Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Slug Shot?Follow

#27 Aug 28 2009 at 10:48 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
The -40Racc you quoted has NOTHING to do with Thf/Rng racc loss.

It looks like you quoted my post without actually reading it at all. I didn't mention thf/rng anywhere in it. I talked only about barrage.


Actually lil buddy, I was referring to when you said this. In the same post as your -40 Racc from Slug.

Queen Noodles wrote:
Someone using a weapon with -40 native accuracy from skill


My dislike for you only has to do with your moronic posts coming in here and calling me stupid (lol) and acting like a complete unprovoked douche bag for my asking to compare gear sets. I asked you to stop posting about this several posts ago. I gave you several reasons why it CAN be effective, and even admitted that it isn't useful for everytihng. When you ignored me, I said "/shrug, who gives a sh*t" and tried to move on. This idiotic little anti THF/RNG rampage of yours is starting to become entertaining.

THE REASON to put racc in your barrage set is because of the way feint works. The effect weakens over time, from very potent at the start to gradually weaker at the end. There is no good reason not to put racc in your barrage macro because the purpose is less about barrage's damage on its own and more about getin 100 tp instantly from it in order to WS again.

Shamaya wrote:
I tried this. With feint on I wiffed everything and people laughed at me, lol. Had sushi as well. I came lowest on the parse. I can't remember how much ranged acc equip I had on. Maybe with a full heavy r acc build. Usually feint should be enough but it just didn't seem to do the job on Kirin. And not like you're going to get preludes in a zerg.


If you could recall what your gear set was (even vaguely) I'd be most grateful. Do you have marksmenship merits? How far away were you shooting from? Was it just on Kirin that that one time?

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 2:50pm by ThiefKiller

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 4:27pm by ThiefKiller

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 4:27pm by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#28 Aug 28 2009 at 1:09 PM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
And again you're missing the point that if you are at acc cap anyway, more racc does nothing. You're going to barrage almost immidiatly after slug shot. maybe 5-10 seconds. Are you telling me feint weakens so much in that 5-10 seconds that you go from being able to wear full STR on a native -40acc WS to having to put on full racc for barrage? Do you then use the same barrage racc set for your second slug shot? The quip post by the other guy swaps out heca harness and flame ring for skadi and behemoth, meaning essentially, you're gaining about +60 racc from your slug shot to barrage. Are you really telling me feint loses 60acc power in 5-10 seconds? I think not.

The fact is you quoted my post which had nothing to do with thf/rng and talked only about barrage and then continued to talk about something completely different. But if you want to go back to talking about thf/rng then lets go for it.

As Shamaya has said too, you can have feint and sushi and still suck for racc.
Feint isn't insta-capped acc if your skill/acc is low to start. Yes, you can have 246 skill with 8 merits, and yes, you can add a futher 12 skill from gear. But whilst we're talking about that 12 skill: Why would you use Faith Torque? PCC is better. Ditto for Gun Belt and Buccaneer's Belt. Gun belt will give 5 Att and 4-or-5 Acc. Buccaneer's 4Str and 7Racc is better in every way. Torque will probably give 6racc and 7ratt, and 4racc from PCC will be better than 7Ratt.

So we'll ignore those 12 skill points because they are gained through bad gear choices.

So. 246 Skill. Let's say you have 71Agi, +22 from traits. And for gear, let's take this set, posted above:
fire staff / axe grip /
skadi's mask / light gorget(Faith for barrage) / triumph *2
Hecatomb body (skadi's for barrage)/ skadi's hands / rajas / flame (behemoth for barrage)
amemet / bucaneer's belt / skadi's legs / hecatomb feet

Gorget is 10Racc. Culverin is -10Racc, so we'll cancel those out. Slug shot @100%TP is -40Racc. The only Racc you have is 9AGI from skadi and +21 from skadi/bucc and gorget/pcc.

