- MMO News & Info
- Dark Age of Camelot
- EverQuest
- EverQuest II
- Final Fantasy XI
- Final Fantasy XIV
- FreeRealms
- Lord of the Rings Online
- World of Warcraft
- Cube World Forum
- Cube World Forum Wiki
- DayZDB
- Diablo 3 Database
- Dota Outpost
- Dragon Nest Armory
- Guildhead
- Hearthhead
- LolKing
- MMOUI
- NoobMeter
- Rifthead
- SC2 Ranks
- TankSpot
- Tera Tome
- TF2 Outpost
- Thottbot
- Torchlight Armory
- Torhead
- Vindictus DB
- Wowhead
- XIVDB

Scholar

19 posts

So I kinda' looked around the trials and what kind of g.kat you can get etc. None of them seems really special. I was too sleepy as hell to remember all of em but the only decent one I saw had like 79 base damage +10 more base damage (89 base damage only, no other stats). And then there was another with 65 base damage +16 more base damage(not sure) +15 attack, +4 str and another sh*tty augment. Then there's another with similar one but with dex and acc instead of str and attack.

So what do you ladies think about this? yay or nay?

So what do you ladies think about this? yay or nay?

Sage

402 posts

From BG:

Great Katana

Path: 644 > 645 > 646 > 652 > 653 > 654

Reward: Kurodachi: DMG:40 Delay:444 DMG+28 Delay+20 Occasionally attacks twice.

Does this have any potential of being a contender for GKs?

Great Katana

Path: 644 > 645 > 646 > 652 > 653 > 654

Reward: Kurodachi: DMG:40 Delay:444 DMG+28 Delay+20 Occasionally attacks twice.

Does this have any potential of being a contender for GKs?

90 RDM SAM BLM BLU BRD

Sage

798 posts

Proc rate on that 2x attack is the key. Soboro, according to wiki, averages 1.9 attacks per round. This new GKT would need a 90% proc rate to match Soboro in swing rate. The extra 14 delay won't make any difference in an x-hit build and won't seriously affect tp per swing, so Soboro still looks to be king of TP gain. Maybe it will beat Soboro in a merit type setting though (?). The added damage might push it ahead, but again it is going to depend on the 2x hit proc rate.

6,481 posts

"occasionally attacks twice" is usually 45-55% activation, working on that assumption:

soboro:

tp/hit: 11.5

sTP/6hit: 46

base DPS: 10.13

adjusted DPS (12 fSTR): 13.17

WS freq: 3.04/min (no haste/medi)

WS base dmg: 144

kurodachi:

tp/hit: 12.2

sTP/6hit: 37

base DPS: 13.19 (50% DA)

adjusted DPS (12 fSTR): 15.52

WS freq: 2.33/min (no haste/medi)

WS base dmg: 172 (assuming fSTR capped by non additive weapon base dmg)

Kuro/soboro: (15.52/13.17)*300+(172/144)*(2.33/3.04)*700 = 994.4/1000= .9944

So they're nearly identical comparing dmg vs delay vs #hits, however, Kurodachi saves you some sTP, meaning a lot of players could free up a slot for haste/DA/etc. Including medi also works in Kurodachi's favor, and DA (while less effective for either) takes a smaller hit for Kurodachi. Not bad, maybe I shouldn't be so unimpressed with this update after all.

It actually does quite a bit, and since people are going to ask: 64sTP for a 5-hit. This in one of the few GK cases I can think of where it might be viable after they raise cap to 90+ and we get sTP V.

*Edited, Mar 23rd 2010 2:37pm by shintasama *

soboro:

tp/hit: 11.5

sTP/6hit: 46

base DPS: 10.13

adjusted DPS (12 fSTR): 13.17

WS freq: 3.04/min (no haste/medi)

WS base dmg: 144

kurodachi:

tp/hit: 12.2

sTP/6hit: 37

base DPS: 13.19 (50% DA)

adjusted DPS (12 fSTR): 15.52

WS freq: 2.33/min (no haste/medi)

WS base dmg: 172 (assuming fSTR capped by non additive weapon base dmg)

Kuro/soboro: (15.52/13.17)*300+(172/144)*(2.33/3.04)*700 = 994.4/1000= .9944

So they're nearly identical comparing dmg vs delay vs #hits, however, Kurodachi saves you some sTP, meaning a lot of players could free up a slot for haste/DA/etc. Including medi also works in Kurodachi's favor, and DA (while less effective for either) takes a smaller hit for Kurodachi. Not bad, maybe I shouldn't be so unimpressed with this update after all.

