Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Are ther any mmmorpgs lef tthat have....Follow

#1 Apr 06 2014 at 10:46 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,038 posts
Im looking for MMORPGs that arent F2P (those are terrible) that have "useless" non combat skills... like "listening" (allows you to do things like hear through walls/doors for eavesdropping. Or being able o set and disarm traps, or have traps out in the open world which are triggered by certain actions (one game for example had a trap that was triggered by talking.. so everytime you talked using "say" the trap blasted you (talking in party chat or through private chat didnt set it off though), though a good thief or rogue could detect and disarm traps, as well as pick locks (since said game came from s time where treasures chests needed keys to be opened and werent as simple and just walking up and clicking on it... a thief on the other hand with the right skills leveled could bypass finding a key altogether and just pick the lock (this worked on locked doors too not just chests).

But the MAIN feature Im looking for in open world PKing, it could be either ANYWHERE outside of town or just specific areas scattered all over the world (though these areas would be areas youd have to venture to or at least through at some point so avoiding them altogether wasnt an option) and possibly being able to loot players after you kill them (though that part isnt mandatory for what Im looking for but it would be a nice bonus), I miss the thrill of exploring an unknown area, or doing a qust in an area while constantly looking over my shoulder knowing that at any moment another player could come out of nowhere and start attacking me. MMOs seem to have gotten so care bear as of late, where the stuff for those of us who are still looking for a rush?

Soo any MMOs out there liek that these days? It doesnt even have to be new one, I would prefer the newest game closest to it but if such a game doesnt exist this day and age and we have to go back to 1995 then so be it, Id play that too, I can name a million text based MUDs that fit the description Im looking for but I wanna play a graphical game thats the same or at least similar
#2 Apr 06 2014 at 11:54 PM Rating: Good
Guru
Avatar
*****
11,147 posts
PKing isn't popular in the West for a simple reason: Griefing. It's why you see PvE servers on games. It's why you see few PvP only games at all. Most people just want to have fun, not be bullied by those who live and breathe a game 24/7.

So, if you can put aside your asinine F2P bias, keep an eye out for ArchAge. It should be out by the end of the year for us and after a point, open world PvP is a thing as it also involves the control of lands, possible naval battles, and so on. I'm sure Trion has an official page up for it by now, so you can do the rest of the legwork.

But there's also a reason why some "old features" you're pining for aren't likely to appear in new games these days, either. I'll let you figure that one out, too.
____________________________
Violence good. **** bad. Yay America.
#3 Apr 07 2014 at 12:12 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
Seriha wrote:

So, if you can put aside your asinine F2P bias,

Yeah, F2P has proven to be a viable business model for MMO's, so there's no reason to assume a f2p mmo will be better, worse or the same as a monthly sub one.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Apr 07 2014 at 12:19 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
But the MAIN feature Im looking for in open world PKing, it could be either ANYWHERE outside of town or just specific areas scattered all over the world (though these areas would be areas youd have to venture to or at least through at some point so avoiding them altogether wasnt an option) and possibly being able to loot players after you kill them (though that part isnt mandatory for what Im looking for but it would be a nice bonus), I miss the thrill of exploring an unknown area, or doing a qust in an area while constantly looking over my shoulder knowing that at any moment another player could come out of nowhere and start attacking me. MMOs seem to have gotten so care bear as of late, where the stuff for those of us who are still looking for a rush?


You are looking for EVE Online

- can kill other players anywhere (although in High security space you will in turn be killed by the cops)
- Exploring WH's is about as unknown as it gets
- Doing missions or plexes in Lowsec or Nullsec requires you to constantly scan for other ships. In WH's sites are even riskier without aid from local channel numbers
- Players can cloak and attack you out of no where, so you also need to be constantly ready to fight or run.

Some things you can do.

