Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Star Wars vs Barbara WaltersFollow

#177Almalieque, Posted: Mar 16 2012 at 10:35 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You left out Arip.
#178 Mar 17 2012 at 12:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
The "punishment" was a public warning not to do that. If I was going to do something else I would have already done it.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#179 Mar 17 2012 at 1:31 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,119 posts
Almalieque wrote:

Well, I'll guess I'll just take whatever punishment there is, because my posts aren't intentional triple posts. I post when I have time and if no one else posts in between my posts, then that isn't my fault. If that's nothing to be understood, then I guess I have a problem. Smiley: grin

Your last 3 triple posts are only 16 minutes apart from first to third, so I am going to call BS on this excuse.
#180 Mar 17 2012 at 8:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
HEY GUYS I HEARD THERE'S THIS THING CALLED AN 'EDIT' BUTTON THAT YOU CAN USE TO INSERT MORE INFORMATION INTO A POST OR FIX MISTAKES OR OTHER COOL THINGS!
#181 Mar 17 2012 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Almalieque wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
I don't know why anyone would put any stock in his claim. It shouldn't be any surprise he turned out to be a lying little *****, after all.


Oh, you must have read that in the same AR that states your other lie? You have some nerve as a spineless p*ssy that can't even admit to being wrong to something completely irrelevant to us to call someone else a LIAR! Really? At this point, you have no weight in any discussion over veracious actions.


Bets on the word of the day?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#182 Mar 17 2012 at 9:26 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Sir Spoonless wrote:
HEY GUYS I HEARD THERE'S THIS THING CALLED AN 'EDIT' BUTTON THAT YOU CAN USE TO INSERT MORE INFORMATION INTO A POST OR FIX MISTAKES OR OTHER COOL THINGS!
No way! Really? When did they add that?
#183 Mar 17 2012 at 9:32 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
It would have been more amusing if you triple posted that.
#184 Mar 17 2012 at 9:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
I was going to wait 16 minutes and post it a few more times, but now I can't.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#185 Mar 17 2012 at 9:56 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
I don't know why anyone would put any stock in his claim. It shouldn't be any surprise he turned out to be a lying little *****, after all.


Oh, you must have read that in the same AR that states your other lie? You have some nerve as a spineless p*ssy that can't even admit to being wrong to something completely irrelevant to us to call someone else a LIAR! Really? At this point, you have no weight in any discussion over veracious actions.


Bets on the word of the day?

No bet!
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#186 Mar 17 2012 at 11:22 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Kao wrote:
The "punishment" was a public warning not to do that. If I was going to do something else I would have already done it.


I meant for future references. See, now I'm home and have no time constraint, so I can take that extra time to include other posts. However, during the morning and during the day, that's not guaranteed. There's been plenty of times where I started a thread in the morning and had to finish it later. I'm not doing that anymore and that's why I why I started responding to "gbaji length" posts in two pieces.

Besides, unless you're Gbaji or that other guy, you're typically not responding to as many people on different points as me on an average discussion. So, you have two choices, one large post or double/triple posts.

People complain about the length of Gbaji's posts (similar to my previous posts) and now you're complaining about multiple posts. There is no happy medium.

Tyrrant wrote:
Almalieque wrote:

Well, I'll guess I'll just take whatever punishment there is, because my posts aren't intentional triple posts. I post when I have time and if no one else posts in between my posts, then that isn't my fault. If that's nothing to be understood, then I guess I have a problem. Smiley: grin

Your last 3 triple posts are only 16 minutes apart from first to third, so I am going to call BS on this excuse.


Oh, I guess I didn't realize that when I posted them and when I posted my "excuse"...Smiley: rolleyes I have been doing the same thing for months now, this is just one of the few times where it ended up as triple post. That doesn't make my reasoning any less valid.

Just look at the time difference between the third post of that triple poster and my next post.

Now I will say that after changing my posting habit, I have grown accustomed to just replying to each post.

Spoon wrote:
HEY GUYS I HEARD THERE'S THIS THING CALLED AN 'EDIT' BUTTON THAT YOU CAN USE TO INSERT MORE INFORMATION INTO A POST OR FIX MISTAKES OR OTHER COOL THINGS!


Yea... if people don't even read the original, what makes you think people will read an edit?
#187 Mar 17 2012 at 1:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quote:
People complain about the length of Gbaji's posts (similar to my previous posts) and now you're complaining about multiple posts. There is no happy medium.
No, there is a happy medium. You and gbaji are just incapable of finding it.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#188 Mar 17 2012 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
While I don't believe I've ever complain about wordiness from anyoen here, I don't think you're understanding the complaints of others Alma. If people are complaining about the lengths of your posts or not reading them because they are too long, then splitting a single post into three spammed one after each other doesn't rectify the problem.

