Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Buying a new laptopFollow

#1 Jan 11 2010 at 4:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Alright folks, here's my deal. I've had my current laptop for almost 5 years now, and it has more problems than not (although it still runs!). I'm starting to settle into grad school now, and will be needing a more reliable laptop for the next 4-5 years. I plan on using it mostly for work, which means a lot of typing documents, running basic programs looking at various data, and maybe running some basic games for non-work related stuff. It doesn't have to have a powerful video card, but I don't want something that's already outdated. I don't really want to pay more than $500. I've thought about getting a netbook, but a 10" screen scares me, as does the small keyboard. I think a standard 15ish" screen would be right what I'm looking for. That being said, today's deal on woot.com is a refurbished netbook for $220 =/.

I have been looking at this item from Newegg ($500): http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834115654

Quote:
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
CPU Type AMD Athlon X2 QL-65(2.10GHz)
Screen 15.6"
Memory Size 4GB DDR2
Hard Disk 320GB
Optical Drive DVD Super Multi
Graphics Card ATI Radeon HD 3200
Communication Modem, Gigabit LAN and WLAN
Battery Life Up to 3 hours
Dimensions 15.1" x 9.8" x 1.0-1.5"
Weight 6.16 lbs.


I stopped by Best Buy today just to see what they had, and I found what I think is a fairly comparable laptop (and same price, $500) with the following stats:

Quote:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
AMD Athlon II x2 M300
15.6" screen
4 GB memory
500 GB Hard Drive
ATI Radeon HD 4200 (1919 MB Dedicated Memory <---- I think, picture I took on my phone is a little fuzzy)
5.8 lbs


Thoughts? Suggestions? It seems like I could get a laptop for cheaper that would suit my work needs just as well, but I want something that will last me and I probably would use it for more than just work if I could.


Edited, Jan 11th 2010 8:12pm by Vataro
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#2 Jan 11 2010 at 7:46 PM Rating: Decent
*
107 posts
Normally if it wasn't a desktop it would not be on my radar, but as I have personally seen this particular laptop, Ill say that for the money for gaming it isnt going to be beat with a stick. Your last pc lasted 5 years, this one should easily do that, and not cost a fortune in doing so while also giving you good fps etc at the same time for a bargain price.

anyhow this is bestbuy's link to it below.

http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Asus+-+Laptop+with+Intel%26%23174%3B+Core%26%23153%3B2+Duo+Processor+-+Black/9556125.p?id=1218124208054&skuId=9556125
#3 Jan 11 2010 at 7:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Thanks for the link, but I'm actually not looking for a gaming laptop, and don't want to go above $500 (which the one you linked is twice that). =/
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#4 Jan 11 2010 at 10:16 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
You're not going to get a laptop with a video card for $500. Even a graphics chip that isn't "outdated" would be somewhat difficult to find at that price.

What exactly do you mean by "basic games"?
#5 Jan 11 2010 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
If you really dont mind having on board graphics, i'd vote for a C2D laptop, http://www.dell.com/us/en/home/notebooks/laptop-inspiron-1545/pd.aspx?refid=laptop-inspiron-1545&s=dhs&cs=19&~oid=us~en~29~laptops_great_deals_anav_2~~ for example.
#6 Jan 12 2010 at 7:52 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Quote:
You're not going to get a laptop with a video card for $500. Even a graphics chip that isn't "outdated" would be somewhat difficult to find at that price.

What exactly do you mean by "basic games"?


I misspoke, my apologies. I don't need an actual video card, on board graphics are fine.

And by "basic games", I mean games 3-4 years old or more that didn't have taxing system requirements even at the time. As a point of reference, if it could run the Orange Box games at low to moderate settings I would be happy as far as graphics go.

Sorry for being unclear.

Edited, Jan 12th 2010 8:11am by Vataro
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#7 Jan 12 2010 at 7:55 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
KTurner wrote:
If you really dont mind having on board graphics, i'd vote for a C2D laptop, http://www.dell.com/us/en/home/notebooks/laptop-inspiron-1545/pd.aspx?refid=laptop-inspiron-1545&s=dhs&cs=19&~oid=us~en~29~laptops_great_deals_anav_2~~ for example.


Not too bad looking, but the 3 gigs of ram and 250 GB hard drive seem inferior to the ones I'm already looking at. Or does the Dell have other features that I'm missing that make up for it?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#8 Jan 12 2010 at 9:06 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Well for most of the applications you will be using, 3Gigs will be enough, and i think the computer is easily upgradeable to 4gig (maybe more?) if you so desire. C2D processor is significantly better than AMDs though.

imo, 250GB of HD space is sufficient for a non gaming machine, but who knows maybe you have gobs of music/video. /shrug

http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php ctrl-f is your friend. The second computer you posted is the better choice of those two, if you liked the ram and HD space.

