Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

God vs. AllahFollow

#1 Jun 29 2004 at 6:38 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
Who do you think would win?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#2Fike, Posted: Jun 29 2004 at 6:40 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I think the doctor should have slapped your mom when you popped out.
#3 Jun 29 2004 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Thor!

But not the Norse mythos Thor. The Marvel Comics one.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Jun 29 2004 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,569 posts

Ganesh

"Stop chasing Ganesh, you're just going to get more wrath!"



Edited, Tue Jun 29 19:50:03 2004 by trickybeck
____________________________
Na Zdrowie
#5 Jun 29 2004 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
31,572 posts
Um... You are aware that God and Allah are just two names for the same deity right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#6 Jun 29 2004 at 8:05 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Who do you think would win?


I think we are going to find out!
____________________________
Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit, is my best weapon.

Reinmon, 58 Ranger
Slaher, 58 Shaman
Aude Sapere
Povar Server
#7 Jun 29 2004 at 8:29 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,246 posts
Fantasy scenario with 2 imaginary beings, you can have any winner you like Smiley: tongue
____________________________
66 Guardian
66 Provisioner
#8 Jun 29 2004 at 9:28 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
Quote:
But not the Norse mythos Thor. The Marvel Comics one.



I think they are the same.Smiley: tongue
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#9 Jun 29 2004 at 9:54 PM Rating: Decent
**
693 posts
Bob would just whip the winners ass.
#10 Jun 30 2004 at 9:13 AM Rating: Decent
**
862 posts
Quote:
Um... You are aware that God and Allah are just two names for the same deity right?


Um...not really. "God" in the Christian sense has a Son named Jesus Christ, and His Holy Spirit is in the earth today. Allah has no such things.
____________________________


Ender's Blog

#11 Jun 30 2004 at 9:35 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm pretty sure the collected tales of Norse mythology never have Thor doing battle with The Hulk Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Jun 30 2004 at 10:05 AM Rating: Good
******
20,650 posts
bah Tricky beat me to the Ganesh call, its either Ganesh or Krishna.

Come on when on the field of Kuru when Arjuna stood between the arrayed forces of the Pandavas and Kauravas and had his moment of doubt good ole Krishna layed down the word and showed himself to be infinite and composed of all beings. Pretty much the entire universe.

When God shows up all he is, is a burning bush and i dont even know what Allah.

So yeah my bets on Krishna.



____________________________
Bode - 90 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#13 Jun 30 2004 at 10:12 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts

Um...not really. "God" in the Christian sense has a Son named Jesus Christ, and His Holy Spirit is in the earth today. Allah has no such things.


Um really. Read the Koran. Muslim's accept Christ as a prophet of Allah. Same God, disputes over the details.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#14 Jun 30 2004 at 10:18 AM Rating: Default
**
945 posts
God has Jesus, Allah has Muhammed (sp?) sound similar enough?

One in the same, my man, one in the same.
____________________________
Member of the BlueDevils on Asura
Smuttygirl lvl 58/29 Rng/Nin
Samurai 56, 58 Ranger, Ninja 37, Warrior 31, Monk 11,Black Mage 7 White Mage 5

Total Levels: 203
#15 Jun 30 2004 at 10:25 AM Rating: Good
******
20,650 posts
Quote:
God has Jesus, Allah has Muhammed (sp?) sound similar enough?

One in the same, my man, one in the same.


Jesus was the son of God. Mohammed was just a guy doing some preaching and prophet work. Not trashing Mohammed or Islam but i think if you were gonna compare Mohammed to someone in the bibe it would have to be one of the many prophets from the old testament.

As a matter of fact the Koran goes out of its way to state that Mohammed was just a man preaching Gods word. In the bible you got Jesus is a part of the holy trinity and more than man the son of god.

Both preached the word of god yes for there respective faiths but how each fits into the faith is vastly different.
____________________________
Bode - 90 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#16 Jun 30 2004 at 10:59 AM Rating: Default
Scholar
**
642 posts
Jesus was gay.

Grady
____________________________
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by madness, starving hysterical naked, dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn looking for an angry fix, angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machin ery of night.
#17 Jun 30 2004 at 11:55 AM Rating: Good
******
20,650 posts
So was your priest.
____________________________
Bode - 90 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#18 Jun 30 2004 at 12:02 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts

Jesus was the son of God. Mohammed was just a guy doing some preaching and prophet work. Not trashing Mohammed or Islam but i think if you were gonna compare Mohammed to someone in the bibe it would have to be one of the many prophets from the old testament.