- Mining
- Production
- Piracy
- Empire Building
- Spying
- Exploration

Do one or do them all, its a sandbox play however you want. (if you make enough Isk you can "play for free" as well)


Edited, Apr 7th 2014 2:24pm by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#5 Apr 07 2014 at 12:20 PM Rating: Excellent
******
49,733 posts
MMOs are dead.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#6 Apr 07 2014 at 12:47 PM Rating: Good
There was tons of open world PKing in Age of Wushu when I played it. The skill leveling system is extremely time intensive though so new characters are at a pretty bad disadvantage to the power curve.

When I played it I was on a new server so there was pretty even PvP in the world a lot of the time. But I decided I did not want to invest the time it takes daily to stay with the power of no-lifers so I quit.
____________________________
An old silent pond...
A frog jumps into the pond,
splash! Silence again.

~ Matsuo Basho
#7 Apr 07 2014 at 2:20 PM Rating: Default
****
5,038 posts
Im not looking at EVE cause while it is an MMO its not an RPG.

As for F2P games I dont like them because they lack content, might get updated every 6+ months, and their idea of "new content" is usually just adding more areas, with higher level monsters to grind on and raising the level cap thats not content thats called "more tedious grinding."


Also leveling in those games is HORRIBLE, so much so they have to have double exp weekends every week because they know its horrible (and even still i doesnt help much). I mean for example in some games of the game sI played you have to get 100% exp to level... monster give you 1% at lower levels so thats, 100 kils to level, ok I can do that, then itll go to .75 a kill, ok thats fine too, then .50%, ok thats fine too, then .25%, getting worse but thats 4 kills for 1% so 400 kills to level, ok I can do that, eventually you get to the point where you get .01% per kill, thats 100 kills for 1%, so 10000 kills to level, and then it goes even further to the point where you have to kill 4-6 m,obs just to get that .1%, and this is before youre even HALFWAY to level cap, im sorry but i dont wanna play a game 3 years and still feel like im not gonna hit max level for another 7 years.

At least sub based MMOs give you HUGE new content updates every 2-3 months.. why? because they need you to keep giving them 15 bucks every month so theyre gonna do whatever it takes to keep you paying.. free to play doesnt do that because well its free, so you might go 6 month before theres any REAL content that isnt just increasing level cap and higher level mobs to grind on.

So name me some F2P mmorpgs that dont play like what I describe above and Ill HAPPILY go play them... the ones Ive played are:

DC Universe online (which isnt like above but i consider that more of a button mashing action game than an RPG)
2Moons
Last Chaos
9 Dragons

and they all played just like what I described

#8 Apr 07 2014 at 10:24 PM Rating: Default
****
5,038 posts
sooo anyone?
#9 Apr 08 2014 at 5:02 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Try a WoW PvP server, if you find the right one there will be plenty of open world PvP. Of course it doesn't have any pointless skills like "listening" to train in or gimmicky traps like you described because almost nobody cares about that kind of **** and it adds nothing to a game.
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
#10 Apr 08 2014 at 6:56 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
DuoMaxwellxx wrote:
At least sub based MMOs give you HUGE new content updates every 2-3 months.

Smiley: confused Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Apr 08 2014 at 7:02 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Jophiel wrote:
DuoMaxwellxx wrote:
At least sub based MMOs give you HUGE new content updates every 2-3 months.

Smiley: confused Smiley: dubious


Yeah, that's a conception that exists. I was having the same argument with people on the FFXIV board two months ago, because they were INSISTING that a F2P game had to get less content than a sub game. I eventually gave up; it was like talking to gbaji. Except it was a board of gbajis. And one of them was an admin.

At the end of the day, it all comes down to whether or not a company thinks designing content for the game will be profitable (and one would hope they did, or you probably want to drop it now). Sub or no sub, they make money by keeping people playing the game. They keep people playing the game by delivering content.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#12 Apr 08 2014 at 7:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I've never played a sub game that released "huge" content updates that regularly. And, when they did have a huge content update, it was often in the form of a paid expansion. Of course these days the whole F2P line is blurred anyway with games offering "premium" subscriptions, cash shops, etc.

