Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

ESOFollow

#427 Apr 11 2014 at 6:43 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Are Imperials still locked behind a paywall? that really pissed me off.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#428 Apr 11 2014 at 7:23 AM Rating: Good
Friend discovered that medium and high render water reflections differently, and it actually looks cooler on medium. Just straight up reflects the light source, it seems.
#429 Apr 11 2014 at 7:56 AM Rating: Good
***
3,973 posts
idiggory the Fussy wrote:
Are Imperials still locked behind a paywall? that really pissed me off.



Yup. I bought it but for the free horse really. Which is not really worth it. The horse is slow and I forget to bother to use it most of the time.
____________________________
An old silent pond...
A frog jumps into the pond,
splash! Silence again.

~ Matsuo Basho
#430 Apr 11 2014 at 8:07 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
I noticed that in the Let's Play I watched, the free horse is only about 5-10% faster than just running.
#431 Apr 11 2014 at 8:23 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
See, as much as I want my PC to flex its muscle, I also really don't want to give Bethesda the sale for this game. We'll see how long that holds out.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#432 Apr 11 2014 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
For me it'll hold out til we see the first 50% off sale, probably.
#433 Apr 11 2014 at 8:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
idiggory the Fussy wrote:
I can't help but want to buy it so I can use it to show off my new rig. Smiley: frown

I'd think that a graphic-modded Skyrim would be better for that.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#434 Apr 11 2014 at 8:46 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I mean, sales on the retail price of MMOs come quickly. The real money in a MMO is in the longterm fees. The big initial purchase is the company capitalizing on the fact that early adopters will pay it, but there's really no reason it's financially necessary.

What's irritating is that the stupid Imperial upgrade will be $20 until they finally roll it into the game (probably with the first expansion).

But I'm really not amused by their decision to provide something as extensive as a race in their CE upgrade package. I think that's absolute crap. Particularly in a game like ESO, where they get unique racial skills that aren't just cosmetic.

In TOR, I would have been pissed if the Twi'lek were behind a paywall. But at least that'd have been just a character skin. This actually comes with unique traits.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#435 Apr 11 2014 at 8:48 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Jophiel wrote:
idiggory the Fussy wrote:
I can't help but want to buy it so I can use it to show off my new rig. Smiley: frown

I'd think that a graphic-modded Skyrim would be better for that.


But then OTHER people can't see how awesome it is. Smiley: madSmiley: madSmiley: mad
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#436 Apr 11 2014 at 8:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Erm, the other people can't see your monitor anyway for you to show off your system. What on earth do you think you're going to be showing them over a MMO?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#437 Apr 11 2014 at 8:58 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Oh they'll know. They'll know.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#438 Apr 11 2014 at 9:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
idiggory the Fussy wrote:
I mean, sales on the retail price of MMOs come quickly. The real money in a MMO is in the longterm fees. The big initial purchase is the company capitalizing on the fact that early adopters will pay it, but there's really no reason it's financially necessary.
High entry price keeps the population down at launch, that's less hardware you need to buy and then discard in 2 months when the population crashes.
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#439 Apr 11 2014 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Limited releases do the exact same thing, in a more-controlled fashion.

They're obviously free to charge whatever they want. That's capitalism. But let's call a spade a spade; they're charging $60 to monopolize on fans who are early adopters. It's the same reason they have a $20 CE upgrade for "fans" of the series.

It's also gives them the benefit of primarily attracting an early fanbase of people who are already predisposed to enjoy the game, which keeps initial reviews and word-of-mouth more positive than if entry was at a lower price bracket. You'll probably never see the general buzz around a F2P game be as positive as the buzz around a sub game in the first months, assuming equal server stability and such, because of that population disparity.

It's fine if people think it was an acceptable purchase, it's their money. If they want to spend $60 now rather than wait a few months and save, that's 100% their choice, and it's perfectly fine to do so.

