Here is my victory lap.
ETA: Apparently I'm doing it in a hovercraft full of eels.
Edited, Jun 29th 2011 12:45pm by PunkFloyd
·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- New York approves Same Sex Marriage.
New York approves Same Sex Marriage.Follow
Love,
PunkFloyd
PunkFloyd
Edit eels don't count.
idiggory wrote:
Quote:
Given that I've been arguing the same exact argument, I would have to say "no, it's not"
Your argument is made up of sub-arguments that contradict each other.
Example?
I'm not going to bother. There's no reason to attempt to teach someone who is actively trying not to learn.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#156Almalieque,
Posted: Jun 30 2011 at 5:58 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Oh, thanks, that's all you had to say. Providing an example of the said contradictions isn't teaching.
Is there any better example of Alma's junior-high level debate skills than his "nyah-nyah" retorts? Or his obsessive-compulsive need to get the last word?
Perhaps its the fact that he has to characterize others giving up trying to have a rational back-and-forth with him as a personal victory. I think I'll go with that one.
Edited, Jun 30th 2011 9:20am by Eske
Perhaps its the fact that he has to characterize others giving up trying to have a rational back-and-forth with him as a personal victory. I think I'll go with that one.
Edited, Jun 30th 2011 9:20am by Eske
Eske Esquire wrote:
Is there any better example of Alma's junior-high level debate skills than his "nyah-nyah" retorts? Or his obsessive-compulsive need to get the last word?
Quote:
Perhaps its the fact that he has to characterize others giving up trying to have a rational back-and-forth with him as a personal victory. I think I'll go with that one.
Yeah. Fortunately, I don't really care if he fools himself into thinking he's intelligent.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Eske Esquire wrote:
Is there any better example of Alma's junior-high level debate skills than his "nyah-nyah" retorts? Or his obsessive-compulsive need to get the last word?
"nyah-nyah" resorts?
I was accused of making sub arguments that contradict each other. I asked for an example. He failed to provide one. How is that "trying to get the last word"? If you can't back up your claim, then don't make one. That's how arguments work. Just because I counter your nonsense, that doesn't mean I'm trying to get the last word. Don't say anything stupid and it wont be countered.
Lubriderm Quick Hands wrote:
I can't say which is better, but both are fair assessments. To be fair to him, since he's probably within 10 years of being caught on the business end of a glory hole, .
"Business glory hole"? Do you mean out of a job?
Lubriderm wrote:
I don't blame him for not having any substantial arguments against homosexuality other then that 'ewww, it's icky' (reads: why do I have these feelings about other guys?)
Just because you refuse to accept any argument that contradicts your own, doesn't meant that it has to be reduced to "eww, it's icky".
Almalieque wrote:
"Business glory hole"? Do you mean out of a job?
"Business end of a glory hole." In other words, you're catching through the hole in the shady restroom off of the interstate.
That's as close as I'm coming to explaining a glory hole. Google it otherwise.
Almalieque wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Is there any better example of Alma's junior-high level debate skills than his "nyah-nyah" retorts? Or his obsessive-compulsive need to get the last word?
"nyah-nyah" resorts?
I was accused of making sub arguments that contradict each other. I asked for an example. He failed to provide one. How is that "trying to get the last word"? If you can't back up your claim, then don't make one. That's how arguments work. Just because I counter your nonsense, that doesn't mean I'm trying to get the last word. Don't say anything stupid and it wont be countered.
Thanks for proving my point. I knew you'd come through for me.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
"Business glory hole"? Do you mean out of a job?
"Business end of a glory hole." In other words, you're catching through the hole in the shady restroom off of the interstate.
That's as close as I'm coming to explaining a glory hole. Google it otherwise.
I know what a glory hole is, but I wasn't sure what the business part was in reference to.
Eske wrote:
Thanks for proving my point. I knew you'd come through for me.
Wait, what?
So, let me get this straight. If someone makes false accusations about you (in this case "nyah-nyah " tactics /contradicting points), asking for examples is a "gotta get the last word"?
You're not fooling anyone. The simple fact that you replied with a post of no substance other than "I told you so" is evident enough that you're a victim of your own accusation disguised as "trolling".
Almalieque wrote:
Eske wrote:
Thanks for proving my point. I knew you'd come through for me.
Wait, what?
So, let me get this straight. If someone makes false accusations about you (in this case "nyah-nyah " tactics /contradicting points), asking for examples is a "gotta get the last word"?
No. Insisting on being the last person to respond, no matter what, is how you have "gotta get the last word."
I can't tell you how many times someone has said something (or posted here) about me and I've just rolled my eyes and went on instead of rising to the bait and having to get the last word in on them. It's almost like you think if you're the last one to post on the topic, you think you've won the argument. As if by simply outlasting everyone, you're winner by default.