Out of the mainstream MMORPGs I'm familiar with, Everquest by far had the most non-combat/non-crafting style skills. Things like Safe Fall, Lock Picking, Pickpocketing, Forage, Sense Heading, Alcohol Tolerance, Swimming, Begging, Sneak, Hide, a ton of different languages, etc. And spells like summoning light sources, summoning food, levitating, magical scrying eyes, a 'sanctuary' spell to warn if monsters were close and more. Most games these days seems to streamline everything solely into combat which I think is too bad but so it goes. No idea what the PvP situation is on Everquest these days; I think they're down to one PvP server and I don't know what its rule set is.

[edit: It's =/= Its... was bugging me. Also, added Begging to skills list]

Edited, Apr 8th 2014 9:48am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Apr 08 2014 at 8:02 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
There have been some interesting articles and talks on the problem of combat in games recently.

The extreme simplification is that the focus on combat is part of an industry-wide misconception in demographics that is only just now being made apparent. Essentially, of the various demographic ranges, the only group that cares a ton about content is the teenage male group. Which is unsurprising, really.

But most people tend to think this group actually makes up a big portion of the market, when they actually don't. They're definitely the most representative population relative to the size of the original pool (as in, a higher percentage of males 13-19 play video games than males 20-35, or whatever the actual ranges are). But they're only something like 8-12% of the total market of players.

They're also not the group with the most money to spend on gaming.

So studies are suggesting that more moderate gains in a wider base of demographics will lead to more profits overall. That means a reduced emphasis on combat and an increased emphasis on alternate progression systems. Progression being the key. "Casual" content is tossed around to mean anything non-combat, but non-combat systems can still be deep and interesting.

There are plenty of gamers out there who are really interested in operating shops/farms/towns, for instance. And there's plenty there to make those systems deep and interesting, with extensive progression.

There will still be plenty of games that are designed with the idea of getting 100% of the teenage male market and 40% of the 20s male market (AKA, Call of Duty). But games that aren't guaranteed success are learning that targeting a smaller demographic with established brand allegiance and little spending money is probably not the most profitable endeavor.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#14 Apr 08 2014 at 8:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
Jophiel wrote:

Out of the mainstream MMORPGs I'm familiar with, Everquest by far had the most non-combat/non-crafting style skills. Things like Safe Fall, Lock Picking, Pickpocketing, Forage, Sense Heading, Alcohol Tolerance, Swimming, Sneak, Hide, a ton of different languages, etc. And spells like summoning light sources, summoning food, levitating, magical scrying eyes, a 'sanctuary' spell to warn if monsters were close and more.

Don't forget, Druids could stop the rain. Smiley: grin

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Apr 08 2014 at 8:18 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
Quote:
So studies are suggesting that more moderate gains in a wider base of demographics will lead to more profits overall. That means a reduced emphasis on combat and an increased emphasis on alternate progression systems. Progression being the key. "Casual" content is tossed around to mean anything non-combat, but non-combat systems can still be deep and interesting.
The diplomacy game in Vanguard was the most unique and interesting alternate progressions I've run into in MMO's. It was basically a board game - you had parley matches. You'd win faction and material stuff, area buffs and the ability to parley with ever more important peoples. You'd lose faction and end up in a fight if your faction dipped too low for your surroundings. It was a good game but limited originally when I played.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#16 Apr 08 2014 at 9:29 AM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
I'm trying to get filthy rich in XIV. So far it's working. Smiley: grin

Everyone has a different definition of content, too. For some people it's new quests, for others it's new battles, for still others it's new areas to explore or new gear to acquire. (I personally don't put "new clothes" into the content category, but apparently some people do.)

So for a game that serves up a helping of all of those things in each patch, everyone will blow through their little definition of "content" and then claim that it wasn't enough.

