Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

I want the new Razer LaptopFollow

#1 Aug 26 2011 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
It's so pretty!

Seriously, seriously pretty.

That price is definitely an issue, but I love the innovation this thing allows for. If it gets a large enough market, then a legitimate gaming pc market might form that allows for more options and specs.

The fact that intel and razer worked together to optimize it specifically for certain specs just makes me even happier. :)

But still, it's so pretty. If I had 3 grand to toss around (even for another pc in general) I would seriously consider it. If they ever release a $1500 model...
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#2 Aug 26 2011 at 1:16 PM Rating: Good
******
49,889 posts
That's hot. I'd probably drop the three grand for it if I needed a laptop.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#3 Aug 26 2011 at 2:31 PM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
I had never even IMAGINED replacing a trackpad with a touchscreen. But the minute I saw it I was all "WHY ARE WE NOT ALREADY DOING THIS?"

The only complaint I have about the keyboard is the way they've done the arrow keys. But I can't say it surprises me, either. And once you adjust to it, it would be fine.

And I love the whole look.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#4 Aug 26 2011 at 2:51 PM Rating: Default
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
It's seven @#%^ing pounds. That's not a laptop. It's an all-in-one desktop that happens to fold shut and not have any (easily) replaceable parts.

Oh, and it costs three grand.

It's incredibly similar to someone dropping three grand on a 17" MBP; in fact, a lot of the specs are very similar between the two, except you get a poorer GPU and better HDD on the Mac.

Also kind of laughable that despite Intel apparently partnering with Razer on the laptop, it doesn't even have Thunderbolt technology in it.

I'd never spend $3000 on a laptop. $1000-1500, sure. But I don't need to move my computer around if I'm going to be gaming on it. For a similar price, you can get far better specs on a desktop, even going with the overpriced sh*t Alienware tosses around these days.

Edit: 17" laptops are in general incredibly stupid, including the Macbook Pro. 15" should be the absolute maximum size of a laptop; if you need a bigger screen, plug in a cheap external.

Edited, Aug 26th 2011 1:53pm by Theophany
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#5 Aug 26 2011 at 3:37 PM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
Quote:
It's seven @#%^ing pounds. That's not a laptop. It's an all-in-one desktop that happens to fold shut and not have any (easily) replaceable parts.


lolwut?

My laptop is 6.2 pounds and I can't say I've ever ONCE noticed its weight or felt it was heavy in any way.

Also, Kotaku says it is 5 pounds. Do you have a different source?

Also, your thunderbolt comment strikes me as ridiculous. This is a laptop built with very specific parameters (and specifically for gaming). If the extra 5gbs theoretical maximum wasn't necessary for reaching those specs, then why would they include it? USB 3.0 is likely more than sufficient, and more attractive considering the current state available peripherals.

Plus, I imagine this a laptop specifically catering to people who want a gaming rig but would also need a laptop (like me). Just with more cash. The fact that it allows you to do high-quality gaming on the go would be VERY attractive to many people.

Would I pay 3k for it? No. But there are very few things I would pay that much money for. If it were to go down to $2k, it would be another story.

Also, how exactly do you plan to use an external screen if one of the reasons you'd be buying this LAPTOP is mobile gaming? My parents actually have a 17" laptop. Is it quite large? Yes. Larger than I'd want my laptop to be? Probably. But would I want that size on a gaming laptop? Probably.

And comparing laptop specs to desktops is, generally speaking, an absurd thing to do. If you are buying a laptop, it's because you want to be mobile. No matter how much you spend on a desktop, it doesn't offer that feature. Do you pay a lot more for the feature? Yes. But it's up to the buyer to decide if that matters to them or not.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#6 Aug 26 2011 at 3:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Supreme Lionator
*****
14,174 posts
Kotaku said the screen was five pounds, did it not?

But yeah, seven pounds is so light I wouldn't see that as any kind of issue. I'm sure the market cares about that kind of thing, but fortunately, as I'm not in Razer's marketing department, I don't have to care what it thinks.

That said, this is just a laptop, not the messiah. A very overpriced laptop, at that.

Edited, Aug 26th 2011 9:53pm by Kavekk
____________________________
“Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.”
#7 Aug 26 2011 at 4:01 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:

lolwut?

My laptop is 6.2 pounds and I can't say I've ever ONCE noticed its weight or felt it was heavy in any way.