We'll assume squid sushi, 15% Racc, and we'll assume Kirin for the mob, who is level 92.

First let's figure out your Racc. 200+(46*0.9)+(80/2)+22+21= 324 (.4). +Sushi's 15% is (47) is 351. -10 from culverin and +10 from PCC/gorget cancel out, and we have -40 from slug. Sharpshot is an unknown increase, but we'll assume +40 to negate slugshot's penalty. That's 351 Racc. Just for refference now, 351 racc is 66% on a Lv82 Greater Colibri.

A Lv82 Colibri gives you a -28 acc penalty through level correction. Kirin is Lv92, 17 levels above you. that means you'll have a -68 penalty through level correction. If Kirin had the same evasion as a colibri, you would have 47% hit rate. He doesn't, his evasion will be higher. He's a SMN, so let's assume he has E skill in evasion. Gaining 2 skill per level, or +20 skill over a colibri. or +18 eva (20*0.9). that means you're down another 9% acc.

So let's say you're now around 40% Racc with the above posted gear and sushi. To be capped racc, you're going to need Feint to give -105 Evasion bonus. Feint does not give 105 eva down.

This is just math, and estimates, but everything is accounted for. Level correction, gear, AGI, traits, sharpshot, merits, everything.

But if you will ignore this and say "you haven't tried it so you wouldn't know, feint is that powerful", then I'll leave you with this. Why, the time befor last we did Baha V2, where a leader messed up the bard rotation, and the Drk party ended up missing madrigal (SV 2 mad is 106 acc), yet feint was up, did the drks all still whiff with their Ridills and MKs?

Feint is not insta cap. You're going to be at 40% acc ish (if that:, kirin could have higher evasion) with sushi in the above gear (lifted from a post above) befor feint. That's 40% taking into account /rng acc bonus, sushi, snapshot, the lot.

Don't call me stupid and ignorant. I know how most sh*t works and from the way you gear barrage and the little you post about hit rate and feint, I evidentally know it a lot better than you.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 9:11pm by Noodles
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#29Queen Noodles, Posted: Aug 28 2009 at 1:13 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) This doesn't matter much as Snapshot negates the distance:acc penalty, and Shamaya mentions whiffing a lot.
#30 Aug 28 2009 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
******
22,699 posts
Wiki says the initial effect of feint is -50% evasion. So if that's true, it would indeed be at least +100acc. But that's wiki, so I'm not really going to instantly trust their numbers.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#31 Aug 28 2009 at 2:02 PM Rating: Good
****
7,106 posts
Quote:
Or is it 258 with Gun Belt and Faith Torque? (Hint: that's 11 skill points shy of an unmerited marksmanship RNG).

Hint: a naked unmerited RNG still has 2 ACC traits on you. He's also probably wearing clothes with stats on them in the slots where you are getting your skill.

You're kind of outing yourself as math-impaired when you focus on that skill number as if it closes the gap with RNG. Skill is just ACC and ATK, and you aren't nearly close to even an unmerited RNG.
#32 Aug 28 2009 at 2:44 PM Rating: Good
***
1,064 posts
Caesura wrote:
Quote:
Or is it 258 with Gun Belt and Faith Torque? (Hint: that's 11 skill points shy of an unmerited marksmanship RNG).

Hint: a naked unmerited RNG still has 2 ACC traits on you. He's also probably wearing clothes with stats on them in the slots where you are getting your skill.

You're kind of outing yourself as math-impaired when you focus on that skill number as if it closes the gap with RNG. Skill is just ACC and ATK, and you aren't nearly close to even an unmerited RNG.


Tha particlar comment was in response to an arguement that the idea was lol becuase thf has 220 Marskmanship skill (Base is 230 actually but I digress).

Not that thf was magically closing some gap with RNG. Just that within the realm of gear merits and feint, that we can close the acc deficiency gap that Noodles is arguing.