But let's just be honest here; there's no reason for a MSRP that matches the market trend for non-subscription games besides the fact that they can get people to pay it. Which is all the justification they need, so let's not try and make it seem more benevolent than it is.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#440 Apr 11 2014 at 9:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
And a high price does it without any need for a release schedule. Why not let the people decide whether or not they want to pay the price instead of trying to sort them into groups? Two birds with one stone or something.

I dunno, it costs years and millions of dollars it costs to develop an MMO and people are crawling over each other in a desperate bid to give you an extra $50 so they can have the deluxe version that comes with a bonus pair of elf panties and a spiffy neon lion you can ride around on.

There's a point it just doesn't feel like exploitative behavior anymore.

Edited, Apr 11th 2014 8:44am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#441 Apr 11 2014 at 10:03 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Taking a race that has been a standard option in ES games and locking it behind a paywall doesn't feel exploitative to you?

We're not talking about a new race, here. Oblivion, Morrowind, Skyrim... They all had 10 playable races included. ESO has 9, and one behind a paywall.

If Skyrim launched with a classic race as day one DLC, you wouldn't think that was exploitative of longterm fans?

And we're not just talking about cosmetic stuff here. I don't give a crap if the CE includes a ton of cosmetic items. I DO care that a small subset of players now have access to an additional racial option with unique passive skills, giving them different build options than what I can access without paying more money.

That's absolutely exploitative.

I'd think this was a dirty move if the races were purely cosmetic; the fact that they aren't makes it really dirty to me.

If they had launched F2P, gave everyone access to Imperials and the rest were unlocks, I wouldn't have an issue with it. I do have an issue with them charging a $60 MSRP, a $15/month subscription, and then still having day one unlocks. That's not okay.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#442 Apr 11 2014 at 10:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
idiggory the Fussy wrote:
Taking a race that has been a standard option in ES games and locking it behind a paywall doesn't feel exploitative to you?
No.

idiggory the Fussy wrote:
If Skyrim launched with a classic race as day one DLC, you wouldn't think that was exploitative of longterm fans?
No.

idiggory the Fussy wrote:
If they had launched F2P, gave everyone access to Imperials and the rest were unlocks, I wouldn't have an issue with it. I do have an issue with them charging a $60 MSRP, a $15/month subscription, and then still having day one unlocks. That's not okay.
Well if they're clearly superior to the other races I'll buy an argument about P2W stuff. That's not something that has worked out well in games in the long term, and really undermines the idea that it is a "game" per-se (I'd also be really disappointed to see ESO go P2W so soon in it's lifespan). On the other hand if it's just another flavor of racials and some unique looks I can't say it'd bother me at all. I mean, it's not like there aren't other human races as well. I never cared for Imperials anyway... Smiley: lol

Edited, Apr 11th 2014 9:24am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#443 Apr 11 2014 at 10:44 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
I didn't call it P2W.

And I just fundamentally disagree with you, then. Serious question: what WOULD be exploitative for you?

[EDIT]

To make this clearer, I agree companies are going to take the route that leads to their best profits. I think it's a serious issue with fandom that, by nature, it opens itself up to exploitation in a way that lets companies get away with a lot of crap, because there WON'T be a financial backlash for a company who aggressively exploits brand loyatly.

So I do think it's reasonable to hold companies up to a moral standard in the way they treat their fans, and I'm absolutely going to call them out for exploitative crap that passes the line, for however little that is worth.

It's a big part of my issue with the evolution of Blizzard into Activision-Blizzard. They used to have a very fan-centric approach. Now they have a corporate milk-the-fans approach.

And I think the industry as a whole is far, far worse because of it (not Blizzard specifically, the trend). But because its an industry of fandoms, people are inclined to just take it. Why wouldn't they? They're torn between loyalty to the IP and dissatisfaction with the studios. But their fandom-specific affiliations are generally with the IP, not the studio.

It's sort of like the Enders Game/Orson Scott Card crap. I recommend the book all the time, but I also stress that people should buy it used. Studios are getting more and more control over the distribution of their IPs (and MMOs are obviously a direct service), so you can't be loyal to a product and refuse to support the company practices anymore.