Also, Kotaku says it is 5 pounds. Do you have a different source?

Also, your thunderbolt comment strikes me as ridiculous. This is a laptop built with very specific parameters (and specifically for gaming). If the extra 5gbs theoretical maximum wasn't necessary for reaching those specs, then why would they include it? USB 3.0 is likely more than sufficient, and more attractive considering the current state available peripherals.

Plus, I imagine this a laptop specifically catering to people who want a gaming rig but would also need a laptop (like me). Just with more cash. The fact that it allows you to do high-quality gaming on the go would be VERY attractive to many people.

Would I pay 3k for it? No. But there are very few things I would pay that much money for. If it were to go down to $2k, it would be another story.

Also, how exactly do you plan to use an external screen if one of the reasons you'd be buying this LAPTOP is mobile gaming? My parents actually have a 17" laptop. Is it quite large? Yes. Larger than I'd want my laptop to be? Probably. But would I want that size on a gaming laptop? Probably.

And comparing laptop specs to desktops is, generally speaking, an absurd thing to do. If you are buying a laptop, it's because you want to be mobile. No matter how much you spend on a desktop, it doesn't offer that feature. Do you pay a lot more for the feature? Yes. But it's up to the buyer to decide if that matters to them or not.


Does anyone actually need a mobile rig for gaming though? >_> I can understand needing a laptop for business and school work, but i've never understood the purpose of the expensive gaming laptops. Buy a 500 laptop that can do word processing, powerpoints and web surfing, then spend the remaining 2500 on a desktop that is better in every way than this thing.
#8 Aug 26 2011 at 4:12 PM Rating: Decent
******
20,020 posts
KTurner wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:

lolwut?

My laptop is 6.2 pounds and I can't say I've ever ONCE noticed its weight or felt it was heavy in any way.

Also, Kotaku says it is 5 pounds. Do you have a different source?

Also, your thunderbolt comment strikes me as ridiculous. This is a laptop built with very specific parameters (and specifically for gaming). If the extra 5gbs theoretical maximum wasn't necessary for reaching those specs, then why would they include it? USB 3.0 is likely more than sufficient, and more attractive considering the current state available peripherals.

Plus, I imagine this a laptop specifically catering to people who want a gaming rig but would also need a laptop (like me). Just with more cash. The fact that it allows you to do high-quality gaming on the go would be VERY attractive to many people.

Would I pay 3k for it? No. But there are very few things I would pay that much money for. If it were to go down to $2k, it would be another story.

Also, how exactly do you plan to use an external screen if one of the reasons you'd be buying this LAPTOP is mobile gaming? My parents actually have a 17" laptop. Is it quite large? Yes. Larger than I'd want my laptop to be? Probably. But would I want that size on a gaming laptop? Probably.

And comparing laptop specs to desktops is, generally speaking, an absurd thing to do. If you are buying a laptop, it's because you want to be mobile. No matter how much you spend on a desktop, it doesn't offer that feature. Do you pay a lot more for the feature? Yes. But it's up to the buyer to decide if that matters to them or not.


Does anyone actually need a mobile rig for gaming though? >_> I can understand needing a laptop for business and school work, but i've never understood the purpose of the expensive gaming laptops. Buy a 500 laptop that can do word processing, powerpoints and web surfing, then spend the remaining 2500 on a desktop that is better in every way than this thing.


A gaming laptop would be WAAAAAAY more useful for me than a desktop would be (assuming I also had a cheap laptop). I lived at school, but would still find myself home for breaks. And I lived close enough (an hour to an hour and a half away) that I'd be home for enough weekends to make things annoying. Time home in the middle of winter when all your friends are at school? Prime gaming time. :P

Plus, a loooot of people travel for work. If you spend a fifth of your year away from home (spending nights bored in a hotel room), it would be a very attractive option.

How much the scope of the market extends beyond those two groups, I have no idea. But I imagine a lot of people wouldn't mind switching to a mobile platform. Would they pay $2800? IDK. I wouldn't. But if they come out with a more affordable option, this thing could sell quite well I imagine.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#9 Aug 26 2011 at 6:14 PM Rating: Default
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:
It's seven @#%^ing pounds. That's not a laptop. It's an all-in-one desktop that happens to fold shut and not have any (easily) replaceable parts.


lolwut?

My laptop is 6.2 pounds and I can't say I've ever ONCE noticed its weight or felt it was heavy in any way.