I have no interest in comparing THF to RNG or to SAM or to MNK or to any othe "Heavy DD"

I have no delusions that THF/anything is going to consistantly win zerg parses with the big boys.

But what frustrates me are statements like this.

Quote:
Your primary roles are feint and treasure hunter. You're kidding yourself if you think that you're there for damage


My friend, you lost all credibility with me on that statement.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 7:33pm by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#33 Aug 28 2009 at 4:25 PM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
A greater colibri has 334/339 Evasion. Naked I have 285 Dagger skill and 108 H2H.

Checking Coli, needs 349 to con Low Eva (80.5%) (Dagger, Ohat/PCC/Homam Feet/Homam hands/Swift Belt). (Swapping Feet to Sniper's Ring checks neutral)

This is interesting in it's self, As with -24 through level correction, you should need 358 for 75% Acc right? (And thus 369 for 80.5%)? If that's right then Why does the mob check Low Eva with 20 acc less than that? Have I made a mistake somewhere?


Well, let's try and get back to the test. If feint is -50%, then the coli will have 167 Evasion, and I will need 175 Acc +12 (as feint lowers evasion, not evasion and level, so the lvl correction remains the same), or 187 Acc.

My H2H is 108, 80DEX, acc naked is 148. so +40Acc should make the mob con Low Evasion.

SH, PCC, OHat, Homam Hands/Feet should be enough. I will use life belt too, which will put me +10 over that.

So with this gear, empty handed with feint up, the same checked colibri should con low evasion. Even if I have made a mistake in the math, it will still con neutral evasion, I can't be that far off. Let's test.

Applying Feint, empty handed, with SA. 108 Skill, 80Dex and +50 Acc in gear exactly (10more than I should need)
:53 Feint applied
:54 Neutral Evasion
:48 Neutral Evasion
:03 Neutral Evasion
:06 High Evasion
:17 Hide
:22 Feint wears off

So let's try gearing for the High Evasion threashold, the same colibri. If I need 187 Acc for 80.5%, I will need 145 for 59.5%, so, I should get check neutral completely naked. let's test with +20 Acc.

With +20Acc:
:18 Feint applied
:20 Neutral Evasion
:23 High Evasion

A second test, This time I will equip a lone sniper's ring and no other acc gear. This is to counter any lag between the initial hit and the first check.

On the same mob:
:33 Applied
:35 Neutral Evasion
:37 High Evasion

This is interesting, whilst it seems I do innitially turn the mob to neutral evasion, which supports a -50% evasion boost. It seems I jump from neutral to high evasion at the same speed in both cases, even though I have 20acc more in the first instance.

Once more, completely naked (now with 110 skill, skillup ftl), feint (applied through SA in every instance):
:09 Applied
:09 High Evasion
:11 High Evasion

This is such a much more bodge job that I had hoped for, so I'm going to spoiler all the above and post the following, which is concise enough. Theres a 5acc difference between it innitially conning neutral eva or not.

With feint up, Lv81 colibri
150 Acc (110 skill, 80 dex) = low evasion
155 Acc (+sniper) = neutral evasion

We know hit rate: When Player_Acc = Mob_Eva, Hit rate= 75% +(mob_level/2)%

Let's say 155 Acc gives 60% hit rate on a mob 6 levels above the player. Then 185 Acc will give 75%, meaning the mob wlll habe 185-24 Evasion, or 161 Evasion. (That correct?)

That means feint is giving either static -170 Eva, OR 52% decrease. The latter being more likely.

My numbers may be off, and I'm still confused as to why the mob checks Low Eva 20acc lower than it should in the innitial dagger test, but it does seem that feint gives a reduction of 50% eva.

However, what confuses me is whilst my Neutral-Low tests seemed to prove this, my high-neutral tests did not at all. Maybe I did not check fast enough originally? Repeated again, using more acc than should be required to con low evasion, and it still never conned high evasion.

I'm lost. This is such a bodged post, but hey. I tried.