Almalieque wrote:
Wait, what?
So, let me get this straight. If someone makes false accusations about you (in this case "nyah-nyah " tactics /contradicting points), asking for examples is a "gotta get the last word"?
You're not fooling anyone. The simple fact that you replied with a post of no substance other than "I told you so" is evident enough that you're a victim of your own accusation disguised as "trolling".
So, let me get this straight. If someone makes false accusations about you (in this case "nyah-nyah " tactics /contradicting points), asking for examples is a "gotta get the last word"?
You're not fooling anyone. The simple fact that you replied with a post of no substance other than "I told you so" is evident enough that you're a victim of your own accusation disguised as "trolling".
Keep it up. I bet if you keep doggedly retorting, you'll prove that you don't always have to get the last word in.
Though, that's not safe. If I get bored enough, I'll feel the need to give him proof. That'll just reinforce the bad behavior.
This is why all the dogs I have owned have been poorly trained. >.<
This is why all the dogs I have owned have been poorly trained. >.<
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
idiggory wrote:
This is why all the dogs I have owned have been poorly trained. >.<
Did you just imply that Alma is no better than an untrained dog who keeps barking at the wind because he knows no better?
Wouldn't dream of insulting dogs.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Tyrrant wrote:
idiggory wrote:
This is why all the dogs I have owned have been poorly trained. >.<
Did you just imply that Alma is no better than an untrained dog who keeps barking at the wind because he knows no better?
Sometimes my dog picks a random object in the apartment (say, a bag, chair, or plant) that's been there for months, and that she's seen a million times, and will suddenly jump back from it and tense up as if it just appeared in front of her. She'll then bark at it for a few minutes, and stare and whine, before eventually assuring herself that it is not a threat.
I think that she's smarter and more self-aware than Alma.
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.
LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
My last dog would walk into walls. Still smarter.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
My sister has a cat that literally drags a stuffed monkey to where ever the crowd is and starts humping it. I'd feel appalled if it wasn't hilarious.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
My sister has a cat that literally drags a stuffed monkey to where ever the crowd is and starts humping it. I'd feel appalled if it wasn't hilarious.
Oh my god.
Belkira wrote:
No. Insisting on being the last person to respond, no matter what, is how you have "gotta get the last word."
I can't tell you how many times someone has said something (or posted here) about me and I've just rolled my eyes and went on instead of rising to the bait and having to get the last word in on them. It's almost like you think if you're the last one to post on the topic, you think you've won the argument. As if by simply outlasting everyone, you're winner by default.
I can't tell you how many times someone has said something (or posted here) about me and I've just rolled my eyes and went on instead of rising to the bait and having to get the last word in on them. It's almost like you think if you're the last one to post on the topic, you think you've won the argument. As if by simply outlasting everyone, you're winner by default.
Well, that's not the case. This is a debate, accusations were made and I asked for examples. If you don't anyone to question an accusation made on them, then don't make any. Now, if the accusation were "You're just a big poo-poo face", then you would have a point. That's not the case.
I actually started ignoring Idiggory(even told him so) because he was just stuck on repeat. He had made several comments that I haven't responded to. Ugly ALWAYS make stupid comments in attempt to troll and I've ignored plenty of those. So, once again, this has nothing to do with "Getting the last word", but all about "back up your claims". If it bothers you that people always want you to back up your claims in a debate, then just stop arguing. It's just as simple as that.
Finally, I never said nor hinted that by having the last word means "winning", this is nothing but gibberish that others here live by. They accuse others of believing that while all at the same time insist on having the last word while pretending to be "trolling".
It's typically fairly simple to determine if someone gives up out of frustration vs being wrong.
Eske wrote:
Keep it up. I bet if you keep doggedly retorting, you'll prove that you don't always have to get the last word in.
So, are you going to answer the question?
Ugly wrote:
My sister has a cat that literally drags a stuffed monkey to where ever the crowd is and starts humping it. I'd feel appalled if it wasn't hilarious.
And since it naturally occurs in nature, then.......
Almalieque wrote:
I actually started ignoring Idiggory(even told him so)
Almalieque wrote:
Finally, I never said nor hinted that by having the last word means "winning"...
I didn't say that you ever said or hinted that. I said "it seems like you believe..." Which means I'm inferring an assumption based on your actions. Nothing more.
Quote:
My sister has a cat that literally drags a stuffed monkey to where ever the crowd is and starts humping it. I'd feel appalled if it wasn't hilarious.
The fact that it's a cat makes it hilarious.
If it was Alma, I'd feel obliged to put him down.
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people
lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
Recent Visitors: 321
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (321)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- Out Of Topic
- New York approves Same Sex Marriage.
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC