Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Apocalypse vs GHFollow

#1 Jan 10 2011 at 4:57 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,232 posts
There is certainly a use for this, but I'm debating including it in most of my DD setups as my third atma on THF.

So, assuming you start with RR/VV, we've had a few discussions recently on the advantages of GH, ScorpQueen, etc., but 15% triple attack is also pretty nice.

That's almost a straight 30% increase in damage (i.e. 15% triple attack is 2 extra swings each time--which also get TP to WS faster), downside being if you get too many triple attacks you'll be wasting TP more often with 125 TP WSes.

Gnarled horn is an increase of 20% to crit hit rate which increases both TP and WS (assuming evisc). To calculate TP would be easy (if I had a parser)--take a typical party and compare the average damage of each TP swing and compare it to the average damage of a crit hit. If it's double, it's a 20% increase in TP damage. WS damage should mirror that. Also, wiki says the counter rate is 10 to 20%, but it seems far lower than that to me. Any info on counter rate?

So GH would be very close (depending on ratio of damage a crit/non-crit and couter rate).

I'm also assuming here that TA takes precedent over DA (I can't ever keep track of where the status of that is).

I'm also excluding the 50AGI from GH on trick attack damage since, well, rarely do I seem to get a chance to trick attack onto anyone. Mostly because there are so few melee DD on a mob at once/sides being important/etc.

Unlimited RR is very nice, but there are definitely situations where I wouldn't want to bother with it if I can convince myself that GH can be better DD wise.
#2 Jan 11 2011 at 1:04 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,678 posts
RR/GH/Apoc go.
____________________________
Dooom wrote:
BG elitists <3 haste.

Allatards/uber casuals hate elitists.

Allatards/uber casuals hate haste, as valuing it would acknowledge that elitists are right


kerberoz wrote:
People don't hate emo kids because they're "misunderstood." People hate emo kids because they're useless.


Realix wrote:
PUP is an average to above average DD... when not in a zerg situation... or on particularly hard targets... and when properly configured... on windsday... with a RDM...
#3 Jan 11 2011 at 1:11 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
*
71 posts
Don't forget everything is situational. It might even be smart to use apocalypse and GH in certain situations.
#4 Jan 11 2011 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,755 posts
TybudX wrote:
RR/GH/Apoc go.

+1

Very hard not to use this combo fosure especially solo maybe change one for cloak and dagger or siren shadow if tanking or solo...
____________________________
....::: All Jobs 99 but GEO and RUN :::....
Genbu [O] Suzaku [O] Seiryu [O] Byakko [O] Kirin [O] In Loving Memory of Kirin RIP 3/6/05
xXIEOSIXx Forums on Shiva



#5 Jan 11 2011 at 9:33 AM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
VV does little for thf, no Str modded WS (except Mercy Stroke on Mandau) so it's essentially regain which may or may not drop a hit and 25 attack/5 DA. RR is almost Permanent, Apoc is also almost Permanent (the TA beats out even GH), and GH would be 3rd best atma for pure DD.
#6 Jan 11 2011 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
1 post
RR/GH/Apoc is the way to go most of the time.

The only change would possibly to swap Apoc out for a HP atma if you're tanking and need to break a certain threshold of HP due to a specific NM one-shot type move.

The AGI boost on GH helps greatly with TP given to the mob and thus limiting the nasty stuff it can do at times.(Some people missed this change that took place in the last update) Its also been stated the relationship between AGI and evasion further helps boosts our evasiveness.

Never give up RR if you plan on do any sort of damage.
#7 Jan 11 2011 at 10:19 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
***
1,713 posts
I personally think people over use RR often. It is not like DD is the had party of abyssea. Depending on the mob and size of group, !! triggering can be much harder than just killing the mob.

In these cases, people should use STP, Conserve TP, regain, type atmas. People might should even use different subs than normal (like war or drk or mnk) to gain access to more WS in total.

I know lots of players just exp/merit in abyssea. I have quit exping at all in abyssea. There is just too much exp to gain killing nms or whatever to bother with exp anymore. My last parse of nm spamming (on nm **** in Altepa) put the exp/hour of that run at about 60k. I know its really easy to break 100k+ an hour in exp, but with up to 60% of that exp rolling in with a 4 man group killing stuff that dops useful items, I see no point in using stones or time in a exp group (which likely is full of gimps and people with 2, 1 or no lunar abyssites).

So depending on type of group and goal, remember that DD is in no way hard. Using RR 100% is a waste.
____________________________
-LordTrey
99 THF, COR, DRK, BLM, WHM, DNC
Twashtar (90)
Leviathan
#8 Jan 11 2011 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
I have personally been tanking a lot of 'bigger' game. Bigger NMs require far more HP devolves thf into the tank role where 2 things matter. HP and keeping enmity.

I often have two HP atmas to push me into 3500hp range. Yes you DO need that much on some thigns, and it makes enmity loss from damage far less since the lost enmity is based on the % of your HP you loose. More HP means X damage is a smaller % of your total HP.

This leaves my HP covered but requires damage for both hate and kill speed. RR is a 1 stop shop for that. These big boss buggers (especially in new zones) have REALLY high def and even a little eva to deal with. RR covers all your bases brutally efficiently for DD on HNM class mobs and leaves my additional 2 atma slots open for survival.

On medium mobs, I will often drop the second HP atma for a DD related one. This is where I use GH for all the eva/subtleblow/Crit powa benefits.

On even smaller mobs, I will forgo HP atmas and go RR, GH, and either SA (neutral HP+atk/str), Omega(if i dont care about HP at all), or SS (if I feel i need a little HP over just cruor buff boost and enjoy the extra crit damage).

If I am in a larger group and there for procs, ill jsut replace SA/omega/SS with VV for regain and call it a day.

In every scenario I generally deal with, RR is a staple. Its just so brutally efficient for DD on thf with dex/crit rate/crit damage I cant give it up unless i am not doing a DD role in any capacity (hasnt happened yet. I guess if you are just a proc/TH monkey in a large group, but who wants to do that!)
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#9 Jan 11 2011 at 1:48 PM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
I would switch to a level 1 Dagger before I dropped RR Atma in Abyssea. It really is just that good.

Oh, and discernment says sup - when it finally decides to proc dammit.

Edited, Jan 11th 2011 4:11pm by Neisan
#10 Jan 11 2011 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,232 posts
Of course it's situational. My post was for damage output.

I don't have HP merits but as a galka with full abyssite merits I'm at 3K before atmas and if I need to use one for it, impreg tower puts me at 3800.

As for VV, it's advantages are: increasing fstr (isn't capped certainly on NMs with just cruor bonuses)/PDIF on all hits, 40 free TP a minute from regain, and the "roughly" straight 5% increase in damage from double attack.

Whether or not that is better than the 20% more crits (1.0 increase in PDIF plus the 38%ish damage bonus on crit), I'm not sure.

Triggering is a question of strategy that atmas minorly influence. You want a dedicated tank/healer and then people to trigger. You CAN get regain only atma and stand around, but it's usually better to just TP on side mobs and go in the for the triggering.

Really, discernment has a pretty high proc rate and makes it not nearly so bad to trigger provided you have the correct jobs around for the procing.

But, anyway, RR/GH/Apoc sounds interesting and for some reason I haven't tried it yet. I'll give that a go next time on THF.
#11 Jan 11 2011 at 4:15 PM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
Grrr stupid galkas. I have 4/6 abyssites of merit and 8/8 HP merits as a mithra. With TWO HP superior atmas+cruor buffs I am at about 3500 in normal gear. /hate galkas. When you only have 1 atma slot left to hurt things, its pretty clear to pick RR :P

I suppose I could create a more hybrid HP set with permanent dedicated HP slots, (especially since i recently got meridian ring etc) but then I will need to do a buncha work to determine if its better to get HP atma+DD gear or HP gear+DD atma.....and thats more work than I plan to do right now xD

