Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

My next ComputerFollow

#1 Aug 22 2008 at 4:41 PM Rating: Decent
**
773 posts
I am playing with the idea of building a new system. I currently play FFXI and WOW and have been looking at LOTRO. My current system has a 2.0 Ghx Athelon XP 2400 cpu and Geforce 6200 AGP graphics. Windows XP Home SP3. No hurry to replace but its showing signs of age. My question is the OS for my new computer if I build it. Since it will be a gaming computer, I was thinking Vista for DX10 might be a good idea. My main question though is since everything is now into Multi-core, should I get a 64 bit OS or stick with 32-bit?
____________________________
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
- SE Cruciatus Curse




#2 Aug 22 2008 at 5:56 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
XP pro, 32. Pro because of NTFS, you're likelyhood of wanting to have a file in excess of the FAT32 limit is much more likely in the next few years.

64 bit home operating systems are still largely useless, even if you go with Vista, there's almost no benefit to the home user.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#3 Aug 22 2008 at 8:57 PM Rating: Decent
**
734 posts
Aye, I'd say Vista would be playing it safe. DX10 will eventually kick in and it'll be nice to have it then. When DX11 launches it will be backported to Vista as well. If you know anyone who bought a Vista retail/OEM disc you can sort of "demo" it for 30 days before you buy.

The worries of 64-bit are generally hardware drivers, so if you plan on going 64-bit, check your hardware manufacturer's website for drivers. I have no insider information but I'm going to assume Windows 7 will be the last version of Windows with this whole 32-bit/64-bit configuration. By the end of Windows 7's lifetime everyone should have 64-bit drivers. If you're planning on grabbing 3.5GB+, 64-bit is a must as 32-bit Microsoft Operating Systems can only see 3.25~3.5GB. If you want more info on 64-bit visit this site.
#4 Aug 23 2008 at 7:28 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

If you're planning on grabbing 3.5GB+, 64-bit is a must as 32-bit Microsoft Operating Systems can only see 3.25~3.5GB.


No. I work with 100GB XP Pro files every day. Stop guessing. It helps no one.





Edited, Aug 23rd 2008 11:25am by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#5 Aug 23 2008 at 7:53 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,086 posts
If you really need more than 4GB (which you don't), then go Vista. You really don't need Vista right now, but since everyone is going towards it and its "the future", then you might as well. It works and is alright for the most part. You don't need DX10 either really, but again that's a future directional thing so you might as well.

Ram is also very cheap, so you can get 2x2x2 kits and throw in 4 sticks (although this can be a problem populating the motherboard to full capacity... I've had some troubles depending on the mobo and ram). If you get a new video card, which I highly recommend, get the Radeon HD 4850... can't go wrong there.

So in short, yes, get Vista 64, get 8GB of memory and be done with it, and an ATI 4850 (or if you're scared of ATI for whatever reason, the Nvidia GTX260 will do just fine as well). Ensure 120mm fans for case and power supply cooling and a full copper heatsink if you can install your own (others retail CPUs come with this).

Here are my recommendations at this time:
http://www.allakhazam.com/wiki/System_Performance_Guide

I hope this helps some!
- Berek
#6 Aug 23 2008 at 9:11 AM Rating: Decent
**
734 posts
Quote:
No. I work with 100GB XP Pro files every day. Stop guessing. It helps no one.
3.5GB+ of system memory. Its well beyond well documented that Microsoft made 32-bit operating systems can't use that much memory without PAE, which the desktop variants do not come with by default.

Edited, Aug 23rd 2008 11:00am by RhondaTheSly
#7 Aug 23 2008 at 10:53 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

3.5GB+ of system memory.


Right, my mistake. Sorry.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8 Aug 23 2008 at 12:12 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Here are my recommendations at this time:
http://www.allakhazam.com/wiki/Syste...mance_Guide


First, this is really well done, and looks great. The Intel value machine CPU, however, way to far up the product line. Also, the Intel MBs are a poor value proposition. The AMD MB is an excellent value proposition without discrete graphics. For gaming with discrete graphics, the 780G northbridge makes little sense. The PCI-E controller does a poor job with discrete graphics relative to better chipsets like the 790FX, or even the value priced nForce layouts.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2000200022%20107191003%201071933047&bop=And&Order=PRICE

Is going to deliver on the order of 30% increase in framerate while gaming compared to the 780G, when using discrete graphics.

Really is a great design job, though.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Aug 23 2008 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,086 posts
Thanks Smasharoo for the inputs! I agree on the motherboard for Intel especially. I've been looking to replace that in the value slot for some time now. The guide is being updated tomorrow, so I'll make some adjustments based on your recommendations.

- Berek


Edited, Aug 23rd 2008 4:16pm by Berek
#10 Aug 25 2008 at 10:23 AM Rating: Good
****
5,492 posts
Smasharoo wrote:


Here are my recommendations at this time:
http://www.allakhazam.com/wiki/Syste...mance_Guide


First, this is really well done, and looks great. The Intel value machine CPU, however, way to far up the product line. Also, the Intel MBs are a poor value proposition. The AMD MB is an excellent value proposition without discrete graphics. For gaming with discrete graphics, the 780G northbridge makes little sense. The PCI-E controller does a poor job with discrete graphics relative to better chipsets like the 790FX, or even the value priced nForce layouts.