A pound is apparently heavy when we're talking about consumer electronics; ask all of the iPad detractors who say it's "too heavy" at a pound and a third.

idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Also, Kotaku says it is 5 pounds. Do you have a different source?

Razer's website says 6.9 lbs.

idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Also, your thunderbolt comment strikes me as ridiculous. This is a laptop built with very specific parameters (and specifically for gaming). If the extra 5gbs theoretical maximum wasn't necessary for reaching those specs, then why would they include it? USB 3.0 is likely more than sufficient, and more attractive considering the current state available peripherals.

Thunderbolt isn't just a data port, though. It can run displays, HDDs, etc. And because it's dual-channel, it can send/receive at the same time, meaning that you can essentially hook up multiple peripherals to the same port with no noticeable loss in speed.

USB 3.0 is actually the less desirable, BTW. Intel and Apple are both completely behind Thunderbolt, and while peripherals are still fairly expensive, mini-Display Port monitors aren't, and they're compatible with Thunderbolt.

idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Plus, I imagine this a laptop specifically catering to people who want a gaming rig but would also need a laptop (like me). Just with more cash. The fact that it allows you to do high-quality gaming on the go would be VERY attractive to many people.

Would I pay 3k for it? No. But there are very few things I would pay that much money for. If it were to go down to $2k, it would be another story.

But you're their market. Professionals with the kind of money to drop on this kind of product don't care about the portability because they likelihood is that they'll be at home sometime in the next few days. Their laptop that they take with them is—90% of the time—office/IT department-issued. Another 7 lbs on top of the 5-6 lbs of that laptop? Yeah, sure.

The market for gaming laptops is basically college students, who don't have the kind of cash to waste on a $3k laptop.

idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Also, how exactly do you plan to use an external screen if one of the reasons you'd be buying this LAPTOP is mobile gaming? My parents actually have a 17" laptop. Is it quite large? Yes. Larger than I'd want my laptop to be? Probably. But would I want that size on a gaming laptop? Probably.

Uh, because a ~$300 monitor gets you a 27" display that's a **** of a lot bigger than your dinky 17" display, and all it takes it popping the cord into the laptop when you're at home (which is probably most of the time). Keep that display at school and take the laptop when you go home. Get a 15" laptop instead.

idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
And comparing laptop specs to desktops is, generally speaking, an absurd thing to do. If you are buying a laptop, it's because you want to be mobile. No matter how much you spend on a desktop, it doesn't offer that feature. Do you pay a lot more for the feature? Yes. But it's up to the buyer to decide if that matters to them or not.

That's my point though. Let's compare this computer to a non-gaming laptop (which can still be used for gaming quite well): a Macbook Pro 15".

With a SSD, a 15" MBP would benchmark very close to the Razer at a lower price point. ($2599 for the MBP, $2800 for the Razer, and keep in mind that the MBP is a quad-core, the Razer is only dual-core)

That's not even a gaming laptop. That's a laptop for video editors and other professionals in the graphics industry.

It's a terrible laptop. Until it drops to ~$2000, it's a complete waste of money.
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#10 Aug 26 2011 at 7:26 PM Rating: Default
******
20,020 posts
People actually dislike the iPad for being heavy? O.o;; I'm not a fan of it (for my own use), but that would NEVER have been on the list of reasons why.

Quote:

With a SSD, a 15" MBP would benchmark very close to the Razer at a lower price point. ($2599 for the MBP, $2800 for the Razer, and keep in mind that the MBP is a quad-core, the Razer is only dual-core)


...You couldn't POSSIBLY know this. All we know right now is that it uses an i7, 2nd generation chip, has 8 gigs of ram, and some dedicated graphics card that fully supports dx11. Is it a dual core processor? Yes, but using the new SB technology which has shown some SERIOUS power (easily competing with quad core processors even with only 2).

And since the resolution is capped at 1080p, that should be MORE than enough to give you very high framerates on all current (and the next few years' worth of) games.

Also, the screen size shouldn't be surprising. 17" is pretty standard for 1080p support with normal usage distance from the screen.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#11 Aug 27 2011 at 12:47 PM Rating: Decent
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:
With a SSD, a 15" MBP would benchmark very close to the Razer at a lower price point. ($2599 for the MBP, $2800 for the Razer, and keep in mind that the MBP is a quad-core, the Razer is only dual-core)


...You couldn't POSSIBLY know this. All we know right now is that it uses an i7, 2nd generation chip, has 8 gigs of ram, and some dedicated graphics card that fully supports dx11. Is it a dual core processor? Yes, but using the new SB technology which has shown some SERIOUS power (easily competing with quad core processors even with only 2).