Edit: I'm also confused why all our ridill drks can't hit **** without madrigal AND feint. NQ madrigal is enough, but without mad compltely they are useless.

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 12:32am by Noodles
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#34 Aug 28 2009 at 4:28 PM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
ThiefKiller wrote:
Quote:
Your primary roles are feint and treasure hunter. You're kidding yourself if you think that you're there for damage


My friend, you lost all credibility with me on that statement.
I'm sorry but it's completely true. In terms of raw damage, a Drg, War, Sam, Drk, Rng all have higher potential output. If Thf didn't have feint or treasure hunter, why would you invite one over an equally geared war/sam/drg/drg/rng/etc? You wouldn't.
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#35 Aug 28 2009 at 5:07 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,064 posts
Decided to look over the math. lol I’m not very good so correct me if I am wrong here.

Naked Racc from skill and traits:

Marksmanship Merited THF

200 + .9*46 = 241 + 22 = 263

Unmerited RNG

200 + .9*69 = 262 + 48 = 310

+47 Racc on THF

Marksmanship Merited RNG

200 + .9*85 = 276 + 48 = 324

+61Racc on THF

Racc form AGL between the 2 jobs is going to be within a negligible margin and both have sharp shot.

So a naked RNG has a native 47-61 Racc over a THF

I have never personally done any testing on how strong feint is or isn’t. Wiki quotes Feint as being -50% mob evasion. Other tests I have read have claimed it to be least 50-60. Either way, feint is potent enough to close that Racc deficiency on a naked fully merited marksmanship ranger.

The issue of gear. We can wear a lot of the same gear. But I’m sure that certain pieces would tilt the scale a bit in favour of RNG.

The issue of Ratt. At the time of a zerg, mobs are going to be debuffed all to **** and you will also be crazy attack buffed. So then with food, on the issue of crazy evasive mobs you can use pot-au-feu. Ones that aren’t so evasive you can eat meat dishes.

But we aren’t really competing with Rng damage on this, just our own dagger damage. The main reason I prefer it is because our dagger WS’s are limited to being stacked in most fights. And on many of them you can’t SAWS because of spike flail. So being able to pump out 3 strong WS plus barrage plus a few fully geared TA and SA has always appealed to me.

The point of this was never to say that THF/RNG is the LEEEETEST LEET OGWFBBQ zerg DD there ever was or that we were better than (whatever job) at zerg DD. The point of this is that if we are going to be there for feint and TH already, we should also maximize damage. There are many fights where THF/RNG can achieve this, and many where I’m sure it probably couldn’t.

I have never tried this on Kirin (I’m not sure how this debate became centered on him). But I have done ACP Zergs, Nyzul bosses, Dynamis Lord and a few others with impressive results.

Maybe it doesn’t work on Kirin or Bv2? I have never seen it or tried it. I cannot comment. I don’t think that means it cannot be effective elsewhere.
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#36 Aug 28 2009 at 5:14 PM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
ThiefKiller wrote:
And on many of them you can’t SAWS because of spike flail.
What the **** are you zerging that can spike flail?

Brb. drk zergin faf.
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#37 Aug 28 2009 at 5:16 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Quote:
Your primary roles are feint and treasure hunter. You're kidding yourself if you think that you're there for damage


My friend, you lost all credibility with me on that statement.
I'm sorry but it's completely true. In terms of raw damage, a Drg, War, Sam, Drk, Rng all have higher potential output. If Thf didn't have feint or treasure hunter, why would you invite one over an equally geared war/sam/drg/drg/rng/etc? You wouldn't.


Thats completely not true. But more importantly its not the point either.

No one is arguing that a thf is the highest DD job in the game.

Most of the zergs I have been in that have caused wipes were because one too many DD went down or the mob lived past a CS stun. When every job is maximizing their damage, this doesn't happen as much.