But this is only really a concern for BIG boss mobs mostly in the new zones, or particularly ****** mobs like glavoid that can 1 shot the unwarry ><
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#12 Jan 11 2011 at 4:26 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,232 posts
Is one of your superior atmas ebon hoof? I think that's only 30% incraese where as impreg tower is 50%. Whereas SS is another 20% but also gives you some more critical hit damage. If you did impreg tower + SS you'd be about 3350 HP (if my numbers hold up) but have crit hit damage instead of sleep resist.
#13 Jan 11 2011 at 4:38 PM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
Whenever i need bawls to the wall hp i had been using ebon hoof+Impreg tower+RR. I was under teh impression that both were 30% hp buff since wiki doesnt list exact % on tower. But that is easily verified when I next get online. That would be good to know if there is a difference. Might get away with tower+ the 'good' perma hp gear swaps (full time meridian ring, gigant mantle etc).
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#14 Jan 12 2011 at 12:00 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,983 posts
Quote:
I don't have HP merits but as a galka with full abyssite merits I'm at 3K before atmas and if I need to use one for it, impreg tower puts me at 3800.
Freaking galkas -.-. Probably the best overall race.

I was thinking RR/Apoc myself and for a third, I couldn't decide between GH and Alpha & Omega. I was thinking Dark Depths or Scorpion Queen before, but after the wiki has been recently updated, both of these atma seem a lot weeker.

The OP had a question but the answer was to replace VV instead. But that being said though, I do wonder about A&O vs GH. 10% triple is going to be less than 20% increased DPS but it's still a lot. I'm not sure what pDif typically rides at in Abyssea. Pre-abyssea, ~1.0 pDif average in merit parties was very common evenw ith good equip. If it's the same now, then a crit doubles damage. So doubling dmg, 20% crit from GH is slightly better for dmg during the TP phase. But triple attack from A&O not only increases melee DPS, but also TP gain.

So I'd say for the TP phase, A&O beats GH. But GH should be better in the WS phase. 20% crit rate at 1.0 pDif is 20% more dmg, but pdif is probably a little higher than 1.0 in a WS set. The big difference here is that whereas in the TP phase, A&O gave an almost 20% boost in DPS, it:s not going to do that for WS's because of the 8-hit cap.


To re-iterate, is GH's WS dmg advantage and extra AGI more important than extra TP gain from A&O in terms of overall damage?
____________________________
Shamaya, Asura
#15 Jan 12 2011 at 6:10 AM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
I'd have to look over the math again but from what I recall for dual wielding Gnarled was higher overall damage than A/O, assuming the other two atma were RR & Apocalypse.

Edited, Jan 12th 2011 8:11am by Neisan
#16 Jan 12 2011 at 8:28 AM Rating: Good
***
3,775 posts
There are a lot of choices to play with, but personally I think scorpion queen is better than gnarled horn. 50 agi/10% crit rate for sTP +20 is a better trade than you may think. My favorite full DD set is currently RR + SQ + VV because I haven't gotten apoc from shinryu yet. We used to say one point of haste was worthless and blitz ring was bad until we realized fights don't last a set duration and because of this just 1% haste gave predictable returns over time. VV's regain should also raise WS frequency over time in a similar fashion because of this, and 50 str (25 atk) and 5% DA doesn't hurt. I'll definitely try out apoc when I get it though, but right now I have a very high ws frequency and a 68% melee crit rate, and since evisceration raises crit % by 10-15% at 100% tp anyway I still get monstrous weaponskill results, but I'm getting far more of them than if I had chosen a full damage only atma selection.

Don't underestimate sTP (major)!!! I think you guys should really try Scorpion Queen instead of Gnarled Horn. The triple atma selection of Razed Ruins + Scorpion Queen + Apocalypse looks very!! nice, and I think that will be my DD combo of choice once I get red on shin.

Edited, Jan 12th 2011 9:31am by Melphina
____________________________
[ffxisig]56619[/ffxisig]

There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#17 Jan 12 2011 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,232 posts
FYI, not sure if it has actually be verified but someone changed VV to be 10% DA on wiki.
#18 Jan 12 2011 at 3:15 PM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
Brb, changing it back.

