Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Iron Lance vs others spear?Follow

#1 Nov 09 2010 at 9:24 PM Rating: Decent
17 posts
I found that, Iron Lance are pretty good with pierce damage compared to others spear because Iron Lance have 100% pierce based while others is 60-70% and its make big different

Iron Lance have 116 attack and Battle Fork have 133 attack
Iron Lance 100% pierce and Battle Fork 60% pierce

here are dmg dealt by both weapons

I choose Antling Digger for testing dmg

Iron Lance --> 195-215
Battle Fork --> 135-145

about accuracy, its almost the same when I testing acc

any comments?
#2 Nov 10 2010 at 12:09 AM Rating: Good
***
1,501 posts
What's your Lancer rank? Is the Battle Fork optimal for you? Also Antling Digger is weak vs Piercing it seems, but other mobs might not. Yes, there are damage type weakness, but people just don't bother much about it, cause at the end of the day mobs die no matter what you hit it with.

____________________________



FFXIV Signature
#3 Nov 10 2010 at 5:39 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
53 posts
He dinged 40 recently judging by his previous post. So he's well over the OR, can you tell us more damage results from other mobs? I'm curious about this topic too.
#4 Nov 10 2010 at 5:47 PM Rating: Good
***
1,501 posts
Oh and to OP, is your Iron Lance +1/+2/+3 by any chance? I bet a +3 Iron Lance is better stat wise compared to a normal Battle Fork.

Also if you're Gysahl I will happily make you a Yarzonshell Harpoon :p free of charge as well. I saw r50 LNC use Halberd though, so I'm not sure if Lance are that good, because Banneret Lance seems much better than Halberd which somehow has 50% Piercing, lowest of all the LNC weapons.

Edited, Nov 10th 2010 8:57pm by Khornette
____________________________



FFXIV Signature
#5 Nov 10 2010 at 10:36 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
53 posts
Free of charge? Why aren't you on Fabul lol. People are charging 750k for that over here :<.
#6 Nov 14 2010 at 5:57 AM Rating: Good
**
398 posts
Before I read this thread, I made myself four +1 Tortoiseshell Harpoons (R29).

After reading this thread, I made myself three +0 Iron Lances (R28)

Since you guys were checking out the differences between Battle fork and Lances, I think I was a little misled. I went to ants at R28->R29 today, but unfortunately I didn't pull out my tortoiseshell harpoon for damage comparisons. (I was doing insane damage comparitive to everyone else anyways) However, After the fact, I looked at my stats page.

For a 1 rank difference, Tortoiseshell has nearly the same attack, crit, and parry, however it has like 20-30 more +Accuracy compared to the lance! Seriously.

I'm now kind of regretting making my Iron Lances, however I have consolation in two facts.

1) Tortoiseshell Harpoon is 10% Water, and Efts, the main grind target from R27-R37, are water element. The worst two things you can do element-wise, is to use Water on its counterelement (Water vs. lightning mobs), or using it on the same mob type (Water vs. Water). Perhaps the Iron Lance would be better in this situation? It's only 10% Damage, and like 30 accuracy!

2) Iron Lance upgrades to Banneret Lance. I'm not sure about all the details and whatnot, but by making these three lances, I can just upgrade them to get my R48 weapon. Pretty sweet deal anyways.

I don't think that Iron Lance is the godsend you guys are making it out to be, but I don't know. How many monsters are actually weak to pierce? We need to do more research about that sort of stuff.

and I need to go find myself the recipe for heavy iron lances / battle forks.
#7 Nov 14 2010 at 8:17 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
513 posts
At least in beta, mobs of the firefly family were extremely weak to piercing and were a superb skill up targets for lancers and archers. I believe spears were more heavily piercing based in beta, as well.
____________________________
FFXIV Signature
#8 Nov 14 2010 at 7:27 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
53 posts
Why don't you just test your two weapons and post the results here? It's not like you're doing Efts every night right?

I didn't get the impression they were godsends but in my own experience with them, they're doing great damage and I'm glad I bought them. I also bought them for the fact that I don't see myself ranking up to 30 carpentry (along with 40 BSM help) to pump them out but I will probably use it to upgrade to the Banneret Lance if my GS ever gets up there.



Edited, Nov 14th 2010 8:30pm by mygosity
#9 Nov 15 2010 at 12:01 AM Rating: Good
***
1,501 posts
Based on my observation, the Halberd is somehow better than Banneret Lance at r50, despite the lowest Piercing %. No idea, just need to get up there for ourselves to see it through I guess, may have something to do with WS II (Moonrise II anyone?). Me? I'm going to get every Lances that are available, including Iron Guisarme and Jarl Guisarme that most people forgot about, they look spiky cool.
____________________________



FFXIV Signature
#10 Nov 24 2010 at 1:34 PM Rating: Decent
iron spear for ACC
iron lance for dmg

____________________________

FFXIV Signature
#11 Nov 24 2010 at 5:50 PM Rating: Good
***
1,501 posts
SterlingHighwind wrote:
iron spear for ACC
iron lance for dmg



ACC wise: Harpoon > Spear > Guisarme > Lance
ATK wise: Lance > Guisarme > Spear > Harpoon (Spear vs Harpoon might be the same for the fact that Harpoon has less ATK/level but 10% more Piercing).

Trident? and Battle Fork are spear. Halberd is its own category and can't really compare yet without actual testing, since it has only 40% Piercing.
____________________________



FFXIV Signature
#12 Nov 28 2010 at 11:34 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
513 posts
I did some brief tests with iron spear vs iron lance at R27. At that rank I get 105 atk with the spear and 100 with the lance, however, the lance was consistently dealing at least 20 more damage per Light Thrust against both sea slugs and aldgoats. WS damage didn't seem to scale up quite as dramatically, however.
____________________________
FFXIV Signature
#13 Dec 03 2010 at 9:35 AM Rating: Decent
11 posts
Omena wrote:
I did some brief tests with iron spear vs iron lance at R27. At that rank I get 105 atk with the spear and 100 with the lance, however, the lance was consistently dealing at least 20 more damage per Light Thrust against both sea slugs and aldgoats. WS damage didn't seem to scale up quite as dramatically, however.


What WS were you using? Is there a correlation between the motion of the weaponskill and the damage type?

For weapon skills like Skewer and Doomspike which use a "thrust" motion like like light thrust, is piercing damage the only thing important?

For weapon skills like Moonrise which use a "sweep" motion, maybe slashing/blunt damage is more important?

I'm not saying this stuff is related, just throwing it out there as food for thought.
#14 Dec 03 2010 at 2:47 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
513 posts
I only used Trammel and Skewer II.

Edited, Dec 3rd 2010 3:48pm by Omena
____________________________
FFXIV Signature
#15 Dec 03 2010 at 6:13 PM Rating: Good
***
1,501 posts
Lance seems to do significantly more dmg on normal attack rather than WS. For example with Spear-ish or Harpoon, Feint tend to be 200% dmg of normal attack, whereas with Lance Feint fall down to 170% dmg of normal attack. Feint in reality does not fall in term of damage, it's just that there is no increase on Feint dmg with a Lance, but there's a significant increase in term of dmg on normal attack with Lance. Same case for Moonrise, Skewer II, Heavy Trammel and Doomspike II.
____________________________



FFXIV Signature
#16 Dec 04 2010 at 10:54 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
**
447 posts
It has to do with the enemy armor type. Most mobs right now are weak vs. piercing. Generally speaking, all else equal, a Lance will do more average damage that a Spear given the weakness vs. Piercing.
____________________________
Djigga, please. Highland Hyurs can't jump.

FFXIV Signature
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 9 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (9)