Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Fast Stealth ActionFollow

#1 May 05 2011 at 7:07 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,450 posts
So what do you all think about the faster movement speed in stealth? Personally I am loving it. I hated the movement reduction.
____________________________
Rhodekylle wrote:
In a world where studies show marriages now run into trouble after three years, it is probably to be expected that games lose their enchantment at least as quickly.
#2 May 05 2011 at 8:05 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
201 posts
I'm liking it. I pretty much walk in stealth all the time now.
____________________________
"Could this be... an omen?!"
#3 May 06 2011 at 5:01 AM Rating: Good
****
7,610 posts
The shorter CDs is my favorite part.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#4 May 06 2011 at 7:04 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,450 posts
I feel like it is a bit easier to sneak up on stuff now. That may be because I often am not as focused as I should be when I play my rogue.
____________________________
Rhodekylle wrote:
In a world where studies show marriages now run into trouble after three years, it is probably to be expected that games lose their enchantment at least as quickly.
#5 May 06 2011 at 8:05 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,602 posts
odd thing, Wow's stat bar concernign speed is saying iam stalking faster than i run [with nightstalker and the assasination speed buff talents invested in]
____________________________
Quote:
Also they aren't pixels, they're polygons, any **** you watch on your PC is pixels, and besides, real women are just cells.
#6 May 06 2011 at 2:39 PM Rating: Good
Does it from behind...
Avatar
*****
13,048 posts
Tenjen wrote:
odd thing, Wow's stat bar concernign speed is saying iam stalking faster than i run [with nightstalker and the assasination speed buff talents invested in]

How is that shocking to you? 15% from Quickening, and 10% from Nightstalker.

You should be at 115% when you're out of stealth and something like 126% (or 125%, I forget whether it's additive or multiplicative in WoW) in stealth.

The REAL question is "why do you have both Quickening and Nightstalker in the same build?"
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#7 May 10 2011 at 8:53 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,602 posts
shouldnt i be :3? havent heard of anything saying otherwise for assassination builds.

then again i havent checked recently since my hard drive started acting up...

hmmm *goes off to research*

Edited, May 10th 2011 3:00pm by Tenjen

are you refering to how assasination is having trouble with scaling in higher content as gear gets better?

thats just me being a stupid loyalist, was assasination before mutilate even appeared. *shrugs*

Edited, May 10th 2011 3:04pm by Tenjen
____________________________
Quote:
Also they aren't pixels, they're polygons, any **** you watch on your PC is pixels, and besides, real women are just cells.
#8 May 10 2011 at 12:52 PM Rating: Decent
Does it from behind...
Avatar
*****
13,048 posts
I suppose it makes sense for an assassination build as filler in the first tier.
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#9 May 11 2011 at 1:13 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,602 posts
yep, pretty much.

Edited, May 11th 2011 7:13pm by Tenjen
____________________________
Quote:
Also they aren't pixels, they're polygons, any **** you watch on your PC is pixels, and besides, real women are just cells.
#10 May 19 2011 at 9:35 AM Rating: Default
24 posts
To easy.
____________________________
Some say I am different person when leveling my Mage. I disagree URL REMOVED
#11 May 20 2011 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
201 posts
trackline wrote:
To easy.


Making a useless post without checking your spelling? I agree.
____________________________
"Could this be... an omen?!"
#12 May 20 2011 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,450 posts
I am not easy... well I guess I am. But maybe he meant: To Easy, and Easy is a place.
____________________________
Rhodekylle wrote:
In a world where studies show marriages now run into trouble after three years, it is probably to be expected that games lose their enchantment at least as quickly.
#13 May 24 2011 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
Moonkissed wrote:
To Easy, and Easy is a place.


Easy Street?
____________________________
Alliance
90 Rogue - Aresella
90 Shaman - Aislynn
90 Warrior - Alazara
88 Mage - Gízmo
85 Druid - Araxi
85 Hunter - Xeliara
85 Priest - Alaxandra
85 Paladin - Kallísto
30 Monk - Faewyn
#14 May 31 2011 at 12:39 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,450 posts
Could be Easy St. or maybe there is a town called easy?
____________________________
Rhodekylle wrote:
In a world where studies show marriages now run into trouble after three years, it is probably to be expected that games lose their enchantment at least as quickly.
#15 Jun 04 2011 at 3:07 AM Rating: Default
23 posts
it's definitely an improvement. The other classes got some new advantages, and this helps even things out for the rogue. ;-)

Edited, Jun 4th 2011 5:07am by KyndFellow
#16 Jul 13 2011 at 12:19 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
988 posts
I think I actually saw it at 132% on my nelf. Plain awesome, and soo much smoother than the non-stealthed running with cloak and tabard flapping around like crazy.

Necro Warning: This post occurred more than thirty days after the prior, and may be a necropost.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 37 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (37)