Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

We're being told to eat seven portions of fruit and vegFollow

#77 Apr 10 2014 at 2:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Also, the idea that it's poor urban people eating all the fast food is hilarious. Someone's never driven by a suburban Burger King or Wendy's at lunch time.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#78 Apr 10 2014 at 2:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Because anecdotes are totally data, I don't recall increasing our fast food intake when we moved into town from the farm. Then again what's urban anyway? Because people in small highway truck-stop towns which are loaded with fast food restaurants eat a lot of fast food. I could see them lumped in with "urban poor" fairly easily.

Edited, Apr 10th 2014 1:28pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#79 Apr 10 2014 at 3:45 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Yup. Now find me how many times in the last few years a politician made a major policy movement or even proposal regarding this problem which got more than local media attention?

Why don't you find out and report back since you know it's "literally 1000 times!" less than blah blah blah.


I listed several different issues raised which primarily targeted fast food restaurants and which have received significant media coverage. Given that my point is that there isn't much media coverage of the problem with the lack of fresh food in poor inner city neighborhoods, it's kinda silly for you to demand that I must present exactly that. Scratch that, not silly; ridiculous.

Quote:
That said, attracting businesses generally *is* a "local issue" by its very nature so of course attention to it will be local. Hell, most of the other stuff you cry about is local as well such as the NYC soda ban or the (San Francisco?) ban on kid's meal toys. Those do make for more interesting stories though than "St. Louis city council votes to supply economic incentives to grocers".


I think that media has an enormous amount of power to determine what the public finds "interesting". They choose to focus on the evils of fast food. And because they do this, we pay attention to it because it's a story we've heard. If they did the same with food deserts, those would be interesting too ("Look Marge, another story about food deserts. That's such a shame. Why doesn't someone do something about that!").

Media coverage creates interest.

Edited, Apr 10th 2014 2:45pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#80 Apr 10 2014 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Also, the idea that it's poor urban people eating all the fast food is hilarious. Someone's never driven by a suburban Burger King or Wendy's at lunch time.


And once again you've got it completely backwards. My argument is that other factors (like over consumption of processed foods) are the real problem, but that we over focus on just fast food. How busy fast food restaurants in the burbs are is completely beside the point. The folks in the suburbs are more likely to eat home cooked meals as an alternative to eating fast food. The poor urban family is more likely to eat cheap processed foods as an alternative to fast food.

I'd also speculate that the middle class suburban people are more likely to be consuming fast food for lunch, but having a home cooked meal for dinner, which is far more healthy than eating a diet that consists almost entirely of fast food and pre-cooked processed food. There are reasons why Obesity correlates with poverty in the US. And food choice is a huge part of that.

Edited, Apr 10th 2014 3:03pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#81 Apr 10 2014 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'd also speculate that the middle class suburban people are more likely to be consuming fast food for lunch,
You'd be wrong about that, too.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#82 Apr 10 2014 at 5:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
So you know that Thing A is reported on literally 1,000 times more than Thing B, but it's "ridiculous" to ask for your numbers or cites on Thing B.

Well, you sure know hoe to frame a convincing argument Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#83 Apr 10 2014 at 5:59 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
So you know that Thing A is reported on literally 1,000 times more than Thing B, but it's "ridiculous" to ask for your numbers or cites on Thing B.

Well, you sure know hoe to frame a convincing argument Smiley: laugh


The numbers on Thing B are small. So small that I can't find a single cite of it ever happening. So I guess that proves I'm right! Yay!

Usually, when one person's argument consists of "X happens far more often than Y", the correct response to counter him isn't "Prove it by listing examples of Y". It would consist of *you* listing off examples of Y. I'm hoping I don't have to explain why this is the case.

pssst! It's because I can just say "whups! Guess there aren't any, so I win!". Just sayin'.

Edited, Apr 10th 2014 4:59pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#84 Apr 10 2014 at 6:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
The numbers on Thing B are small. So small that I can't find a single cite of it ever happening.

So it's literally 1,000 times zero?

Huh. No, really, do continue Smiley: laugh

Yeah, I get that you can just claim you can't find any. But then that's how I know you're either a liar or retarded. Or maybe both, who knows. That would certainly explain a lot.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#85 Apr 10 2014 at 6:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
The numbers on Thing B are small. So small that I can't find a single cite of it ever happening.

So it's literally 1,000 times zero?

