Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Black people are dumb pt. 2Follow

#227 Oct 24 2007 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
So, have we answered the age old question yet? Are blacks inherently stupid?
#228 Oct 24 2007 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
So, have we answered the age old question yet? Are blacks inherently stupid?


Not quite, Damien has to try to prove that individually they are all lazy still, one at a time.

Come back next year maybe?
#229 Oct 24 2007 at 11:44 AM Rating: Good
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?
#230 Oct 24 2007 at 11:45 AM Rating: Good
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?


I don't think Santa delivers happiness to poor lazy people. Only to people who work hard.
#231 Oct 24 2007 at 11:48 AM Rating: Good
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?


I don't think Santa delivers happiness to poor lazy people. Only to people who work hard.


Smiley: mad I WANT THE TRUTH!
#232 Oct 24 2007 at 11:51 AM Rating: Good
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?


I don't think Santa delivers happiness to poor lazy people. Only to people who work hard.


Smiley: mad I WANT THE TRUTH!


Santa is actually a poor underpaid social worker. Thats why you're not getting presents this year.
#233 Oct 24 2007 at 11:52 AM Rating: Good
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?


I don't think Santa delivers happiness to poor lazy people. Only to people who work hard.


Smiley: mad I WANT THE TRUTH!


Santa is actually a poor lazy black dude. Thats why you're not getting presents this year.


Smiley: disappointed
#234 Oct 24 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Good
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
Blacktuesday wrote:
StubsOnAsura the Magnificent wrote:
I'll settle for an answer by Christmas. Can we work that out?


I don't think Santa delivers happiness to poor lazy people. Only to people who work hard.


Smiley: mad I WANT THE TRUTH!


Santa is actually a poor lazy black dude. Thats why you're not getting presents this year.


Smiley: disappointed


lmao

Edited, Oct 24th 2007 2:55pm by StubsOnAsura
#235 Oct 24 2007 at 12:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
In a neat synchronicity, here's an op-ed from today about the state of education. The interesting thing is the comments, really. A hot article on sfgate will garner 50-100 comments. This one has well over 200.

Quote:

American kids, dumber than dirt
Warning: The next generation might just be the biggest pile of idiots in U.S. history

By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist

I have this ongoing discussion with a longtime reader who also just so happens to be a longtime Oakland high school teacher, a wonderful guy who's seen generations of teens come and generations go and who has a delightful poetic sensibility and quirky outlook on his life and his family and his beloved teaching career.

And he often writes to me in response to something I might've written about the youth of today, anything where I comment on the various nefarious factors shaping their minds and their perspectives and whether or not, say, EMFs and junk food and cell phones are melting their brains and what can be done and just how bad it might all be.

His response: It is not bad at all. It's absolutely horrifying.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#236 Oct 24 2007 at 12:09 PM Rating: Good
****
9,997 posts
Damien, really, the suggestion that African Americans are at a disadvantage not because of social and environmental factors but because of some entirely theoretical and empirically unsupported notion that it's in their genes, is laughable.

Science works from the bottom up.

I'll humor you though. Let's suppose that black people are, in general, lazy. There are any number of explanations for this, notwithstanding genetics. Are the parents hardworking? Do they encourage, or demand that their children be hardworking? Historically, does working hard demonstrate positive outcomes for these individuals? Not everyone has the same opportunities. If you examine a group of families who are historically oppressed and impoverished, their ability to raise children conducive to success is hindered significantly by default. Hell, ask some teachers if you doubt it. They will tell you that children don't leave their problems at the door when they come to school. School is not some magical world where the realities of their daily life no longer play a role.

Presuming that the explanation is genetics is a very top to bottom approach, and not scientifically admissable. And in this case, yes, not abiding by science would make you a bad person.
#237 Oct 24 2007 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
Doesn't change the fact that it's much easier to get a degree from, say, UMass, than Harvard, correct?


Perhaps in terms of actually getting into the school, and possibly should you be the kind of person who thrives in smaller classes (not sure how those compare Harvard:UMass). The actual quality of education was found to not be significantly different at Ivy League schools as opposed to smaller universities (don't have a link to the study, sorry).