To Melphina, after doing more testing I'm going to have to agree, it seems dropping hits to 100 TP was more important than I thought (should be basic but I never get it quite right with dualwielding). RR/SQ/Apoc should be best then.
#19 Jan 13 2011 at 10:12 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,580 posts
What about Alpha/Omega instead of Apoc? You lose 5% Triple Attack but you get a hefty +50 Attack.
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#20 Jan 14 2011 at 6:53 AM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
50 attack isn't competitive with 5% TA at all.
#21 Jan 14 2011 at 7:04 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
*
207 posts
Noodles wrote:
What about Alpha/Omega instead of Apoc? You lose 5% Triple Attack but you get a hefty +50 Attack.

Well no
Neisan wrote:
50 attack isn't competitive with 5% TA at all.

I'll answer differently. Since you probably use Raze Ruins with another CritRate Atma (Gnarled Horn or Dark Depth) you should be on caped or almost on those 74% (or above) crit hit. Therefore, Atk do less than Triple Atk (more CritHit).
____________________________
Prepare your barbecue! Tarutaru eater is back!
#22 Jan 14 2011 at 11:28 AM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
I wouldnt write off atk so fast. Dont forget since everything but haste has diminishing returns, 'stacking' any 1 stat becomes a larger trade off the more of it you stack, while the reverse is true as well. Basically, the more multi-hit you have, the less effective adding more is. Also the less multi you have the more effective adding more is. Same for atk. The less you have the more important it is and vice versa.

The exact breaking points depend on the value of each compared stat and other junk (mob stats, etc). With that said, I wouldnt write off attack so fast when we have so much accesss to multi hit gear/atmas and still really short on the atk end as we always have been.

Also dont forget, all our crazy crit damage boost stuff is STILL affected by atk. Think of crit damage boost like piercing damage boost for crits. You dont stop using atk on birds because you get 'free' damage boost. You use as much as you can get because it is all multiplied by the extra 'free' damage.
___________________________________________________________________________________
So some hypothetical situations to consider:
Crit rate: RR+GH+Raider legs+Ddex+merits+base5%=78% crit rate.
Crit Dam: 8% trait, 30% RR=38% crit damage boost
DA: Twilight belt2%, Brutal5%, Atheling3%=10%
TA: Base+merits+Raid head=13%
______________________________________________________________________________________
Multi Hit:

So: (Assuming TA procs before DA based on a recent thread floating around here)
with an additional 10% DA from A/O atma:
TA:23%
DA:10%
Total additional hits per 100 base attacks: 151.4

With 15% from Apoc:
TA:28%
DA:10%
Total additional hits per 100 base attacks: 160.4

getting 5% more triple attack is a net gain of: 1604/151.5=1.0595 or 5.95% more hits.

Apoc gets 5.95% more hits over time than A/O atma under the above assumptions (TA procs before DA and in the listed gear).

So the question is, does 50 atk do more melee damage than 5.95% more hits (and it has to win by a decent margin to beat the associated 5.95% more TP as well. But much of that is lost in overflow, so it will not equal 5.95% more WS in practice).
___________________________________________
APOC

Lets assume 1.0 pdif for both simplicity and the fact that thf atk generally sucks a lot.

A crit will put our ratio at 2.0. Multiplied by our 38% damage boose= 2.76x the damage of a non-crit. We crit at 78% crit rate with GH/RR/merits and Raid pants+2. So per every 100 hits landed:

100 hits=
78 will crit at 2.76x noncrit power.
22 will not crit and land for 1x power.
So you do the equvalent damage of 237.28 hits at 1.0 Pdif every 100 hits.

But we dont hit 100 timer per 100. With Apoc atma and DA gear, we actually hit (worked above) 160.4 times, or 160.4% more.

1.604*237.28=380.6

380.6 is our base number with apoc, GH, RR. Every 100 hits at 1 pdif, the multi hits and crits bring our total damage up 380.6%. Multi hits+crits make us do 3.8x more damage than 0 crits and 0 multi hits. Lets see what 50 atk might do at teh expense fo 5% triple.
__________________________________________________________________________
A/OMEGA

Here I am just removing that 5% TA for the multi hit and boosting Pdif to account for 50 atk. 50 atk against an IT-ish mob starting at 1.0 should be 'roughly' 0.1 boost to Pdif. So instead of 1.0, we would have about 1.1. This is an estimate and can vary depending on your exact atk and the mob level difference, but it will be close enough to see if it is even in the same ballpark as 5% more TA. So lets go!