Jax wrote:

The extra 14 delay won't make any difference in an x-hit build and won't seriously affect tp per swing,

Quote:

I don't believe in good guys versus bad guys anymore… I only see a plethora of states acting in self interest… with varying ethics and moral standards of course, but self-interest nonetheless

Winston Churchill wrote:

Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things

6 posts

89 dmg Radennotachi enough to de-throne the Hagun? Same delay etc.

edit: spelling is overrated..

*Edited, Mar 23rd 2010 4:35pm by RotisTFL *

SAM TP: edit: spelling is overrated..

6,481 posts

RotisTFL wrote:

89 dmg Radennotachi enough to de-throne the Hagun? Same delay etc.

Quote:

I don't believe in good guys versus bad guys anymore… I only see a plethora of states acting in self interest… with varying ethics and moral standards of course, but self-interest nonetheless

Winston Churchill wrote:

Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things

1 post

Is there math backing up ~94-95 dmg = Hagun?

Not that I don't believe it, just would like to see the logic behind it.

Not that I don't believe it, just would like to see the logic behind it.

499 posts

hows the amano upgrades look in magians?

the monk i wish i had they playtime to be: Scholar

19 posts

I believe the amano can get +5 base damage. I'm not sure if that's the highest you can go, but It didn't show any more trials after the +5 one.

Sage

10,813 posts

SirMcclane wrote:

Is there math backing up ~94-95 dmg = Hagun?

Not that I don't believe it, just would like to see the logic behind it.

Not that I don't believe it, just would like to see the logic behind it.

it's based on how much you'd need to increase both melee and WS damage to match hagun's WS bonus. it's easy to quantify both, because you can see what a % increase in base damage does to melee and WS, and you can see how much adding 100% TP's worth of fTP improves WS damage.

neither of these are influenced by ATT or ACC, because the whole equation basically amounts to base damage multiplied by what ATT does multiplied by what ACC does. that being the case, raising base damage by, say, 10%, will raise your total damage by 10%.

(it's a little more "complicated"/detailed in that WS mods add to base damage, but the math shinta has in mind does take that into account)

edit: trivial typo

6,481 posts

I actually forgot to take increased fSTR on WS (assuming that it's actually higher, "additional base dmg" tends to work funky) into account when I did it in excel bringing it a little lower. Math is easy though:

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

Quote:

I don't believe in good guys versus bad guys anymore… I only see a plethora of states acting in self interest… with varying ethics and moral standards of course, but self-interest nonetheless

Winston Churchill wrote:

Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things

Sage

1,147 posts

Quote:

I actually forgot to take increased fSTR on WS (assuming that it's actually higher, "additional base dmg" tends to work funky) into account when I did it in excel bringing it a little lower. Math is easy though:

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

Are these calculations merely on the WS damage or overall DoT? If it's just WS, then I would imagine this would end up shifting slightly in favor of the higher base damage GK.

Also, how would repeated use of JAs like sekkanoki (hagun doesn't get bonus) or runover tp beyond 100% factor in?

Scholar

96 posts

Efunotachi DMG:81 Delay:437 VIT+4 Physical damage taken -7% doesn't appeal to anyone else for low-man tanking?

My LS has dwindled down to a small handful of members and my sam is pretty much our defacto tank and DD for everything we do. For stuff that smacks me around like a rag doll I am totally psyched that I can potentially swap into this when my ohshi* set alone isn't enough and not take a humongous hit to dps like I would be taking with iron ram lance.

My LS has dwindled down to a small handful of members and my sam is pretty much our defacto tank and DD for everything we do. For stuff that smacks me around like a rag doll I am totally psyched that I can potentially swap into this when my ohshi* set alone isn't enough and not take a humongous hit to dps like I would be taking with iron ram lance.

6,481 posts

darnimsexy wrote:

Quote:

I actually forgot to take increased fSTR on WS (assuming that it's actually higher, "additional base dmg" tends to work funky) into account when I did it in excel bringing it a little lower. Math is easy though:

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

1000=300*((75+12)/(X+12))+700*(((75+16+92)*1.975)/((X+18+92)*1.6625))

X= 92.7 base dmg

the "18" actually changes with increasing X which I didn't account for, 18 is correct value for base dmg = 90->99

Answer doesn't change though, 89 isn't high enough.

Are these calculations merely on the WS damage or overall DoT? If it's just WS, then I would imagine this would end up shifting slightly in favor of the higher base damage GK.

Also, how would repeated use of JAs like sekkanoki (hagun doesn't get bonus) or runover tp beyond 100% factor in?

Quote:

Efunotachi DMG:81 Delay:437 VIT+4 Physical damage taken -7% doesn't appeal to anyone else for low-man tanking?

Quote:

Winston Churchill wrote:

15 posts

I decided to take a look into this with my limited damage formula experience in FFXI, but here's what I got. Let me know if I went wrong somewhere. ^^

I wanted to compare the Radennotachi vs. Hagun 100 swings vs. 100 swings including double attack from Askar Body, Pole Grip, and Brutal Earring and WSing as soon as you get 100% (for comparisons sake.)

