Nilatai wrote:
Then you should throw homophobes out of the Army. Do you have this issue with racists? Would you tolerate this behaviour from racists?
Your argument is f*cking stupid.
Why, because you don't agree with it?
Go ahead and throw them out, throw the racists out too, I'm all for that. The problem is that bigots and racists know they'll get in trouble if they out themselves, so they generally don't. If they aren't willing to out themselves, how do you identify them prior to a problem arising?
Eske wrote:
You'll forgive me if I'm not convinced by your anecdote. I've heard more times than not that "nobody cares" about homosexuals in the military right now. In fact, Alma's on the record for saying just that. High level military brass are on board with the change, and have assured the government that it can be enacted without issue. The precedent of open homosexual service that is already occurring in other nations helps to suggest that it will cause no significant problem.
At any rate, I pose to you that the repeal of DADT is actually a solution to the problems that you suggest. DADT's unfair treatment of homosexuals perpetuates the stigma that they are something to be reviled, thereby encouraging (or at least, condoning) the types of behavior that you allude to.
I keep hearing about how good military folk are about putting personal issues aside and obeying orders...
Most people, regardless of whether they are a good soldier or not, don't care. That doesn't mean that nobody cares. Believe it or not, a lot of homosexuals aren't completely in the closet, they are just careful to keep it out of work and away from people they don't trust.
I agree that the repeal of DADT will reduce bigotry, but it won't eliminate it and it won't happen over night. Homophobes aren't going to magically wake up and say "Hey, the military is ok with it, I guess I am too." And until they do, it introduces a potential problem.