If you can apply TH and Feint, contribute to damage and then Accomplice PD that DRK and tank for a while, that makes you very useful. If you are just there to apply th, feint and go look up internet **** I would kick you in a heartbeat.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 11:51pm by ThiefKiller

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 1:41am by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#38 Aug 28 2009 at 5:27 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
And on many of them you can’t SAWS because of spike flail.
What the **** are you zerging that can spike flail?

Brb. drk zergin faf.


Personally? Mostly Nyzul Bosses.
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#39 Aug 28 2009 at 6:03 PM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
So you want to take thf/rng to nyzul?
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#40Queen Noodles, Posted: Aug 28 2009 at 6:13 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Most of your zergs probably fail because you're in a **** ls who let people use stupid combos like thf/rng. The only mobs that should outlive your CS stunner are einherjar bosses. If you're in a shell that's new to zerging, then don't only bring one rdm/drk.
#41 Aug 28 2009 at 7:53 PM Rating: Good
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Quote:
Your primary roles are feint and treasure hunter. You're kidding yourself if you think that you're there for damage


My friend, you lost all credibility with me on that statement.
I'm sorry but it's completely true. In terms of raw damage, a Drg, War, Sam, Drk, Rng all have higher potential output. If Thf didn't have feint or treasure hunter, why would you invite one over an equally geared war/sam/drg/drg/rng/etc? You wouldn't.


Thats completely not true. But more importantly its not the point either.

No one is arguing that a thf is the highest DD job in the game.

Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes because one too many DD went down or the mob lived past a CS stun. When every job is maximizing their damage, this doesn't happen as much.

If you can apply TH and Feint, contribute to damage and then Accomplice PD that DRK and tank for a while, that makes you very useful. If you are just there to apply th, feint and go look up internet **** I would kick you in a heartbeat.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 9:21pm by ThiefKiller
Most of your zergs probably fail because you're in a sh*t ls who let people use stupid combos like thf/rng. The only mobs that should outlive your CS stunner are einherjar bosses. If you're in a shell that's new to zerging, then don't only bring one rdm/drk.

And I am still completely right. Your primary role is, and always will be, feint and TH. You deciding to maximize your damage doesn't make that any less true. I did not say your only role is feint/TH, I said your primary role is feint/TH. There is no other reason to bring a thf over another equally geared/skilled Drg/Drk/Mnk/War/Sam/Rng. Why do you think you never see two thieves in a zerg?

You have an aweful lot of opinionated views, and call me an idiot a lot, for someone that has failed "most" of their zergs. Maybe try listening to the advice from someone who's LS zerg 2-4 Baha V2s or Kirins per run, regularly kill KV without full alliance and do einherjar twice weekly with enough success that the only reason it takes us longer than three runs ever between odins is lack of people online during the summer.


Lol I meant most of the zergs that I have seen wipe. Not that most of my zergs wipe. And yes I do take thf/rng to nyzul for boss floors. And yes princess, you are an idiot lol.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 11:54pm by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#42 Aug 29 2009 at 5:37 AM Rating: Excellent
******
22,699 posts
For the records, I've outdamaged other jobs when zerging on thf. You can't only compare to "equally geared" jobs, because then you're living in a fantasy world. As well when not zerging, but still killing stuff like kirin in ~7 minutes and cerberus znm, and doing odin, etc I've outdamaged other jobs on thf. Our primary roles may be what you say they are, but we do do a lot of damage if we try.

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 9:38am by Deadgye
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#43 Aug 29 2009 at 6:20 AM Rating: Default
****
6,580 posts
That may be true, however if you have a good linkshell, I think it's not to hard to be able to compare yourself to equally geared players.

And if you're talking about TP Burning a mob, not zerging, and taking 5-10mins to do it, then at that point Thf/Rng becomes useless as feint only lasts 30 seconds and after that you wont land ****.

