Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Awesome Game ShowFollow

#77 Apr 01 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
You can be a @#%^ing genius in math and still not understand how it applies to an everyday situation. This situation is a perfect case in point.


You seem to have difficulty seeing that the two are one and the same.

Stop me if you get lost in this logical proposition, hopefully you can see with this method, if you don't get the expansion method.

When you pick something out of a 1 in 3 chance, you win 1/3 of time time, correct?

You then also have a 2 in 3 chance of losing, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors, correct?


If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors even if you would win one less goat from the two doors, correct?

1/3 chance of car or 2/3 chance of car, is the reason you would do this, correct?

Opening a goat door that you didn't pick is like winning one less goat from the set of two unchosen doors, correct?

two choices, 1/3 car, 2/3 goat vs. 2/3 car 1/3 goat, you choose the 2/3 car correct?

So logically you should change to the door you didn't pick first.



____________________________
Just as Planned.
#78 Apr 01 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^
#79 Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,189 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Prince Kaain wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

If you decide in the beginning that are you are going to change your mind, then you must choose a goat first to win, which gives you a 66.667% chance of winning.

If you choose one of the two losing doors and change to the other losing door, you still lose.

It's not a 66.66% chance of winning.

Unless I've misread somewhere and by "changing" you mean pick the opposite of whatever outcome you've just chosen.
You can't change to the other losing door, because the host has opened it.

Ahh, mkay.. I didn't read through everything 'cause I'm awesome like that. Smiley: schooled

Then wouldn't it be 50/50 as opposed to a 66% chance?
#80 Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
You can be a @#%^ing genius in math and still not understand how it applies to an everyday situation. This situation is a perfect case in point.


You seem to have difficulty seeing that the two are one and the same.

Stop me if you get lost in this logical proposition, hopefully you can see with this method, if you don't get the expansion method.

When you pick something out of a 1 in 3 chance, you win 1/3 of time time, correct?

You then also have a 2 in 3 chance of losing, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors, correct?


If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors even if you would win one less goat from the two doors, correct?

1/3 chance of car or 2/3 chance of car, is the reason you would do this, correct?

Opening a goat door that you didn't pick is like winning one less goat from the set of two unchosen doors, correct?

two choices, 1/3 car, 2/3 goat vs. 2/3 car 1/3 goat, you choose the 2/3 car correct?

So logically you should change to the door you didn't pick first.



How about you refute any of the **** I've said after that post, and stop rating me down?
#81 Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.


The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.
By this logic, it doesn't matter which of the losing doors you picked, because the outcome is also the same. Which would revise your above list to:

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.



The only thing that matters is the outcome of changing your mind when you chose that door.

Will you win if you choose the door with the car and change your mind? No.
Will you win if you choose the door with goat #1 and change your mind? Yes.
Will you win if you choose the door with goat #2 and change your mind? Yes.

Would it be easier to understand if they were not both goats? If one was a goat and one was a cow?

If you choose the car, and change, you lose.
If you choose the goat, and change, you win.
If you choose the cow, and change, you win.

It all comes out to 2/3.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#82 Apr 01 2008 at 12:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Allegory wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^


I'm confident that I think it looked smart.

But, honestly, you're all looking at this the wrong way. You have a 100% chance in winning. If you don't get a car, you get a goat! How awesome would that be?
#83 Apr 01 2008 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^


I'm confident that I think it looked smart.

But, honestly, you're all looking at this the wrong way. You have a 100% chance in winning. If you don't get a car, you get a goat! How awesome would that be?
Smiley: laughSmiley: thumbsup
#84 Apr 01 2008 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
By this logic, it doesn't matter which of the losing doors you picked, because the outcome is also the same. Which would revise your above list to:

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.


This is exactly the point!

you have 2 chances at initially picking the losing door and 1 chance at initially picking the wining door. Thus 2/3 chance of winning if you switch doors.

Quote:
How about you refute any of the sh*t I've said after that post, and stop rating me down?


Edit: Not rating you down, just trying to help you understand.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 5:02pm by Timelordwho
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#85 Apr 01 2008 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,189 posts
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you? Smiley: dubious
#86 Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Ash whines about his karma enough that I'm definitely going to start camping him. Hard. Like, Tailmon hard.

#87 Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Quote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you?


The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#88 Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you? Smiley: dubious


It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#89 Apr 01 2008 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The only thing that matters is the outcome of changing your mind when you chose that door.

W
Its not the only thing that matters. The host's choice of doors tells you a few valuable things. It tells you that one of the 2 remaining doors are a winner. As you said before:
Quote:
If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.
The same is true of the opposite outcome. It doesn't matter that there were originally 3 doors, because now, the host's choice of opening a door has shown you that one of the two remaining doors is empty and one is a prize. My above chart is the smoking gun on this.
#90 Apr 01 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,189 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.

Timelordwho wrote:
The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?

And the one opened is always an incorrect one? Or does it show a goat anyway if the host opens the car door?

If this has been discussed already I do not apologize.
#91 Apr 01 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
Prince Kaain wrote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you? Smiley: dubious


What's the point of Howie Mandel Deal or No Deal?

Mindless entertainment. Which this forum has managed to **** up by using their mind. Smiley: rolleyes
#92 Apr 01 2008 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.

Timelordwho wrote:
The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?

And the one opened is always an incorrect one? Or does it show a goat anyway if the host opens the car door?

If this has been discussed already I do not apologize.
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?
#93 Apr 01 2008 at 1:08 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
I'm bored of this, we are going around in circles. It was fun Ash, good trolling, kept me busy during the last 30-45 minutes of work. Hopefully you really do see the truth, and are just acting. Gotta pack up and head home.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#94 Apr 01 2008 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#95 Apr 01 2008 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,189 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that. Smiley: mad

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)
#96 Apr 01 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that. Smiley: mad

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)
Yes?

And BT: get the **** out of this thread.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:11pm by AshOnMyTomatoes
#97 Apr 01 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,189 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?

Yes.

Then it's 50/50.

An incorrect door is always revealed to you before any sort of finalizing decision is to be made, thus forcing one of the three doors completely out of the equation.
#98 Apr 01 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that. Smiley: mad

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)


Sometimes he opens the door, and it is a goat, but really a car. It turns out to be the next generation of Transformers.

Transformers, BeastofBurden Wars.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#99 Apr 01 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:


And BT: get the @#%^ out of this thread.


Okay, I'll go camp you in other threads.
#100 Apr 01 2008 at 1:16 PM Rating: Excellent
**
424 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?

Yes.

Then it's 50/50.

An incorrect door is always revealed to you before any sort of finalizing decision is to be made, thus forcing one of the three doors completely out of the equation.


Sorry, but this would be the case only if the host were to open a door without asking you to pick one first. It really is relevant that you can pick one of them before he opens one, because the host

1) Never opens the door you picked.
2) Never opens the door that has the car.

So, if he can't open the one you picked OR the one that has the car, then, if you pick a door that DOESN'T have a car in it, he will be forced to open the other door that has no car in it.

Therefore, if you pick one of the goat doors at first, and you have a 2/3 chance of doing that, you win by changing.

The 50-50 chance is only true if you ignore that the host can't open the door you picked, or if you forget which door you picked.
#101 Apr 01 2008 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
****
4,901 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that. Smiley: mad

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)


Absolutely yes. This is key to the exercise.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 305 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (305)