Nilatai wrote:
Surely, with Military being a branch of the state, religion has no place what so ever in it?
Also, why do you end every post with "You are wrong, give it up"? Would that work on you?
Also, why do you end every post with "You are wrong, give it up"? Would that work on you?
That's kind of the point I'm trying to convey, the Chaplain corps is unique in respect to others. They don't follow the same guidelines. You can argue against that they shouldn't be different, but not that they aren't different.
As for the "give it up", you're right. I noticed that after I posted that last. I asked myself "Didn't I already say that?".. Oh, well.
idiggory wrote:
Quote:
This is why I'm not bothered with the rest of your post, because your problem can be seen right here. IN THE MILITARY THERE IS A RELIGION AS A WHOLE. CHAPLAINS ARE NOT THERE TO FAVOR ONE DENOMINATION OVER ANOTHER, JUST CHRISTIAN, MUSLIM and JEWISH. There's no Baptist Chaplain, just Chaplain. If you ever gone to Chaplains service, it becomes very obvious. I only went to one sermon and it was horrible. Completely PC to only mention generic teachings.
This just weakens your argument, you do realize that, right?
If they are giving simple services designed to be compatible with all denominations of a religion then it makes absolutely no sense for them to use their own denomination's ideas about what is and is not sinful.
Which is your entire argument, no?
Uh, except homosexuality being a sin isn't a "denominational thing". That's widely accepted as it's clearly written in black and white. It's not one of those interpretations of changed words with various meanings. So, no, it doesn't weaken my argument.
Lubriderm wrote:
Fair enough.
Alma, you act the way you do towards homosexuals because in your head, you can still smell the whiskey breath of the uncle who came to 'tuck you in' an hour after everyone else in the house went to bed when you were a child. The thing is, while you lash out at homosexuality, you have never felt more alive than on those special uncle visits.
Now I have said something totally random about you. Provide merit that I'm a racist, and I'll recant/apologize.
Alma, you act the way you do towards homosexuals because in your head, you can still smell the whiskey breath of the uncle who came to 'tuck you in' an hour after everyone else in the house went to bed when you were a child. The thing is, while you lash out at homosexuality, you have never felt more alive than on those special uncle visits.
Now I have said something totally random about you. Provide merit that I'm a racist, and I'll recant/apologize.
Are you really this confused? You started this by agreeing with a false accusation made by another poster. I didn't just come at you. You came at me with complete nonsense with nothing to back it up. As a 3rd grade counter, I made something up about you.
You wanted me to "take it back". I told you that what I said had no merit (4 times now) and that I was just doing unto you what you were doing to me. Furthermore, I'm not going to apologize for it because unless you can actually site my argument, then you were making stuff up against me, which was why I did what I did to make a point.
You started this, not me.
Exodus wrote:
I just want to restate how it cracks me up that almost every gay thread I've seen in both OoT and the Asylum revolves around Alma vs the forum. gbaji only if marriage is involved, cause only baby makers should get that right.
sh*t...I might've accidentally summoned gbaji.
Sorry guys. Smiley: frown
Anyway...I don't understand why any "devout heterosexual" would pay this much attention to what happens in the homosexual community. You aren't taking it up the pooper nor getting shot in the eye, so why the hell does anything related to this affect you? Why talk about it so much and debate on it so much? On an random video game forum, no less. What's there to gain? I mean, sure, let's all kill time, but gay people can't possibly be the only thing you can be completely wrong on, Alma. I'm just sure of it.
sh*t...I might've accidentally summoned gbaji.
Sorry guys. Smiley: frown
Anyway...I don't understand why any "devout heterosexual" would pay this much attention to what happens in the homosexual community. You aren't taking it up the pooper nor getting shot in the eye, so why the hell does anything related to this affect you? Why talk about it so much and debate on it so much? On an random video game forum, no less. What's there to gain? I mean, sure, let's all kill time, but gay people can't possibly be the only thing you can be completely wrong on, Alma. I'm just sure of it.
I would never physically do any work for/against homosexual anything. As I said in the other thread, other than this thread, I don't recall ever making any homosexual threads. Also, as stated in previous threads, my main thing isn't even about homosexuality, but the stupid arguments used in homosexuality's favor.
I'm here to argue and debate and this topic brings up the stupidest arguments. Most of them boils down to "Whatever it takes, no matter how illogical it might be". That's the wrong answer in ANY argument. If your cause is legit, then you would be able to provide legitimate arguments.
My personal opinion on SSM changes often, but I will never accept an argument that by disallowing SSM you are taking away the right for a homosexual to be married because that's simply misleading and isn't true.
Idiggory wrote:
Probably because a large population actually wanted to take it up the pooper and got shot in the eyes, but couldn't admit to themselves that they did. So they got really violent about it. But being overly angry about it alone makes you stick out, so they needed to get everyone else angry about it too.
If that what makes you feel better.
Allegory wrote:
Because it's an infringement on their worldview. For some people it's also a rejection of their identity; it is telling them that some part of their core belief system is wrong. That is a very difficult notion to accept, and so naturally many people adamantly reject it.
That's like a million times more likely the reason.
Raolan wrote:
From what I understand, being a Chaplain is a special duty assignment, meaning it's a voluntary assignment. I'm not sure what the specific qualifications are.
But you're right, they aren't there to judge, they're there primarily for spiritual guidance and counseling. Which again backs up my point that the policy is designed as a "cover your ***" policy should they have to go into territory that some would consider discriminatory or negative, it isn't there so they can berate people. Can you honestly tell me that at no point in time a marriage counseling session, or counseling session of any type, might go into an aspect that someone may take offense to? Something as simple as a term taken the wrong way could be enough to get a Chaplain lynched, especially with how sensitive this subject is going to be for awhile. If a Chaplain has to tiptoe on eggshells because they have to worry about offending someone, it's going to be damn near impossible for them to do their job.
Lets use a little common sense for a second. I don't care what policies are in place, if a Chaplain starts spouting off at a homosexual about this or that, they're done. Not a chance in hell the military is going to protect them from that media sh*t storm.
There's a very simply rule when it comes to working with the government in any way, shape, or form. Cover your ***.
But you're right, they aren't there to judge, they're there primarily for spiritual guidance and counseling. Which again backs up my point that the policy is designed as a "cover your ***" policy should they have to go into territory that some would consider discriminatory or negative, it isn't there so they can berate people. Can you honestly tell me that at no point in time a marriage counseling session, or counseling session of any type, might go into an aspect that someone may take offense to? Something as simple as a term taken the wrong way could be enough to get a Chaplain lynched, especially with how sensitive this subject is going to be for awhile. If a Chaplain has to tiptoe on eggshells because they have to worry about offending someone, it's going to be damn near impossible for them to do their job.
Lets use a little common sense for a second. I don't care what policies are in place, if a Chaplain starts spouting off at a homosexual about this or that, they're done. Not a chance in hell the military is going to protect them from that media sh*t storm.
There's a very simply rule when it comes to working with the government in any way, shape, or form. Cover your ***.
This.
Chaplains aren't going around telling people that they are going to hell, but if they can't read a verse out of the KJV Bible, because it might offend someone, then they can't do their job.
According to a Chaplain, you have be to ordained first, just like with Legal and Medical. You can come off the street and come in as a CPT or MAJ depending on your experience and expertise.