Same calculations as above but boosting the base Pdif to 1.1 and dropping the multi hit multiplier down from 160.4 hits (apoc) to 151.4 (A/O) gives us the damage equivalents of:

A crit at 1.1 pdif with 1.0 pdif boost from crit and 38% damage boost=2.1*1.38=2.89. A crit does 2.89x more damage than a 1.0 pdif hit.

100 hits=
78 will crit at 2.89x noncrit power.
22 will not crit and land for 1.1x power.
So you do the equvalent damage of 250.24 hits at 1.0 Pdif every 100 hits.

But again, were not hitting 100 times. Toss in the (5% TA lower) multi hits of 151.4 or 151.4% more hits and we get:

1.514*250.24= 378.9

378.9 is our base number with A/O, GH, RR. Every 100 hits at 1 pdif, the multi hits, crits and 50 atk(+0.1pdif) bring our total damage up 378.9%. Multi hits+crits+atk make us do 3.789x more damage than 0 crits and 0 multi hits and +0atk.
_________________________________________________________________________

With the following assumptions of:
1.0 pdif
Specified multi hit and crit rate gear(13% TA, 10% DA, 4% crit rate in gear)
RR+GH atmas (with 3rd being either Apoc of A/O)
That TA procs before DA
50 atk adds 0.1 pdif

Apoc does ~0.5% more damage than A/O.
_________________________________________________________________________

The 5% TA rate is virtually identical to 50atk in raw DPS (wins by the SLIGHTEST hair, but considering the generalized nature of my assumptions, it is to close to call and can swing either way based on bajillions of factors)

However, this is only DPS. This does not include the extra TP from APoc. Nor does it attempt to calculate WS damage (gut says WS damage will favor A/O due to 8hit caps and only the ability for 2 hits to multi hit while atk affects ALL hits. Basically the amount of damage from multi hits drops through the floor on WS compared to TP). With increased TP from Apoc and increased WS damage from A/O, its probably, again, a wash and will vary a lot based on situation/WS spammage etc.

Long story short, it looks like (from some relatively basic) calcs that the overall they are to close to call without some really obscene and **** calcualtions for VERY specific scenarios. Heaven forbid you change the other 2 atmas, get any buffs, fight exceedingly high or low level mobs or use different gear than that listed for this example.

However, I will say that I originally placed my bet on A/O before this and now see that it is far closer than I had imagined. This also ignores the other aspects of the atmas. A/O shoots your HP total in the foot. Apoc gives perma RR and quick cast. Once you factor in those non-damage related pros/cons I will be personally be using Apoc over A/O from now on (once i get stupid apoc atma....) since the raw damage is not heavily skewed towards A/O as i thought it would.

____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#23 Jan 14 2011 at 11:44 AM Rating: Good
Sage
***
1,294 posts
I am glad I stopped doing the math because Banalaty did it so much better than I would have. Food for thought also, That base TA rate can jump from 23% all the way to 29% if you are using Triplus Dagger and Epona's Ring (I think that is the one with 3% TA and 3% DA), further decreasing the margin of Apocalypse purported benefit.
#24 Jan 14 2011 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
Ah somehow the ring entirely slipped my mind. I considered the dagger, but left it alone since I wanted to apply it to all dagger combos to widen the applicable side of the info. Either way, your point still stands. The more Triple attack stuff we get, the less appealing adding more becomes.

I still dont know what the proc rate of the AF set is on triple attacks and that would obviously boost the initial power of TA the more AF+2 is used, but it just bumps the bar higher. TA will still diminish, but the exact point that other DD 'stuff' that takes up the same 'slot' the TA does (gear/atma etc) beats said TA in a given 'slot' will just be moved up a bit, not negated (if that makes any sense). I cant stress this enough, my previous post was a very generalized 'ball park' estimate. There a TONS of things that will adjust the outcome in a real game scenario of something less than half a % different. Both are 'close' to each other. IMHO, close enough that the additional stats (-HP vs RR/Quick Cast) far outweigh any tiny damage boost that will swing either way constantly.
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#25 Jan 14 2011 at 1:41 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
4,864 posts
Banalaty wrote:
I have personally been tanking a lot of 'bigger' game. Bigger NMs require far more HP devolves thf into the tank role where 2 things matter. HP and keeping enmity.

