Torrence wrote:
I don't really understand why some folks are fixating on the number 3. From what I gathered in the article, she underwent therapy and was observed over the course of her entire childhood, and now that she is in her teens has decided to forge ahead with physically matching her body to her mind. No concrete decision was made at 3 years old. She was merely afforded opportunities to live in a way that was comfortable for her. Kudos to the parents for not cramming GI joe down her throat and instead letting her make her own decisions.
And holy sh*t, what a beautiful little girl. It's hard to look at that picture of her and her brother smiling and think she was somehow 'forced' into this change or that it's unnatural. In fact, it's hard to imagine that she actually has a ***** at all. She's certainly a much prettier and feminine looking girl than I was at her age.
I think that Gbaji's words of caution are wise, but some of his comments do border on paranoid. There's definitely some anxiety there on his part, and that's ok. Not everyone is comfortable enough with themselves to actually be accepting of others. I'm just glad that the decision wasn't his to make and was instead in the hands of smarter, stronger, and more accepting individuals.
the fixation on the number three is due to most of the research done on the matter suggesting and supporting the conclusion that a child's gender identity is cemented around 36 months of age. It's not exactly 36 for each child, but within a few months either way. Some develop sooner, some later, but typically, the range is 2 and a half to 3 and a half.