Edited, Apr 8th 2014 11:30am by Catwho
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#17 Apr 08 2014 at 9:33 AM Rating: Excellent
******
49,733 posts
Elinda wrote:
Don't forget, Druids could stop the rain. Smiley: grin
It's not sane.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#18 Apr 08 2014 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,594 posts
I was listening to that under headphones here at the office. I started singing along.. out-loud. Oops.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#19 Apr 08 2014 at 11:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,020 posts
Catwho wrote:
I'm trying to get filthy rich in XIV. So far it's working. Smiley: grin

Everyone has a different definition of content, too. For some people it's new quests, for others it's new battles, for still others it's new areas to explore or new gear to acquire. (I personally don't put "new clothes" into the content category, but apparently some people do.)

So for a game that serves up a helping of all of those things in each patch, everyone will blow through their little definition of "content" and then claim that it wasn't enough.

Edited, Apr 8th 2014 11:30am by Catwho


It all comes down to the design, really.

When all your content sources are completely independent of one another, that's a problem. But when they organically bleed into one another, it's far less likely that players will exhaust content they're interested in, because you remove the access hurdle. But when all your alternative content sources are being implemented as amusing side things to compliment combat (as in, the main rewards are combat oriented, and the content can't stand on its own), it doesn't work.

Using WoW as an example, right now the tradeskills have one purpose - better combat stats. Essentially, you level the craft all the way to cap for one or two specific recipes and then you sort of stop caring, except to make that one recipe that can make money/be used by you.

But that's because the only real content line in WoW is combat.

But if there were more content lines distinct from combat/raiding, tradeskills could naturally become much fuller, and the economy would expand and get more diverse. And they could further expand tradeskills in ways a lot of players would probably be interested in, such as working towards getting their own alchemy lab, say, so they could get higher efficiency on their distillations. Etc.

But the thing is, none of those expansions work until the content is integrated in a way it makes sense. As long as it's combat first, everything else second, it just won't work.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#20 Apr 08 2014 at 9:12 PM Rating: Excellent
So I've been watching Sword Art Online the last few days. Minus the getting stuck in a virtual world, a total sandbox MMO would be neat.
FFXIV kind of did that, or I felt it did. With just the change of my weapon I could become something else.

It would be neat to have no set "class/job". Want to be a sword wielding, black magic caster, tank? Go for it, train the skills, figure out what works best, do it.
Want to be a shop owner and get rich? Do it.
I guess something like second life, but with that good ol RPG-feel.

As for a game that allows PKing... I would not know. Last time I PKed was back in FFXI before one of the "fixes" that changed the way mobs moved around. Nothing was ever gained from it, other then getting to meet GMs.
Now for open world PvP, the games have been listed.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#21 Apr 09 2014 at 3:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Guru
Avatar
*****
11,147 posts
Quote:
But the thing is, none of those expansions work until the content is integrated in a way it makes sense. As long as it's combat first, everything else second, it just won't work.

This is kind of the root of why I've said RP gets mocked and never really leads to anything in other similar conversations, too. There's no really meaningful carrot tied to it other than some warm and fuzzy feelings. Thus, it will indeed get bashed and labeled useless by the "teen male" demographic and then some.

That said, I still care about combat, but I can't really say I like the MMO norm. GW2 and Tera tried to spice things up a bit, but the former suffered from underwhelming skills and selection for me. The latter had a bit of that, too, but I feel like it squandered the potential of glyphs. As a common theme, both required "aiming" alongside positioning. Tab targeting and just watch your missile home in wasn't really a thing, and that's an obvious advantage for ranged attackers if such is present in the PvP sphere.