I used an fSTR of 16.75 (130 STR vs. a Greater Colibri) and a PDIF of 1.5 with maxed accuracy at 95%.

First Let's do WS Damage.

WS Damage = ("Effective" Base Damage + fSTR + WSC) x fTP x PDIF

WSC = Weapon Skill Conditions (75% of STR x 0.83 at lvl 75)

PDIF = Your attack / The target's Defense (Defaulted this to 1.5 which is an attack of 579.6 on 81 Colibri and 604.95 on 82 Colibri)

Radennotachi: (89 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.5625) x 1.5 = 437.5495 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 453.0825

Hagun: (75 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.875) x 1.5 = 485.6484 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 529.356

Obviously that TP bonus is just @#%^in hard to beat. Let's add in the melee hits now though. 1.5 = PDIF 1.09 = Dbl Atk 0.95 = Accuracy Cap.

Radennotachi: (89 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 160.29

Hagun: (75 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 138.55

Now, since we're calculating for 100 swings and we're assuming a 6-hit build with haste. 100 swings / 6 = 16.666 WS "rounds" per 100 swings.

In every WS round there is the WS and 5 melee hits to get you back up to 100% TP for another WS. So per WS "round":

Radennotachi: WS: 453.082 x1 Melee: 160.29 x 5 = 801.45 + 453.082 = 1254.53

Hagun: WS: 529.356 x1 Melee: 138.55 x 5 = 692.75 + 529.356 = 1195.638

In just one WS round the Radennotachi seems to come out on top. Now let's compare these with 16.666 WS rounds to equal 100 swings

Radennotachi: 1254.53 x 16.666 = 20,907.9969

Hagun: 1195.638 x 16.666 = 19,926.5029

Unless I did something wrong it's looking like this Radennotachi, while not entirely de-throning the Hagun. Is probably the first one to equal it.

*Edited, Mar 24th 2010 5:10pm by Kraeia *

I wanted to compare the Radennotachi vs. Hagun 100 swings vs. 100 swings including double attack from Askar Body, Pole Grip, and Brutal Earring and WSing as soon as you get 100% (for comparisons sake.)

I used an fSTR of 16.75 (130 STR vs. a Greater Colibri) and a PDIF of 1.5 with maxed accuracy at 95%.

First Let's do WS Damage.

WS Damage = ("Effective" Base Damage + fSTR + WSC) x fTP x PDIF

WSC = Weapon Skill Conditions (75% of STR x 0.83 at lvl 75)

PDIF = Your attack / The target's Defense (Defaulted this to 1.5 which is an attack of 579.6 on 81 Colibri and 604.95 on 82 Colibri)

Radennotachi: (89 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.5625) x 1.5 = 437.5495 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 453.0825

Hagun: (75 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.875) x 1.5 = 485.6484 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 529.356

Obviously that TP bonus is just @#%^in hard to beat. Let's add in the melee hits now though. 1.5 = PDIF 1.09 = Dbl Atk 0.95 = Accuracy Cap.

Radennotachi: (89 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 160.29

Hagun: (75 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 138.55

Now, since we're calculating for 100 swings and we're assuming a 6-hit build with haste. 100 swings / 6 = 16.666 WS "rounds" per 100 swings.

In every WS round there is the WS and 5 melee hits to get you back up to 100% TP for another WS. So per WS "round":

Radennotachi: WS: 453.082 x1 Melee: 160.29 x 5 = 801.45 + 453.082 = 1254.53

Hagun: WS: 529.356 x1 Melee: 138.55 x 5 = 692.75 + 529.356 = 1195.638

In just one WS round the Radennotachi seems to come out on top. Now let's compare these with 16.666 WS rounds to equal 100 swings

Radennotachi: 1254.53 x 16.666 = 20,907.9969

Hagun: 1195.638 x 16.666 = 19,926.5029

Unless I did something wrong it's looking like this Radennotachi, while not entirely de-throning the Hagun. Is probably the first one to equal it.

よろしくおねがいします～

CPU: Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8 GHz

Memory: 6GB OCZ RAM DDR3-1600+

HDD: 60GB Solid State HDD

GPU: Nvidia GTX 260 Superclocked 896MB GDDR3

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

6,481 posts

Quote:

I decided to take a look into this with my limited damage formula experience in FFXI, but here's what I got. Let me know if I went wrong somewhere.

Quote:

*sigh*

Quote:

Hagun: WS: 529.356 x1 Melee: 138.55 x 5 = 692.75 + 529.356 = ~~1195.638~~ 1222.106

692.75/1222.106= 56.7% of hagun dmg is melee <- rofl

yeah, I totally don't see how there could be any inaccuracy here at all that would possibly skew the data away from the GK that produces higher WS dmg.