Muslims would tell you Jesus was misguided.

Of the three major religions that all belive in the same God, only one of them is composed of people gulliable enough to accept that Christ was God's "son".

Muslim's my buy that whole blowing yourself up for 72 virgins thing, but even they said:

"Oh sure, there're 72 virgins waiting for matyrs in paradise, but God knocking up some sheep hearder's wife? **** please."
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#19 Jun 30 2004 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
******
20,650 posts
True enough.
____________________________
Bode - 90 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#20 Jun 30 2004 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent
*
75 posts
1 sec i thought god was jesus (sorta i dunno just felt like typing)




I think it would be a hard fight then buddah (hmmm i think thats the spelling) would come in and kill em both mwa mwa mwa mwa mwa
____________________________
if u read this u r ****

mwa mwa mwa mwa mwa

#21 Jun 30 2004 at 2:07 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts
It depends upon who you let tell you what to belive.

Depending upon who's relating the fairy tale, Christ is a man, God's son, God, or just this mediocre carpenter.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 Jun 30 2004 at 3:42 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
31,572 posts
Just a few points:

bhodisattva Defender of Justice wrote:

Jesus was the son of God. Mohammed was just a guy doing some preaching and prophet work. Not trashing Mohammed or Islam but i think if you were gonna compare Mohammed to someone in the bibe it would have to be one of the many prophets from the old testament.


It's a silly comparison though. From the Muslim point of view, Jesus is just another prophet. Thus, in the Koran both are of similar importance (along with Moses, and all the other figures from the old testiment). You talk about the people in the Old Testiment as less important the Jesus, but that's because to christians Jesus is the centerpiece of "their book". Since the Koran is newer then the New Testament, Mohammed is of more importance in that book. It's a New-new Testament if you want to think of it that way. Muslims look on Jesus in exactly the same way you look at a figure like Ezekiel or Abraham or Moses. Important to earlier worshipers of god, but not as important as your prophet.

Remember, the OT is about God from the perspective of the Jews. The NT is an add on work by the Christians. Same god. They just add Jesus. The Koran is still the same god. They just add Muhammed.

Quote:
As a matter of fact the Koran goes out of its way to state that Mohammed was just a man preaching Gods word. In the bible you got Jesus is a part of the holy trinity and more than man the son of god.


Actually, so does the New Testament. How often does Jesus correct his disciples when they refer to him as the "son of god", and he says he's just the "son of man"? On several ocasions Jesus rebuks those who try to attribute divinity to him. Jesus tried really hard to convince his followers that he was really just a man with a essage (ie: a prophet. although he doesn't even accept that title himself, just Rabi). Everything in the NT about Jesus being god commes after he dies and is made up by his followers. The concept of the trinity doesn't appear until centuries later. It is not in any of the gospels, I know. I'm reasonably sure it doesn't appear at all in the NT.

Quote:
Both preached the word of god yes for there respective faiths but how each fits into the faith is vastly different.


Which would be great if this was a "Jesus vs Muhammed" thread. But it's not. God and Allah are exactly the same deity. Always have been. They're just two diffeent works for the same thing.

Edited, Wed Jun 30 16:44:16 2004 by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#23 Jun 30 2004 at 4:04 PM Rating: Decent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Oh, sweet Christ on a cracker, who cares? This thread doesn't even deserve the theological debate.

Idliragijenget wins, three rounds.

Gbaji is wrong, btw.. heheh

Edited, Wed Jun 30 17:08:33 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Jun 30 2004 at 4:40 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
Quote:
On several ocasions Jesus rebuks those who try to attribute divinity to him. Jesus tried really hard to convince his followers that he was really just a man with a essage (ie: a prophet. although he doesn't even accept that title himself, just Rabi). Everything in the NT about Jesus being god commes after he dies and is made up by his followers. The concept of the trinity doesn't appear until centuries later. It is not in any of the gospels, I know. I'm reasonably sure it doesn't appear at all in the NT.



somone didn't pay attention in Sunday school.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#25 Jun 30 2004 at 5:16 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,847 posts
Some basic theology:

Allah, and "God" are just different names for the same god, Jehovah (or Yah-weh if you want to get technical). This is the god that confronted Abraham. Abraham fathered 2 sons, both of which he fostered with his teachings: Ishmael, and Isaac. However, Abraham banished Ishmael and his mother (I can't remember why) and left them in a desert to fend, while keeping Isaac. Isaac is related to the founding of Judaism, and Ishmael to Islam. Both pay homage to the same god, they just call him different names, and respect the teachings of different "prophets."

