Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

WoD Cinematic Reveal and Release Date LivestreamFollow

#1 Aug 14 2014 at 9:46 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,564 posts
Apparently this forum is pretty slow... really surprised to not see a topic on this. Livestream is less than an hour away, and they'll be revealing the WoD cinematic as well as the release date for the expansion. You can view the livestream on the blog or on Blizzard's website.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#2 Aug 14 2014 at 11:19 AM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
God, Zuckerberg up there was annoying.

Trailer was cool.

November 13th.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#3 Aug 14 2014 at 11:52 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Damn, Morhaime must be dealing with some serious stage fright. It's super uncomfortable watching him up on the stage. He's reading from a teleprompter, and he's obviously extremely nervous.

Edit: The feature trailer was meh. Looks like WoD will be TBC 2.0 in terms of areas and such. And no new classes or races to spice it up. Also, the game's age is starting to show real bad. Or maybe they just recorded that trailer on low graphics settings, because I think the trailer in its entirety contained less polygons than the character selection screen in Elder Scrolls Online. Even the updated models looked kinda jagged - except the Dwarf model. That new model looks amazing, but compare it to the new Tauren model... It's like they switched designers or ran out of money after they did the first couple of models.

Edit: Cinematic trailer was okay. Excellent CGI, like always, but not really spine-tingling like some of the previous trailers. Where the other trailers, minus the Pandaria one, were escalations of "zomgwtf", this one was more of a short story about "35 years ago". It lacked some kind of... oomph.

Edited, Aug 14th 2014 9:59pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#4 Aug 14 2014 at 1:41 PM Rating: Good
*****
10,564 posts
The Watters guy was annoying the entire time. Mike was super awkward and didn't know what to do with his body while reading deadpan off the teleprompter. The animated short thing was reasonably good but not mind blowing. The interview was terrible, and they basically said nothing that we didn't already know. The content preview had more stuff than I expected and I was glad to see how many dungeons they've got. The cinematic was of expected quality, but I agree that it didn't have the "oomph" or epicness of some past trailers. Then again, we don't have a big baddie of the caliber of Arthas or Illidan here, so I guess I shouldn't hold it to the same standard.
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#5 Aug 14 2014 at 4:02 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,148 posts
Did not watch the live-stream, just the trailer and the feature trailer. The fight between the Hellscreams and Mannoroth was nice. I liked the small nod to the old WC3 video in which Grommash takes the blast of Mannoroths explosion and subsequently dies. In this new version of the fight Garrosh tackles him out of the blast at the last possible moment.
But why did Garrosh have a hood over his face? Noone can possibly know him so it seems rather useless to disguise himself. Smiley: lol And for us, the audience, it is rather obvious who he is from the start.


Edit: Either it slipped by me or they didn't mention it, but does anybody know when the pre-patch will hit? Since I still haven't lost all hope to get some FoS that will be gone after the patch, this information is of utmost relevance to me.

Edited, Aug 14th 2014 6:07pm by TherealLogros
#6 Aug 14 2014 at 4:44 PM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
The hood is leftover from the prequel comic Gul'dan and the Stranger which directly leads to the cinematic.

The prepatch release date hasn't been announced, but it's traditionally about one month before the expansion launch. Looking like October 14th, with a PTR going live soon.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#7 Aug 14 2014 at 5:08 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,148 posts
IDrownFish of the Seven Seas wrote:
The hood is leftover from the prequel comic Gul'dan and the Stranger which directly leads to the cinematic.


Thanks, just read it. It's quite okay I guess. Maybe I should have read the novel regarding Garrosh (War Crimes?) but something seems to be missing for me.
#8 Aug 15 2014 at 1:35 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,393 posts
Well, I guess I know when I'm coming back to WoW for a month or two. I always like to play for a bit around expansion releases.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#9 Aug 15 2014 at 5:11 AM Rating: Good
Sage
***
2,269 posts
It was interesting, but lacked impact like many said. WotLK was epic, Cata had the sundering (w/e you want to call it), Pandarias opening had humor/mystery, this had.... filler? It looks nice but just didnt seem all that interesting.

I'm planning on coming back for my chopper and corgi and expansion. I wish they would give you the option of not taking a free 90 and allowing you to transfer all your characters. I have 9 characters (5 90's, the rest 80+) on a server that is now so one sided I cant quest without being ganked because alliance outnumber horde like 3:1, the server is busy, but oceanic, and when I rolled there it was balanced and my schedule worked for playing at peak times.

