Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

This ForumFollow

#1 Nov 30 2010 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
Are we no longer allowed to rate posts in the site feedback forum?
#2 Nov 30 2010 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
No.

It was heavily abused and served no purpose on this forum. I've been meaning to remove it for a while. Recent events have caused me to finally do it.

It is not the purpose of karma to allow people to downrate posts when they simply disagree with them when the post itself is well thought out and formed. Especially on this forum where we want to encourage users to give us their feedback without fear of reprisal from some group of users with a mob mentality.

Admins maintain their ability to rate posts on this forum. I routinely rate up people who give clear, concise and useful feedback. Even if I strongly disagree with it. Except Rog.
#3 Nov 30 2010 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
I'd be guru by now if you rated all my feedback posts up Smiley: frown

Also, you should definitely leave the option to rate up, and just remove the rate down option.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 2:27pm by ThePsychoticOne
#4 Nov 30 2010 at 1:29 PM Rating: Good
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Also, you should definitely leave the option to rate up, and just remove the rate down option.


This.

I see your point, but if someone posts a suggestion, it would be nice to be able to rate it up to show support instead of making a needless post saying, "Yeah, do it!"

But thanks for the heads up, nonetheless! I was a little worried my computer was going bonkers.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 1:30pm by Belkira
#5 Nov 30 2010 at 1:46 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Should just have Like/Dislike buttons that show how many people like or dislike an idea, with no effect on karma.
#6 Nov 30 2010 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Should just have Like/Dislike buttons that show how many people like or dislike an idea, with no effect on karma.


Even better.
#7 Nov 30 2010 at 2:42 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,959 posts
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Should just have Like/Dislike buttons that show how many people like or dislike an idea, with no effect on karma.
<Insert rate up here>
____________________________
MyAnimeList FFXIV Krystal Spoonless
#8 Nov 30 2010 at 3:21 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Kirby, Star Breaker wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Should just have Like/Dislike buttons that show how many people like or dislike an idea, with no effect on karma.
<Insert like here>
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#9 Nov 30 2010 at 3:24 PM Rating: Decent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Nizdaar wrote:
It is not the purpose of karma to allow people to downrate posts when they simply disagree with them when the post itself is well thought out and formed.


Have you seen the rest of the site?

Karma is broken and has been since ever. It serves no real purpose anymore. Bad posts get reported and removed. Sub-default posts are read anyway, because most people have the filter set to Never. Rating others up and down is only used to voice agreement and disagreement. And with enough posts, it doesn't matter what people rate you.

I'm not saying it should go, but the problem you saw on this forum is also a problem everywhere else.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 10:28pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#10 Nov 30 2010 at 5:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
Mazra wrote:
Nizdaar wrote:
It is not the purpose of karma to allow people to downrate posts when they simply disagree with them when the post itself is well thought out and formed.


Have you seen the rest of the site?

Karma is broken and has been since ever. It serves no real purpose anymore. Bad posts get reported and removed. Sub-default posts are read anyway, because most people have the filter set to Never. Rating others up and down is only used to voice agreement and disagreement. And with enough posts, it doesn't matter what people rate you.

I'm not saying it should go, but the problem you saw on this forum is also a problem everywhere else.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 10:28pm by Mazra


We're aware and have been discussing what to do about it. forum=3 is a different forum than most though so it was safe for me to remove the ability to rate from it without notice.
#11 Nov 30 2010 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Nizdaar wrote:

We're aware and have been discussing what to do about it. forum=3 is a different forum than most though so it was safe for me to remove the ability to rate from it without notice.

I posted some of this in the thread in =10, but I figured it was relevant here as well:

There's a vBulliten-based board that I frequent that uses a reputations system. You can only dole out so much rep per 24 hours. You have to spread it around before you can give rep to the same poster again, and negative rep is reserved basically for flagrant abuse of board rules. Basically, those who make the most knowledgeable posts or what have you end up with a lot of positive rep, but those who aren't popular or whatever aren't penalized by having people bomb them with negative rep. They just don't get rated very often.

The other thing about the vBulliten rep system the other board uses is that you see who gave you rep in your User CP. When you take the anonymity out of the equation, people are generally less downrate happy. Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.

Combine this with some Like/Dislike buttons on individual posts that don't affect the posters' rep so people can continue to anonymously voice their agreement or displeasure with a post (because people do like to be able to say "I hate this" with a single click), and add in a thread rating system where you can rate the thread overall on a 5-star scale.
#12 Nov 30 2010 at 5:48 PM Rating: Decent
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.
Surely the most common reason is ".", right?
#13 Nov 30 2010 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.
Surely the most common reason is ".", right?
No, there's a minimum amount of characters, and the admins spank you if you don't have a valid reason for neg-repping someone.
#14 Nov 30 2010 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.
Surely the most common reason is ".", right?
No, there's a minimum amount of characters, and the admins spank you if you don't have a valid reason for neg-repping someone.
Minimum characters doesn't do jack ****. And i'm pretty sure alla is too big for that to be possible here.
#15 Nov 30 2010 at 6:19 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
So you guys want to go the way of Facebook?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#16 Nov 30 2010 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Smiley: thumbsup 1 person likes this.

