Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Pre-Cata 4.0.1 buildsFollow

#1 Sep 30 2010 at 3:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Here are some basic builds that I have thrown together for current content after 4.0 is released (probably in a week or two).

Arcane 31/2/3
- This seems like a pretty bad tree right now, needing to spend too many points on specialized talents.

Fire 2/31/3
- Fire seems to actually have some points to be thrown around. If you are having mana issues dropping NP for AC for clearcasting is a viable option. There could also be some debate about the different points in fire to pick up more aoe stuff (I didn't take pyromaniac as it seems too situational) but I did take imp scorch so that those times when you get brezzed with no mana cds you can spam scorch and get mana back at the same time.

frost coming soon
#2 Sep 30 2010 at 4:34 PM Rating: Decent
Thanks, Anobix. I think I took 2/2 imp fire blast and 3/3 netherwing presence instead of 3/3 burning soul on the PTR, because I tend to use fireblast quite a bit when moving (Halion purple phase, running to/from spores, PP, etc), but it's good to see what others are thinking about specing. I haven't kept up with many of the other class changes, but isn't there another class who is also going to help the raid with pushback?

edit: no, that's probably not right, I'd have to take at least 1 in burning soul...I'll take a look at it later tonite.

Edited, Sep 30th 2010 5:36pm by Trilliandent
#3 Oct 01 2010 at 7:35 AM Rating: Good
I guess it will just depend on how much pushback there is on the various fights. If there is a lot then burning soul will be useful (and good for all specs) if not then taking whatever is necessary would work and being able to put points into fireblast (which will be nice when impact procs in aoe-ish situations).
#4 Oct 01 2010 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
In my experience, playing without pushback resistance is an exercise in frustration.
#5 Oct 02 2010 at 1:46 AM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
Anobix wrote:
Here are some basic builds that I have thrown together for current content after 4.0 is released (probably in a week or two).

Arcane 31/2/3
- This seems like a pretty bad tree right now, needing to spend too many points on specialized talents.

Fire 2/31/3
- Fire seems to actually have some points to be thrown around. If you are having mana issues dropping NP for AC for clearcasting is a viable option. There could also be some debate about the different points in fire to pick up more aoe stuff (I didn't take pyromaniac as it seems too situational) but I did take imp scorch so that those times when you get brezzed with no mana cds you can spam scorch and get mana back at the same time.

frost coming soon


The lack of the Monkey minor glyph troubles me greatly. AI over Monkey is crazy talk.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#6 Oct 03 2010 at 10:51 AM Rating: Good
This is what I've come up with...

This is what I came up with for Fire at 81. It's designed around Scorch.

I love the new Scorch; I love that with talents the damn thing is FREE. I love the free pyroblasts too. I especially love using Scorch with CDs.

The thing with the 4.0.1 spells is they hit a LOT harder. Using an ad-hoc build, I did around 5400 DPS, which given my relatively crappy build and total lack of experience with fire, I feel is petty good for level 80.

Frost at 79. Typical Frost stuff.

And finally Arcane at 79.

Anybody that does not take the Mirror Image minor glyph for Fire or Arcane should have their mage licensed revoked.

I think I forgot to switch it out in my frost build, and I'm too lazy to correct it. Oh well, imagine you're turning stuff into penguins or monkeys. Make it monkeys, penguins are too cute to kill. I don't like monkeys, so blast away.
____________________________
"Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible c*** : me."
#7 Oct 03 2010 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
BillyRayValentine wrote:
I love the new Scorch; I love that with talents the damn thing is FREE. I love the free pyroblasts too. I especially love using Scorch with CDs.
I can't believe I had missed the changes to Imp Scorch(that've probably been around since Beta started, knowing how often I miss things Smiley: laugh).

I was having trouble deciding, but I'm definitely gonna be leveling as fire now.
#8 Oct 03 2010 at 1:34 PM Rating: Good
Yeah, it just looks so fun.

Leveling as Arcane won't be too bad once you hit 20 and get Arcane Blast. After that, it's just gonna be crazy.

For me, Frost just seems to be the least interesting of the builds right now.
____________________________
"Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible c*** : me."
#9 Oct 03 2010 at 1:52 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,157 posts
Here is what I devised for frost at 80 (79).
#10 Oct 03 2010 at 7:29 PM Rating: Good
BillyRayValentine wrote:
This is what I've come up with...

This is what I came up with for Fire at 81. It's designed around Scorch.