#9 Jan 12 2010 at 10:36 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
250 GB would probably be enough, but my general thinking is that more is always better (if I have the space I will fill it up with stuff to watch). My thinking for the RAM was that for Windows 7, 4 GB might be more ideal (even though it doesn't require as much as Vista). If you think 3 GB would be enough, then perhaps I should focus on other aspects. I appreciate the link to the benchmarks. What exactly makes the C2D so much better, if you don't mind me asking?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#10 Jan 12 2010 at 10:59 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Umm, C2Ds are faster, dunno why exactly...(honestly, not a LOT faster, but faster nonetheless). They also have historically ran much cooler than AMDs. They also are more expensive. Thing with AMD laptops is you can generally get more/better ram/HD/vid card for the price of a C2D laptop with integrated video. So, for value at time of purchase, i'd say the AMDs might be better value. But nothing is stopping you from putting a bigger HD or more RAM in the C2D machine sometime down the road. As long as you are OK with the non-upgradeable graphics!

2GB RAM stick is 40 bucks, and you could get a slick 500gb 7200 RPM HD for 100 bucks or so.
#11 Jan 12 2010 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Upgrading a laptop hadn't really occurred to me. Is it more involved than upgrading a desktop?

Another question: should I be looking for DDR3 ram over DDR2, or does it really matter?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#12 Jan 12 2010 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Vataro wrote:
Upgrading a laptop hadn't really occurred to me. Is it more involved than upgrading a desktop?

Another question: should I be looking for DDR3 ram over DDR2, or does it really matter?


In most laptops, ram, HD and wireless card are usually relatively easy to mess with. For example, my laptop (basic run of the mill HP) has 2 hatches on the underside, 1 for RAM and 1 for Wireless. Then there is a tray that comes out of the front that has the HD in it. so yeah, its pretty easy in the grand scheme of things.

As for DDR3 vs DDR2, DDR3 is better yes, but i think most laptops in your price range come with DDR2. If you're asking about compatibility, use DDR2 if your computer uses DDR2.
#13 Jan 12 2010 at 11:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
KTurner wrote:
Vataro wrote:
Upgrading a laptop hadn't really occurred to me. Is it more involved than upgrading a desktop?

Another question: should I be looking for DDR3 ram over DDR2, or does it really matter?


In most laptops, ram, HD and wireless card are usually relatively easy to mess with. For example, my laptop (basic run of the mill HP) has 2 hatches on the underside, 1 for RAM and 1 for Wireless. Then there is a tray that comes out of the front that has the HD in it. so yeah, its pretty easy in the grand scheme of things.

As for DDR3 vs DDR2, DDR3 is better yes, but i think most laptops in your price range come with DDR2. If you're asking about compatibility, use DDR2 if your computer uses DDR2.


I was asking because of this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834115668&nm_mc=EMC-IGNEFL011210&cm_mmc=EMC-IGNEFL011210-_-Notebooks-_-LS2A-_-34115668
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#14 Jan 12 2010 at 12:05 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
So a concern of mine that just occurred to me is that many of the programs that I might be running as part of my job may not be approved for use on W7. It seems like getting a laptop with the necessary hardware to run XP mode would be a little too difficult... should I just hope for the best or try to find a more compatible laptop?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#15 Jan 12 2010 at 12:08 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
ehh i dunno. that processor is the slowest of anything mentioned so far. Not sure the better RAM offsets that or what.
#16 Jan 12 2010 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
KTurner wrote:
ehh i dunno. that processor is the slowest of anything mentioned so far. Not sure the better RAM offsets that or what.


Good point. If I were to get the upgradable Dell, could I just put any normal hard drive in it or are there specific ones that I would need to look for?

Thanks again for all the help so far. I definitely would not have chosen the right laptop without your help.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#17 Jan 12 2010 at 12:49 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
wow just saw that the dell has a 'dual core processor' rather than a core 2 duo. hmm. Still, it's faster than the AMDs heh. Let's see if i can pull up some other options.
#18 Jan 12 2010 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
check this one out! http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834200027

wtf are edits not taking today?

Anyway, surprisingly the T4300 processor actually benchmarks better than that T6670. now im confused!

Edited, Jan 12th 2010 11:18am by KTurner
#19 Jan 12 2010 at 1:33 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
In all honesty, if you need to ask the questions you're asking, you shouldn't attempt to upgrade a laptop yourself. While some laptops have direct access to hard drives and memory, a lot don't, and the process of accessing these components can be much more difficult than simply opening a cover. That's assuming the laptop can even be upgraded. Also, keep in mind that paying someone to upgrade your laptop is usually much more expensive than if you had just purchased the upgrade in the first place.

In the $500 range, you're looking at a very nice netbook or a low/mid level portable. What you seem to be asking for would be a high end portable or a low level desktop (gaming) replacement. If you could push you budget into the $600-$800 range, you would have a much easier time finding what you were looking for.

I'll do some browsing and see what I can find this evening but you might want to seriously consider adjusting your price range or your wants. Even if you do get what you're looking for, higher end machines in the lower end price range usually end up there for a reason.

Take a look at the extras you're going to need as well and be sure to factor those into your price. A case, $50; I highly recommend a neoprene sleeve even with a case, $20; an air pointer if you're looking at doing presentations, $25-$50; a flash drive, $20-$60; a surge protector, $25-$50. Get the surge protector, the minor cost is well worth the investment. I have a Belkin.

