Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

WOTLK Scoreboard - Shield: 1 COH: 0Follow

#1 Jun 07 2010 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
It's time I faced the cold hard truth.

I can't remember the last time I used my Holy spec.

I am a Disc priest.

In BC I was Holy/IDS (hybrid Holy-Disc build) for a really long time until I was converted by the cult of CoH and became a devoted Holy priest. But Lich King (and Moz) have slowly chipped away at my love of the Holy tree until, when I do switch to a Holy spec, I can't remember how to play it. I don't even know what the buttons do. And where's Penance? FOR THE LOVE OF DOG, HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO HEAL WITHOUT PENANCE??

Wonder what Cataclysm will bring? I think Holy's mastery thingie is interesting and it'll be a great spec, but I doubt I'll change. The emergence of Disc as the mitigation healer is just too exciting for me to go back, I think. (I mean, you know, WoW exciting, not I got tickets to Bon Jovi exciting.) I love being proactive. I love throwing shield on everyone and then ignoring them while I smite down the enemy. (Smite/Disc build FTW.)

Insert your waffling between trees story here.
#2 Jun 07 2010 at 10:13 AM Rating: Good
teacake wrote:
In BC I was Holy/IDS (hybrid Holy-Disc build) for a really long time


I was stuck in that role for IDS in progression because it was so important. Apart from being Shadow for a long time later on, the only healing spec I had apart from Holy/IDS was PvP Disc, which at that point was fairly overpowered.

In WotLK, I've just been Disc all the way apart from Smite Spec for the earlier levels and that shadow offspec I used to have for getting a raidspot that I gave up after one unfortunate encounter with Marrowgar.
So now I'm Disc/Disc, and it's lovely.

Plus the AoE grinding and soloing elites I can do seems like it'd be quite a bit harder as holy.
#3 Jun 07 2010 at 3:32 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
I'm actually not sure where I went down the disc road. I've been holy on all my priests pre-WOTLK for ages. I think when I was leveling my new priest I decided "to try out that new disc thing" as I was dinging 71-72.

That said, I do still love holy, though. B&S gave me back a lot of love for the tree, and Serendipity+CoH just work so nicely together that the playstyle just works out for me.
#4 Jun 07 2010 at 7:24 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
Kalivha wrote:
teacake wrote:
In BC I was Holy/IDS (hybrid Holy-Disc build) for a really long time


I was stuck in that role for IDS in progression because it was so important.


It was, but the problem was you needed one but only one. I got kicked out of it because I started running with someone who was already the official IDS girl of the raid. I resisted at first but eventually came to really love Holy. Remember that one week after they nerfed the bosses but there was no cooldown on CoH? That was, like, the best week ever. Black Temple in my Primal Mooncloth, you say? Sure, I'm there!

I loved the IDS build. Not even so much for IDS, although that was kickass when you were badly geared, but because you got to play with some other Disc talents to get up to it too. Maybe I was always a closet Disc lover. Smiley: wink

Mozared wrote:
That said, I do still love holy, though. B&S gave me back a lot of love for the tree, and Serendipity+CoH just work so nicely together that the playstyle just works out for me.


Strangely enough, I think Serendipity is what ruined it for me. It is a great talent that does great things, but it also moves you away from "pick the right spell for the current situation" toward this rotation. I feel so tied down. I am not a DK. I don't want a rotation.


Edited, Jun 7th 2010 9:30pm by teacake
#5 Jun 07 2010 at 9:00 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
Strangely enough, I think Serendipity is what ruined it for me. It is a great talent that does great things, but it also moves you away from "pick the right spell for the current situation" toward this rotation. I feel so tied down. I am not a DK. I don't want a rotation

I feel that this depends on the content you're doing. If I'm healing Val'kyr twins or Festergut heroic, I really don't mind having a rotation for once. If I can just stand still and focus getting it perfect, topping the meters as a result of that is enjoyable. For other fights, I see Serendipity as a pure bonus - I can still pick the right spell for the right situation, but if I find a way to fit in Flash Heals I'll get a pretty neat bonus on my next PoH.