Now when I was playing the server was dead at the times I play, again one-sided factions, and dealing with Aussies and their capped internet/latency (This made raiding a pain) is just old. I could re-roll on another server but my main has all secondaries maxed, and every character has crafts maxed. Just dont want to throw all that work away.

If I choose to transfer I wouldn't just be transferring my 9 but also my wifes and I would almost have to take a loan out to just move everyone.

Edited, Aug 15th 2014 6:12am by BeanX
____________________________
→What I Play←
→Recently Played←
#10 Aug 15 2014 at 5:41 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,148 posts
BeanX wrote:
If I choose to transfer I wouldn't just be transferring my 9 but also my wifes and I would almost have to take a loan out to just move everyone.


They should have offered a discount for moving multiple characters years ago. The ugly face of greed I guess.
#11 Aug 16 2014 at 8:09 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Cinematic was solid. LK is still the best, however I preferred it to the others. I am a fan boy though, and I still remember the better part of 15 years ago and Thrall & Grom fighting Mannoroth in WC3. So when that sweet reference popped up I was like Smiley: eek

Lords of War vid was nice.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#12 Aug 16 2014 at 9:02 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Holy retcon Batman.

Grom was so eager to drink Mannoroth's blood he literally cut in line ahead of the Warchief of the Horde, which was an extremely bold statement. And then...

line from Rise of the Horde wrote:
Grom did not hesitate. He brought the cup to his lips and drank deeply.


Literally no persuasion. Gul'Dan essentially held up the cup and asks "Who wants to be first to pledge himself to the cause," looks towards the Warchief, and then Grom strolls up and cuts in line, drinking with no hesitation.

This might seem like a small retcon, but it's huge. Durotan refused to let his clan drink Mannoroth's blood, and he alone was the only one to hesistate (his clan was angry with him). That led to his assassination, which was fundamental to the entire story of Thrall's beginnings, his rise as the first Shaman to be accepted by the spirits since they first began consorting with demons, and eventual ascent to Warchief.

The blood was offered as a choice, not a requirement. Orgrim was the only one besides Durotan to refuse.

Oh, also, Mannoroth wasn't there. As in, the orcs had no clue what they were getting into. They didn't know what was in that chalice until it was far too late.


The cinematic was gorgeous, but holy crap...

My only hope is that this was the effect of Garrosh consorting with Grom long before this point. Still, Mannoroth being there makes no sense. And that would seem to be an important part of any plan to rebel against Warchief Blackhand.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#13 Aug 16 2014 at 10:23 AM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Well, it is an alternate timeline. So any changes in continuity do not effect our timeline.

The story is a convoluted mess though. You would think when the story team tabled the idea for "a magical dragon gets turned evil, captures the main boss for the last expac, takes him to an alternate timeline, then back in time in that alternate timeline, so he can intercept the hordes domination by the Burning Legion and take them back to the future (in the original timeline)", that they would have all been sh'it canned on the spot. Then again, they seem to like Christie Golden as an author, so I guess I can't be too surprised.


The what if's of the Crisis on Infinite Azeroth's story lines are interesting and a can of worms. There was a fairly good lore thread on my guilds page about it. The implications for alternate timeline Azeroth etc. I think there was a good reddit thread as well. Honestly it would have been amazing if Medivh from the alternate timeline brought the Alliance into the mix mid expansion (as bad guys). However that won't happen.

Edited, Aug 16th 2014 12:26pm by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#14 Aug 16 2014 at 11:25 AM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Wait.

Wait.

Wait.

This is an alternate timeline in the sense of Garrosh traveling to a parallel universe sort of thing, and then backwards in that universe, and NOT a case of him traveling backwards in time in his own universe and then CAUSING a parallel timeline branch to form by influencing events?

Yeah.... Yeah, no. I can't do it. I just can't.

I generally find time travel stories to be really, really weak to begin with. But that... that's just... just no.

I particularly love the idea that it's not just a parallel timeline, but it's a timeline just parallel enough that everything is the same, except Mannoroth was in a position to be easily assassinated before the Orcs were corrupted completely.