Huh. No, really, do continue Smiley: laugh

Yeah, I get that you can just claim you can't find any. But then that's how I know you're either a liar or retarded. Or maybe both, who knows. That would certainly explain a lot. But if you can't make a convincing and fact based case for it, it's not on me to do it for you, I just disregard your argument as unsupported and irrelevant. Sort of like I'm doing right now. Go ahead and try and blame that one me though, I'll be sure to take it under careful consideration.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#86 Apr 10 2014 at 7:37 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I'm just finding it hard to believe that even you are falling for the BS you're writing. Imagine this exchange:

gbaji: This is a nice neighborhood. People are always friendly and helping each other out, and I can't remember the last time I had any issues with any of my neighbors.

Jophiel: Prove that by listing how many times you've had issues with your neighbors.

gbaji: Um... what? I just told you I couldn't remember the last time.

Jophiel: Ah. So you admit you don't know how often it happens! How can you prove people are nice more often than they are mean?

gbaji: /facepalm
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#87 Apr 10 2014 at 7:38 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
That is literally a thousand times wrong.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#88 Apr 10 2014 at 11:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Once upon a time not long ago, I was on another board talking about games. I was making some point about the number of games with X vs Y (details aren't important) and so looked at some lists on Steam. Then I was able to say "according to this list, the top games have X vs Y and the top action games have this and the top RPG games have that". Now obviously I could have just made up numbers to "support" my point but instead I gave something others could check and verify, thus giving real evidence to my point.

Someone telling stories about their neighbor is doing just that, telling stories. If you meant to say you just perceive some liberal media fast food conspiracy bias, then that's fine... you're just telling stories and no one can say you're wrong but then no one would really consider it fact based either. When you start acting in your usual pseudo-authoritative way, one might be tempted to call you on it by asking for verifiable evidence of your claims. Of course, this is the quickest way to make you spin around, demanding that it's everyone else's fault for asking and then hustling back into the "it's just my OPINION, man!" position. I won't say that you can't have your opinion, but maybe you should stop presenting it as fact when you have nothing to back it up except for hissy fits.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#89 Apr 11 2014 at 7:13 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
But if you call your opinions logic, then it sounds more convincing.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#90 Apr 11 2014 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
***
2,010 posts
gbaji wrote:

Advocating directly? No. Advocating by default? Absolutely. What percentage of people who decide to cut back on fast food as a result of a "fast food is bad" campaign are going to replace it with processed foods from the grocery store versus healthy home cooked meals from fresh ingredients? If all they hear is how bad fast food is, but not how bad any processed food is, the answer is likely to be "pretty darn high".


gbaji wrote:
My argument is against documentaries and health movements that focus solely on "fast food", because that's only part of the picture, and can lead people to think that buying processed pre-packaged foods in the grocery store is an improvement, when it really isn't.


You didn't watch the documentary in question, did you? If we are talking about this specific one, yes he absolutely did campaign for a healthy, raw-foods vegan juicing extreme diet. In fact, just about every documentary in my recent memory has had some agenda such as this, not the "go get hungry man instead" that's going on in your mind. The Perfect Human Diet advocates paleo. Hungry for Change advocates raw and juicing. The one we were discussing here was also one that advocated vegan and some level of juicing.

In short, you are just making sh*t up when you have no idea what you are talking about. Not one of these documentaries just slams fast food without giving a practical, and almost always healthier, alternative. Personally I subscribe to the paleo way of thinking, but that doesn't mean I'm going to pretend that Supersize me defaulted to a "go get ramen" position. It didn't. Go watch the documentaries before making comments.

Edited, Apr 11th 2014 2:59pm by Torrence
#91 Apr 11 2014 at 2:03 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Anything in excess is unhealthy.

Isn't this what we're all trying to say?
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#92 Apr 11 2014 at 2:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Only most of us; wouldn't want to agree in excess. Smiley: wink
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#93 Apr 11 2014 at 2:12 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
I don't get the idea of "juicing" being healthy.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#94 Apr 11 2014 at 3:39 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
TirithRR wrote:
I don't get the idea of "juicing" being healthy.


It's not. Most of the "extreme diet" fads are quite bad for you.


Um... Also, I thought we were talking about SuperSize me. That was pretty much exclusively about showing how bad fast food was. Specifically McDonalds fast food.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#95 Apr 11 2014 at 4:39 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
someproteinguy wrote:
Only most of us; wouldn't want to agree in excess. Smiley: wink


Touché. Smiley: tongue
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
1 2 3 4 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 351 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (351)