Quote:
Lol I meant most of the zergs that I have seen wipe. Not that most of my zergs wipe.
Quote:
Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes
Smiley: dubious
____________________________
[HTID]
DRG BRD TH4 RNG RDM75
Dragoon Equipment Guide
ArsDraconis wrote:
Ultima spends 10 whole seconds shouting "I'MA FIRIN MAH LAZER" like a 2004 valkurm melee waiting for SC
#44 Aug 29 2009 at 9:48 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
That may be true, however if you have a good linkshell, I think it's not to hard to be able to compare yourself to equally geared players.

And if you're talking about TP Burning a mob, not zerging, and taking 5-10mins to do it, then at that point Thf/Rng becomes useless as feint only lasts 30 seconds and after that you wont land sh*t.


Which is why I said its only for Zergs, works well in certain situations and probably doesn't work well in others.

Thf can use plenty of sub jobs and be effective. I'm sure many of us on these boards have out damaged the "heavy DD's" in the game in almost every situation at one point or another. (I have raped SAMs MNKs WARs on Thf/Rng ZOMG)

And as you said its not because a THF has a higher potential to DD, but because a good player that can truly maximize THF damage is going to put out a relevant contribution to damage, whether he is outparsed by some other job that has put for a similar efort is unimportant and irrelevant.

I have a real problem with this mentality that 2 hander DD's are gods among men simply becuase of the weapons they use. I have seen more sh*t geared and sh*t performing SAMs than ones that mad me truly go "Wow...he's good."

I suspect that even if we didn't have feint and TH in zergs we'd still be there on a lot of fights to plant that hate staple on the tank. I almost wish it was this way (Not that I don't love TH and Feint) so that it would force more THVs to put a better effort into their dd builds. But we can use accomplice too on a drk or someone that took too much hate, pop PD and then lighten the load for a bit.

Just to say that TH anf FEINT are not the only useful tools in the THF toolbox.

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 1:53pm by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#45 Aug 29 2009 at 9:51 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
Quote:
Lol I meant most of the zergs that I have seen wipe. Not that most of my zergs wipe.
Quote:
Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes
Smiley: dubious


Thats right princess I neglected to type the word "that" right before have.

Congratulations you just won the internet.

/CHEER

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 1:52pm by ThiefKiller
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#46 Aug 29 2009 at 11:32 AM Rating: Good
******
22,699 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
Quote:
Lol I meant most of the zergs that I have seen wipe. Not that most of my zergs wipe.
Quote:
Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes
Smiley: dubious


Noodles wrote:
however if you have a good linkshell Thf/Rng becomes useless as feint only lasts 30 seconds and after that you wont land sh*t.


Hay look I can do it too.
____________________________
Dear people I don't like: 凸(●´―`●)凸
#47Queen Noodles, Posted: Aug 29 2009 at 1:39 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) So you mean "Most of the zergs I that have been in have caused wipes"? or "Most of the zergs I have been in that have caused wipes"?
#48 Aug 29 2009 at 1:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
4,327 posts
Sheesh I can't believe I read this entire thread, I don't know what's up with Noodles but you kinda need chill my friend.
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Quote:
Your primary roles are feint and treasure hunter. You're kidding yourself if you think that you're there for damage


My friend, you lost all credibility with me on that statement.
I'm sorry but it's completely true. In terms of raw damage, a Drg, War, Sam, Drk, Rng all have higher potential output. If Thf didn't have feint or treasure hunter, why would you invite one over an equally geared war/sam/drg/drg/rng/etc? You wouldn't.


Thats completely not true. But more importantly its not the point either.

No one is arguing that a thf is the highest DD job in the game.

Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes because one too many DD went down or the mob lived past a CS stun. When every job is maximizing their damage, this doesn't happen as much.

If you can apply TH and Feint, contribute to damage and then Accomplice PD that DRK and tank for a while, that makes you very useful. If you are just there to apply th, feint and go look up internet **** I would kick you in a heartbeat.