Now you have to support the company practices if you want to access the product. And I think the consumers are the ones who lose in that situation, completely.

Edited, Apr 11th 2014 12:53pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#444 Apr 11 2014 at 11:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
The biggest thing that comes to mind would be some kind of addiction exploitation. For example, those goodie boxes that you have to unlock with real money keys. If you put items in them that are important for the game then you end up with people rolling the dice constantly and dropping more cash then they really want to. TERA was bad for this with having things like their good Alkahest and Spellbind in the lockboxes, and making people play that RNG nightmare to masterwork stuff.

Creating additional premium content that's necessary to enjoy the game would be a nice example too; but I think we've pretty much lumped that in with P2W stuff. So for example if you have to pay a subscription, then you realize you'll pretty much be excluded from endgame unless you drop the extra $20 for an Imperial character for the racial benefits, I'd consider that exploitative.

1) Optional additional premium content is not exploitative.

2) Necessary additional premium content is P2W (and thus exploitative, or at minimum deceptive).

3) RNG based addiction exploitation is bad.

I'm certain there's about 50 shades of grey in there as well.

Edit: If you want to talk Blizzard, they're in an interesting position of having people with thousands of dollars invested in characters in WoW, and they have to keep paying $15/month for access to them. I'm not going to out-and-out call that exploitative, there's still plenty of reasons people enjoy playing the game, but if you want to argue there are people there who want to move on and are being taken advantage of I wouldn't bat an eye. Of course you can unsub/resub at any time, which would seriously diminish that argument for me, especially with lulls like now in the content where nothing new is happening for a year or so. Nonetheless it's probably getting into that grey zone for some people.

Edited, Apr 11th 2014 10:38am by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#445 Apr 11 2014 at 2:11 PM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts


Nothing else to add to the convo, just this.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#446 Apr 11 2014 at 6:44 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
I don't think they should have limited Imperials to a higher priced edition. I think that's a completely unnecessary turnoff to customers. There are plenty of cosmetic things to offer in a collector's edition that aren't as major as a race. I also don't think Imperials are pay-to-win. I'm interested in their racials for the specific character I'm building one with, but I don't think they're fundamentally superior to anything else. So I guess I'm somewhere in the middle.

I wouldn't go so far as to say the fans are being exploited. I'm a pretty smart cookie, and I have complete agency in this situation. I know what they're doing. I also know I could wait a few months or a year at the outside and get everything I'm paying for now for a lot less. It's either worth the price to me to get the product now, or it's not, and that choice is entirely my own to make. I think it's a little self indulgent to apply the term "exploited" to such a situation, thereby putting myself in the same company as, say, a minor-runaway-turned-sex-worker, you know?

Of course, my credibility is slim when you consider I upgraded to the Imperial edition mainly for the mudcrab.
#447 Apr 11 2014 at 7:49 PM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
Wait. There's a mudcrab?
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#448 Apr 11 2014 at 7:52 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Not gonna lie, I had the exact same thought.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#449 Apr 11 2014 at 7:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
IDrownFish of the Seven Seas wrote:
Wait. There's a mudcrab?


idiggory the Fussy wrote:
Not gonna lie, I had the exact same thought.



____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#450 Apr 11 2014 at 9:05 PM Rating: Excellent
****
4,074 posts
MUDCRAB!

You see what I'm saying?

Worth every freaking penny.
#451 Apr 12 2014 at 11:15 AM Rating: Good
***
3,973 posts
Welp I collected all 15 skyshards, (Omg 5 free points) dinged 16, and finally left Auridon. I'm going to miss that zone, I grew rather fond of it. Grahtwood looks like it has potential though. Jungle Kitty land.

Also yup love my mudcrab. I call him Pinchy naturally.
____________________________
An old silent pond...
A frog jumps into the pond,
splash! Silence again.

~ Matsuo Basho
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 423 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (423)