The "punishment" was a public warning not to do that. If I was going to do something else I would have already done it.
I meant for future references. See, now I'm home and have no time constraint, so I can take that extra time to include other posts. However, during the morning and during the day, that's not guaranteed. There's been plenty of times where I started a thread in the morning and had to finish it later. I'm not doing that anymore and that's why I why I started responding to "gbaji length" posts in two pieces.
Besides, unless you're Gbaji or that other guy, you're typically not responding to as many people on different points as me on an average discussion. So, you have two choices, one large post or double/triple posts.
People complain about the length of Gbaji's posts (similar to my previous posts) and now you're complaining about multiple posts. There is no happy medium.
Well, I'll guess I'll just take whatever punishment there is, because my posts aren't intentional triple posts. I post when I have time and if no one else posts in between my posts, then that isn't my fault. If that's nothing to be understood, then I guess I have a problem.
Your last 3 triple posts are only 16 minutes apart from first to third, so I am going to call BS on this excuse.
Oh, I guess I didn't realize that when I posted them and when I posted my "excuse"...
I have been doing the same thing for months now, this is just one of the few times where it ended up as triple post. That doesn't make my reasoning any less valid.
Just look at the time difference between the third post of that triple poster and my next post.
Now I will say that after changing my posting habit, I have grown accustomed to just replying to each post.
HEY GUYS I HEARD THERE'S THIS THING CALLED AN 'EDIT' BUTTON THAT YOU CAN USE TO INSERT MORE INFORMATION INTO A POST OR FIX MISTAKES OR OTHER COOL THINGS!
Yea... if people don't even read the original, what makes you think people will read an edit?