Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Black people are dumbFollow

#102 Oct 18 2007 at 8:02 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Lady Annabella wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Annabella wrote:

Well, also, the more relevant issues is that women actually have to give birth and breast feed. Guys, not so much, so the need to be at home during the early part--especially the month that is usually paid instead of the unpaid two months after that--is usually based on biological realities around childbirth.

When Daboder starts popping babies out of his man-****** and feeding them with his man-boobies, then he can complain about the inequalities of life.



I find it odd that women always clamour about inequality, then bring up childbirth. Childbirth is a natural inequality. Men and women are inherently unequal. You can't have it both ways.


It's not an inequality--it's a difference. I'm not sure what this proves about anything other than you have a chip on your shoulder.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 11:58am by Annabella


How is a difference not an inequality?

There's no chip on my shoulder, I'm just saying that its silly to have an argument along these lines:

"I shouldn't be punished by not being treated as equal to a man. I have to endure childbirth, isn't that punishment enough?"

I hear childbirth regarded as a burden and a negotiation device way too often when women argue about inequality, that was my point.
#103 Oct 18 2007 at 8:05 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:


How is a difference not an inequality?


If the difference doesn't privilege one group over another.

Quote:

There's no chip on my shoulder, I'm just saying that its silly to have an argument along these lines:

"I shouldn't be punished by not being treated as equal to a man. I have to endure childbirth, isn't that punishment enough?"

I hear childbirth regarded as a burden and a negotiation device way too often when women argue about inequality, that was my point.


That's not what we were saying though--you are projecting your stuff. The reality is that there is a good reason that there is a longer maternity leave because of biological reasons-- a woman experiences greater physical changes than a man does. Not...your point about unequal treatment. Realistically, if i had to pass a child through my ******, it's gonna signal that I might possibly need some time off of work more than if you watched me do it.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 12:06pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#104 Oct 18 2007 at 8:07 AM Rating: Good
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
How is a difference not an inequality?


You're taking two different definitions of inequality and trying to use them to prove a point.

Inequality in the workplace =/= differences of anatomy.

And any woman who uses childbirth as a "negotiation point" is a *****.
#105 Oct 18 2007 at 8:08 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Lady Annabella wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:


How is a difference not an inequality?


If the difference doesn't privilege one group over another.

Quote:

There's no chip on my shoulder, I'm just saying that its silly to have an argument along these lines:

"I shouldn't be punished by not being treated as equal to a man. I have to endure childbirth, isn't that punishment enough?"

I hear childbirth regarded as a burden and a negotiation device way too often when women argue about inequality, that was my point.


That's not what we were saying though--you are projecting your stuff. The reality is that there is a good reason that there is a longer maternity leave because of biological reasons-- a woman experiences greater physical changes than a man does. Not...your point about unequal treatment. Realistically, if i had to pass a child through my ******, it's gonna signal that I might possibly need some time off of work more than if you watched me do it.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 12:06pm by Annabella


I see.

We were talking about two different things then.
#106 Oct 18 2007 at 8:08 AM Rating: Good
***
3,261 posts
Lady Annabella wrote:

Please, educate me on these rights.



They may not necessarily be rights, per say, but favoritism at the very least. Two examples here:

woman accuses man of rape.
man accuses woman of rape.

But cases will be handled very differently. In the eyes of the public, the man who is accused is presumed guilty, not so in the case of the accused woman, because the woman is favored.

And from personal experience, the police were called to my apartment one time because of a fight I was having with my ex-girlfriend. When they arrived, I showed them the bite marks, bruises, and hand prints she left on me from biting, punching and slapping me. I had not even touched her. What did the cops do? They didn't even put that in their report.
A couple weeks later we got into another heated argument, this time she was really pissed. Same thing, she yelled, screamed, punched and kicked me as I stood there and did nothing, but get my stuff so I could leave. I was gone by the time the cops arrived, but they asked what happened, and she told them I shoved her, (which didn't even really happen). The police then called me in for questioning, and when I got there, they arrested me for domestic abuse. I never laid a hand on her. She had no marks. I did. I showed them. I ended up paying over $2000 in fines, bail, and court costs, while she got off scot free. Not to mention I was also not allowed to return to my apartment for 2 days. All because they took the woman's side on the issue. Men get the shaft all the time when dealings with legal issues between a man and a woman.

What about divorce? Especially with kids. More often than not, the woman will get custody with all other variables being equal. Where's the fairness in that? What about all the men getting "taken to the cleaners" after a divorce?

Also, let's look at dating:

While there are occasions where the woman will take the man out, and pay for the date, that's usually not the case. It's expected of the man to wine and dine the woman. How many free drinks do you think women get at the bars compared to men?

You get paid maternity leave from some employers, where men don't.

And how many stories have you heard about a women getting out of a speeding ticket by batting her eyes a little, of maybe even showing some skin?
Guys don't have that luxury.

And as far as sex is concerned, women can use their body's as a tool to get what they want. How many times have you heard of a man "sleeping his way to the top"?