/nod/nod

Kiki wrote:

Stay good Shinta! Stay good!

Quote:

Winston Churchill wrote:

15 posts

Well thank you for persevering and holding back as much as possible.

Also thank you for showing the mistake in addition there. I realize that those numbers aren't representative of the actual damage done as I just plugged in constant numbers to compare the two weapons.

I am curious as to what you meant by bolding parts of the first quotes. As I said I'm new to this and I want to get good at it. I'm going to @#%^ up but I intend to improve. Thanks for any help that can be given.

Also thank you for showing the mistake in addition there. I realize that those numbers aren't representative of the actual damage done as I just plugged in constant numbers to compare the two weapons.

I am curious as to what you meant by bolding parts of the first quotes. As I said I'm new to this and I want to get good at it. I'm going to @#%^ up but I intend to improve. Thanks for any help that can be given.

よろしくおねがいします～

CPU: Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8 GHz

Memory: 6GB OCZ RAM DDR3-1600+

HDD: 60GB Solid State HDD

GPU: Nvidia GTX 260 Superclocked 896MB GDDR3

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Sage

517 posts

I don't believe Hagun is obsolete, and I think that its too soon to say that it is in the first place. Considering that SE said we would be able to eventually upgrade current weapons and armor. There's still a possibility in the future that additional Magian updates allow us to finally add specific, worthwhile augments, on regular gear like Haubergeon, or weapons like Hagun. Nothing is certain, and we damn well learned that when SE said they were going to raise the level cap after years of saying they weren't.

*Edited, Mar 25th 2010 7:09am by Metakaiser *

ArTwoKay wrote:

Long before the Crystal War, the Galka Raogrimm was wandering the streets of Jeuno and happened to stumble into the Marble Bridge Tavern on Behemoth Baked Bean Burrito day.

One hour later, the Shu'meyo Cataclysm was born.

One hour later, the Shu'meyo Cataclysm was born.

Vyren wrote:

I lost it when Trion started thrusting at me.

Sage

10,813 posts

Kraeia wrote:

I decided to take a look into this with my limited damage formula experience in FFXI, but here's what I got. Let me know if I went wrong somewhere. ^^

I wanted to compare the Radennotachi vs. Hagun 100 swings vs. 100 swings including double attack from Askar Body, Pole Grip, and Brutal Earring and WSing as soon as you get 100% (for comparisons sake.)

I used an fSTR of 16.75 (130 STR vs. a Greater Colibri) and a PDIF of 1.5 with maxed accuracy at 95%.

First Let's do WS Damage.

WS Damage = ("Effective" Base Damage + fSTR + WSC) x fTP x PDIF

WSC = Weapon Skill Conditions (75% of STR x 0.83 at lvl 75)

PDIF = Your attack / The target's Defense (Defaulted this to 1.5 which is an attack of 579.6 on 81 Colibri and 604.95 on 82 Colibri)

Radennotachi: (89 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.5625) x 1.5 = 437.5495 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 453.0825

Hagun: (75 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.875) x 1.5 = 485.6484 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 529.356

Obviously that TP bonus is just @#%^in hard to beat. Let's add in the melee hits now though. 1.5 = PDIF 1.09 = Dbl Atk 0.95 = Accuracy Cap.

Radennotachi: (89 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 160.29

Hagun: (75 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 138.55

Now, since we're calculating for 100 swings and we're assuming a 6-hit build with haste. 100 swings / 6 = 16.666 WS "rounds" per 100 swings.

In every WS round there is the WS and 5 melee hits to get you back up to 100% TP for another WS. So per WS "round":

Radennotachi: WS: 453.082 x1 Melee: 160.29 x 5 = 801.45 + 453.082 = 1254.53

Hagun: WS: 529.356 x1 Melee: 138.55 x 5 = 692.75 + 529.356 = 1195.638

In just one WS round the Radennotachi seems to come out on top. Now let's compare these with 16.666 WS rounds to equal 100 swings

Radennotachi: 1254.53 x 16.666 = 20,907.9969

Hagun: 1195.638 x 16.666 = 19,926.5029

Unless I did something wrong it's looking like this Radennotachi, while not entirely de-throning the Hagun. Is probably the first one to equal it.

*Edited, Mar 24th 2010 5:10pm by Kraeia *

I wanted to compare the Radennotachi vs. Hagun 100 swings vs. 100 swings including double attack from Askar Body, Pole Grip, and Brutal Earring and WSing as soon as you get 100% (for comparisons sake.)

I used an fSTR of 16.75 (130 STR vs. a Greater Colibri) and a PDIF of 1.5 with maxed accuracy at 95%.

First Let's do WS Damage.