Also, as for the Jesus being the son of god thing... we must also remember that according to the old testament, and even to the new testament, Jesus does never refer to himself as the son of god. When confronted by the Pharyces(sp?) and asked if he is the son of God, his fatal response was "If you believe I am, then I am."


Edited, Wed Jun 30 18:20:37 2004 by scubamage
____________________________
I refuse to be victimized by notions of virtuous behavior. - Calvin, to Hobbes

Mage Class Officer
Uldum PUG - SSC/TK Now Recruiting! Click for more info.
#26 Jun 30 2004 at 5:17 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts

Actually, so does the New Testament. How often does Jesus correct his disciples when they refer to him as the "son of god", and he says he's just the "son of man"? On several ocasions Jesus rebuks those who try to attribute divinity to him. Jesus tried really hard to convince his followers that he was really just a man with a essage (ie: a prophet. although he doesn't even accept that title himself, just Rabi). Everything in the NT about Jesus being god commes after he dies and is made up by his followers.


Except for the numerous times when he refers to himself as the son of God.

Do you ever actually research things, or just go with what you've picked up from TV Guide pretty much all the time?

Just curious.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#27 Jun 30 2004 at 7:42 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Jesus does never refer to himself as the son of god.

"But what about you?" he asked. "Who do you say I am?"
Simon Peter answered, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God."
Jesus replied, "Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven."
- Matthew 16:15-17 (NIV)

The high priest said to him, "I charge you under oath by the living God: tell us if you are the Christ, the Son of God."
"Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.
- Matthew 26:63b-64a (NIV)

"No one has ever gone into heaven except the one who came from heaven, the Son of Man [...] For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son..." - John 3:13, 16a (NIV)

"Why do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said I am God's Son?" - John 10:36b (NIV)

"My Father, who you claim as your God, is the one who glorifies me." - John 8:54 (NIV)

The NIV cleans up John 10 as "God's Son". If you want to quibble over semantics, the KJV says "Son of God". Yes, Jesus also refers to himself as the Son of Man, a term which speaks of his dual-existance: God born into the form of a mortal. The two terms are not mutually exclusive, but different facets of the same being.

The Trinity is cleared spelled out in the end of Matthew in the "Great Commission": Go forth and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. The concept of the Trinity is simple: God exists in three parts -- God in Heaven, God on earth (divine - the Holy Spirit), and God on earth (mortal - Jesus). God decides to bring Jesus into the world. Mary is made pregnant when the Holy Spirit comes upon her. Mary gives birth to Jesus, the Son of God & Man. There's no special "power" to it being the Trinity except that the NT holds over Judaic numerology where "3" is a divine number. Certainly there's nothing unbiblical about recognizing the Father, Son and Holy Spirit since Jesus himself calls it so.

EDIT: uBB clean-up

Edited, Wed Jun 30 20:45:20 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#28 Jun 30 2004 at 7:49 PM Rating: Decent
Half of the bible is crap, countless roman emperors have changed it to meet there own personal agenda. The king james edittion is like 60% of the bible because he didnt like 40% of it, and he added a few verses for himself, thats the version we work with today, at least sloppy translations of it, and how many kings and emporers did that before him?
____________________________
Expert Brewer Dracoid Electricbozoukiboy
68 Halfling Druid with 35AA

The first one now will later be last, for the times, they are a-changin'
#29 Jun 30 2004 at 7:57 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts

Half of the bible is crap, countless roman emperors have changed it to meet there own personal agenda. The king james edittion is like 60% of the bible because he didnt like 40% of it, and he added a few verses for himself, thats the version we work with today, at least sloppy translations of it, and how many kings and emporers did that before him?