I often have two HP atmas to push me into 3500hp range. Yes you DO need that much on some thigns, and it makes enmity loss from damage far less since the lost enmity is based on the % of your HP you loose. More HP means X damage is a smaller % of your total HP.

This leaves my HP covered but requires damage for both hate and kill speed. RR is a 1 stop shop for that. These big boss buggers (especially in new zones) have REALLY high def and even a little eva to deal with. RR covers all your bases brutally efficiently for DD on HNM class mobs and leaves my additional 2 atma slots open for survival.

On medium mobs, I will often drop the second HP atma for a DD related one. This is where I use GH for all the eva/subtleblow/Crit powa benefits.

On even smaller mobs, I will forgo HP atmas and go RR, GH, and either SA (neutral HP+atk/str), Omega(if i dont care about HP at all), or SS (if I feel i need a little HP over just cruor buff boost and enjoy the extra crit damage).

If I am in a larger group and there for procs, ill jsut replace SA/omega/SS with VV for regain and call it a day.

In every scenario I generally deal with, RR is a staple. Its just so brutally efficient for DD on thf with dex/crit rate/crit damage I cant give it up unless i am not doing a DD role in any capacity (hasnt happened yet. I guess if you are just a proc/TH monkey in a large group, but who wants to do that!)


This. For me the equation result isn't about most damage anymore, it's about what I can accomplish solo/duoboxed or with whoever is available and wants the extra seals/+2 items, etc.

I typically go with RR/MC/SS
____________________________
Carbuncle


#26 Jan 14 2011 at 2:19 PM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
Sanguine Scythe's addition to Crit damage is severely depreciated not only due to the Crit damage cap but also due to Thf having 2 critical attack bonus traits, you're not even getting half of the crit damage+ from Sang Scythe. I wouldn't recommend it.

Edited, Jan 14th 2011 4:19pm by Neisan
#27 Jan 14 2011 at 2:45 PM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts
Unless im mistaken (always possible :P), SS is 20% crit damage. RR is 30% and our trait (lv2) is 8% and there is an overal cap of 50%. You should get 12/20 using RR, Traits and SS and get more than half of SS boost. I dont mean to sound like I reccomend it for DD, but it also has 20% hp buff. 'superior' HP atmas have no DD stats but give 30%hp and zero damage boost of any kind. (Side note to a previous question: I checked and both ebon hoof and impreg. Tower are identical HP buffs).

I only reccomend SS for what it is, a hybrid atma. When you want HP, but dont feel you need the full 30% hp buffs to be safe, drop only a little HP but get a little boost (12%) to crit damage. Its better than 10% more HP that you dont need, and better than 0% hp buff when you do need hp.

It will never be the best atma for raw DD power if that is what you need at that time.
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#28 Jan 14 2011 at 2:49 PM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
10% Removed automatically from damage cap, RR+Traits, 12% out of 30% is what I meant, assuming no other crit damage gear.

Edited, Jan 14th 2011 4:50pm by Neisan
#29 Jan 14 2011 at 3:06 PM Rating: Good
*
75 posts
I took the liberty to copy pasta Banalty to check now RR/A-0/Apoc combo.

So we'll have 58% crit, +50 attack and +25% triple attack.

100 hits=
58 will crit at 2.89x noncrit power.
42 will not crit and land for 1.1x power.
So you do the equivalent damage of 213.82 hits at 1.0 Pdif every 100 hits.

But we don't hit 100 times per 100. With Apoc atma and A/O, we actually hit 182.2 times, or 82.2% more.

1.822* 213.82=389.58

/surprised lol

I have never rolled with this combo, but i wanted to test it for a while now (specially when i get +2 body and hands lol). Nice to know that it can work.


Edited, Jan 14th 2011 4:12pm by Laphine
#30 Jan 14 2011 at 3:10 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
597 posts
Sorry to derail a bit but I have a quick question about triple attack. I whm/nin quite a bit, hexa is a 6 hit ws, 7 with offhand. Given that there's an 8 attack per round cap, does it being 7/8 prevent TA from procing or can it proc but only 1 hit will take place, leading to an 8 attack round (assuming all hits connect)?