WS Damage = ("Effective" Base Damage + fSTR + WSC) x fTP x PDIF

WSC = Weapon Skill Conditions (75% of STR x 0.83 at lvl 75)

PDIF = Your attack / The target's Defense (Defaulted this to 1.5 which is an attack of 579.6 on 81 Colibri and 604.95 on 82 Colibri)

Radennotachi: (89 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.5625) x 1.5 = 437.5495 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 453.0825

Hagun: (75 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.875) x 1.5 = 485.6484 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 529.356

Obviously that TP bonus is just @#%^in hard to beat. Let's add in the melee hits now though. 1.5 = PDIF 1.09 = Dbl Atk 0.95 = Accuracy Cap.

Radennotachi: (89 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 160.29

Hagun: (75 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 138.55

Now, since we're calculating for 100 swings and we're assuming a 6-hit build with haste. 100 swings / 6 = 16.666 WS "rounds" per 100 swings.

In every WS round there is the WS and 5 melee hits to get you back up to 100% TP for another WS. So per WS "round":

Radennotachi: WS: 453.082 x1 Melee: 160.29 x 5 = 801.45 + 453.082 = 1254.53

Hagun: WS: 529.356 x1 Melee: 138.55 x 5 = 692.75 + 529.356 = 1195.638

In just one WS round the Radennotachi seems to come out on top. Now let's compare these with 16.666 WS rounds to equal 100 swings

Radennotachi: 1254.53 x 16.666 = 20,907.9969

Hagun: 1195.638 x 16.666 = 19,926.5029

Unless I did something wrong it's looking like this Radennotachi, while not entirely de-throning the Hagun. Is probably the first one to equal it.

i'm in a hurry, but quick tips: learn where things get "floored" (which for our purposes just means "drop everything to the right of the decimal point). fSTR and WSC are always integers. remember to include the pDIF (and ACC if you aren't capped to begin with) bonus on gekko (pDIF is doubled, which usually means it caps), along with overwhelm. remember that 30% melee 70% WS is a more realistic split for hagun users.

actually gekko doubles cRatio i think? or is it even Ratio? i can't remember. anyway, those are good starting things.

Scholar

349 posts

Everyone says hagun is obsolete now, when the level cap is getting raised incredibly slowly. I sure as hell am not going to be trying to level with my Polearm on Greater Colibri from 75-80 when they raise the cap, and i also enjoy the ability to not suck before the cap gets raised.

Sell your Hagunz! There might be a better weapon in 2011!

Sell your Hagunz! There might be a better weapon in 2011!

15 posts

milich wrote:

i'm in a hurry, but quick tips: learn where things get "floored" (which for our purposes just means "drop everything to the right of the decimal point). fSTR and WSC are always integers. remember to include the pDIF (and ACC if you aren't capped to begin with) bonus on gekko (pDIF is doubled, which usually means it caps), along with overwhelm. remember that 30% melee 70% WS is a more realistic split for hagun users.

actually gekko doubles cRatio i think? or is it even Ratio? i can't remember. anyway, those are good starting things.

Thank you! I was wondering what the floor meant in the formulas. I know that in parsed instances the WS/melee ratio is much greater than my #s showed, but what I'm a little confused on is how that affects a side-by-side comparison with fixed variables. Was the 100 swing comparison I used just not a good way to go about it? :/

I didn't know anything about any PDIF increase with Tachi: Gekko but would definitely like to learn more about that. But I did use capped ACC. ^^

Even with missing flooring variables that should have been floored and increases from Tachi: Gekko. While the Hagun WS damage would be boosted more than the Radennnotachi WS dmg. Since the equations would be affected in both GK's WSs it seems like the two would still compare rather closely (assuming that there isn't something inherently wrong with this comparison scenario.)

By the way I own a Hagun and use it. And I will continue to use it, even after getting a Radennotachi to actually test it not on paper. It's a great GK and of course I endorse it. I just am always on the look out for more weapons. Hence this slightly rocky trip through the formulas, lol.

よろしくおねがいします～

CPU: Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8 GHz

Memory: 6GB OCZ RAM DDR3-1600+

HDD: 60GB Solid State HDD

GPU: Nvidia GTX 260 Superclocked 896MB GDDR3

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Scholar

2,887 posts

I believe the DRK's did some testing awhile back to figure out the order cRatio and pDiff is capped. Turns out it is capped twice (from what I can understand).

Attack/Defense -> 2.2 Cap -> LCF applied -> cRatio bonus applied (for WS) -> 2.2 Cap (3.0 if Crit) -> * 1.05 random bonus (produces 3.15 crit on a lv 1 bunny).

Things to take away from this are,

#1 No amount of attack can counter the monsters level penalty as the LCF is applied after the first 2.2 cap is applied.