I love the new Scorch; I love that with talents the damn thing is FREE. I love the free pyroblasts too. I especially love using Scorch with CDs.

The thing with the 4.0.1 spells is they hit a LOT harder. Using an ad-hoc build, I did around 5400 DPS, which given my relatively crappy build and total lack of experience with fire, I feel is petty good for level 80.

Frost at 79. Typical Frost stuff.

And finally Arcane at 79.

Anybody that does not take the Mirror Image minor glyph for Fire or Arcane should have their mage licensed revoked.

I think I forgot to switch it out in my frost build, and I'm too lazy to correct it. Oh well, imagine you're turning stuff into penguins or monkeys. Make it monkeys, penguins are too cute to kill. I don't like monkeys, so blast away.


While scorch is great and all.... the spell doesn't scale at all compared to the other spells. Using normal spells I hit around 10k dps relatively easily on a target dummy (at 80 on the PTR, without proper glyphs). I'd only use scorch if I had to (no mana left) or moving with fireblast on CD, and LB and Instant pyro unavailble.

Edited, Oct 3rd 2010 9:29pm by Anobix
#11 Oct 03 2010 at 10:21 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Anobix wrote:
While scorch is great and all.... the spell doesn't scale at all compared to the other spells. Using normal spells I hit around 10k dps relatively easily on a target dummy (at 80 on the PTR, without proper glyphs). I'd only use scorch if I had to (no mana left) or moving with fireblast on CD, and LB and Instant pyro unavailble.
While true, think about it for soloing. It has potential to be a lot of fun.
#12 Oct 06 2010 at 10:16 AM Rating: Good
*
100 posts
Fire Build looks good but I will probably skip Improved Scorch in favor of Improved Flamestrike. With Cauterize and Ice Block I don't see myself being in the situation Anobix described much. Improved Scorch would be more useful on content that is really difficult (with no AoE) or unfamiliar.

The Arcane build looks ok. For now there aren't many choices but it's a nice tree to sub in.


Quote:
I can't believe I had missed the changes to Imp Scorch...I'm definitely gonna be leveling as fire now.


Mobs have respectable health bars and kiting gets old when it takes 15 scorches to score a kill. If you're indoors, or in an area densely populated by mobs, fuggedaboutit. Another problem is that Molten Armor doesn't seem ideal on the way from 80-85. Mana is a concern and TB and others have ranted about needing Mage Armor, particularly in dungeons where scorch spec will be comparatively weak (gogo Improved Flamestrike/Pyromaniac).


Quote:
For me, Frost just seems to be the least interesting of the builds right now.


I'm most excited about Frost. It's always been a great leveling tree and it's only gotten better with a permanent pet, streamlined FoF mechanics, and even better crowd control. It's a really fun spec but the utility wasn't enough to make up for the loss of damage in most groups. They seem to be bringing those two into balance for Cataclysm and it's exciting.

I plan on using a frost spec like this. My understanding is the extra chill effects from Piercing Chill can proc FoF and Brainfreeze so it seems like a solid talent for anytime you're fighting 2+ enemies. Improved CoC also seems like a strong talent for leveling. Depending on how tight mana is, it may be worth dropping Arcane Concentration all together and getting 2/2 Imp.CoC and 1/2 Ice Shards. Nearly every time you cast Blizzard you'd get two FoF charges and an instant, free, high crit % FFB.

Edited, Oct 6th 2010 12:20pm by CatPredator
#13 Oct 06 2010 at 2:44 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
CatPredator wrote:
Mobs have respectable health bars and kiting gets old when it takes 15 scorches to score a kill.
I think you fail to realize just how much of a dork I am. Smiley: laugh

CatPredator wrote:
Another problem is that Molten Armor doesn't seem ideal on the way from 80-85. Mana is a concern and TB and others have ranted about needing Mage Armor, particularly in dungeons where scorch spec will be comparatively weak (gogo Improved Flamestrike/Pyromaniac).

Yes, but if you're using Imp Scorch, you won't need mana! It's perfect in its insane way!

