturers should start emphasizing handling; titanium springs, mass centrilization, lower tanks, inverted forks, etc. I'd much rather have another 10 degrees of horizontal lean than another 10hp. I saw a video where a super-minibike (50cc) ran through a slalom faster than a Gixxer 1k AND a Gixxer Sixer. I understand the mini has a significant handling advantage on a really tight course, but that just seems wrong.

Don't get me wrong, I love the new bikes. They are beautiful, and the technology behind the bike is so advanced it just confirms my theory that nobody on the planet but those yellow monkey-faced Nips should be making motorcycles, because they're the only ones that know how to do it right.

I'm not opposed to more HP, not at all.

And if I can't have better handling, I'd sacrifice another 20hp for 10 more lb/ft on almost any super-sport liter bike out today, with the possible exception of the new ZX10R.

Buying a 180hp bike is like buying a Cray Supercomputer to play Everquest. If you can afford it, and you enjoy the bragging rights that such an acquisition is accompanied by, then by all means, go out and buy it. Just remember that it won't run EQ any better than a 3,000 box, and contrary to popular belief, it will not make your ***** any larger.

Btw, Prae, I realize your post was made at least partially in jest, I just thought I'd take this opportunity to expound on my earlier theory.

#29 Apr 11 2004 at 8:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
nobody on the planet but those yellow monkey-faced Nips should be making motorcycles, because they're the only ones that know how to do it right.



The Italians make some pretty slick bikes, they just need to bring the prices down. Until they do I'll stick with the big four for my bikes (and probably even afterwards).

#30 Apr 11 2004 at 11:16 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
BMW makes a fantastic bike.

Not cehap either, though, and who isn't going to get the Ducati instead at that price point.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#31 Apr 11 2004 at 11:41 PM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Quote:
The Italians make some pretty slick bikes, they just need to bring the prices down. Until they do I'll stick with the big four for my bikes (and probably even afterwards).


Ducatis and Aprilias are very nice, extremely fast, absolutely gorgeous, and are probably the best handling production bikes on the planet. With that said... they are also obscenely expensive, and require an absurd amount of maintenance. And heaven forbid you need to replace any mechanical parts- your bike will be out of commission for a month or two.

Quote:
BMW makes a fantastic bike.


I disagree. I think that when you buy a BMW bike, you are buying 80% of the handling of a *** bike, 70% of the power, and you're paying 150% of the price.

It does come with that nifty 'BMW' logo though.

I'm not saying they are a bad bike. I just believe that performance-wise, they aren't competitively priced. You're paying extra for the 'BMW image'.

I'll say this much on BMW's behalf- better to pay an extra 5k for the 'Yuppie Bimmer' image than an extra 15k for Harley's 'Chromed-Out Garage Decoration' image.

Don't even get me started on English bikes.

Nope, I'll take a bike from the land of Rice any day. In fact, for the price, I might just take two.







Edited, Mon Apr 12 01:33:56 2004 by Thundra
#32 Apr 11 2004 at 11:48 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Well, I guess it depends on your point of view. If you ride in low temperatures at all the BMW is absolutely bulletproof even in the snow at zero degrees.

Of course they're not competively priced. If they were, Japanese bikes wouldn't have the market share they do now. Nothing's competively priced in those terms.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Apr 12 2004 at 12:50 AM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Well, my only experience riding in sub-zero temperatures for a prolonged period resulted in me almost dropping a bike because I could feel neither the kickstand nor the ground- but that's neither here nor there.

Personally, and this is just me (kinda redundant, huh?), even if I could buy a Bimmer for the same price as a comparable *** bike, I'd still take the *** bike. That's assuming, of course, I was prohibited from immediately reselling the Bimmer for a profit.
#34 Apr 12 2004 at 1:27 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Me too.

That's why I ride a Honda. You meet the nicest people on them too.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 Apr 12 2004 at 1:36 AM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
A Honda?