I am very curious about how Cataclysm is going to feel like though, with the whole Holy Chakra thing. On one hand, having to cast three heals to upgrade my tank healing feels a bit stupid - it's like I spend a lot of time tank healing after which my tank healing improves, at the moment I most likely need it the least. On the other hand, it does supply me with interesting boosts. Until we really learn how it works, though, I guess it's all guesswork. I'm thinking the 3X same spell thing will somehow change before release, though.
#6 Jun 07 2010 at 11:54 PM Rating: Good
****
7,732 posts
I only rolled a priest because of the Wrath Disc changes.

Seemed like a lot of fun. I was right.
____________________________
Hellbanned

idiggory wrote:
Drinking at home. But I could probably stand to get laid.
#7 Jun 08 2010 at 6:23 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
Mozared wrote:
I feel that this depends on the content you're doing.


I have no doubt you're right. If you're a progression raider you don't get to be a special snowflake and cast whatever you want when you want it anyway. All I do with my priest is a.) goof off, b.) get achievements and c.) run battlegrounds. In all those situations, I love a spec where flexibility and spontaneity don't have a negative impact on my healing.

I also disliked this about the druid back in the day when the rule was three-stacks-of-Lifebloom-if-you-let-it-bloom-you-fail. One of the reasons I prefer healing to DPS is because I've got the freedom to choose. Of course there is always going to be some level of button-b-always-follows-button-a. But there's a lot less of that with healing in general. Unless you're a pally. Then it's button-a-always-follows-button-a. Smiley: laugh
#8 Jun 08 2010 at 6:43 AM Rating: Good
When I switched to Disc, my guild leader seemed a bit nervous, like he had lost his main healer to some crazy off-spec.

I was dual-spec disc/holy for a while. I found that eventually, I felt like a fish out of water as holy. So, after leveling as holy since level 10, to midway through Wrath, disc is where I'll stay. One day I'll get bored and spec holy again for fun. I can't guarantee it will last more than about one dungeon run though.
#9 Jun 08 2010 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
Actually, I think I never really liked Holy that much.

I played Holy/IDS for raiding, but I also played a Resto shaman sometimes because our group preferred it.

I think I had actually tried out Shadow 69-70 on that first priest or something, at least I wasn't completely new to that when I stopped using my primary account and then leveled another priest (this time as shadow because I thought it was so awesome!), and respecced her to Disc at 69 for some BG fun, and I remember constantly respeccing between Disc and Shadow depending on what I wanted to do. TBC sucked a bit in that respect.

Anyway, I initially wanted to make my Troll girl shadow, too, but then I sort of got back into healing and with Disc being viable for PvE, I actually have a healing class/spec I really enjoy now. And I'm quite certain Shadow was ten times as awesome in TBC as it is now. Resto shamans also, which means I don't really enjoy it at all right now, but I really want to try Elemental at 80 and stuff, because that seems like fun.
#10 Jun 08 2010 at 5:38 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
I have no doubt you're right. If you're a progression raider you don't get to be a special snowflake and cast whatever you want when you want it anyway. All I do with my priest is a.) goof off, b.) get achievements and c.) run battlegrounds. In all those situations, I love a spec where flexibility and spontaneity don't have a negative impact on my healing.

I also disliked this about the druid back in the day when the rule was three-stacks-of-Lifebloom-if-you-let-it-bloom-you-fail. One of the reasons I prefer healing to DPS is because I've got the freedom to choose. Of course there is always going to be some level of button-b-always-follows-button-a. But there's a lot less of that with healing in general. Unless you're a pally. Then it's button-a-always-follows-button-a. Smiley: laugh

Oh, no, but you're misunderstanding me! Priests, imo, are actualy the most flexible healers you can have in end-game. Even if you're thoroughly hardcore, there is very little 'rule' to playing a healer priest past "Keep Prayer of Mending up at all times". Aside from that, you can literally do as you please. The thing is just that there is very little room for ineffective healing as a priest - unless you're just spamming one button, at which point it will be obvious to anyone that they are doing it wrong (even if your main is a ret pally).

What I meant was, that on some encounters I specifically prefer holy over discipline *because* of the 'rotation' it gives me. On those fights where there's constant raid damage but I virtually don't have to move, holy is lovely to play. We barely ever use our 'rotation' so having one for once and just standing still and 'perfecting' it is a nice change from playing disc with a "I dunno, I'll just push this button this time" attitude. Especially if you consider that on those fights, as disc, your 'rotation' is "click > shield > click > shield > click > shield > OH WAIT POH! > click > shield ...."