Yeah you can. The 15" MBP uses a higher power i7 (quad-core), has a much faster HDD (SSD), the same amount and kind of RAM (but probably higher quality), and the only thing that it lacks is a 2 GB GPU.

Of course we can't tell exactly how it'll benchmark, but all of those things add up to a fast computer, one that will easily keep up with the Razer Blade.

The best part? The current line of MBPs have been out for ~6 months at this point, while the Blade isn't even on sale.
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#12 Aug 27 2011 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
20,917 posts
While reading the article I had trouble figuring out what was supposed to be so exciting and what problem this product was supposedly solving, then I read the first comment and realized that I wasn't the one not getting it, the author was.

This changes nothing about the problems of laptop gaming. There is still the extreme price difference for equivalent desktop performance. There is still the inability to swap out components to make economical upgrades. Gamers will still want quality peripherals that significantly reduce the convenience and portability of laptops. Laptop gaming still doesn't make sense.

This product is a move in the direct of Apple's marketing strategy, and Intel isn't going to beat Apple at it.
#13 Aug 27 2011 at 7:42 PM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
Quote:
Yeah you can. The 15" MBP uses a higher power i7 (quad-core), has a much faster HDD (SSD), the same amount and kind of RAM (but probably higher quality), and the only thing that it lacks is a 2 GB GPU.


I think you are underestimating the power of the newer generation chips. The i3 dual core chips are competing with (and often beating) decent i5 quad cores from the last generation.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#14 Aug 28 2011 at 9:48 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,297 posts
KTurner wrote:
Does anyone actually need a mobile rig for gaming though? >_> I can understand needing a laptop for business and school work, but i've never understood the purpose of the expensive gaming laptops. Buy a 500 laptop that can do word processing, powerpoints and web surfing, then spend the remaining 2500 on a desktop that is better in every way than this thing.


i do, but i only spend about 8 nights at home every month. i think anyone who spends at least 30% of their gametime on the road starts to seriously consider getting a desktop replacement. they might travel for work, or just want to game in the same room with buddies and not want to break down a desktop 3 or 4 times a week. high-end gaming laptops are a small market, but don't forget about the bratty kids of rich divorcee's who have mastered the guilt trip.

i gotta be careful because i got a **** of an open box deal on a $1000 laptop for $630. turns out there's some kind of short in the audio so the speakers crackle. bought some usb headphones and disabled onboard audio. now i want every future laptop have an option to remove the built-in speakers and save $300, lol. seriously, give me an option to skip the speakers and put some ventilation in these things. headphones on the road, 27" 19x12 lcd + 5.1 speakers at home.
#15 Aug 28 2011 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
******
20,020 posts
I think one of the biggest aspects of these machines is that Razer is managing all the necessary updates. The players no longer need to worry about updating drivers for various parts/ensuring compatibility--all that will be done by Razer, who will likely be testing all the new games to ensure they work properly.

That's pretty attractive, actually.

Plus, most people (even gamers) just don't want to build their own computers. That's easily the minority. This is a dedicated gaming PC engineered specifically with proper gaming parameters in mind (and will likely last many years, based on those specs, before you start to feel the need to upgrade). Because, remember, these are people who wouldn't want to upgrade anything anyway. MAYBE a new GPU, but that's it--most just use the same computer with the same parts until they want a new one.

Is it expensive? Sure. But if mobile gaming is attractive and you don't consider building a rig viable, it's a very nice option for you.

Oh, not to mention that as a PC, you'll definitely be able to play any game that comes out. It doesn't matter how good your macbook's specs are if you aren't going to put Windows on it too (or Linux, I suppose)--way too many games still don't support Macs for them to be considered a viable gaming option. And that doesn't even seem to be changing, actually. At least not at a speed worth commenting on.

If you're well-informed, you can buy the same rig for much cheaper, but let's look at Alienware prices. The equivalent rigs are about $2k. Only $800 more for a laptop with some nice additional features and full driver support? That doesn't strike me as a bad deal (IF you aren't willing to build your own rig).
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#16 Aug 28 2011 at 1:30 PM Rating: Decent
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:
Yeah you can. The 15" MBP uses a higher power i7 (quad-core), has a much faster HDD (SSD), the same amount and kind of RAM (but probably higher quality), and the only thing that it lacks is a 2 GB GPU.