Really, what it comes down to is that you have professors who are going over very basic information in most of their classes, and it's basic knowledge to most anyone in the field. The advantage comes in their ability to effectively educate, which is something that most professors don't do, as there is no requirement for supplementary experience or education in the field of education to be a professor. Basically across various college campuses, you have a bunch of professors teaching the same material who have generally the same lack of understanding of educational concepts. As a result, the education itself is not significantly better. The overall college experience, on the other hand, may be much better, or worse, depending on how you look at it. Furthermore, it seems less likely that the aforementioned applies to the same effect in terms of graduate programs.

Edited, Oct 24th 2007 1:21pm by Kachi
#238 Oct 24 2007 at 12:42 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Once you have a job and start having money to pay the bills and feel your education is holding you back, you can start making steps towards entering a trade school or community college. And so on and so forth.

....

But refer to my last post to see what it can accomplish. It's a stepping stone. That first crappy job will lead to a slightly less crappy job if you show that you're a good worker, show up every day, etc. That slightly less crappy job will lead to a decent job, then a good job. I can tell you from experience that having a reputation as a good worker and having good job references is more important to a potential employer than if their high school meets NCLB standards.


Daimen, your view is rather skewed to say the least. Your idea that a crappy job will somehow benefit someone enough to get an education after high school has some serious problems.

1: A crappy job is most likely not going to do enough to make a living. I'm sorry, but $5.35/hr for 40 hrs a week is only $11k a year. Can you survive on this?

2: Let's say someone CAN survive on $11k a year. What's the likeliness that working for this wage for 5 years is going to net you a better paying job? I'm not talking the $.15 cent raises that this person would get each year, but something to where they'd at least be making $10/hr.

3: Okay. Let's say they do actually get the $10/hr job. What's the likeliness that after 3-4 yrs of doing this job that they'd be able to make a $18/hr in this or another job? Let's face it, at that point, they'd be 25. You really should have a dwelling and your own car at this point.

4: You finally have a $18/hr job, but you realize it's holding you back from getting a job where you can afford a house, a wife, children, whatever your focus is for your life. You decide to go back to college finally. Only, you've forgotten everything you learned in high school. It's been 8-12 yrs since you graduated. You have to take tests, and with your already limited education from high school, you fail requirements to pass into regular courses and have to start out with remedial classes.

So now you're paying for classes that don't even count towards a degree. You are having to go solely on grants and loans because there aren't any current education records for you to get scholarships, and even if they went on your high school scores, you just barely passed because of substandard teaching.

5: After years and years of taking night classes and working a job, you finally graduate. You are in your mid-30s. You can finally go get a job with your degree. Now you get to find a spouse, have kids, get a mortgage, and on $40-45k a yr because you are entry level with no experience.


---

Sorry.. way too many IF's for this to be concrete evidence that black people are lazy.
#239 Oct 24 2007 at 1:53 PM Rating: Default
Wait, so you jump from the guy making 10/hr to being in trouble?

If you're making $10/hr, you've ******* made it, you're not poor anymore. Why do you have to continue on after that?

I guess we just have a different idea of what "poor" is. If you can afford to pay your bills with your own money, you ******* win. So, you've just made my point for me. You're not saying it's much of a stretch for a single person to make $10/hr within a few years of graduating high school. This would be even less of a stretch if they had gone to a vocational high school or knew a trade.

I'm not saying that "Omg $10/hr is pretty sweet, you can own your own home and have like 4 kids and live happily ever after". What I am saying is that it's not welfare, and you won't be starving or stuck in the house all day either.

A single person can live nicely on a job that pays $9-10/hr if they're smart about their spending.

It's not much of a stretch to say that you'll meet a girl you'll marry/live with, and you just doubled your income. Since your monthly expenditures aren't going to double as well (only your food bill and maybe light/gas bill will be higher).

So, then you BOTH are productive and bringing money into the household and things get alot easier.

I'm not saying that every single poor person can end up making 75k/yr, but I am saying that if you work hard enough you will not be, at the very least, poor.






#240 Oct 24 2007 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Ten bucks an hour is what? Twenty grand a year?

That's what we call the working poor.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#241 Oct 24 2007 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
Ten bucks an hour is what? Twenty grand a year?

That's what we call the working poor.