But call me silly, I'd love to see an MMO, or at least a multiplayer game, use some variant of Tales of Vesperia's combat. Let the players put together those insane infinite combos, be able to dodge/block attacks, and all that jazz. There series has even generally tied move sets to weapons and on occasion has even had skill leveling, too. Give it the FF treatment so you can swap classes with a weapon swap and bam, some longevity there in leveling alone. Take the rest further with meaningful crafting, some land development systems, etc. and perhaps we finally could have a world and not just blocked off locations with combat dummies of specific level ranges.
____________________________
Violence good. **** bad. Yay America.
#22 Apr 09 2014 at 6:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Seriha wrote:
This is kind of the root of why I've said RP gets mocked and never really leads to anything in other similar conversations, too.

I always figured it was the Mary Sue personalities, maudlin prose, "Son of a vampire, a dragon and a were-kraken" backgrounds and the thin excuse for "My eyes journey like two travelers along the expanses of your white elven skin to rest upon your sweet elf boobies".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#23 Apr 09 2014 at 8:28 AM Rating: Good
****
5,038 posts
Sandinmygum the Stupendous wrote:
So I've been watching Sword Art Online the last few days. Minus the getting stuck in a virtual world, a total sandbox MMO would be neat.
FFXIV kind of did that, or I felt it did. With just the change of my weapon I could become something else.

It would be neat to have no set "class/job". Want to be a sword wielding, black magic caster, tank? Go for it, train the skills, figure out what works best, do it.
Want to be a shop owner and get rich? Do it.
I guess something like second life, but with that good ol RPG-feel.

As for a game that allows PKing... I would not know. Last time I PKed was back in FFXI before one of the "fixes" that changed the way mobs moved around. Nothing was ever gained from it, other then getting to meet GMs.
Now for open world PvP, the games have been listed.



This.

It seems anime does better at making MMORPGs than MMORPGs do (Sword art online isnt the only on, .hack was pretty good to), what happened to the days when an mmo player could do whatever they wanted, some cared about raiding and endgame and they did that, others just wanted to be merchants and spent their day hunting monsters and selling loot to players, others spent their time making armor/weapons to sell to players, some were cooks that hunted the ingredient and cooked food to sell and keep players fed, others in guilds worked as spies to spy on rival guilds to get intel (i.e something an technique like listening would be good for) etc etc. With stuff like that it made the world seem more alive, you didnt really need NPCs at all because players could (and in most cases did) provide/supply all the things an NPC would have done).
#24 Apr 09 2014 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
******
49,733 posts
DuoMaxwellxx wrote:
others in guilds worked as spies to spy on rival guilds to get intel (i.e something an technique like listening would be good for)
Could you go back to the Specific General Forums and stop trying to infect the rest of Zam with stupid? Thanks.

Edited, Apr 9th 2014 10:31am by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#25 Apr 09 2014 at 8:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I've been playing MMORPGs since '99 and don't remember a time like that. Maybe in the MUDs (which I didn't play) but not in the "modern" 3D MMO era. Yeah, you had some people who liked tradeskills and stuff but the best way to excel at tradeskills was still to be a high level character with access to the best components and +Stat gear to increase your chances at success. Likewise, the best way to play the markets was always to be able to go out and get the stuff that people wanted to buy. Which meant high levels which meant killing things which meant combat. Some people would play the "buy low/sell high" game but 95% of the guys yelling "Sword for sale" had just pulled that sword off some dead monster's corpse.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Apr 09 2014 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
******
27,272 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Some people would play the "buy low/sell high" game but 95% of the guys yelling "Sword for sale" had just pulled that sword off some dead monster's corpse.
It's best when there's still blood all over it and a hand clinging on to the weapon.
____________________________
Theophany wrote:
YOU'RE AN ELITIST @#%^ AETHIEN, NO WONDER YOU HAVE NO FRIENDS AND PEOPLE HATE YOU.
someproteinguy wrote:
Aethien you take more terrible pictures than a Japanese tourist.
Astarin wrote:
One day, Maz, you'll learn not to click on anything Aeth links.
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 84 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (84)