His Excellency Soracloud wrote:
If he has scientific findings to back it, you can't call it racist can you?
My sentiments exactly, people once again are taking research and turning it into some "super scheme" to overthrow society
. They did it with Evolutionary Theory, and Planetary Plate Tectonic Theory back in the day so why not this one?
Here we have a highly credited geneticist, many consider him a great pioneer in the field. As a scientist, part of your duties is not to take things and believe them to be true because it gives everyone a nice, warm, fuzzy feeling inside. Because of this, scientists and science in general has come under the gun before, this isn't the first.
Fact of the matter is, I don't believe he reported his findings to be some di
ckhead. He did research and presented his findings, you'd have to either be A) retarded or B) have no clue how science works to believe that no other scientist is going to try to refute his findings (especially a black scientist). despite the fact that if he didn't have reasonable evidence to his conclusions I seriously doubt he is just going to throw his reputation away like that.
Finally, did any one of you stop to find information that lead to his conclusion? Did you stop and realize that you are criticizing a man who knows much more about genetics than any single one of us hope to understand.
This is typical crap media does, they take one thing, and blow it out of proportion and now science is being Mr. Bad Guy to all blacks.
He is doing research, he isn't trying to victim anyone.