Trying to figure out if AO is worth it for me.
#31 Jan 14 2011 at 5:09 PM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
It's still one of the Best Atmas for DoT regardless of not proc'ing on Weaponskills from the looks of it. Went back and double checked and seems I underestimated A/O, it's doing better than I originally had listed, turns out A/O was set to 5% TA for some reaosn >.< fixed it and it's winning now.

Edited, Jan 14th 2011 7:16pm by Neisan
#32 Jan 14 2011 at 10:01 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,236 posts
Neisan wrote:
It's still one of the Best Atmas for DoT regardless of not proc'ing on Weaponskills from the looks of it. Went back and double checked and seems I underestimated A/O, it's doing better than I originally had listed, turns out A/O was set to 5% TA for some reaosn >.< fixed it and it's winning now.



Can you clarify what you 'fixed'? Initial eyeball estimates had it at 10%, but further testing indicated it was 5%. It does do very well on my spreadsheets if it's set to 10%, but if that's not the actual proc rate you're just overinflating the numbers.
#33 Jan 14 2011 at 10:52 PM Rating: Good
***
3,775 posts
Personally I would take Atma of the Apocalypse over alpha omega even if the damage was slightly less because of the utility. Apocalypse has permanent reraise 3 whereas alpha/omega reduces your maximum hp by 25%. The difference between 50 attack and 5% triple attack may favor one atma over the other, but it won't be a major difference by any means. Permanent RR 3 means you just saved a lot of gil by never buying a reraise item again, and losing 25% hp is going to get you killed more often which has implications that go beyond just the cost of RR items.

I've said it before, but I will reiterate it again. My personal favorite "standard" atma combo for thief is this

Atma of the Apocalypse (I just got this today, I am very happy with it)
Razed Ruins -- This needs no explination
Atma of the Scorpion Queen

You could argue Gnarled Horn in place of scorpion queen, but I've had wonderful results with it. sTP + 20 spams weaponskills surprisingly well (even better now that I have apocalypse), and I only lose 10% crit rate and 50 agility which is most noticable with trick attack (while guard and the subtle blow effect of agi are there they are less of a concern). I have an evasion set to swap into so if I can't dodge a mob in that then there is nothing the 50 agi on gnarled horn can do to protect me in my standard tp gear (worst case scenario is a mage may have to cure me (oh no!) or I swap in the stronghold or plaguebringer to solo with). I've gotten great results with this combo, and it really shines for me in a wonderful way.

Edited, Jan 14th 2011 11:53pm by Melphina
____________________________
[ffxisig]56619[/ffxisig]

There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
#34 Jan 15 2011 at 12:25 AM Rating: Default
**
785 posts
EDIT: Seems it was setting it to 10% that was causing the inflation, using pld sheet and making 'dummy' TA Trait+merits RR/Apoc/GH seems to be in the lead again unless I overlooked something. Scorp Queen is right behind it and is quite close, while A/O is now behind both if it's 5% TA.

Edited, Jan 15th 2011 2:37am by Neisan
#35 Jan 15 2011 at 8:20 AM Rating: Good
***
2,270 posts

Quote:
Can you clarify what you 'fixed'? Initial eyeball estimates had it at 10%, but further testing indicated it was 5%. It does do very well on my spreadsheets if it's set to 10%, but if that's not the actual proc rate you're just overinflating the numbers.


I must have missed this info. I went with the assumption A/O was 10%. If its only 5, then it wont even keep up with apoc. Is Apoc still at 15% or is that exaggerated as well?
____________________________
Aanalaty, Mithra of San d'Oria
99Thf/99Drg/99Rng/95Pld/Secret Job 92
Bonecraft-100+3 7/29/08
Lu Shangs-5/28/08
Twashtar-90
Ryunohige-75: 1/7/2012
Mandau-75: 3/9/2012

Maat-1/1 Thf Meleed (pansies steal)
Some of mah gearz: http://www.ffxiah.com/player/Lakshmi/Aanalaty#item-sets
Join 'People Against The Heart Snatcher' and help put Thfs on the right P.A.T.H.S. today!
#36 Jan 15 2011 at 10:45 AM Rating: Good
*
180 posts
My wyvern had a 9.8something% triple attack rate over 2k attack rounds when my drg was using A/O, so I'm pretty sure it's not 5%.