So if i wanted to try and build a good gaming rig, i should follow that guide?
#11 Aug 25 2008 at 10:20 PM Rating: Decent
**
734 posts
I wouldn't follow any guide to the letter but these are very solid recommendations.

» Case recommendations are odd as design preference is mostly up to the individual. The Tsunami doesn't look to have anything worth writing home about and, in my opinion, looks like ***. The build quality on my old Thermaltake Shark was pretty good (though the door felt a bit flimsy...), if it's worth anything to you.

» If you're not ordering your parts tomorrow look for reviews of the Seagate 640GB HD when they start to touch ground. It looks "promising" but I don't honestly expect it to outrun the WD.

» The Wiki may have chosen the DFI Blood Iron for a reason (overclocking is likely, possibly reliability) but if you want a cheap no frills board the P35-DS3L is good. It's been replaced by the EP35-DS3L, which I haven't looked into, but I imagine its similar enough.

» GPU purchase decision making should be made mostly around two factors: what games you play and what resolution you wish to play them at. A 4850 should be adequate for most though. You might feel inclined to scale up to the 4870 if you want to play at max resolution on a 22~24" screen on more modern games.

Like I said, these are very solid recommendations but the best advice is to shop around and find you need... at the absolute cheapest! :)

http://www.Newegg.com/
http://directron.com/
http://www.mwave.com/mwave/index.hmx?
http://microcenter.com/index.html

Anandtech.com is also a informative review site with a nice forum.


Edit: The Operating System: XP and Vista come in three package types, Retail, OEM, and Upgrade.

» Upgrade (99.99 and 122.99), as its name would imply requires a previous version be installed, unless you're the unscrupulous type.

» Retail ($194.99 and $212.99, respectively) is the full package have no prereqs, it can be installed on a single computer as many times as you want.

» OEM packages are specifically for system builders, having no official Microsoft support, and the license is tied to the motherboard its installed to, but that cuts the price in half ($84.99 and $99.99, respectively). Most people consider the OEM packages the best value. Shop around, I bought Vista HP 64-bit OEM for $79.99 back in January, so you can probably find it around that price if you look.

Something funny I found getting prices on Newegg for this edit. 3/19/2008, so I'm not sure about the SP1 part, but the latter is... o.O. lolfud
Quote:
SP1 still isn't out 32bit Doesn't support 4 gigs of ram(only 3.25) 64bit doesn't support internet, sound or video cards...
Doesn't support internet, sound, or video cards? Come'on! XD

Edited formatting

Edited, Aug 25th 2008 11:50pm by RhondaTheSly
#12 Aug 26 2008 at 5:01 AM Rating: Good
In defense of 64 bit Vista, I've been using the Ultimate edition of 64 bit vista since I built my machine in January and haven't had any issues with drivers. I may be lucky, but it seems driver support is finally starting to arrive, at least for new hardware. Legacy stuff may not have the support but since he's building a new system anyway I would imagine that most of the things he would buy would have 64bit drivers available.
#13 Aug 26 2008 at 5:20 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

In defense of 64 bit Vista, I've been using the Ultimate edition of 64 bit vista since I built my machine in January and haven't had any issues with drivers. I may be lucky, but it seems driver support is finally starting to arrive, at least for new hardware. Legacy stuff may not have the support but since he's building a new system anyway I would imagine that most of the things he would buy would have 64bit drivers available.


This is great, and all, but the real question is if there's any actual benefit for you. The sort of silly reality, ATM, is that for most home users, vista64 is going to be slower and use more memory.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#14 Aug 26 2008 at 7:14 AM Rating: Good
Smasharoo wrote:

In defense of 64 bit Vista, I've been using the Ultimate edition of 64 bit vista since I built my machine in January and haven't had any issues with drivers. I may be lucky, but it seems driver support is finally starting to arrive, at least for new hardware. Legacy stuff may not have the support but since he's building a new system anyway I would imagine that most of the things he would buy would have 64bit drivers available.


This is great, and all, but the real question is if there's any actual benefit for you. The sort of silly reality, ATM, is that for most home users, vista64 is going to be slower and use more memory.



Absolutely. I'm sure this PC would be just as fast under the 32bit edition as it is under the 64bit. I just was saying that driver support is becoming less of an issue, now it's up to the programmers to take advantage of the new architecture.
#15 Aug 28 2008 at 9:28 PM Rating: Decent
**
773 posts
After checking various boards at Tiger Direct and Newegg I have tentatively decided on

Asus M2N-E Green Socket AM2 nForce 500 ATX Motherboard

Yes its an older board. But I do have to watch my $$$.

For CPU I am thinking

AMD Athelon 64 X2 5000, or possibly 6000


Sound good?

____________________________
"We apologize for the inconvenience"
- SE Cruciatus Curse




Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 3 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (3)