I'm not enough of an elitist jerk to take on the "unless you're raiding, then you have to spec cookie cutter to not suck" attitude ;P
#11 Jun 08 2010 at 6:36 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
Mozared wrote:
We barely ever use our 'rotation' so having one for once and just standing still and 'perfecting' it is a nice change


Ooohhhh now I get it. You want to be able to eat Oreos, watch TV, and heal at the same time. Smiley: wink

I kid. I got what you were saying. I would never think you were elitist, honestly. I mean, except that you play with Aethien.
#12 Jun 08 2010 at 6:44 PM Rating: Default
I have always been an unconformist. I never like going with what is "In". For example, the hunter I am leveling will be endgame BM speced, and I will still top you on the dps charts even though I am not MM. With my priest I leveled as shadow and fully thought I was going to be a dps priest. I had a pvp disc spec but it was hastly made and I pvped about once a month. Then during a H PoS the tank sucked, and the pally healer went tank spec, but that meant we needed a healer. Since between the shammy and me I was the only one that had any healing experiance at all, I was thrown into the gauntlet (literaly, we were at the ramp to the cave). Some were between shielding the tank threw the trash and saving the tank at the last minute with a Penance during the final boss, I fell in love with Disc healing. Never dpsed on my priest since.

Now a days I find new reasons to love being disc, like being able to pull RFC faster then a DK. Who needs plate when you have a never ending bubble. :)
#13 Jun 08 2010 at 10:06 PM Rating: Good
WoWboo wrote:
For example, the hunter I am leveling will be endgame BM speced, and I will still top you on the dps charts even though I am not MM.


Aren't you just precious
#14 Jun 08 2010 at 10:27 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Overlord Norellicus wrote:
WoWboo wrote:
For example, the hunter I am leveling will be endgame BM speced, and I will still top you on the dps charts even though I am not MM.


Aren't you just precious
I only like special flowers if I get to crush them.
So no, you won't be topping DPS as BM, and if you do happen to top dps it's not because you're so skilled but because the rest of the group/raid sucks more.
Raiding as BM (Or survival) is just ******* yourself over and taking away 1k+ dps from the raid.
#15 Jun 09 2010 at 4:28 AM Rating: Default
Hey, I have proof from a friend that you can pull 8k+ as BM in ICC, so don't say it is impossible to do good dps as BM. A lot of people thought of Disc as a bad raiding spec, but look at it now. I have not seen one post on this board not about Disc healing, or atleast with a mention of why disc is better then holy. What WotLK did to Disc, I am predicting Cata will do to BM, from the looks of the class preview.
#16 Jun 09 2010 at 6:41 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
And I do 10k+ dps as MM.
So my point stands, you're intentionally sabotaging yourself and your raid.

Really, going out of cookie cutter build doesn't make you special or cool it makes you stupid.
If you want to show any sort of skill you spec the cookie cutter and perform better with it than others, if you need to spec differently to show that you're not just a normal hunter it's likely that you're just lacking skill altogether, in which case going with that other spec is only hurting you more.

Your comparison with healing also fails, as the usefulness of a healing spec is much harder to measure than dps.
And in case you are interested, BM can do about 13.5k dps vs MM's 15.5k.

As for the future, who knows what it will bring? It's far too early to predict anything and considering that we've had BM, SV and MM as the top specs in various eras of this expansion it's not unlikely for the top spec to change a few more times during the beta testing, if the focus change alone is not enough to completely throw things around.
Not to mention that I don't see any data in the class preview with which one could make any sort of serious prediction about the next top dps spec.

Also note that I never said that BM couldn't do good dps. It's just a fact that MM will do better dps.

Edited, Jun 9th 2010 2:43pm by Aethien
#17 Jun 09 2010 at 9:54 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
Also note that I never said that BM couldn't do good dps. It's just a fact that MM will do better dps.