Its enough to get you to Disney land if you eat ramen enough, so therefore it is the fulfillment of the American dream. Nobody that goes to Disneyland is poor right?
#242 Oct 24 2007 at 2:23 PM Rating: Good
You're realy funny Damien. Really.. $10/hr is $1600/mo before taxes, right?

Salary:   1600 
Rent:      500 
Phone:      50 
Elec:      100 
Water:      40 
Gas (Car):  60 
Food:      100 
Car:       300 
-------------- 
           450


This assumes absolutely no extra expenditures. You cannot expect to have absolutely nothing come up. You cannot expect a person to not indulge in something extra for themselves once in a while. This also assumes no social life. People in general want to be around others. Especially teenage/young adults. If they had wanted to not be around their friends, then they would have done better in high school to go on to college. Go rethink your ideas.




BTW, does anyone know how old Daimen is?
#243 Oct 24 2007 at 2:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Nagah wrote:
People in general want to be around others. Especially teenage/young adults.


This is another reason why at ten bucks an hour they're well-served to have three or four roommates.
#244 Oct 24 2007 at 2:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Ten bucks an hour is what? Twenty grand a year?
Closer to $15k after Federal, FICA and Medicare. Not counting state taxes, if any.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#245 Oct 24 2007 at 2:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
Ten bucks an hour is what? Twenty grand a year?
Closer to $15k after Federal, FICA and Medicare. Not counting state taxes, if any.


Well, if you set your aims that low, I suppose you CAN succeed on hard work alone. You'd be a chump for not selling drugs, though.

Lovely, tax-free drugs.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#246 Oct 24 2007 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Man, only $100 on food? I noticed they don't have any health insurance either :c
#247 Oct 24 2007 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kachi wrote:
Man, only $100 on food? I noticed they don't have any health insurance either :c
Hey, they're paying into Medicare! You don't want that to be money wasted, do you?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#248 Oct 24 2007 at 3:38 PM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Man, only $100 on food? I noticed they don't have any health insurance either :c
Hey, they're paying into Medicare! You don't want that to be money wasted, do you?


Yeah. You don't really expect someone to pay for health insurance when they're working as an assistant manager at McDonald's, do you? I know $100 a month on food is really really small, but it is only one person. And if they DON'T eat out, it's not out of the question to be able to survive (not flourish) on just $100 for one person.


To BT, you assume too much to say that 4 friends from the ghetto would all be able to have jobs. Too many people get screwed over when they gain roommates. People that don't pay rent, utilities. Someone has to pick up the slack. And then you've spent out of your budget. So not worth it.
#249 Oct 24 2007 at 3:38 PM Rating: Default
Yep tossing away a decent future to stay Getto!
All the kids want to do is just run the streets and listen to this rap crap.
Most of the lyrics actually sicken me.
the role models they see are Drug dealers and rappers?
#250 Oct 24 2007 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
**
836 posts
The issue is people are judging others because of where the come from. You never know what someone has been through in their life, regardless of if your poor, rich or in the middle. What I really hate about our society is that parents are being allowed to not take responsibilty for not teaching their kids, reality from entertainment. Yes, I understand not every child has an adult to look up to or get guidance from. You will always have someone who will choose to not do the right thing, because either they dont know any better or they just dont care, REGARDLESS of if they are poor or come from a privaledged back round. People shouldnt get their views of a particular race from the news, or from what they see on T.V. What about some of the CEO's of companies who steal their employees life savings and ***** them out of their pension. Talk about lazy, that is just plain evil. I'm also sure that America loses more money from Tax evasion, than from some of the people that abuse the welfare system.

Edited, Oct 24th 2007 7:53pm by kalaria
#251 Oct 24 2007 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
I'm tired of entertaining a witless **** like DK but let me say that we are living in a time where wealth is the most stratified since the time of Eugene Debs and we are honestly berating people for not sucking the teat of corporate America for accepting wages that get don't keep up with inflation and with fewer and fewer benefits so a bunch of hugely wealthy ******** can make a little more money on their stocks.

Instead, let's just blame poor people b/c they are the problem--rather than blame the powerful who horde the resources. Let's **** on people with nothing b/c they aren't happy enough about it.

Smiley: oyvey

And DK, I grew up in a poor neighborhood too. A poor rural one at that. You can't use that as a goddamned trump card for your ****** up argument.
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 207 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (207)