Forum Settings

# Awesome Game ShowFollow

Apr 01 2008 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
35,357 posts
OK, take a look at this from simple math. There are 3 doors, you subtract one away. Now there are 2. What is the chance that you pick the right door now? This is the perspective I'm talking about. From this snapshot, where there are only 2 doors, you have a 50/50 shot of getting it right.

No, you never truly have a 50% chance in any part of the full equation, but in this one frame of it, you do. That's what Tarv was saying.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

Apr 01 2008 at 11:51 AM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Lets look at this from the top.

3 doors, one has a prize, the others are empty. The odds are extremely clear: you have a 1/3 chance of choosing the correct door.

You pick a door. It has 33% chance of being a winner.

The host opens a door that you didn't pick, revealing an empty door.

Does your door still have a 33% chance of winning? NO. It does not, because the equation isn't valid anymore. He gives you the option of switching doors. So now, armed with this knowledge, you are looking at the following situation:

2 doors, one has a prize, the other is empty. The odds are still extremely clear: you have a 1/2 chance of choosing the correct door.

I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:13 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
35,357 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.
It only doesn't matter if you disregard previous knowledge, then you have a 50/50 chance.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.

An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

Apr 01 2008 at 12:15 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.
It only doesn't matter if you disregard previous knowledge, then you have a 50/50 chance.
That's the point: previous knowledge no longer applies.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:15 PM Rating: Good
Unplanned
13,215 posts
So... now we know who here failed math.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:16 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
5,083 posts
Think about it this way if you had a million doors with 1 car and 999,999 goats. you pick a door at random the host (who knows where the car is) opens 999,998 other doors revealing all goats

This is the exact same problem just on a grander scale. The odds of you having initially picked the car are 1 in a million and the odds of you getting the car if you swap are now 999,999 in a million.

Previous knowledge clearly applies

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:17pm by SWM
____________________________
In Loving Memory of SatanWantsMe 2006-2008
SWM Wiki | Journal | What I am listening to right now
Apr 01 2008 at 12:16 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
So... now we know who here failed math.
You can be a ******* genius in math and still not understand how it applies to an everyday situation. This situation is a perfect case in point.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:18 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
SWM wrote:
Think about it this way if you had a million doors with 1 car and 999,999 goats. you pick a door at random the host (who knows where the car is) opens 999,998 other doors revealing all goats

This is the exact same problem just on a grander scale. The odds of you having initially picked the car are 1 in a million and the odds of you getting the car if you swap are now 999,999 in a million.

Previous knowledge clearly applies

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:17pm by SWM
That is, in fact the exact same situation. And you do now still have a 50/50 chance. You can add as many zeros to the end of that as you like.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:19 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.

No, 2/3rds is the correct answer. Take the graphical example of all possibilities, part of which was shown in an earlier post. 2/3rds of those possibilities ends with you winning a car.

```
You choose Door Number 1.
[o] [x] [x]  You change, you lose.  Total So Far: 0/1
[x] [o] [x]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 1/2
[x] [x] [o]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 2/3

You choose Door Number 2.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 3/4
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 3/5
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 4/6

You choose Door Number 3.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 5/7
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 6/8
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 6/9
```

As you can see, out of all the possible outcomes when you change your door, you end up with 6 winning outcomes out of 9 total.

6 chances of winning outta 9 is a 2/3rds possibility of winning if you change your mind.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:21 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
5,083 posts
TirithRR if I wasnt convinced before then I sure am now.
____________________________
In Loving Memory of SatanWantsMe 2006-2008
SWM Wiki | Journal | What I am listening to right now
Apr 01 2008 at 12:22 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.

No, 2/3rds is the correct answer. Take the graphical example of all possibilities, part of which was shown in an earlier post. 2/3rds of those possibilities ends with you winning a car.

```
You choose Door Number 1.
[o] [x] [x]  You change, you lose.  Total So Far: 0/1
[x] [o] [x]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 1/2
[x] [x] [o]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 2/3

You choose Door Number 2.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 3/4
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 3/5
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 4/6

You choose Door Number 3.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 5/7
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 6/8
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 6/9
```

As you can see, out of all the possible outcomes when you change your door, you end up with 6 winning outcomes out of 9 total.

6 chances of winning outta 9 is a 2/3rds possibility of winning if you change your mind.
Ah, some data to work with. This is assuming which door was opened, and which door had the winning prize to start with?
Apr 01 2008 at 12:23 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
SWM wrote:
TirithRR if I wasnt convinced before then I sure am now.
I'm not, and I can prove it with Tirith's help.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:24 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Ah, some data to work with. This is assuming which door was opened, and which door had the winning prize to start with?