Y'know... because going back to when they were corrupted at all wouldn't have made any sense.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#15 Aug 16 2014 at 12:29 PM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
I kind of gathered that Mannoroth wasn't actually there, but was witnessing, until he saw that Grom was refusing. Then he uses demon magic to show up (you can see the glow suddenly reflected on Gul'dan's face that was not there before) and is about to slaughter the orcs. You can see that Gul'dan is actually surprised and visibly afraid that Mannoroth is there. It's not like they said "Ok, and we're gonna put him RIGHT HERE where he can be killed." Also, I don't think any of the orcs noticed him before, and it's kind of hard to hide a Pit Lord.

And no, we don't have a parallel universe thing going on. To quote a recent blue post:

Bashiok wrote:
The moment Garrosh went back an alternative timeline skewed off. Nothing in this alternate Draenor affects our timeline, except that Garrosh has opened a portal back to our universe to bring the Iron Horde through and murder us.

Is this still actually a confusion point?


Edited, Aug 16th 2014 2:50pm by IDrownFish
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#16 Aug 16 2014 at 12:33 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Oh you're preaching to the choir. Even in a fantasy fiction universe with Orcs, talking Cows, and Kung Fu Panda's, to say that this story line is ludicrous isn't an understatement, it is a sign that our language does not have a proper word in its lexicon to encapsulate how ridiculous the story is. That being said, I felt strongly about the obvious pandering of an asian themed expac. I ended up enjoying it a lot. So as long as the raid content is interesting and they don't bork healing too badly I will give them a pass.

It is a shame that they refused to advance the story. But let's be honest, I never played Diablo or Warcraft for the lore or story.

____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#17 Aug 16 2014 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
IDrownFish of the Seven Seas wrote:
And no, we don't have a parallel universe thing going on. To quote a recent blue post:

Bashiok wrote:
The moment Garrosh went back an alternative timeline skewed off. Nothing in this alternate Draenor affects our timeline, except that Garrosh has opened a portal back to our universe to bring the Iron Horde through and murder us.

Is this still actually a confusion point?


Yes it is, repeatedly. Mainly because the story is so convoluted and poorly explained. The cognitive disconnect at blizzard is staggering on this one.



____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#18 Aug 16 2014 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
bodhisattva wrote:
IDrownFish of the Seven Seas wrote:
And no, we don't have a parallel universe thing going on. To quote a recent blue post:

Bashiok wrote:
The moment Garrosh went back an alternative timeline skewed off. Nothing in this alternate Draenor affects our timeline, except that Garrosh has opened a portal back to our universe to bring the Iron Horde through and murder us.

Is this still actually a confusion point?


Yes it is, repeatedly. Mainly because the story is so convoluted and poorly explained. The cognitive disconnect at blizzard is staggering on this one.





Yeah, that was my exact first thought. It was actually along the lines of "Holy crap, did he just say that?"

But then again, what else are they going to do? Admit that the story is horribly convoluted? They have to play ignorant.


As for the scene itself, even if Mannoroth wasn't in plain sight, it's still a problem. The Orcs HAD to fall to deception for the plot to work. It's fundamental to their racial characterization. Orcs, when confronted with a threat, fight. Their flight response is pretty much nothing. And when EVERY Orcish hero is all together, from Orgrim to Hellscream? Good luck, Mannoroth.

The minute Grom engaged Mannoroth, it would have been an act of cowardice for others to back down. They'd have to prove their strength.


The bigger issue here, though, is Grom KNOWING what the blood would do (Mannoroth or no Mannoroth), and it's still a big retcon for Grom to not just be confidently seizing that chalice.

I mean, it's a shame, because it really diminishes his story. Killing Mannoroth in the main story line meant something. Grom was the first Orc to fall under Mannoroth's control, he was a hero among his people, and he effectively led them into giving up their freedom (even if he didn't know what he was doing).

Grom's "We are free" is so poignant because he was finally able to right the wrong he symbolically led his people into.

But if you change that, Grom becomes weak. He's a pushover, not a hero to his people. And what about his second corruption? His character just becomes weaker. He's not a warrior, he's just a meek character who can't stand on his own.

I just really don't like it.


That exact same scene, with Grom confidently and eagerly going up to drink the blood, to be saved by Garrosh' intervention, would have been so much more emotionally powerful. But they want to paint Grom as someone who didn't really want to consort with demons.