I think you are underestimating the power of the newer generation chips. The i3 dual core chips are competing with (and often beating) decent i5 quad cores from the last generation.

Unless I'm missing something, Sandy Bridge (in the current MBPs) is the latest generation of the i-series chips.

Either way, it's a ridiculous price point. It's an extreme niche market and Razer is acting like they've revolutionized gaming by creating a $3000 laptop.
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#17 Aug 28 2011 at 1:37 PM Rating: Good
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,139 posts
Quote:
The Blade
Price: US$2799.99
Availability: North America Q4 2011
Product Specifications:
· 2.8GHz Intel® Core™ i7 2640M Processor
· 8GB 1333MHz DDR3 Memory
· 17.3" LED Backlit Display (1920x1080)
· NVIDIA GeForce® GT 555M with NVIDIA® Optimus™ Technology
2GB Dedicated GDDR5 Video Memory
· Built-in HD Webcam
· Integrated 60Wh Battery
· 320GB 7200rpm SATA HDD
· Wireless Network 802.11 b/g/n Compatible
· Battery: 6 hours idle, 2 1/2 if playing "hardcore" game.
· 16.81" (Width) x 10.9" (Depth) x 0.88" (Height); 6.97lbs (Weight)


Meh. Having a 7200 HDD on a so called gaming rig is silly and a deal breaker.

Edited, Aug 28th 2011 2:38pm by Paskil
#18 Aug 28 2011 at 2:57 PM Rating: Decent
******
20,020 posts
Overlord Theophany wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:
Yeah you can. The 15" MBP uses a higher power i7 (quad-core), has a much faster HDD (SSD), the same amount and kind of RAM (but probably higher quality), and the only thing that it lacks is a 2 GB GPU.


I think you are underestimating the power of the newer generation chips. The i3 dual core chips are competing with (and often beating) decent i5 quad cores from the last generation.

Unless I'm missing something, Sandy Bridge (in the current MBPs) is the latest generation of the i-series chips.

Either way, it's a ridiculous price point. It's an extreme niche market and Razer is acting like they've revolutionized gaming by creating a $3000 laptop.


Last I had heard, the SNB macbooks had been delayed indefinitely. Are they out now?

And looking at the macbooks, I fail to see your argument. The default Macbook is 500 less, yes, but comes with a much smaller, slower HDD. To upgrade to a worthwhile SSD will be 500. Getting the same amount of RAM is another $200. Yeah, now you might have a better computer, but you are also already paying more for this computer than for the Razer, and you don't get the gaming-specific features (such as the macro-ready keyboard).

The Razer is only dual core, yes, but it's 2.8Ghz. The MBP is quad, but only 2.2. TO upgrade to 2.3 is $200.

Finally, it's GPU is pretty decent. It has a gig more dedicated video memory with double the bandwidth, a lower potential processing speed, and twice the memory clock speed.

Maybe it's processor is slightly worse. But that doesn't really matter when the rig is being designed as a dedicated gaming machine, primarily.

Especially since the MBP still sucks for gaming.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#19 Aug 28 2011 at 4:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Why do Xbox games running on six-year-old hardware look nearly as good as a modern PC games?

Because PCs get sh*tty ports of games designed to run on six year old systems? Exhibit A: "From Dust"?

Edited, Aug 28th 2011 5:46pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Aug 28 2011 at 6:14 PM Rating: Decent
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Overlord Theophany wrote:
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:
Yeah you can. The 15" MBP uses a higher power i7 (quad-core), has a much faster HDD (SSD), the same amount and kind of RAM (but probably higher quality), and the only thing that it lacks is a 2 GB GPU.


I think you are underestimating the power of the newer generation chips. The i3 dual core chips are competing with (and often beating) decent i5 quad cores from the last generation.

Unless I'm missing something, Sandy Bridge (in the current MBPs) is the latest generation of the i-series chips.

Either way, it's a ridiculous price point. It's an extreme niche market and Razer is acting like they've revolutionized gaming by creating a $3000 laptop.


Last I had heard, the SNB macbooks had been delayed indefinitely. Are they out now?

