Eske Esquire wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Lol, now I understand... You are completely confused.
My reference to Ugly making stuff up was him claiming that I didn't actually make that argument in the previous thread. I countered with "nice try" and recapped the thread, demonstrating that I was indeed making that argument in the previous thread and that he was just making stuff up.
Therefore, I am correct and you are wrong.
There you just conflated two separate posts of yours, responding to two different points by Ugly.
Here I thought you were going to play the "Misstate the argument, then claim that we actually agree" card (a favorite of yours, as you know). Instead you went with the "Jumble up the actual progression of the discourse and rewrite it as it best suits me" one. You should get "Willful Misunderstanding" tattooed on your forehead.
Poor Ugly...I bet he was really holding out for that apology.
That's a lot of writing just to avoid to say that you were wrong. The best thing about forums is that everything is written.
You are wrong, plain and simple. He accused me of never making that argument. I said that he was making stuff up. I never asked you or anyone on the difference of anything. You made that statement and proceeded to respond to your own comment as if I asked that question.
It's all there.
Rave wrote:
Actually, what I was trying to imply was "you reap what you sow," which I can see being misinterpreted as "everything is peaches and cream." What I was doing was trying to give you feedback on why you get it significantly more than other people since you started posting asking why, and quite a few people have previously said you are an idiot. At least you have clarified that you are clearly "trolling for the lulz," as some people would put it.
What?
I never asked anything. As I stated, I merely pointed out the fact that people went ape bananas when I gave the same argument.
Here's the thing that you're not understanding. I know why people treat me differently, it's because it's not based on merit but which side of the fence you are on most of the time. I've said that numerous times and people deny it. Even if I were the biggest douche in the world, that doesn't justify arguing against my point. So this whole thing about me being annoying, blah, blah,blah does not have any value on your view of my opinion of an argument.
Eske wrote:
Haha, yeah just noticed that. Now I'm wondering why he assumed it. Perhaps it's because the overwhelming revulsion that I demonstrate towards him reminds him of the way that all women react in his presence in real life?
My bad, we had this conversation before and I couldn't remember which one it was. It was a 50/50 chance
