Kavekk the Ludicrous wrote:
I'd bet on warriors - the arms tree looks godly at the moment - but they're still too gear dependent for early dominance.
Warriors has always performed well in PVP
In Wotlk they weren't, they were strong against rogues and sometimes against hunters. They're the hardest class to play.
In Cata Whirlwind damage has been reduced to 50%, I think this means the damage of Bladestorm is also reduced to 50%. If that's the case bladestorm pretty much becomes just an extra Escape Artist button.
I'm not saying warriors will be weak or that bladestorm will be useless, but if bladestorm damage is reduced 50% then the only way in which it will be useful is as a snare remover.
What I'd like to see is stance restriction being removed from pummel or arms working in Zerker stance again just like in TBC. Really, the reason why battle stance wasn't used until wotlk was because you couldn't use pummel, and the reason why arms warriors use battle stance now isn't because they like it, it's just that you're forced to use it because your rotation is dependent on rend-overpower. Nobody wanted to be in battle stance and the reason was pummel.
And I don't think Arms looks very good right now, It looks more like Prot will be the PvP spec.
gushing wounds was too good to be truth.
I would have liked to just have a bleed that refreshes it's duration if the target moves. It doesn't need to do more damage than rend, just refreshing duration would have been good enough. Edited, Sep 21st 2010 12:09am by xorq
NOTE: I may post comments about my like/dislike/approval/disapproval of game features.
1- They are NOT a complaint. They are a perspective.
2- They are NOT advocacy. They are a perspective.
Overlord Theophany wrote:
Insults aren't needed