To be fair though, there's a legio of reasons why someone could use another spec and try and optimize that. Jaysgl used to be an awesome raiding frost mage, and I really respect the effort he's put into that as he must've gotten a lot of ******** because of it.
#18 Jun 09 2010 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
Jaygsl doesn't mince words though and fully admits it's not as effective as Arcane.
#19 Jun 09 2010 at 1:08 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
It's still a mindset that is completely unknown and makes no sense to me.
I cannot understand why anyone would intentionally drag themselves down by using another spec that they consider to be more fun when I can't see the fun in pressing 1233233 over 11211223 or 128646291583629107737637659875424171985 (hai there ferals).
Rotations aren't of such great influence on playstyle as some people seem to think.

I'll take BM vs MM as an example here, because Wowboo wants to distinguish himself by going BM.
MM has Serpent Sting, Aimed Shot and Chimera Shot.
The basic rotation is to apply serpent sting then shoot Chimera shot > Aimed shot > Steady Shot x4 and repeat.
Once Culling the Herd and your 2pc T10 setbonus proc are up at the same time you reapply serpent sting so it will keep the 18.45% damage boost for the rest of the fight. (Which also increases the Chimera - Serpent damage by the mentioned 18.45%)
Once that is done, it is (for me) literally 231111 and repeat, replacing 3 with alt+3 when there are multiple mobs and I shoot a multishot, and making it 253111 when Kill shot becomes available.
This is not particularly difficult, in fact it's really easy.
The difficulty, or the room to perfect yourself, with MM comes with readiness and when to use it to make absolute optimal use out of it.

For BM, you have serpent sting multi-shot and arcane shot.
Arcane > SrS > Multi if I'm not mistaken.
Which also doesn't make for a terribly difficult rotation/priority.
Apply serpent sting once every 21 seconds, then shoot arcane > steadyx3 > arcane while replacing a steady shot with a multishot whenever that is available, and once kill shot becomes available it becomes Kill shot > 5x steady shot > Kill shot while replacing steady shots with arcane and multi when available.
Not all that difficult, albeit a little moreso than MM, the difference once more comes from how to make use of your cooldowns.
Recklessly blowing cooldowns whenever they are up often leads to a badly spread out array of buffs that rarely stack up.
And knowing that buffs stack multiplicative and not additive (10% more AP is much more effective with 15% haste than without etc) just blowing cooldowns at will is not efficient.
It's there where the fun lies in playing a hunter, correctly stacking your buffs and planning out what to use when so that you gain the maximum benefit out of all your buffs.


Between the correct use of your buffs, debuffs and procs and minimizing movement is where the excellent hunter distinguishes him or herself from the mediocre masses, not by speccing BM and having a big red pet.
I find that so far, nobody has come up with a decent argument for sticking with a sub optimal spec, it all boils down to "But I like this more" which is pretty much the same as the 0/71/0 hunter or 71/0/0 special flower people who "play the game their way".

That all said, if you love having a big red pet eating faces, I can definitely understand. If I could have enough specs I'd have a BM spec just to make my little friends big, red, scary and face-melting.
But don't take it into any serious sort of raid where performance matters, because at that point you're doing nothing but holding back yourself and your raid.



Edit: replying to a single sentence with this many words, I feel like Gbaji.

Edited, Jun 9th 2010 9:15pm by Aethien
#20 Jun 09 2010 at 1:21 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
I cannot understand why anyone would intentionally drag themselves down by using another spec that they consider to be more fun


Because lots of people don't prioritize progression the way you do and don't mind doing a thousand or two less DPS, if they're doing it with the spec they like. If I were a mage, which I don't have one, but if I did? ***** min/maxing and the efficient spec. I just want to set people on fire. Setting people on fire is cool. It's the only reason I'd have that mage in the first place.

You acknowledge that preference has to do with more than just rotation at the bottom of your post, but I think that what's an afterthought for you makes more difference to a lot of people than you realize.

I absolutely agree with you that it's best if those people play with each other, and not people like you. I wouldn't dream of bringing that fire mage to your guild and wasting your time. But I might find some like-minded goof-offs who don't care if I raid with a fire mage (my old guild was like this), and we might be two tiers behind you, but we'd be having just as much fun. Maybe more fun, because you wouldn't be hurting our feelings with jokes about our mommies.
#21 Jun 09 2010 at 1:56 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Oh, I know that I'm hardcore and if your raid doesn't mind that you're losing that much dps then by all means go ahead, as long as I'm not in the raid you can play with fireballs and big red dinosaurs all day long if you wish to.
It's simply not understandable to me why someone wouldn't care though.