Sure, but as a source refrence for arguments concerning a certain Galalian Carpenter who may or may not be imaginary and what he said about himself I think it's probably the gold standard.

Not that I don't fully expect Gbaji to come back and say his roomate has a copy of the Dead Sea Scroll and he has a cousin who's uncle translated it and that the words Christ says in it are diffrent and fit his random arbitrary **** spewing.

It'd be consistent with all of his other arguments.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#30 Jun 30 2004 at 8:04 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Erm, most modern translations are not based off the KJV but off of earlier texts. Most notably the Codex Sindaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Codex Alexandrius and the Pesh[/i]itta (all dating c400-450 AD) and older Hebraic texts for the Old Testament such as the Septuagint and, more recently, the Dead Sea Scrolls.

No one is going to base a modern translation off a book from the 1600s when you have versions over a thousand years older to work off of.

That's not to say the Bible is the divine word of God or any such thing, but people who decry it using the KJV as their reason don't know what they are talking about.

[i]Edited, Wed Jun 30 21:05:43 2004 by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#31 Jun 30 2004 at 9:37 PM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts
Joph uses the NIV ussually from what I've noticed.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#32 Jul 01 2004 at 12:13 AM Rating: Decent
39 posts
In my opinion, Islam was ripped off of Christianity. Allah, back in the day was just one of your average joe diety in the bedouin religion. Before Islam, Allah was rarely worshiped. He was basically unheard of until Mohammad.
So, Mohammad being a merchant, traveled. He saw what the European countries were doing and he wanted a part of it so ....the rest is history.
Isnt it weird that in Christainity we believe in the holy spirit, Jesus, and God being the same, well Judiism, Islam, and Christianity are all baisically the same.
____________________________
"The "Way" cannot be learned through frivolous contests in which the outcome is for the name of a school or a large trophy. It can only be realized where physical death is a reality."- Musashi
#33 Jul 01 2004 at 12:29 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,054 posts
Some douche bag wrote:
In my opinion, Islam was ripped off of Christianity.

Actually, if you really want to get technical, you can analyze the similarities between Christianity and the Egyptian worship of the cat god whose name escapes me (Isis maybe?). Just as an example, both were killed and rose again three days later.

Sure, it's a stretch, but then again, so is the concept of religion.

Twiztid
____________________________
Almalieque wrote:
I'm biased against statistics

#34 Jul 01 2004 at 12:47 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Bast was the Egyptian cat goddess, unless my AD&D Deities & Demigods education has failed me.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Jul 01 2004 at 7:45 AM Rating: Decent
****
5,424 posts
Quote:
In my opinion, Islam was ripped off of Christianity

And what do you think christianity is. Jesus is about the only semi-original thing in it. The majority of beliefs are based on judaism, with a lot of influence from the pagan beliefs around Europe. As far as Islam being a copy of christianity, I would say Mohammad copied the romans not christians. If fact I would say if it wernt for the romans conversion to christianity, Jesus would just be know as a petty prophet.
____________________________
%4 run run fast and hard I'll get you I'm Storm the bard!
Karchok-Kerran Dirge
were info
#36 Jul 01 2004 at 7:52 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
think about Bacchus riding into town on an **** changing water to wine.

The Great Flood is in almost every culture.

There was a diety in Rome who would die and be resuurected 3 days later and people would shout through the streets "He is Risen!! He is Risen!!"

indeed most of the concepts you will find aquainted with countless passed beliefs and stories.http://northernway.org/pagandna.html



I ask myself it it indeed people copying off of old stories... or 'history' just repeating itself.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#37 Jul 01 2004 at 8:24 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Wow.. that website can get me my Doctor of Divinity degree in both Celtic Shamanism and Christian Goddess! Smiley: lol
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#38 Jul 01 2004 at 8:48 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
29,327 posts
The Christ story isn't particularly original.

There were probably a dozen or so con men with the same "son of God" story roaming around at the time.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a whore. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Jul 01 2004 at 9:11 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
but the mere Idea of self sacrifice for other peoples benifit were probably not too rampant.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#40 Jul 01 2004 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
****
4,688 posts
Quote:
but the mere Idea of self sacrifice for other peoples benifit were probably not too rampant.


That's why it got popular. I'd whole lot rather have some **** dying for me than the other way around.
____________________________
------------------------------------------------
What of it?
#41 Jul 01 2004 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
of course you would, that's why Jesus loves you. ^^
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#42 Jul 01 2004 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
twice!