I'm guessing you ride a 919.

#36 Apr 12 2004 at 1:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Nah, an '01 CBR-XX.

I do like the 919 a lot though. That whole cafe job look apeals to me. I went for the gaudy HP number that I never use bike though, because it was a great deal used.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#37 Apr 12 2004 at 1:56 AM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
The 'Bird is a nice bike, but I had you figured for a 'Naked' kinda guy.
#38 Apr 12 2004 at 2:04 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I like the look, but the reality is the fairing is worth it on the Highway, especially in the NE where I keep the bike. If I just rode around in a city I'd definately go for something more like the 919, but I get hit with enough debris going 80 as it is that I'd really rather have the plastic there.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Apr 12 2004 at 2:15 AM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Fairings are for pus[i][/i]sies. Anything more than a bikini cowling is needles extravagance. Having your legs pelted with rocks is part of the joy of riding.

In all seriousness, I've gone on thousand-mile-a-day trips on multiple occasions- and did it on a naked. My only requirement, in terms of aerodynamic bodywork, is that the windshield be tall enough to deflect oncoming debris up to at least visor level.

I'll concede that riding in the rain on a fairingless bike does suck moreso than on a fairing-equipped bike.

#40 Apr 12 2004 at 2:17 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Yeah the 919 is windscreenless I believe. Might be wrong about that, but my wife's sister rides one and either she removed it or it doesn't have one.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#41 Apr 12 2004 at 7:49 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
Don't even get me started on English bikes.


Now, now... this is not the past. Triumph actually makes a decent bike now, and they get better every year. I personally am waiting for full production of the new Nortons (they'll be made in America).

http://www.nortonmotorcycles.com/

The 952 Commando is sweeeeeeeeet. A little pricey, but I'm seriously considering one. Probably won't give up my VFR though.

Fairings are a lovely thing. Having put almost 100,000 miles on my two fairingless bikes, I can testify as to how wonderful it is to not have to strain against the windblast after hours of high speed travel.
#42 Apr 12 2004 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
VFR uber alles. Ok, maybe the Yammie FJR is more uber alles, but still, the Viffer is a nifty keen bike.

Totem
#43 Apr 13 2004 at 9:05 PM Rating: Good
Sorry, I was too lazy to read all of the posts. ...then a wrote this Smiley: lol
Lowwatt wrote:
I know there used to be a topic already about what I'm about to ask on the old board. But I can't remember how far back it was from so I'm just going to ask here.

I've recently seriously considered getting my motorcycle lisence, but I've never rode before, and obviously haven't got a bike yet.


Each state has a MSF (Motorcycle Safety Foundation) for instruction on the basics of motorcycling. You can find a local instruction by visiting their web site. http://www.msf-usa.org/

Lowwatt wrote:

Does anyone have any suggestions on a relatively cheap bike that would be good for someone starting out? I would prefer a sport bike over touring (that the name?) but if it looked good I'd still consider either.


Since you are starting out, look at bikes in the 500-to under700cc range. (Depending on your physique.) I personally own a ’99 Suzuki SV650. And I love this bike. It has gone through hell and is still running well with over 35k miles on the engine. (Changed the clocks a few times. Remember the “two types of riders” saying? I’m the latter. Smiley: wink2) Yamaha, Honda, and Kawaski all have bikes in the $5-6k range. Look around at your local dealers and see what you might be able to get your hands on.

Also, IMO, I’d suggest purchasing new, over used, for a first bike. Used bikes are too unpredictable for a novice rider. Could you tell if the clutch needs adjusted or if the crabs/injectors were clogging? (Anyone could sell you a “great deal/bike” Doesn’t mean they told you everything. With a new bike you get a warranty and some peace of mind. With a used bike... it’s anyone’s guess until you open it up Smiley: rolleyes)

Lowwatt wrote:

Second question, are there any tips on things you should be absolutely certain of knowing when you go for your test?
Thank ya


Know basic rules/laws of the road. Be defensive. And keep in mind that just because you see them, doesn’t they see you. (“Loud pipes saves lives” is bogus nonsense. If they can’t see you, what makes you think they’ll hear you!? (While they drive their plush, near sound proof, Bose equipped car.) Make yourself visible at all times.
#44 Apr 13 2004 at 9:37 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Quote:

Now, now... this is not the past. Triumph actually makes a decent bike now, and they get better every year.