Edited, Aug 28th 2009 9:21pm by ThiefKiller
Most of your zergs probably fail because you're in a sh*t ls who let people use stupid combos like thf/rng. The only mobs that should outlive your CS stunner are einherjar bosses. If you're in a shell that's new to zerging, then don't only bring one rdm/drk.

And I am still completely right. Your primary role is, and always will be, feint and TH. You deciding to maximize your damage doesn't make that any less true. I did not say your only role is feint/TH, I said your primary role is feint/TH. There is no other reason to bring a thf over another equally geared/skilled Drg/Drk/Mnk/War/Sam/Rng. Why do you think you never see two thieves in a zerg?

You have an aweful lot of opinionated views, and call me an idiot a lot, for someone that has failed "most" of their zergs. Maybe try listening to the advice from someone who's LS zerg 2-4 Baha V2s or Kirins per run, regularly kill KV without full alliance and do einherjar twice weekly with enough success that the only reason it takes us longer than three runs ever between odins is lack of people online during the summer.
I beleive the point he is making is not that "I'm not coming for TH I'm coming to zerg as thf/rng!", I think it's more like "if I'm going to come thf I might as well pump out as much possible damage as I can".

Then you've gotta realise that since your LS is a very, very good linkshell, with well geared and educated players you don't really need the THF's to be zerging because you have it covered by your DRK's, SAM's and such. Maybe, just maybe, some linkshells in FFXI don't have unlimited amounts of heavy DD. Maybe some linkshells do have a RNG party because RNG is all they have, maybe for some linkshells having a thf/rng pumping out a few k's of extra damage can save them in a fight. Some zergs come down to the wire, I know this because I've zerged as DRK in a shell previously not used to much zerging. I know I've also seen mobs die with a sliver of HP left, if you are in the kind of linkshell that only just scrapes through with a zerg-victory, a THF actually making an effort to do as much as they can is a lot better than the THF who thinks they are Feint/TH/Melee it for a bit.

So lets maybe rerail this with some maths on what thf/rng can do compared to thf/war with Mandalic Stab in zerg situation. Any volunteers?

* Nevermind, now I take notice of your display pic plus above nitpicking, argument for the sake of argument, carry on.

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 9:44pm by LordFaramir
____________________________
drk = 80 sam = 76
pld = 79 thf= 80
nin = 80 drg = 75
mnk = 76 war = 52

Retired for now ^ ***** you Abyssea. FFXIV woo eh..
milich wrote:
buttfucking
#49 Aug 29 2009 at 1:45 PM Rating: Good
***
1,064 posts
Queen Noodles wrote:
ThiefKiller wrote:
Queen Noodles wrote:
Quote:
Lol I meant most of the zergs that I have seen wipe. Not that most of my zergs wipe.
Quote:
Most of the zergs I have been in have caused wipes
Smiley: dubious


Thats right princess I neglected to type the word "that" right before have.

Congratulations you just won the internet.

/CHEER

Edited, Aug 29th 2009 1:52pm by ThiefKiller

So you mean "Most of the zergs I that have been in have caused wipes"? or "Most of the zergs I have been in that have caused wipes"?


Yeah pretty much everything I touch turns to fail.

Every Zerg I have ever been in I have personally caused a wipe of the entire alliance....and the death of a few people that weren't even there.

I'm so good at being bad I'm known fer it.

But I am glad you took the time out of your busy leet schedule to school me. I will remain forever in your debt.
____________________________
Nebo
THF99/BRD99
#50Queen Noodles, Posted: Aug 29 2009 at 1:49 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Hmm, I can't even remember what that quote was in refference to without looking up, but it doesn't really support me anymore. Still, I have no toruble admitting it's contradictory, I don't feel the need to get butthurt and say NO BUT I MEAN THIS INSTEAD OMG YOU'RE SUCH A NOOB QQQQQQQQ
#51Queen Noodles, Posted: Aug 29 2009 at 1:50 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) np, any time. I hope you have learnt the errors of your ways.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 1 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (1)