Most underrated class in your opinion?Follow

ehhh I don't know, enc are good but I've only grouped with one good one, who knew what root was and how to use it, unfortanitly I didn't know how to work with it (couldn't have been the 40+ levels I suffered through where root was just a dream, now could it?) If all enchanters were like that guy, they uh would be praised more, unfortanitly I forget his name because he hasn't signed on in ages. Then there are some ench's who are mediocre, but they are usually better then the average enc. I haven't played in a while mind you, and that might have come from the fact that I haven't been in a group with an enc in a while probably because no one wants to group with them. But I do remember grouping with an enc who was 30 (this was on my war he was like 28-30) and I didn't get one of thems power path buffs o_O dam mid day groups
I always think of rangers as bad, as well as low level necs (low level, let me explain) me and my friend duel box, he has a cl, I usually use Xiahoudun, and if he gets on first or starts the group, I tell him no more necs, or rangers for that matter. Now let me just say, I haven't seen a ranger (in a long time) over 40 that sucked, but I haven't seen one under 40 that didn't suck. As for necs... They're OK but I think pre 29-30 (without the benefits of new pet as well as cms) aren't very good at dfc :)

About the damage with DD's and talking about duels...I don't know if Spife can out damage any DD, or a tank..or a green for that matter, nor can he out tank any other dd, he simply is not built to tank, he's got like 2k hp with were form lol, so yes, a ranger bard or monk could cut him down, I stopped dueling cause of that. Point being, Dueling doesn't meen horse spit when comparing classes unless you had some sort of placebo to compare to, which I'm assuming a lot don't. That being said, don't go back to "well a monk could ks a rogue any day" true or not, ksing is looked down apon, and obnoxious (Its more annoying then my spelling!) so why would you guys be proud of being able to ks? hehe sorry, I've wanted to bring that last point up for a while
uh yeah I haven't played in a while or had to think past the 2nd grade in a few weeks so pardon me

eh with that equipment subby offy thingy I think monks could keep half decent wepons up and still use abbils when they came back. Also I've seen monks avoiding oomage by using a two handed something or another (in theory, pre 35 or even after 35 but I think quad could out damage a two handed wepon) mainly because they can use kicks and what not and not use punches, I have seen this once or twice and in theory its not a bad idea (I say in theory because I don't know if people do it or not)
I think mages might be a little underrated, or atleast (remember, all theoretics hehe) being compared to necs (highish end if I remember correctly) they are sort of underated. My mage, gimped as is,, can do about 1k in two nukes, and where I lack in meeting my "quota" of 1k damage my pet makes up for. This is at 35 with unmaxed dex, and I think at 39 we get a quading pet I don't know/remember, either way with a quading pet at 39, or on the way for 44, and new nukes, I think mages are a force to be recconned with, or something