That said, I reacted to this:
Quote:
I have always been an unconformist. I never like going with what is "In". For example, the hunter I am leveling will be endgame BM speced, and I will still top you on the dps charts even though I am not MM.
Going with non cookie cutter just to be different is a really awful reason.
If he has typed something along the lines of I want to keep playing BM because seeing fluffy my devilsaur go all big and red and ZOMGGODZILLAmode makes me grin and feel happy inside then I can understand it, I still think that he should keep that outside of raids but until we're in the same raid it's not my problem.

There's also no "in" there's the top dps spec because it allows you to do as much damage as possible.
And yeah, I guess that getting my fun from optimizing myself during fights and using my cooldowns right as those two procs are up and sidestepping that Bomb with a single step right before it lands while shooting an instant shot so I don't loose a single point of damage is hard to understand for others. I think that's just how the world works, our differences make things about other people hard to understand or even hard to imagine or acknowledge the possibility.


But yeah in short, going for something sub optimal just to be special is lame and you're much better off distinguishing yourself by perfection.
#22 Jun 09 2010 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
But yeah in short, going for something sub optimal just to be special is lame and you're much better off distinguishing yourself by perfection.

This much is true, but the problem some people seem to have (Hmmmmmmmmmmtheo) is to distinguish the line between 'playing your own game' and 'playing optimal'. Obviously, I'll agree with you in that the huntards who just want to go with their own spec into heroic modes need to be smacked upside the head, but a middle road tends to be hard to find, especially on these forums.

I for one hold the "But I just want to be beastmastery" hunters in higher regard than the "how i point talent?" people, of which I've encountered more. In fact, if you use WoW as a metaphor for real life, it makes a lot of sense to me. A lot of youngsters want to look 'alternative' for the sake of looking alternative. But while that's stupid, I still prefer those people above the average masses who simply fail to think, full stop.

Also, the "But I want to be beastmastery" class generally leads to two things - either someone discovers how the spec works and ends up respeccing because they first-hand discover how 'horrible' it is, or they become very hardened in their 'task' to make beastmastery work in raids. And neither of those groups are per definition bad people. At worst, they'll turn into 'normal' raiders. At best, they become an immensily valuable asset in working out alternative specs - a skill which turns thém into the new "cookie cutter builders" once a new expansion hits and the trees get revamped.
#23 Jun 09 2010 at 3:26 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Mozared wrote:
At best, they become an immensily valuable asset in working out alternative specs - a skill which turns thém into the new "cookie cutter builders" once a new expansion hits and the trees get revamped.
I'm sorry, but no.
The people building the next cookie cutter specs are not the ones sticking to their one sacred tree above all else.
The people building the next cookie cutter are the min maxers, the absolute hardcore EJ fanatics who try out everything to find the perfect build regardless of which tree it is.
#24 Jun 09 2010 at 4:33 PM Rating: Default
Ok maybe I typed that wrong. I do that a lot and that is the reason I tend not to post much. When I look at the BM talent tree I find it more interesting then MM. And btw, people do not just go BM to have a t-rex as a pet. A wolf with its buff is fine for a BM hunter. In case you did not realize this, the final talent of the BM tree also gives you 4 extra talent points for your pet, which alows you to get the last tier of the pet talent tree.
#25 Jun 09 2010 at 5:41 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Look at the title under my name my little friend, it's there for a reason.
And using a wolf over a devilsaur as BM is yet another couple hundred dps loss.
But that aside, you get to the last tier of pet talents without the 51pt BM talent.

And what about the BM tree is more interesting than the MM tree?
#26 Jun 09 2010 at 6:22 PM Rating: Default
I cannot win this battle against the God Emperor of Hunters. I hear by submit and declare all things I said about BM hunters null and void. Seriously though I really cannot tell you why I like BM, blame my friend I guess for brain washing me. It just seems a little more fun to me when your pet is such a big part of your spec, instead of just an after thought to your gun/bow. You know you guys are really making me want to play my hunter less and less......That was you plan all along right. Make it so I never stop being a priest, so you guys still have a fail priest to laugh at :P
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 357 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (357)