No, they're still ******, sorry.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#45 Apr 14 2004 at 8:45 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Quote:
No, they're still sh*tty, sorry.


No. They're not. They might not be on a par with the four major Japanese manufacturers, or (the much more expensive)Italians, but they're not far off. They're generally faster and handle better than BMW's, and blow the doors off anything Harley has ever made. Which puts them right in the middle of the pack. Which isn't too bad for a company that was reconstituted from little more than a logo.

I've been test riding a couple of their models every year since their return, and while they seemed sluggish and top heavy at first, they've gotten consistenly better every year. They're not far behind the big four now. I don't think they'll ever catch up with the Japanese though.



Edited, Wed Apr 14 09:52:43 2004 by Deathwysh
#46 Apr 14 2004 at 10:58 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
The Speed Triple is a terrific bike.

Cad, have you changed your fork springs or oil weight on your Suzie yet? I'm a Cult member too, and gave the bike to my son when I got the Vif, but he finds as I did that while the bike is an absolute hoot to ride, the forks dive at every bump in the road and each and every time you brake.

It's the one thing I'm planning on changing on the bike.

Totem
#47 Apr 22 2004 at 5:14 PM Rating: Good
Totem the fellow SVRider wrote:
Cad, have you changed your fork springs or oil weight on your Suzie yet?

Yeah just did it actually! Seals were worn so I shelled out more for springs. Not sure if they used thicker oil though. Feels better regardless. So it's all-good! Smiley: grin
Stole the idea from Cycleworld or Motorcyclist (can’t remember): Plate says it all!
#48 Apr 23 2004 at 12:34 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Sadly, my son's friend just got his permit and asked if he could learn to ride on the Cult-o-matic, where, after an hour's riding he laid it down, bent the forks, trashed the bodywork, snapped off the shifter, and ruined the handlebars.

:(

Gladly, it wasn't my bike.

On a good note, his folks said they'd pay for any repairs that need to be done. Oh, and he came away with road rash and bruising, mostly to his ego.

Totem
#49 Apr 23 2004 at 12:42 AM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Ewwww, bent forks. No frame tweakage, I hope? I'm assuming not, otherwise his parents wouldn't be offering to pay for repairs, they'd have just bought themselves a salvaged bike.

#50 Apr 23 2004 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
I don't think so, since I took it for a short ride and other than a rightward cant of the bars it feels like it's tracking straight. It's at the shop right now where the mech is looking it over from stem to stern for any potential catastrophic damage.

The handlebar stop tang was snapped off much to my surprise when I was moving it around on my driveway. I got my hand pinched between the tank and the grip. That'd be a nasty surprise in the event of a tank slapper, lol.

My son is majorly bummed since that was his primary mode of transportation and he's having to ask all his buddies for a lift everywhere. I trust him on my Viffer, but since that's my primary mode of transport he doesn't get to ride it much. I suspect this'll teach him to be very leerly of allowing others to hop on his ride.

Totem
#51 Apr 23 2004 at 6:38 PM Rating: Good
****
5,019 posts
Quote:
I suspect this'll teach him to be very leerly of allowing others to hop on his ride.


I'm confident you've heard this expression countless times, Totem, but this is for the benefit of everyone else that isn't as cool as the two of us.

Lending someone your bike is like lending them your girlfriend. Even if you manage to get it back, you still have to live with the knowledge it's been fu[i]cked.[/i]
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 392 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (392)