#2 cRatio bonus's can overcome LCF but are capped again on regular WS.

#3 Sneak Attack (forced crit) will ~always~ produce at least 36% more damage on WS, but before Overwhelm is counted. Critical hits can overcome LCF even at max attack because their applied after the first 2.2 cap.

Attack/Defense -> 2.2 Cap -> LCF applied -> cRatio bonus applied (for WS) -> 2.2 Cap (3.0 if Crit) -> * 1.05 random bonus (produces 3.15 crit on a lv 1 bunny).

Things to take away from this are,

#1 No amount of attack can counter the monsters level penalty as the LCF is applied after the first 2.2 cap is applied.

#2 cRatio bonus's can overcome LCF but are capped again on regular WS.

#3 Sneak Attack (forced crit) will ~always~ produce at least 36% more damage on WS, but before Overwhelm is counted. Critical hits can overcome LCF even at max attack because their applied after the first 2.2 cap.

CoP: Complete AN: O

99 SAM, RDM, BLU, WAR,

lolgaxe wrote:

Nothing in this game is impossible if you set yourself to the task of actually doing it. Even dumb people can only hold you back for so long.

Lucinus wrote:

when you're hefting something that deadly, you don't miss - mobs get the @#%^ out of the way instead...

15 posts

Awesome! Thanks for the info. :)

よろしくおねがいします～

CPU: Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8 GHz

Memory: 6GB OCZ RAM DDR3-1600+

HDD: 60GB Solid State HDD

GPU: Nvidia GTX 260 Superclocked 896MB GDDR3

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Sage

10,813 posts

Kraeia wrote:

milich wrote:

i'm in a hurry, but quick tips: learn where things get "floored" (which for our purposes just means "drop everything to the right of the decimal point). fSTR and WSC are always integers. remember to include the pDIF (and ACC if you aren't capped to begin with) bonus on gekko (pDIF is doubled, which usually means it caps), along with overwhelm. remember that 30% melee 70% WS is a more realistic split for hagun users.

actually gekko doubles cRatio i think? or is it even Ratio? i can't remember. anyway, those are good starting things.

Thank you! I was wondering what the floor meant in the formulas. I know that in parsed instances the WS/melee ratio is much greater than my #s showed, but what I'm a little confused on is how that affects a side-by-side comparison with fixed variables. Was the 100 swing comparison I used just not a good way to go about it? :/

I didn't know anything about any PDIF increase with Tachi: Gekko but would definitely like to learn more about that. But I did use capped ACC. ^^

Even with missing flooring variables that should have been floored and increases from Tachi: Gekko. While the Hagun WS damage would be boosted more than the Radennnotachi WS dmg. Since the equations would be affected in both GK's WSs it seems like the two would still compare rather closely (assuming that there isn't something inherently wrong with this comparison scenario.)

By the way I own a Hagun and use it. And I will continue to use it, even after getting a Radennotachi to actually test it not on paper. It's a great GK and of course I endorse it. I just am always on the look out for more weapons. Hence this slightly rocky trip through the formulas, lol.

what you're not seeing is the big picture as to why hagun is good (or at least you're not applying that knowledge to the comparison).

when comparing total damage and incorporating things like an increase in WS damage, it's important to note what % of your damage comes from melee, and what comes from WS.

notice:

hagun

a) does LOWER melee damage than raden

b) does HIGHER WS damage than raden

c) does an EQUAL AMOUNT of WS as raden

because of this, if you skimp on WS damage for both, you FAVOR raden. it's not going to affect both equally, because (a) through (c) necessitates that hagun's WS portion is a larger % of it's total damage. to illustrate with numbers, it's like this:

say the bonus adds 50% damage to your WS. to see what that does total, it would look something like this:

hagun

melee: 30

WS: 70*1.5 = 105

total: 135

raden

melee: 45

WS: 55*1.5 = 82.5

total: 123.75

notice, a 50% WS increase bumped hagun up by 35%, but the other by only 23.75%.

---

hagun is good because:

1) y/g/k's fTP goes up strikingly with TP, and the mod is large.

2) there's a huge pDIF bonus on gekko (and a smaller one on each of the other 2)

3) sTP skews SAM damage toward WS

4) y/g/k's large WSC and auto-ACC capping (+generally high pDIF) make fTP easily the most effective way to raise WS damage, since base damage, pDIF, and accuracy are already high

if you fail to represent any of those in a comparison where something is "close" to hagun, hagun is clearly better than the competitor.

hagun could be dethroned in this update (i haven't checked much), but you need to use accurate math to show it. always account for melee:WS split, realistic bonuses, etc.