This is all possibilities of door selections and prize locations.

Edit: With 3 doors, and one prize that is.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:25pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Stop rating me down for working through some ******* math and logic, you supercilious pricks.

Whoever you are.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
Unplanned
13,215 posts
TirithRR: You could have just redirected them to my post earlier in the thread

Ash...you are either doing an excellent job trolling, or you clearly don't know what the **** you are talking about.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:28 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
TirithRR: You could have just redirected them to my post earlier in the thread

Ash...you are either doing an excellent job trolling, or you clearly don't know what the @#%^ you are talking about.

I mentioned your post... indirectly. I just couldn't remember who wrote it. I merely expanded on it to show all the possible outcomes, to try and show beyond a doubt that it was true.

Edit:

Basically, it boils down to this:

If you ignore the fact that there were 3 doors, and say that it's now only a 50/50, 2 door problem, you are forgetting the fact that there were two different goats for you to originally choose. Choose either of the two goats, and you win, choose the car, and you lose.

Changing your mind swaps the probability the outcome. You have to choose wrong first in order to win.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:40pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:39 PM Rating: Excellent
4,900 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Stop rating me down for working through some ******* math and logic, you supercilious pricks.

Whoever you are.

Seriously. They're just ****** because they picked goats.

____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
Apr 01 2008 at 12:41 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
I don't care what fancy math you want to apply to it. It doesn't matter whether you switch doors or not, that '2/3rds' odds of you having chosen the incorrect door does not apply to the new situation.

No, 2/3rds is the correct answer. Take the graphical example of all possibilities, part of which was shown in an earlier post. 2/3rds of those possibilities ends with you winning a car.

```
You choose Door Number 1.
[o] [x] [x]  You change, you lose.  Total So Far: 0/1
[x] [o] [x]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 1/2
[x] [x] [o]  You change, you win.   Total So Far: 2/3

You choose Door Number 2.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 3/4
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 3/5
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 4/6

You choose Door Number 3.
[o] [x] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 5/7
[x] [o] [x]  You Change, you win.   Total So Far: 6/8
[x] [x] [o]  You Change, you lose.  Total So Far: 6/9
```

As you can see, out of all the possible outcomes when you change your door, you end up with 6 winning outcomes out of 9 total.

6 chances of winning outta 9 is a 2/3rds possibility of winning if you change your mind.
Ok I think I found the problem with your model. It doesn't take into account the fact that the opened door was definitely a loser. AND the fact that the host CAN'T open a door that is a winner, or the door you chose initially.

Lets see: (we'll have a door that the host can't open represented in bold.)

You choose door 1:

[o] [x] [x] Door 3 is opened. You change, you lose.
Door 2 is opened. You change, you lose.
[x] [o] [x] Door 3 is opened. You change, you win.
[x] [x] [o] Door 2 is opened. You change, you win.

You choose door 2:

[o] [x] [x] Door 3 is opened. You change, you win.
[x] [o] [x] Door 1 is opened. You change, you lose.
Door 3 is opened. You change, you lose.
[x] [x] [o] Door 1 is opened. You change, you win.

You choose door 3:

[o] [x] [x] Door 2 is opened. You change, you win.
[x] [o] [x] Door 1 is opened. You change, you win.
[x] [x] [o] Door 1 is opened. You change, you lose.
Door 2 is opened. You change, you lose.

Your chart leaves out a few possible scenarios.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:43 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
20,908 posts
Uglysasquatch, Mercenary Major wrote:
It is if you just take a snapshot in time, which is what Tarv's doing. Technically, you're right. But once you eliminate one door and then forget it existed, you're left with 2 choices. At this point, you're first guess has as likely a chance of winning as changing does.

But that would be missing the entire point of this puzzle? The point is you do know that there were three doors and that one of the wrong doors was removed, now how can you use this information to your advantage.

What you are arguing is correct, but none of it applies because the given situation is not the one your argument is based on. There is no forgetting of previous information in this situation; there is no snapshot in time.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Someone didn't like my glaringly obvious logic.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Your chart leaves out a few possible scenarios.

While it may seem that way, it's not.

The only thing that matters is what door you choose, and whether or not you change. It doesn't matter what the door is that the game host picks.

If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

If you decide in the beginning that are you are going to change your mind, then you must choose a goat first to win, which gives you a 66.667% chance of winning.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:50pm by TirithRR
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Cervixhouse-Five
30,646 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Someone didn't like my glaringly obvious logic.