Smiley: lol

Does it really matter in the end? As long as people have the opportunity to voice their disagreement with another person through some sort of penalty system, however small that penalty might be, they're going to use and abuse it. In some forums, the same goes for positive ratings.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#17 Nov 30 2010 at 7:39 PM Rating: Good
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
I rated Nizdaar up! Smiley: grin
____________________________

#18 Nov 30 2010 at 7:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.
Surely the most common reason is ".", right?
No, there's a minimum amount of characters, and the admins spank you if you don't have a valid reason for neg-repping someone.
Minimum characters doesn't do jack sh*t. And i'm pretty sure alla is too big for that to be possible here.
Since the person who is on the receiving end can see who sent the rep and what the comment is, all it will take are a few 24-hr norates and some warnings when the system is initially implemented before it will calm down.

Or you could just not have a negative reputation option. Just have the Report Post button, and if something is so flagrant it deserves negative rep, the admins can impose it when they nuke the post.
#19 Nov 30 2010 at 8:02 PM Rating: Decent
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Also, while positive rep does not require a comment to be given out, negative rep does require you to put a comment in there or it won't go through. Basically, you have to justify your reasoning.
Surely the most common reason is ".", right?
No, there's a minimum amount of characters, and the admins spank you if you don't have a valid reason for neg-repping someone.
Minimum characters doesn't do jack sh*t. And i'm pretty sure alla is too big for that to be possible here.
Since the person who is on the receiving end can see who sent the rep and what the comment is, all it will take are a few 24-hr norates and some warnings when the system is initially implemented before it will calm down.

Or you could just not have a negative reputation option. Just have the Report Post button, and if something is so flagrant it deserves negative rep, the admins can impose it when they nuke the post.
Yeah, that will never happen.
#20 Dec 01 2010 at 8:09 AM Rating: Decent
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Also, you should definitely leave the option to rate up, and just remove the rate down option.


This.

I see your point, but if someone posts a suggestion, it would be nice to be able to rate it up to show support instead of making a needless post saying, "Yeah, do it!"

But thanks for the heads up, nonetheless! I was a little worried my computer was going bonkers.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 1:30pm by Belkira
or put both back, but make the rate down arrow actually rate up, so either will rate up a post. Or just put one arrow back, but make it blue and facing sideways, just to **** with people. Smiley: lol
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#21 Dec 01 2010 at 11:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
Lady Jinte wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:
Also, you should definitely leave the option to rate up, and just remove the rate down option.


This.

I see your point, but if someone posts a suggestion, it would be nice to be able to rate it up to show support instead of making a needless post saying, "Yeah, do it!"

But thanks for the heads up, nonetheless! I was a little worried my computer was going bonkers.

Edited, Nov 30th 2010 1:30pm by Belkira
or put both back, but make the rate down arrow actually rate up, so either will rate up a post. Or just put one arrow back, but make it blue and facing sideways, just to @#%^ with people. Smiley: lol


Might as well just make it spin so you can play russian roulette with people's karma.
#22 Dec 01 2010 at 11:45 AM Rating: Excellent
**
373 posts
Yeah - there's been some heavy discussion about it recently, and in general (as you've probably noticed) a lot of discussion on how to make things better without taking away what made Alla/ZAM unique.
#23 Dec 01 2010 at 11:47 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
So you guys want to go the way of Facebook?


Mazra wrote:
Smiley: thumbsup 1 person likes this.


Sure, why not?
#24 Dec 01 2010 at 12:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
So you guys want to go the way of Facebook?


Mazra wrote:
Smiley: thumbsup 1 person likes this.


Sure, why not?


Because Nizdaar hates all things social networking. Smiley: mad
#25 Dec 01 2010 at 12:54 PM Rating: Decent
is Happy on Friday!
Avatar
*****
12,448 posts
Nizdaar wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
So you guys want to go the way of Facebook?


Mazra wrote:
Smiley: thumbsup 1 person likes this.


Sure, why not?


Because Nizdaar hates all things social networking. Smiley: mad


well, you could always go the route of:
"1 Person Agrees with this post"
"87 People Disagree with this post"
"9 People Because Purple"
____________________________
Theytak, Siren Server, FFXI [Retired]
Amerida Baker, Balmung Server, FFXIV
LOLGAXE IS MY ETERNAL RIVAL!

Reiterpallasch wrote:
Glitterhands wrote:
Am I the only one who clicked on this thread expecting actual baby photos [of Jinte]? o.O

Except if it were baby photos, it would be like looking at before and afters of Michael Jackson. Only instead of turning into a white guy, he changes into a chick!
#26 Dec 01 2010 at 4:01 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Nizdaar wrote:
Spoonless of the Seven Seas wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
So you guys want to go the way of Facebook?

Mazra wrote:
Smiley: thumbsup 1 person likes this.

Sure, why not?

Because Nizdaar hates all things social networking. Smiley: mad
Well, it could be more similar to Youtube and just have a Green Arrow icon and a Red Arrow icon with numbers next to them.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 154 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (154)