CatPredator wrote:
If you're indoors, or in an area densely populated by mobs, fuggedaboutit.
Finding a way is half the fun, though. I'm not saying it'll be excellent for everyone, but for crazy people like me, it sounds like major fun.
#14 Oct 06 2010 at 4:08 PM Rating: Good
*
100 posts
Haha, I'm sure scorching will be fun. I will be trying it in PvP and undoubtedly it will work into some fire builds for end game, during which time I may use it for dailies and such. But for leveling I really enjoy frost's ability to lock down so many mobs. It's the best way for a Mage to take on 3+ foes at once (although it seems Mirror Image can now tank pretty well for those times when Fire/Arcane mages pull too many friends) and that's where I get my kicks leveling Mage.
#15 Oct 07 2010 at 2:29 PM Rating: Decent
Why are you guys putting 2 points into the FF orb talent at 79 (80?) We don't get it till 81. Anyway, one of the officers in my mage's guild plans to go frost after the patch, and he's been messing around on the PTR and is getting 20k crits with ice lance. It's making me think of going frost myself, though I'd planned to go fire.

I got into an ICC10 the other nite as fire, and though we just did the first boss and wiped on the second before the dcs (and time, it was late) disbanded the group, fire seemed pretty much the same, and I didn't have any problems with mana, even though I realized I wasn't using my stone (just torrent). The dps was a bit higher, though I'm sure my recount was bugged out (showing me at 35k dps on marrowgar). I did almost 8k on LDW wipe, which is low because I hadn't reforged all my gear and only had 1 glyph. I also missed some LB and some HS due to power auras not working. I'll be glad when I can get powa to work, because I was refreshing LB, which I think is a bad thing lol.

I think I'll be moving the points in imp scorch somewhere else tonite, though. I failed to log because I forgot to start it up again after dcs, except on one LDW wipe, but maybe I'll have better luck tonite. Will let you know.
#16 Oct 07 2010 at 8:43 PM Rating: Good
Trilliandent wrote:
Why are you guys putting 2 points into the FF orb talent at 79 (80?) We don't get it till 81.



I assume most of us are level 80, and will be 81 within a few days of getting the expansion.

For starters, you need to spend the points somewhere to get to 31. It's really the best option if you're planning on doing PvE dungeons/raids as frost.

Ice Floes is purely situational, Improved Cone of Cold is likely to be useless thanks to mobs being immune to that sort of thing, and Piercing Chill, well...I don't really see much of a need to slow more than one mob down. If I pull aggro, then chances are that whatever I'm Frostbolting is already chilled, and if I'm pulling aggro because of Frostbolt, only one mob is coming after me. Second, it only applies to crits FROM Frostbolt, so yeah....the damn thing's already chilled, if you pull aggro in a dungeon because of Frostbolt and more than one mob comes after you, then chances are that the tank and the healer are already dead, meaning it's times to Blink and Invis. There really isn't a better place to put the two points in a strict dungeon/raiding building. I don't see a need for the two talents that improve Ice Barrier, because if I have to rely on that, then the tank's not doing his job, and if the tank isn't doing his job, then the healer's most likely going to die first.
____________________________
"Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible c*** : me."
#17 Oct 08 2010 at 2:20 PM Rating: Good
Ej just edited their original thread with some good info:

http://elitistjerks.com/f75/t104767-fire_cataclysm_discussion/#post1740391

Some solid builds there with some various options. I will edit my original probably sometime this weekend/monday.
#18 Oct 08 2010 at 7:24 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
I thought this would have already been up here, but as it isn't:

Totalbiscuit did (and is doing) reviews of all three specs' PvE capabilities in Cataclysm. Obviously Cataclysm is a bit of a different ballpark from Vanilla, but there might be a couple of heads' up things that apply very much so to level 80 raiding that some of you might find interesting in regards to this thread. Namely the fact that he's currently pulling WAY more DPS as frost than as fire (~7500ish vs 5500, and that's without Deep Freeze damage as it stuns target dummies instead of damaging them).

Fire - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjhdJedV4-Q
Frost - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3HbjJcc1Oc
Arcane has yet to be uploaded.

Part one is an overview of all three talent trees which might not be too interesting to watch for you guys; it's basically him going "Well this talent is a PvP one, so you'll skip those. This one is great damage, so this is a must" for all three builds.
#19 Oct 08 2010 at 7:41 PM Rating: Good
I watched his fire video, it was alright, but rber the gear he was testing with was premade gear and at 85. He also had hardly any chance to crit and no raid buffs (both would help fire immensely). I'm still betting that fire will most likely be top dps at 80 as it is now, but specs will change by tier in cata (ad they have) based on gear thresholds. I would be sad to see my dps drop by half or more at 85 (I pull 11-15k depending on the fight).
#20 Oct 08 2010 at 8:32 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Oh yes, obviously there's gear differences and all - I just thought it was a decent benchmark seeing as all his mages are the same in gear and he's doing 1-2 minute rotations on target dummies.