Brevity and priority. Sometimes there's a lot to respond to and it must all be addressed. In that case, try to make certain you're being as direct and terse as possible. Sometimes there are a lot of people responding, but not all responses merit further reply. In that case, stick to just the posts that you feel are relevant to the point you're making. And lastly, sometimes you just have a lot to say and there's nothing that can be done about it. In that case, grow some balls and just ignore anyone trying to detract from your comments. Spending extra time replying to criticism that you talk to much is an inherently doomed pursuit.
#189 Mar 17 2012 at 3:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
There is no rule against lenght of post assuming it isn't done specifically to disrupt a thread. There is a built in hard cutoff to number of characters per post, but its very difficult to reach. The full ruleset can be viewed here: https://everquest.allakhazam.com/wiki/Forum_Rules

As to "future references" punishments, if you keep doing something an admin warns you not to do, generally you'll get temp muted, then eventually banned. I thought that part would be pretty obvious by now, along with the fact that if someone deliberatly keeps breaking the rules I really have no problem with removing them from the forum. Your choice of course.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#190 Mar 17 2012 at 4:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
There's no such thing as obvious to Alma.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#191Almalieque, Posted: Mar 18 2012 at 12:06 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You're not understanding my point. I understand the potential punishments. I'm letting you know that regardless of what they are, I will have to take them. As I said, this isn't "deliberate". Some times it turns out to be a double or triple post based on the aforementioned factors. If you can't understand how it isn't deliberate, then there's nothing else I can say.
#192 Mar 18 2012 at 12:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
The other people don't do it nearly as often as you do, and have been dealt with separatly. This is about you, and your actions, and your apperent desire to annoy me for some reason. Profiling has nothing to do with it. If you are doing 90 in a 75 mph zone when the cop pulls you over, it really doesn't matter what race / ethnicity / whateverthehell you are. Quite frankly, I find your allegation of "profiling" to be rather offensive.

Now, are you done, or do you need to take some time to think about how you can avoid posting multiple consecutive posts in a very short time period?
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#193 Mar 18 2012 at 2:29 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
There's no such thing as obvious to Alma.
It hasn't been his word of the day yet.


And Smiley: popcorn
#194Almalieque, Posted: Mar 18 2012 at 3:37 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I find your profiling rather offensive.
#195 Mar 18 2012 at 6:05 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
Don't worry, Kao has smacked me before with warnings. It just wasn't in this thread.
#196 Mar 18 2012 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
In before banhammer. Smiley: popcorn
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#197 Mar 18 2012 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
**
493 posts
Alma's gonna get
Screenshot
#198 Mar 18 2012 at 11:39 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
It may be unintentional, but you've been told to stop, so stop. Just edit the existing post if no new ones have been made.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#199Almalieque, Posted: Mar 18 2012 at 11:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) So, if someone makes a post after my last post, then it's now all of the sudden ok to post again?
#200 Mar 18 2012 at 11:56 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Don't worry, Kao has smacked me before with warnings. It just wasn't in this thread.


That's part of my point, there is no standard. Not too long ago, lolgaxe spammed a thread with the same exact post and nothing was said when in the past threads have been locked up for the very same thing.

Sir Xsarus wrote:
It may be unintentional, but you've been told to stop, so stop. Just edit the existing post if no new ones have been made.


So, if someone makes a post after my last post, then it's now all of the sudden ok to post again?


If you have something new and worth saying, then yes. If it's something that is really just a part of your last post, then edit it into that one.

And I'd just love to see the logic of how it's profiling for you to get warned, but when Ari mentions past warnings, those are... proof of your profiling...?

[EDIT]

Worth saying is clearly relative to you, not us. But we'd all appreciate it if you were to use our standards for your own.

Edited, Mar 18th 2012 1:57pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#201 Mar 18 2012 at 11:58 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
Don't worry, Kao has smacked me before with warnings. It just wasn't in this thread.


That's part of my point, there is no standard. Not too long ago, lolgaxe spammed a thread with the same exact post and nothing was said when in the past threads have been locked up for the very same thing.
*ahem*
Almalieque repeatedly in one thread wrote:
Post 206
Bit of a pot/kettle situation you have going on there.

Almalieque wrote:
Sir Xsarus wrote:
It may be unintentional, but you've been told to stop, so stop. Just edit the existing post if no new ones have been made.


So, if someone makes a post after my last post, then it's now all of the sudden ok to post again?

Yes. Before this you can easily use the edit button rather than spamming posts. This is not a difficult concept. Stop trying to make it seem arbitrary.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 266 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (266)