Edited, Thu Jul 1 10:37:00 2004 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#43 Jul 01 2004 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
86 posts
Y'all know that religions are just different ways of saying the same thing, right? Ok, just checking.
____________________________
I eat trolls like me for breakfast!
#44 Jul 01 2004 at 9:54 AM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
Christmas Trees are pagan as well

Jeremiah 10:2-4: "Thus saith the LORD, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them. For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not."


Not to mention that Easter was originally Ostara.. the pagan Fertility holiday.. thus all the eggs and horny little bunnies...

Halloween.... I don't know How Christians can stand that one...

Candle Mass was a Pagan Day.


**** Think of it this way.

The Pagan Romans needed a way to relate the this new FAD called Christianity. The Original Cult of Christians isn't waht the Catholics are is it?
So the pagan Romans translated Dieties into the form of Saints and archetypal Mother/Father Goddess in the form of Mary and Jesus.Catholicsm today is the same as it was when it was converted from paganism.
Catholism is Paganism converted to Christianity..merged with even..
Original Christianity.. as a sect and a brotherhood.... was it's own stylee....Jesus taught a philosophy, not a religion...It became that when the government needed a new way to control the people. I'd go as far as to say that it's connections to Judeaism is purley incidental inregard that that happen to be the Religion of the area..... I think Jesus would have taught the same thing if he was born in Japan or Alaska or Pitcairn Island.



Edited, Thu Jul 1 11:00:24 2004 by Kelvyquayo
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#45 Jul 01 2004 at 10:09 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
I don't know How Christians can stand that one
Because they don't care? Regardless of whatever little Druidic origins it has, Halloween to 99.995% of the people is a day for kids to dress up like Power Rangers and the Little Mermaid and fleece the neighbors for candy. No one give's a rat's **** about its pagan origins except for the teenagers who keep Llewellyn Press in business and some cranky old woman standing on her front porch and muttering about Satan.

Honestly, it's the same for all the holidays. Everyone and their dog has been clubbed over the head with the "secret pagan origins" of Christmas and Easter. No one cares. Any Christian who puts thirty seconds of thought into it comes to the conclusion that Christmas isn't really the bona fide birthday of Jesus, it's just the day people celebrate his birth. The fact that every other culture on the planet has a Solstice or Yule celebration doesn't matter. People don't set up Christmas trees because they think Jesus commanded us to put conifers and popcorn in our living rooms, it's a purely secular method of enjoying the season.

By the way, the NIV says "a craftsman shapes it with his chisel" which would simply imply that the heathens are making wooden idols, fetishes, etc and dressing them up:
"For the customs of the peoples are worthless; they cut a tree out of the forest, and a craftsman shapes it with his chisel. They adorn it with silver and gold; they fasten it with hammer and nails so it will not totter. Like a scarecrow in a melon patch, their idols cannot speak; they must be carried because they cannot walk. Do not fear them; they can do no harm nor can they do any good."

That's not to defend Christmas trees, a purely pagan rooted and currently secular symbol of the holiday, but I doubt having a six foot Fraiser fir with bubble lights is directly mentioned in the Good Book.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Jul 01 2004 at 12:19 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
15,963 posts
you must have never known any 'home schoolers'.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#47 Jul 01 2004 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm willing to bet that the number of home schooled Christian fundamentalists on this forum number zero though so they still didn't learn anything new about Easter Smiley: wink2
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#48 Jul 01 2004 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
***
2,878 posts
Everyone knows Santa will win! Then Ninjas place second, Jesus and Allah tie for 3rd.
____________________________
OniElvaan the Eccentric wrote: I hate my cat so **** much right now, not because she decided to have her kittens at 5am in my bed, that happens. No I hate her because she decided to have her kittens at 5am in my bed on my chest...

#49 Jul 01 2004 at 3:33 PM Rating: Good
16 posts
the elephant god from india would woop them both!
#50 Jul 02 2004 at 12:02 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
the elephant god from india


Yea I have to go with that
#51 Jul 02 2004 at 12:02 AM Rating: Decent
double post

Edited, Fri Jul 2 01:03:21 2004 by Lamnethx
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 57 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (57)