Florida heading for punch number 3Follow

Don't buy a house in the path of 90 percent of hurricanes. It's hard to have sympathy for people having to pay high insurance rates who live in those areas.

And it's all the current administration's fault, I'm sure.


Shut the **** up, fool.

There are 9000 political threads on this forum adn you post that weak *** **** on this one?

You tactless ignorant moron.

He was taking something fron a different thread and mocking shadow in here, it has nothing to do with politics.

So, just to be clear, you were randomly attacking someone on this thread because of something he posted in another thread?

Please explain how that's somehow less ignorant.

Well, since you asked:

Obviously, it wasn't 'random,' if it was 'because of something he posted,' was it?

Having a reason is certainly less 'ignorant' than attacking someone without knowing the score, wouldn't you say?

And it could hardly be judged more 'tactless' than was your 'STFU moron' ad hominem, could it?

Does that help? Or are cartoon diagrams necessary?

When did this forum become the ******* Caster's Realm convention?

I personally care about the events of Florida a lot more than the events of China. I'm not a politician so I'll let them worry about it.

i live in florida it sux but ivan doesnt look like it will hit us very hard
--------------------------------------------------------------

according to the weather guru where i work, it looks now as if it will come off cuba heading north west, and smack right into the lower part of south florida, and either head up the center of the state, or turn westerly and head out into the gulf.

current predictions are suggesting it will loose strength going across Hati, and again across Cuba. they are guesstimating a catagory 2 by the time it reaches south Florida.

but anything can happen. gonna keep my shutters up all week, should be here by saturday.

Well, G2 did a good job of explaining, but let me be a little more clear for you.

I was actually paying attention to the two most active and recent threads on the board. This one, and the one that was right below it; both being the first and second threads in the forum.


So you were tracking a grand total of TWO threads and you couldn't manage to keep them distinct?


You, however, only read one thread and made an incorrect deduction that my statement was political and unrelated to the poster in any way, shape, fashion, or form.


I read both of them, moron. Next time you think that you're beginning to have an inkling that you might understand my thinking, go to the kitchen, pick out the largest frying pan, and strike yourself in the face untill you loose conciousness.

When you regain conciousness, wipe the blood away from your eyes and return to the ktichen to procure a knife, go to a mirror and carve this into your forehead:


I'M A MORON WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND THE MOTIVATIONS OF MY BETTERS

Hopefully, the next time you feel inlcined to tell me what I did without any knowledge of same the pain and written message will jog your memory of why it might be a bad idea.



Had you actullay read the other thread, you would have understood at least a little more clearly how my "attack" was not random at all, had absolutely nothing to do with politics, and that I was quite knowledgeable of what I was talking about (IE--the opposite of ignorant).


Having read the other thread, I understand that you're not only ignorant, but arrogant and woefully ill equipped to deal with the level of discourse on this board. Posting on the wrong thread to follow around a poster you have an issue with is the very pinnacle of ignorance.


Now you are a little less ignorant than you previously were when you made you initial reply telling me to "stfu" ever so kindly.


Let me reiterate the frying pan sugggestion.


Now I ask again, who is ignorant and who attacked whom? I think you can now see the irony of the words you chose.


You're sort of unclear on what irony means, aren't you. I mean, you heard it once in that Alanis Morrisette song and figured that you had a firm grasp on it, but really, ou have no idea what it means, huh?

It's ok. I'll try to dumb it down for you from here on.


When we were invited by your gracious forum administrator in this post:


Ohhhh. You're from Caster's Realm. Well, that explains it. You're like a Special Oplympics athlete who stumbles onto the track at Athens by mistake when you get seperated from your tour group.

It's much clearer now.

Please accept this as my gracious but firm rescinding of your invitation.

Now go **** off.


Edited, Wed Sep 8 15:24:13 2004 by Kaolian

You may have read both threads, but only after I pointed out the fact that my post had something to do with another thread.


Clearly you haven't taken my advice yet. Trust me, the chances of you understanding my motivations is simmilar to the chanced of an ant launching a balistic missle at at a grashopper.



Otherwise you wouldn't have started out in your original reply that you thought I was trying to bring up something political in a non-political thread.


Yet again, let me say that you have absolutely no clue what motivates me to post anything. Thinking that you might is a huge failing of hubris, and will only serve to embarass you further.



Futhermore, you would not have followed up yet again with the statement "So, just to be clear," because you would have already been clear about what was going on, which is quite obvious that you had no clue about what was going on until I pointed it out to you.


I was clear on what was going on, fool.

What I was making clear was that your reply merely demonstrated your ingorance QED where I had merely suggested it.


You're now trying to backpedal your way out of not having a clue as to where my reply came from or why I made it by saying you knew and were aware of my motivations the whole time, yet the evidence of your previous posts proves to the contrary.


Again, wrong. Think it through. Work with me here. Take your time. Ask a freind to help if need be.

I read both threads, pointed out that there were 9000 other threads where your comment was better situated, and you replyed that there was indeed another threas where it was better situated and then went on to point out that because of that you weren't ignorant.

Perhaps ignorant was the wrong term. What's approptiate these days? Challanged? Special? I assume "retarded" is passe, no?



You really should quit taking your own advice, as I can see now that striking yourself in the face repetitively with a frying pan has caused you some brain damage which is inhibiting your ability to lucidly follow a fairly simple argument.


I'm really at a complete loss as to the point of the above paragraph. I assume it's some sort of feeble attempt at a retort to my thrashing of you, but honestly, it's hard to tell.

Implying that I have brain damage would further imply that a brain damaged person was making a fool out of you, which while I grant you is well within the realm of possibility, doesn't really serve your cause very well.



Additionally, it's obvious that you are oblivious to the meaning of the word ignorant. The definition of the word ignorant is: "lacking knowledge or comprehension of the thing specified." In other words, you were the ignorant one when you decided to make assumptions about what my post meant and my reasons for posting it because you had no knowledge of the topic itself.


The one minor problem with your argument is that it relies on the fact that you have correctly assesed my actions and motivations, which as I've pointed out previously, you have not.

Hence, it becomes nonsensical. Fortunately for all of us this is a written medium and not a visual one, so we're spared the sight of your helmeted head spewing drool as you type with the pencil taped to your forehead.

It's the little things, I allways say.



The topic being Lebie, er...shadowrelm. You weren't even aware of what the topic was until I pointed it out to you. That's the epitome of ignorant.


Again, I was aware of it the whole time. Do you really think there are threads on this forum that I don't read?

Clearly you're ignorant of who I am.

Oops, there's that adective corretly applied to you once again.


And yes, it is complete and utter irony that you would accuse me of being ignorant and the random attacker when it was in fact you who was ignorant and randomly attacking me. That's the whole premise of irony.


No, actually it's not. Were it correct, which it clearly isn't, it would be hyporacy.


I grow weary of explaining such simple things to anyone, even someone as mentally disabled as yourself.


Now, see, this sentance after your hama handed incorrect definition of irony is, in fact, ironic. See if you can figure out the diffrence.

Huh? What's that?

ASDFitis

Ever fallen asleep with your face on a keyboard?




If you're lazy and sleepy enough, they make nice pillows, but it's a dead giveaway for a half hour or so after you wakeup.