Since the graphics are the major factor here, use this website to check them out. Notebookcheck

Edited, Jan 12th 2010 10:12am by Raolan
#20 Jan 12 2010 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Raolan wrote:
In all honesty, if you need to ask the questions you're asking, you shouldn't attempt to upgrade a laptop yourself. While some laptops have direct access to hard drives and memory, a lot don't, and the process of accessing these components can be much more difficult than simply opening a cover. That's assuming the laptop can even be upgraded. Also, keep in mind that paying someone to upgrade your laptop is usually much more expensive than if you had just purchased the upgrade in the first place.

In the $500 range, you're looking at a very nice netbook or a low/mid level portable. What you seem to be asking for would be a high end portable or a low level desktop (gaming) replacement. If you could push you budget into the $600-$800 range, you would have a much easier time finding what you were looking for.

I'll do some browsing and see what I can find this evening but you might want to seriously consider adjusting your price range or your wants. Even if you do get what you're looking for, higher end machines in the lower end price range usually end up there for a reason.

Take a look at the extras you're going to need as well and be sure to factor those into your price. A case, $50; I highly recommend a neoprene sleeve even with a case, $20; an air pointer if you're looking at doing presentations, $25-$50; a flash drive, $20-$60; a surge protector, $25-$50. Get the surge protector, the minor cost is well worth the investment. I have a Belkin.

Since the graphics are the major factor here, use this website to check them out. Notebookcheck

Edited, Jan 12th 2010 10:12am by Raolan


Yes, that is why I asked about upgrading a laptop. The one I currently own is the only one I've ever had, and when I've opened it I haven't been able to find much besides the RAM.

I already have all of the extra stuff. Just looking for a laptop. So is it my stated level of graphics what is pushing the price into above $500? Because I feel like a mid level portable is what I'm looking for. Perhaps I exaggerated about what I was looking for there... I really will be using this to play games very rarely; I have a perfectly good desktop. I want it to be able to entertain me when I'm not at home, but even the majority of the time that will probably be watching movies/anime/etc. Gaming on this thing is really one of my last concerns; something that would be nice but not something that I want to pay a whole lot more for.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#21 Jan 12 2010 at 8:13 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
Quote:
So is it my stated level of graphics what is pushing the price into above $500?


Short answer, yes. Graphics capability is a major price factor when it comes to laptops.

A dual core processor greater than 2.0 Ghz, 2-4 gig of ram, integrated graphics capable of supporting video codex, and a DVD optical drive will do everything you asked for except game and can be easily found in the <$500 range.

The AMD vs. Intel argument is pretty much worthless if you're not trying to reach top end. Also, I would take a Win7 machine over XP or Vista any day.

Of the two you linked, I would take the one from Newegg. Just keep in mind that if they do manage to play the games you're looking for, they aren't going to be breaking any playability records.
#22 Jan 12 2010 at 8:24 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
The games I gave were just an example of the most taxing games I would ever attempt to play. I apologize again for even mentioning them, I think it threw people off of my true goals for this laptop. What reason(s) do you have for picking the Newegg one?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#23 Jan 13 2010 at 12:32 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,496 posts
The differences between the CPUs and graphics chips are minimal and if I had to make the choice, I would go with the better CPU, which is the one from Newegg. The lack of info on the M300 was another factor since it generally indicates an outdated or unpopular piece of hardware.

External hard drives are so cheap these days that drive space should be one of the last deciding factors when it comes to a new system.

Also, the only laptop that matched your listed specs on BestBuy.com was this one. I don't know if it's the one you were looking at but it's listed as having a 320GB hard drive, same as the one from Newegg. If you got the specs off the little card they put in front of the laptop, ask them to unlock the laptop for you so you can check the actual specs yourself, those little cards are typed and printed by associates. This wouldn't be the first times one of those cards was wrong.

Find the exact model of the one from Best buy and find some reviews about it, customer reviews are best as long as you remember more customers ***** about a bad product than they compliment a good product. Main thing you want to look for are repeated complaints, this usually indicates an issue with the system. Random complaints can usually be associated to just a bad apple here or there, which is to be expected. The Acer from Newegg got pretty good markings with minor gripes here and there.

I'm not making a recommendation since I've never used either of them but out of the two you listed, I would pick the Acer from Newegg.
#24 Jan 13 2010 at 7:42 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
Heh, the card wasn't even typed, it was hand-written... but yes, that is where I got the specs. I'm more inclined to trust something from Newegg over Best Buy anyway...
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#25 Jan 13 2010 at 11:50 AM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
KTurner wrote:
wow just saw that the dell has a 'dual core processor' rather than a core 2 duo. hmm. Still, it's faster than the AMDs heh. Let's see if i can pull up some other options.


Aside from the one you already linked, have you thought of any other options? I think I'm leaning towards my original Newegg choice (as recommended by Raolan), but I'm still indecisive and would love to get more suggestions/opinions.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#26 Jan 13 2010 at 11:59 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
Yeah i've given it some though and have decided that at 500 bucks they will all pretty much perform the same. lol

Sorry
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 14 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (14)