A mage from my guild did point out the fire+crit thing to me though, and yes, that does make sense. It would however be lovely if frost was actually a decent raiding build for once, as it sure looks to be fun.
#21 Oct 09 2010 at 2:48 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
The EJ post linked brought up an interesting point I hadn't considered.

Quote:
Three fire talents now work together beautifully to create Fires new regenerative rotation - which can be completely cast on the move. Free mana scorches (Improved Scorch) until Hot streak procs, then casting 0 mana Pyroblasts and reaping the rewards of Master of Elements - whilst taking advantage of Firestarter granting mobility.


Imp scorch will allow for you to continue to DPS when low on mana while not just passively regenerating mana through standard regen effects, but to actively regenerate via your critical strikes. In the context of that, I have to wonder if using such a rotation would actually be more beneficial in allowing you to leave up Molten Armor. Since crit will be harder to come by, it might be more worth it to work in these regen rotations instead of relying on Mage Armor.
#22 Oct 10 2010 at 5:48 PM Rating: Good
I will most likely be dual-speccing fire/fire for 4.0.1, getting one spec that has more aoe/cleave talents and another that skips them depending on the fight. Arcane jut doesn't look to great to me right now. I may try out frost eventually, but with my gear set and from what I've been reading fire seems to be doing good dps with 264/277 gear (same as current).

The rotation is possible to change (depending on your glyphs)
If you glyph: fireball, molten armor, ffb
1) Critical mass maintenance (Via Scorch if required)
2) HS Pyro
3) LB Maintenance
4) FFB DoT stacking to 3 and refreshing if casting a Fireball would cause it to drop off
5) Fireball

If you don't glyph FFB then the third glyph will most likely be LB. Come lvl 85 it definitely won't be Pyroblast until much later in gear (current blues give you all of 15% crit I believe).


To update my builds:
AoE/Cleave: http://cata.wowhead.com/talent#o0oZdfhrk0RMsfoc:zbosRMzVm

Single Target: http://cata.wowhead.com/talent#o0bZfshrk0RMscoc:zRosRMzVm

I need to do the math/read up on the math between glyph of living bomb and molten armor. I'd guess that MA is still better, but LB has been a high % of our dps, and it may be more worth while in the aoe/cleave build as well.

For 85 I would most likely just fill out haste+arcane concentration.

For the single-target rotations I was pulling about 12k+ dps solo on a target dummy (without glyph of FFB so that wasn't included).

Edited, Oct 11th 2010 8:24am by Anobix
#23 Oct 11 2010 at 8:52 AM Rating: Good
*
100 posts
I'm interested in FFB's re-emergence for both Frost and Fire. It seems it almost eclipsed Frostbolt in earlier beta builds and is poised to become an important part of Fire's priorities.

I'm not sure how practical 3 stacking a 12s DoT with a spell bearing a 2~2.5s cast time will be. I wonder how big the difference between an FFB glyphed mage and a pure Fireballer will be. If the margin is small on dummies with full DoT uptime, I could see it being non-existent on bosses with complex mechanics. However, if it's reasonably large, FFB could nearly supplant FB as main nuke on fights with lots of target switching or movement. Luckily all you need to do is swap a glyph to play either way. That's nice.

Arcane is the only spec that is really lagging behind in terms of innovation. Seems likely it will still be a popular PvP spec but it's mind numbingly simple in PvE. I'm looking forward to trying out both Frost and Fire in some new dungeons.
#24 Oct 11 2010 at 5:05 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Has there been any word on a post-patch frost PvE spec, btw? We've got a mage in the guild who intends to try both frost and fire and spec whichever ends up being better.
#25 Oct 11 2010 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
Mozared wrote:
Has there been any word on a post-patch frost PvE spec, btw? We've got a mage in the guild who intends to try both frost and fire and spec whichever ends up being better.


I haven't read any for-sure things, but check out the cata frost section on EJ and they have a couple builds linked there, as well as a little discussion of it on mmo-champion.
#26 Oct 12 2010 at 10:24 PM Rating: Good
25man ToC run I was fire and my guildy was arcane, I consistently did about 2-3k more dps than he did on the fights/pulls (same gear level).
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 319 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (319)