I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.
By this logic, it doesn't matter which of the losing doors you picked, because the outcome is also the same. Which would revise your above list to:

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:54 PM Rating: Excellent
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

If you decide in the beginning that are you are going to change your mind, then you must choose a goat first to win, which gives you a 66.667% chance of winning.

If you choose one of the two losing doors and change to the other losing door, you still lose.

It's not a 66.66% chance of winning.

Unless I've misread somewhere and by "changing" you mean pick the opposite of whatever outcome you've just chosen.
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

If you decide in the beginning that are you are going to change your mind, then you must choose a goat first to win, which gives you a 66.667% chance of winning.

If you choose one of the two losing doors and change to the other losing door, you still lose.

It's not a 66.66% chance of winning.

Unless I've misread somewhere and by "changing" you mean pick the opposite of whatever outcome you've just chosen.
You can't change to the other losing door, because the host has opened it.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Unplanned
13,215 posts
Quote:
You can be a @#%^ing genius in math and still not understand how it applies to an everyday situation. This situation is a perfect case in point.

You seem to have difficulty seeing that the two are one and the same.

Stop me if you get lost in this logical proposition, hopefully you can see with this method, if you don't get the expansion method.

When you pick something out of a 1 in 3 chance, you win 1/3 of time time, correct?

You then also have a 2 in 3 chance of losing, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors even if you would win one less goat from the two doors, correct?

1/3 chance of car or 2/3 chance of car, is the reason you would do this, correct?

Opening a goat door that you didn't pick is like winning one less goat from the set of two unchosen doors, correct?

two choices, 1/3 car, 2/3 goat vs. 2/3 car 1/3 goat, you choose the 2/3 car correct?

So logically you should change to the door you didn't pick first.

____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
20,908 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^
Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
Prince Kaain wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

If you decide in the beginning that are you are going to change your mind, then you must choose a goat first to win, which gives you a 66.667% chance of winning.

If you choose one of the two losing doors and change to the other losing door, you still lose.

It's not a 66.66% chance of winning.

Unless I've misread somewhere and by "changing" you mean pick the opposite of whatever outcome you've just chosen.
You can't change to the other losing door, because the host has opened it.

Ahh, mkay.. I didn't read through everything 'cause I'm awesome like that.

Then wouldn't it be 50/50 as opposed to a 66% chance?
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
Quote:
You can be a @#%^ing genius in math and still not understand how it applies to an everyday situation. This situation is a perfect case in point.

You seem to have difficulty seeing that the two are one and the same.

Stop me if you get lost in this logical proposition, hopefully you can see with this method, if you don't get the expansion method.

When you pick something out of a 1 in 3 chance, you win 1/3 of time time, correct?

You then also have a 2 in 3 chance of losing, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors, correct?

If you were offered the choice of taking one door, or taking two doors, you would take two doors even if you would win one less goat from the two doors, correct?

1/3 chance of car or 2/3 chance of car, is the reason you would do this, correct?

Opening a goat door that you didn't pick is like winning one less goat from the set of two unchosen doors, correct?

two choices, 1/3 car, 2/3 goat vs. 2/3 car 1/3 goat, you choose the 2/3 car correct?

So logically you should change to the door you didn't pick first.

How about you refute any of the **** I've said after that post, and stop rating me down?
Apr 01 2008 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the other of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.
By this logic, it doesn't matter which of the losing doors you picked, because the outcome is also the same. Which would revise your above list to:

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

The only thing that matters is the outcome of changing your mind when you chose that door.

Will you win if you choose the door with the car and change your mind? No.
Will you win if you choose the door with goat #1 and change your mind? Yes.
Will you win if you choose the door with goat #2 and change your mind? Yes.

Would it be easier to understand if they were not both goats? If one was a goat and one was a cow?

If you choose the car, and change, you lose.
If you choose the goat, and change, you win.
If you choose the cow, and change, you win.

It all comes out to 2/3.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 12:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Cervixhouse-Five
30,646 posts
Allegory wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^

I'm confident that I think it looked smart.

But, honestly, you're all looking at this the wrong way. You have a 100% chance in winning. If you don't get a car, you get a goat! How awesome would that be?
Apr 01 2008 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I rated you back up. I don't understand this thread, and I'm having horrible flash backs to statistics, but it looked smart.

How confident are you in that statement?^^

I'm confident that I think it looked smart.

But, honestly, you're all looking at this the wrong way. You have a 100% chance in winning. If you don't get a car, you get a goat! How awesome would that be?
Apr 01 2008 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Unplanned
13,215 posts
Quote:
By this logic, it doesn't matter which of the losing doors you picked, because the outcome is also the same. Which would revise your above list to:

The Possibilities are:
If you choose one of the two losing doors, and change, you win.
If you choose the winning door, and change, you lose.

