Quote:
If there are any significant changes to the mem usage on the ones from the diagnostic boot and the full boot, post them here.
Ok, I had three entries from Nvidia on start up that are nuked as of now. Drivers are still in tact but I didn't really need an icon in the task bar that allows me to switch video modes (I'm perfectly capable of doing that with a right click in the middle of my screen, hehe). Quicktime was also in there but has been put into a long term coma until I decide to revive it.
Gonna start messing with Everquest while using EQW and without EQW. I'll post my findings in a bit.
Edit: Just ran Everquest from the EQ icon (didn't use eqw). All models and options turned on. Memory usage for EQ alone jumped to 380,884k in the bazaar. Logged the mule off and started my bard in WFP. Memory usage for EQ dropped to 310 megs. The Commit Charge when I was in the bazaar was hovering at 488 megs. When I added up all the memory usage that was pretty close (did rough rounding in my head on each indivudial program). While in Freeport the commit charge dropped to 415.
Now I'm completely logged out of EQ (haven't rebooted yet). My commit charge is 99M but a quick adding of the mem usage comes up with 73M (including internet explorer at 15 megs).
Rebooting now and will run with EQW all models/options loaded next.
Edit 2: Ran EQ using EQW. This time also will all options and models turned on. Very similar results so it doesn't appear to have much/anything to do with EQW vs. native EQ running.
Edit 3: Ran EQ using EQW. All options and models turned off. Similar results but far less memory used. In the bazaar there was 228megs being used in eqgame.ext and 339megs in the commit charge. While in Nektulous forest 227 megs were being used with 342 in the commit charge. Interesting thing is why would there be about the same memory usage in these two zones when the polygon count decreases dramitically between the zones? Possible carryover memory usage from the bazaar this time?
Completely out of EQ now. Approx 80 megs are being used but the commit charge is showing 101 megs (once again, this is with IE and Taskmanager running and included).
Final note/question. I'm usually very leary using 3rd party programs until I get some good confirmation from several reliable sources that it's a good shareware/freeware program. This is probably why it took me forever and a day to finally download and use EQW. Now some people have been talking about a program called EQplaynice or something like that. It supposedly helps EQ with the memory leak issue and/or resource hog issues. Have you heard anything about it? If it's a good program and will help EQ not eat half of my ram I'll probably get it but the threat of worms, viruses, trojans, etc scares the begeezers out of me (doing all of my financial transactions on this computer makes me worry about bad nasties infecting my prescious - hehe).
Thanks again K, appreciate the help/advice.
Edited, Sat Mar 27 12:41:14 2004 by Madahme Edited, Sat Mar 27 12:54:15 2004 by Madahme Edited, Sat Mar 27 13:20:42 2004 by Madahme