6,481 posts

saveall wrote:

I believe the DRK's did some testing awhile back to figure out the order cRatio and pDiff is capped.

most likely it's:

ratio= multiplier*atk/def

cap ratio around 2.2-2.3

pDIFmax= 1.2*(ratio-lvC)

pDIFmin= 1.2*(ratio-lvC)-.8

(for cratio > 5/6, which is pretty much always)

idk where the pDIF cap also info came from, I need to test if I can break 1k w/o DA on a lv0 bunny to see if it's still true or not.

Krey wrote:

Was the 100 swing comparison I used just not a good way to go about it? :/

for the sake of learning I'll go through the problems I bolded:

Krey wrote:

Hagun(WS): (75 + 16.75 + 80.925 x 1.875) x 1.5 = 485.6484 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 529.356

floor(X) means that you drop whatever the remainder is.

ie. floor(10*.76) = floor(7.6) = 7

Krey wrote:

Hagun(tp): (75 + 14.2) x 1.5 x 1.09 x 0.95 = 138.55

Krey wrote:

I'm going to @#%^ up but I intend to improve.

Shaun wrote:

I'm going to bank on the idea of further upgrades coming down the pipe and go for the Raden with 89 DMG. The optimist in me tells me to do so.

Shaun wrote:

are you really willing to spend time on the hagen at a later date just to get the same weapon.

Shaun wrote:

SE loves hidden effects, they are everywhere.

On the topic of "hagun killers" the only one I'm really looking forward to is a fairly easy to obtain Nanatsusaya.

Quote:

Winston Churchill wrote:

15 posts

Shintasama wrote:

That's all I can ask for. Trust me, I'd rather have people with numbers to back up their arguments than idiots like CBO and Deboro who just go on what they "feel" or competitive parses.

Thank you. ^^ I really do appreciate all of the input people have given in response to my noob attempts at math. I'll make sure I get this information down pat.

よろしくおねがいします～

CPU: Intel i7 Quad Core 2.8 GHz

Memory: 6GB OCZ RAM DDR3-1600+

HDD: 60GB Solid State HDD

GPU: Nvidia GTX 260 Superclocked 896MB GDDR3

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit

Scholar

2,887 posts

Shinta, Long DRK post with lots of swearing

Lots of interesting math thrown around, kinda hard to glean a solid answer from it because too many unknown variables where in there for the Kirin numbers.

My concern was for the order and where the caps were at. We don't know everything exactly but there is enough info to get a general model of how things work. For SAM the second 2.2 cap after our WS bonus is applied is important because it highlights how attack is sometimes needed for Y/G/K dealing damage on really big things.

Kirin is lv 92, 92-75 = 17 * .05 = 0.85 hit as LCF making 1.35 the highest you can get for prior to WS bonus. At Kirin's 400 defense it would require 880 attack to hit the first 2.2 cap. SAM's rarely get that much attack, usually we only have one BRD if they and their with the SMNs / BLMs or with the PLD's. A SAM/THF could have 480~500 attack without food. 500/400 = 1.25 (under 2.2 cap) - 0.85 = 0.4 then apply WS bonus (x2.0) for 0.8, critical hits are 1.8 (forced SA). This is of course near absolute worse case scenario, adding some food for ~70 attack (just pulled it out my a$$) would produce a result of..

570/400 = 1.42 - 0.85 = 0.57 * 2 = 1.15, SAing being 2.15

1.15/0.8 = 1.43 or a 43% increase in cRatio from just 70 attack.

The reason I eat meat on kirin, even if my acc ends up sucking. Makes me want to rethink going /WAR, but the LS leader is kinda anal about /THF and TAing tanks on lessors / when we straight tank Kirin. We use a hybrid strategy of straight tanking Kirin until he fcks up our group then kiting him while people raise / get more MP, then resuming straight tanking him. We do 2~3 Kirins at once so burning isn't an option.

Maybe next time I'll convince our leader to drop a BRD or COR into the melee party and see what it does on our fight times.

Lots of interesting math thrown around, kinda hard to glean a solid answer from it because too many unknown variables where in there for the Kirin numbers.

My concern was for the order and where the caps were at. We don't know everything exactly but there is enough info to get a general model of how things work. For SAM the second 2.2 cap after our WS bonus is applied is important because it highlights how attack is sometimes needed for Y/G/K dealing damage on really big things.

Kirin is lv 92, 92-75 = 17 * .05 = 0.85 hit as LCF making 1.35 the highest you can get for prior to WS bonus. At Kirin's 400 defense it would require 880 attack to hit the first 2.2 cap. SAM's rarely get that much attack, usually we only have one BRD if they and their with the SMNs / BLMs or with the PLD's. A SAM/THF could have 480~500 attack without food. 500/400 = 1.25 (under 2.2 cap) - 0.85 = 0.4 then apply WS bonus (x2.0) for 0.8, critical hits are 1.8 (forced SA). This is of course near absolute worse case scenario, adding some food for ~70 attack (just pulled it out my a$$) would produce a result of..