Our society looks at women as a gender to be pampered. You get favors just for being female.

I have alot more examples to cite, but this is already too long, and work is busy today.
#107 Oct 18 2007 at 8:10 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,550 posts
IIT: If you left and came back later , and skipped the middle pages, racism magically transforms (and rolls out) into sexism.

blatant but researched racism , more than meets the eye.
blatant but researched racism , something about women equalities in disguise.


Edited, Oct 18th 2007 10:14am by tarubstchef
#108 Oct 18 2007 at 8:11 AM Rating: Default
Um, they would have been slaves anyway. Most of the slaves sold to America were SOLD to the Europeans and Americans by African tribes. The sold slaves were ALREADY slaves, being the leftovers of conquored tribes.
#109 Oct 18 2007 at 8:12 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
Lady Annabella wrote:

When Daboder starts popping babies out of his man-****** and feeding them with his man-boobies, then he can complain about the inequalities of life.


Again, that's an issue for you to take up with god. If you want equal rights, you can't ask for special favors simply because your female organs require you to be the one to carry a child. MEN didn't build you that way.
#110 Oct 18 2007 at 8:12 AM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
nomnom wrote:
Um, they would have been slaves anyway. Most of the slaves sold to America were SOLD to the Europeans and Americans by African tribes. The sold slaves were ALREADY slaves, being the leftovers of conquored tribes.


Don't rationalize slavery. I mean, Jesus.

[:headpalm:]
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#111 Oct 18 2007 at 8:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Again, that's an issue for you to take up with god.


Are you going to bring up the Tooth Fairy as well?
#112 Oct 18 2007 at 8:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Prettier Than You
*****
12,975 posts
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Again, that's an issue for you to take up with god.
Jesus Christ, you're just asking for it, aren't you?
____________________________
Did you lose faith?
Yes, I lost faith in the powers that be.
But in doing so I came across the will to disagree.
And I gave up. Yes, I gave up, and then I gave in.
But I take responsibility for every single sin. ♪ ♫


Thank god I stopped playing MMOs.
#113 Oct 18 2007 at 8:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Lady Annabella wrote:

When Daboder starts popping babies out of his man-****** and feeding them with his man-boobies, then he can complain about the inequalities of life.


Again, that's an issue for you to take up with god. If you want equal rights, you can't ask for special favors simply because your female organs require you to be the one to carry a child. MEN didn't build you that way.


Dude, go seek help.

But seriously, what is the special favor for a woman who has a different biological requirements in childcare to have some acknowledgement that she needs some extra time to recover and time to care for an infant? And PS. the child care act says women are entitled to unpaid leave--not paid leave, without getting fired. The majority of women who get paid take their vacation time and buy into short-term disability insurance to recoup some costs.

I mean seriously, but you know, I think you have issues with women. I could go point by point in your post but Jesus, it's a trainwreck and I need to go do some work.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 12:17pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#114 Oct 18 2007 at 8:15 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
woman accuses man of rape.
man accuses woman of rape.

But cases will be handled very differently. In the eyes of the public, the man who is accused is presumed guilty, not so in the case of the accused woman, because the woman is favored.


I'd like to see some evidence of this. The truth of the matter is, there are very very few cases of a man being raped at all, therefore it's nearly impossible for you to come to this conclusion.

Quote:
And from personal experience, the police were called to my apartment one time because of a fight I was having with my ex-girlfriend. When they arrived, I showed them the bite marks, bruises, and hand prints she left on me from biting, punching and slapping me. I had not even touched her. What did the cops do? They didn't even put that in their report.


The cops were wrong. If there is any evidence of any sort of domestic abuse, the cops have to arrest the person who inflicted the harm. That's not favoritism, that's the cops doing a shoddy job.

Quote:
What about divorce? Especially with kids. More often than not, the woman will get custody with all other variables being equal. Where's the fairness in that? What about all the men getting "taken to the cleaners" after a divorce?


I agree with you here. Men should be looked at equally when deciding what's best for the child. As for being "taken to the cleaners" after a divorce, it really all depends on who the breadwinner was. If my husband and I got a divorce, I'd probably be forced to pay him alimony.

Quote:
You get paid maternity leave from some employers, where men don't.


Maternity leave is very very rarely paid, dear.

Quote:
And how many stories have you heard about a women getting out of a speeding ticket by batting her eyes a little, of maybe even showing some skin?


Rarely. But I did hear recently about male cops forcing women to take off their tops and jump up and down to avoid being arrested... And there was a **** actress who recently was made to give a cop head during a routine traffic stop.

Quote:
And as far as sex is concerned, women can use their body's as a tool to get what they want. How many times have you heard of a man "sleeping his way to the top"?


I have honestly, outside of books and movies, heard of a woman sleeping her way to the top. I've heard jealous men insinuating that about a woman who is good at her job, but never actually heard of it happening.