Edited, Jan 15th 2011 11:45am by LafingCat
#37 Jan 15 2011 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,236 posts
Set up a short test to help verify this for myself.

Mnk/sam using a staff. All forms of DA equipment kept in mog sack. Exception: AF3+2 pants have +kick attacks, but since they can't proc with staff, ignored.

Atma: RR, Siren Shadow, A/O. Only form of atma multi-attack is the +TA on A/O.

Only form of DA should be Zanshin.

Summary data:

Melee Data 
 
Player               # Melee Attacks    # Melee Rounds    Attacks/Round    # Extra Attacks 
Motenten                         474               406                1                 68 
 
Player               # +1 Rounds   # +2 Rounds   # +3 Rounds   # +4 Rounds    # >+4 Rounds 
Motenten                      16            26             0             0               0 
 
Player               # MultiAttack Rounds    MultiAttack %     Kills w/Min Attacks    Kills w/<Min Attacks 
Motenten                               42          10.74 %                      15                       0 
 
 
Treat As: 
 
Multi-attacks per attack (2x/3x): 
 
Player               # Double Attacks    DA Rate    Perc. DA     # Triple Attacks    TA Rate    Perc. TA 
Motenten                           16     4.09 %     38.10 %                   26     6.65 %     61.90 % 
 
Multi-attacks per attack (Zanshin): 
 
Player               # Missed First Attacks    # DA w/Missed First   Possible Zanshin % 
Motenten                                 15                      3              20.00 % 
 
Player               Acc. Rate of First Attacks    Acc. Rate of Second Attacks 
Motenten                                96.31 %                       100.00 %




3 Zanshin occurances should be removed.

15 rounds had 1 attack on the killing round, and thus need to be excluded from consideration.

At least 3 kills had 2 attacks occur on the killing round. Can treat those as TAs.


The remaining +1 rounds need to be examined. Checking detail records:

  1/15/2011 11:37:15 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:37:20 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:37:21 AM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 11:37:25 AM -- 1 Attack


Most likely a split TA round.

  1/15/2011 11:42:22 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:42:30 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:42:32 AM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 11:42:38 AM -- 1 Attack


Possibly a split TA round.

  1/15/2011 11:48:32 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:48:37 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:48:38 AM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 11:48:43 AM -- 1 Attack


Most likely a split round.

  1/15/2011 11:49:44 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:49:48 AM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 11:49:49 AM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 11:49:53 AM -- 1 Attack


Most likely a split round.

  1/15/2011 12:15:09 PM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 12:15:19 PM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 12:15:20 PM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 12:15:26 PM -- 1 Attack


Most likely a split round.

  1/15/2011 12:29:55 PM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 12:30:00 PM -- 1 Attack 
  1/15/2011 12:30:01 PM -- 2 Attacks 
  1/15/2011 12:30:07 PM -- 1 Attack


Most likely a split round.


So 6 more rounds that can be marked as TAs, and also a reduction in base number of rounds by 6.


406 base rounds
- 15 min kill rounds
- 3 zanshin rounds
- 6 split rounds
= 382 remaining rounds

+1 rounds = 16 - 3 - 3 - 6 = 4
+2 rounds = 26 + 3 + 6 = 35


The remaining 4 +1 rounds are uncertain. Are probably TA procs, but exact nature is undefined (ie: whether they're split rounds or kills), so how to reintegrate them is a bit fuzzy. Will consider adding them in as is.

35 TAs out of 382 rounds = 9.16%
39 TAs out of 382 rounds = 10.21%


Both values approximate 10%, and the confidence interval for each (~3% @95%) tends to rule out 5% proc rate.

So it seems there were issues with the previous tests I'd seen on the A/O proc rate, and it's most likely 10% rather than 5%.

Will adjust my spreadsheets accordingly.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 16 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (16)