This is exactly the point!

you have 2 chances at initially picking the losing door and 1 chance at initially picking the wining door. Thus 2/3 chance of winning if you switch doors.

Quote:
How about you refute any of the sh*t I've said after that post, and stop rating me down?

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 5:02pm by Timelordwho
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:01 PM Rating: Good
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you?
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
19,727 posts
Ash whines about his karma enough that I'm definitely going to start camping him. Hard. Like, Tailmon hard.

Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Unplanned
13,215 posts
Quote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you?

The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you?

It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
The only thing that matters is the outcome of changing your mind when you chose that door.

W
Its not the only thing that matters. The host's choice of doors tells you a few valuable things. It tells you that one of the 2 remaining doors are a winner. As you said before:
Quote:
If you choose the winning door originally, and change, you lose. You cannot count that twice, cause it's the same scenario.
The same is true of the opposite outcome. It doesn't matter that there were originally 3 doors, because now, the host's choice of opening a door has shown you that one of the two remaining doors is empty and one is a prize. My above chart is the smoking gun on this.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.

Timelordwho wrote:
The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?

And the one opened is always an incorrect one? Or does it show a goat anyway if the host opens the car door?

If this has been discussed already I do not apologize.
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 1:06 PM Rating: Good
Cervixhouse-Five
30,646 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
So what's the point of even havin' three doors if an incorrect one is always opened for you?

What's the point of Howie Mandel Deal or No Deal?

Mindless entertainment. Which this forum has managed to **** up by using their mind.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:07 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
TirithRR the Mundane wrote:
It's just a stupid TV Game Show thing, supposed to add suspense by revealing one of the doors you didn't choose, and asking you if you wish to change your mind now.

Timelordwho wrote:
The point is that it's a game show, and doing it this way is more exciting then handing them a prize?

And the one opened is always an incorrect one? Or does it show a goat anyway if the host opens the car door?

If this has been discussed already I do not apologize.
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?
Apr 01 2008 at 1:08 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
I'm bored of this, we are going around in circles. It was fun Ash, good trolling, kept me busy during the last 30-45 minutes of work. Hopefully you really do see the truth, and are just acting. Gotta pack up and head home.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Unplanned
13,215 posts
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?
____________________________
Just as Planned.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that.

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Bloodle-Oodle-Oodle
13,007 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that.

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)
Yes?

And BT: get the **** out of this thread.

Edited, Apr 1st 2008 4:11pm by AshOnMyTomatoes
Apr 01 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Good
I bet you think this title's about you
14,189 posts
Timelordwho wrote:
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?

Yes.

Then it's 50/50.

An incorrect door is always revealed to you before any sort of finalizing decision is to be made, thus forcing one of the three doors completely out of the equation.
____________________________

Apr 01 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
16,823 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that.

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)

Sometimes he opens the door, and it is a goat, but really a car. It turns out to be the next generation of Transformers.

Transformers, BeastofBurden Wars.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
19,727 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:

And BT: get the @#%^ out of this thread.

Okay, I'll go camp you in other threads.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
424 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
Timelordwho wrote:
If it helps, think of this like this:

a goat, a pig and a car are hidden behind 3 doors.

The problem remains the same, but the host will open either the goat or the pig door. Does that make it clearer?

Yes.

Then it's 50/50.

An incorrect door is always revealed to you before any sort of finalizing decision is to be made, thus forcing one of the three doors completely out of the equation.

Sorry, but this would be the case only if the host were to open a door without asking you to pick one first. It really is relevant that you can pick one of them before he opens one, because the host

1) Never opens the door you picked.
2) Never opens the door that has the car.

So, if he can't open the one you picked OR the one that has the car, then, if you pick a door that DOESN'T have a car in it, he will be forced to open the other door that has no car in it.

Therefore, if you pick one of the goat doors at first, and you have a 2/3 chance of doing that, you win by changing.

The 50-50 chance is only true if you ignore that the host can't open the door you picked, or if you forget which door you picked.
Apr 01 2008 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
4,900 posts
Prince Kaain wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes, Guardian of the Glade wrote:
There are three doors, and you pick one. One has a prize, the others have goats, or something stupid.

Before showing if you win or not, the host opens one of the doors you didn't pick and shows it has a goat. He gives you the option to switch doors. Do you switch?

I understand that.

Does the host always open a door containing a real goat? (read: a door not hiding the car.)

Absolutely yes. This is key to the exercise.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

Recent Visitors: 60 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (60)