But, honestly, your entire list has nothing to do with oppression, discrimination, or inequality. It has more to do with personal grudges.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 11:17am by Belkira
#115 Oct 18 2007 at 8:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Are you going to bring up the Tooth Fairy as well?

I am! I wanna know why Kaain got a gold brick for his ****** little tooth and if I managed to get $2, I nearly had a heart attack.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#116 Oct 18 2007 at 8:18 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:


Rarely. But I did hear recently about male cops forcing women to take off their tops and jump up and down to avoid being arrested... And there was a **** actress who recently was made to give a cop head during a routine traffic stop.



Pics or it didn't happen.
#117 Oct 18 2007 at 8:23 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:


The cops were wrong. If there is any evidence of any sort of domestic abuse, the cops have to arrest the person who inflicted the harm. That's not favoritism, that's the cops doing a shoddy job.


Yes, I agree, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and SHE had the marks, I would have been whisked away immediately. All because of the gender. In this instance alone, I paid over $2000 because I was the male in the situation.

Belkira the Tulip wrote:

But, honestly, your entire list has nothing to do with oppression, discrimination, or inequality. It has more to do with personal grudges.


I really don't have anything in common with anything other than the personal conflict above. I bear no grudge for the other things in my list at all, I'm just pointing them out. It certainly isn't a personal thing.
#118 Oct 18 2007 at 8:25 AM Rating: Decent
Lady Annabella wrote:
nomnom wrote:
Um, they would have been slaves anyway. Most of the slaves sold to America were SOLD to the Europeans and Americans by African tribes. The sold slaves were ALREADY slaves, being the leftovers of conquored tribes.


Don't rationalize slavery. I mean, Jesus.

[:headpalm:]


I'm not RATIONALIZING it at all. I'm simply stating a fact that sometimes gets lost among the emotional rubble of indignities tossed around. Europeans didn't have "Slave Farmers" in Africa. There were no "Slave Ranches". The Europeans had 2 things that made many African tribal leaders VERY rich: money and a market for cheap labor.

As I've stated earlier, I am not stating my opinions, I'm just pointing at stuff.
#119 Oct 18 2007 at 8:25 AM Rating: Good
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Yes, I agree, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and SHE had the marks, I would have been whisked away immediately. All because of the gender. In this instance alone, I paid over $2000 because I was the male in the situation.


So... tell me again what this has to do with a woman getting paid less than a man for doing the same work?
#120 Oct 18 2007 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Yes, I agree, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and SHE had the marks, I would have been whisked away immediately. All because of the gender. In this instance alone, I paid over $2000 because I was the male in the situation.


So... tell me again what this has to do with a woman getting paid less than a man for doing the same work?


He's saying that there are also inequalities in women's favor.
#121 Oct 18 2007 at 8:30 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Yes, I agree, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and SHE had the marks, I would have been whisked away immediately. All because of the gender. In this instance alone, I paid over $2000 because I was the male in the situation.


So... tell me again what this has to do with a woman getting paid less than a man for doing the same work?


That can be misleading. I really wish I could find the study to cite it, but something I read said men tend to make more than women because men are more willing to put career ahead of family, putting in extra hours, taking time to go to optional seminars, that kind of thing, which tends to be noticed by management.

Edit: I'm not saying there isn't a gender bias overall, but that it appears larger than it is.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 10:32am by Poldaran
#122 Oct 18 2007 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Daboder da Basher wrote:
Yes, I agree, but had the shoe been on the other foot, and SHE had the marks, I would have been whisked away immediately. All because of the gender. In this instance alone, I paid over $2000 because I was the male in the situation.


So... tell me again what this has to do with a woman getting paid less than a man for doing the same work?


He's saying that there are also inequalities in women's favor.



Ding, Ding, Ding.

We HAVE a WINNER!
#123 Oct 18 2007 at 8:31 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Annabella wrote:
but you know, I think you have issues with women.


YA THINK?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#124 Oct 18 2007 at 8:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
That can be misleading. I really wish I could find the study to cite it, but something I read said men tend to make more than women because men are more willing to put career ahead of family, putting in extra hours, taking time to go to optional seminars, that kind of thing, which tends to be noticed by management.


I'd agree with that when it comes to advancement or people who have been around for the same amount of time, but I believe there's evidence supporting the fact that they start the same job at different wages.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#125 Oct 18 2007 at 8:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:


That can be misleading. I really wish I could find the study to cite it, but something I read said men tend to make more than women because men are more willing to put career ahead of family, putting in extra hours, taking time to go to optional seminars, that kind of thing, which tends to be noticed by management.


That could very well be true, in which case I would agree with the pay difference. Problem is, there's no real way to get an accurate measurement on something like that.

Edit: Read ugly's post above, and agree with that one more.

Edited, Oct 18th 2007 11:34am by Daboder
#126 Oct 18 2007 at 8:33 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
Annabella wrote:
but you know, I think you have issues with women.


YA THINK?



I have issues with women too. They smell better then me and I don't like it. So you take your 70 cents and like it!
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 198 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (198)