And looking at the macbooks, I fail to see your argument. The default Macbook is 500 less, yes, but comes with a much smaller, slower HDD. To upgrade to a worthwhile SSD will be 500. Getting the same amount of RAM is another $200. Yeah, now you might have a better computer, but you are also already paying more for this computer than for the Razer, and you don't get the gaming-specific features (such as the macro-ready keyboard).

The Razer is only dual core, yes, but it's 2.8Ghz. The MBP is quad, but only 2.2. TO upgrade to 2.3 is $200.

Finally, it's GPU is pretty decent. It has a gig more dedicated video memory with double the bandwidth, a lower potential processing speed, and twice the memory clock speed.

Maybe it's processor is slightly worse. But that doesn't really matter when the rig is being designed as a dedicated gaming machine, primarily.

Especially since the MBP still sucks for gaming.

I don't think you know how dual core vs quad core work, especially when it's the same processor line. (The 15" and 17" MBP i7s are Sandy Bridge i7s, btw, and have been since February.)

If you think you need more than a 128 GB SSD on a gaming computer you're crazy; external HDDs with Firewire 800 (or even Thunderbolt externals) are a far better value and as long as you're not booting off of them they're more than equal to any task you need them for unless you're doing high-end video work and working off of the drive (I run iTunes off of a 750 GB FW800 external with zero issues).

MBPs suck for gaming? You've obviously never used one since they went to Intel. I can tell you right now that it's basically a toss-up with the Razer, which is ridiculous. A 320 GB 7200 RPM drive is beyond stupid for a gaming laptop, especially when you're shelling out $2800 for it.

That said, I wouldn't buy either for gaming. It's a ridiculous discussion, and that's what I was pointing out. That it'll benchmark near a MBP and probably cost more is insane. That's not a way to get into the market.

Edited, Aug 28th 2011 5:15pm by Theophany
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#21 Aug 28 2011 at 8:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
****
4,297 posts
somebody sounds a little ticked off that there's a more expensive option than mac...
#22 Aug 28 2011 at 9:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
What this needs to be a true, absolute, quintessential groundbreaking gaming laptop: A tray that holds a thin wireless controller that has an inflating mesh bubble back to be supported comfortably in one's hands. When you're done with the controller, you just hit the "deflate" button and then pop it back into its tray.

The touchscreen/touchpad is a nifty innovation, but it's not worth $2800.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#23 Aug 28 2011 at 10:12 PM Rating: Decent
******
20,020 posts
Quote:

MBPs suck for gaming? You've obviously never used one since they went to Intel. I can tell you right now that it's basically a toss-up with the Razer, which is ridiculous. A 320 GB 7200 RPM drive is beyond stupid for a gaming laptop, especially when you're shelling out $2800 for it.


That comment had nothing to do with their specs and everything to do with the OS. The number of games that are mac compatible is still pitifully low. Unless you intend to put Windows/Linux on it, you aren't going to be doing much gaming anyway.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#24 Aug 29 2011 at 5:02 PM Rating: Decent
Does it from behind...
*****
13,048 posts
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
Quote:

MBPs suck for gaming? You've obviously never used one since they went to Intel. I can tell you right now that it's basically a toss-up with the Razer, which is ridiculous. A 320 GB 7200 RPM drive is beyond stupid for a gaming laptop, especially when you're shelling out $2800 for it.


That comment had nothing to do with their specs and everything to do with the OS. The number of games that are mac compatible is still pitifully low. Unless you intend to put Windows/Linux on it, you aren't going to be doing much gaming anyway.

That's wonderful, but since you can put Windows on them, Apple computers are still a viable option for gaming.

A smart one? Probably not.

But you seem to be missing the entire point of why I brought up a Macbook Pro: the Blade is comparable to one in both price and processing power, something that people always ***** and whine about when people bring up Apple computers. If Razer is looking into getting into the gaming market in PC production—an area where home-built CPUs dominate—they're going to have to lower their prices dramatically.

I couldn't really give two ***** less what everyone here thinks about Apple. I was pointing out that it's priced similarly to a Mac.
____________________________
The·oph·a·ny (thē-ŏf'ə-nē)
An appearance of a god to a human; a divine manifestation.
Rogue Hunter
#26 Aug 29 2011 at 7:28 PM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
referenced post deleted.

Edited, Aug 29th 2011 7:05pm by KTurner
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 3 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (3)