570/400 = 1.42 - 0.85 = 0.57 * 2 = 1.15, SAing being 2.15

1.15/0.8 = 1.43 or a 43% increase in cRatio from just 70 attack.

The reason I eat meat on kirin, even if my acc ends up sucking. Makes me want to rethink going /WAR, but the LS leader is kinda anal about /THF and TAing tanks on lessors / when we straight tank Kirin. We use a hybrid strategy of straight tanking Kirin until he fcks up our group then kiting him while people raise / get more MP, then resuming straight tanking him. We do 2~3 Kirins at once so burning isn't an option.

Maybe next time I'll convince our leader to drop a BRD or COR into the melee party and see what it does on our fight times.

CoP: Complete AN: O

99 SAM, RDM, BLU, WAR,

lolgaxe wrote:

Nothing in this game is impossible if you set yourself to the task of actually doing it. Even dumb people can only hold you back for so long.

Lucinus wrote:

when you're hefting something that deadly, you don't miss - mobs get the @#%^ out of the way instead...

6,481 posts

You realize, of course, I wrote half the posts in that thread and already knew exactly which one you were talking about, ya?

You also know that, if anything, that thread indicated you're probably applying the WS bonus in the wrong place, ya?

Read it again, redo your math and get back to me.

You also know that, if anything, that thread indicated you're probably applying the WS bonus in the wrong place, ya?

Read it again, redo your math and get back to me.

Quote:

Winston Churchill wrote:

Scholar

2,887 posts

Did read over it, much of your math is just a jumble of numbers and parentheses without noting what you did where. Makes it nearly impossible to follow properly. No matter the fact that people forget to mention where their apply which cap. Also there was no definite conclusion to that thread, it boiled down with people trying to compare damage on a Kirin fight to what should be there. Except Kirin is a lv 92 monster and its nearly impossible to control all the variables, things like "I try to get overwhelm on all WS" means your not sure that its always applied. Makes correcting for that 19% a b!tch to do. TP wasn't always at 100, sekkanoki was used (overwhelm doesn't stack with sekkanoki) and what not. Its why Kirin numbers are unreliable at best and misleading at worst.

So tell me then, where exactly would you apply the 2.0 bonus, and is it indeed 2.0 know that we know the original formula used to figure it out wasn't entirely correct. Is it after the initial attack/defense but before the first 2.2 cap? Is it after the initial cap but before critical? Or is it after everything else? Because its assumed to be such a large bonus, exactly where its placed can determine what number pops out at the end.

So tell me then, where exactly would you apply the 2.0 bonus, and is it indeed 2.0 know that we know the original formula used to figure it out wasn't entirely correct. Is it after the initial attack/defense but before the first 2.2 cap? Is it after the initial cap but before critical? Or is it after everything else? Because its assumed to be such a large bonus, exactly where its placed can determine what number pops out at the end.

CoP: Complete AN: O

99 SAM, RDM, BLU, WAR,

lolgaxe wrote:

Nothing in this game is impossible if you set yourself to the task of actually doing it. Even dumb people can only hold you back for so long.

Lucinus wrote:

when you're hefting something that deadly, you don't miss - mobs get the @#%^ out of the way instead...

6,481 posts

Ignoring that Relax and I already stated the mostly likely order of events in that thread, I wrote it in this thread too. It doesn't fit perfectly, indicating that one of the caps/multipliers aren't exact, but only one situation came even close to modeling the results.

Quote:

Winston Churchill wrote:

Scholar

1,054 posts

What about using the OAT weapon with Rana (since muli-hit WS can DA the first 2 hits)? Obviously, your WS gear set would be more similar to a Warrior's Kings Justice; but taking the DA 40% into account might make it more viable.

Quote:

You can't transform numbers into other numbers like that. It'd just go on forever. That's like witchcraft.

There's one guy I know who

Quote:

is a big deal now.

Guru

281 posts

doctorugh wrote:

What about using the OAT weapon with Rana (since muli-hit WS can DA the first 2 hits)? Obviously, your WS gear set would be more similar to a Warrior's Kings Justice; but taking the DA 40% into account might make it more viable.

"Testing of the GK here http://www.bluegartr.com/forum/showthread.php?t=90728&page=19

Look for DarkMagi's posts starting halfway down the page. The Occasionally attacks twice doesn't proc on WS"

bsphil wrote:

This is when bsphil wanders in to wonder what the f*ck you people have done.

Edited by bsphil

21,733 posts

Which isn't shocking, because that's how all OAT and OAxT weapons work.

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

gbaji wrote:

I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.

**B***i*__U__~~S~~
Smileys

**Post**

Anonymous Guests (17)