What they're trying to do is raise sympathy for Garrosh and the villains by trying to get the audience to see Garrosh as a more-militant version of Durotan. It would have been better if they just treated the character like he's always been.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#19 Aug 16 2014 at 2:51 PM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
I don't know, I really don't see an issue here. In the original timeline, Grom didn't know at all that the blood would make them slaves. Nobody besides Gul'dan and Ner'zhul knew that. In the new timeline, Garrosh tells Grom head-on what would happen if they drink the blood. Grom knows this time around that drinking the blood would doom them all. Hell, he might even still have cut in front of Blackhand in order to do the whole dramatic "pour out the cup" thing. I'm not understanding where the retcon is that you're talking about.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#20 Aug 16 2014 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
I with Fish here.
If someone from the future popped into your world now, and told you things about how your life went to **************** and when, and when the time came you just went with it knowing you had a chance to change, you would not?

Big spoil here:
You all do know Garrosh isn't around for this xpack? Thrall Kills him.
and then: **Also Ner'zhul is killed in Alliance questing around level 92, so no Lich King revival; without being screwed by Kil'jaeden, his Shadowmoon clan is pressured into the Iron Horde, and they start dabbling with void magics, much like the questline in Netherstorm with the ethereals. Gul'dan is killed in an instance dungeon.** (from some one in beta, or has info).


Anyways here is how I see the "time" line.

Old orc history > WC > 2 > 3 > WoW > BC >LK >Cata >MoP >*>Today.

Garrosh does what he does at the "*", goes ALL the way back and changed Old Orc History by telling info. Iron Horde is made, and they are going/do attempt to use the portal to open a Time Portal that brings them to Today.
But it is Today in our universe, so it is a cross-universe-time-portal.
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
#21 Aug 16 2014 at 3:44 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
The whole interaction is tonally COMPLETELY different from the book version. The book version has Gul'dan excited, the Orcs are excited. It's not dark, it's more jubilant - they're on the brink of winning their war, and they're receiving a godly gift.

Gul'dan's entire purpose is tricking the Orcs into taking the blood. It's a gift that will lift them up. Grom's question about what they have to give in return? Gul'dan would never have answered "everything," because this wasn't supposed to be a sacrifice. It's was a selfless gift from their patron Kil'Jaedan, it was the seductive promise of wish fulfillment from a demon.

In the book, he begins by talking about how wonderful it is that the clans have come together as one to stand shoulder-to-shoulder, old conflicts forgotten. How they no longer had any threats looming over them, how their technology had advanced by leaps and bounds. Without any foreknowledge of the situation, his speech wouldn't feel dark to an audience at all. Hell, if you replace Gul'dan with a Priest of the Light, it doesn't seem horribly out of place.

"WE COULD BE CONQUERERS!" is a completely different tone, and it doesn't jive with the Horde at this point. The bloodlust from the demonic taint is what focused them into a constant need for dominance. Up to this point, they didn't dream of conquest, they fought out of a belief that the Draenei were a threat. They spoke of victory and safety, not conquering.

And then, Grom refuses the blood... so Mannoroth shows up? Why? He didn't appear to challenge Durotan's decision. He didn't care about Orgrim's. But Grom's is so offensive?

And he shows up KNOWING there's an ambush for him?

Plus, how would they have gotten siege weaponry up there without anyone else noticing? And where the hell is the Warchief in all this?

And, what, the Orcs refuse Mannoroth's gift and Kil'Jaedan just leaves them alone? How does that make any sense? Bringing the Orcs to Azeroth was SARGERAS' plan. So, what, the Orcs just decide to follow the BL without any demonic taint? I mean, Sargeras is the one who teaches Gul'Dan how to build the portal.

One of the things that bothers me is that this is part of an ongoing effort of Blizzard's to undo the canon they established that depicted Orcs as a more peaceful race. They spent a lot of time early on making them sympathetic; war-like, but tied to the Earth and the balance. More interested in honor than bloodshed. Willing to fight for what they believed in, but not seeking violent ends.

After they brought in Garrosh, they've been slowly challenging that idea, and building up the natural bloodlust of the Orcs more and more. Making them more violent, than just willing to fight, and slowly reducing the historic impact of Shamanism by altering the current state of Shamanism in the Horde, as well as the historic value. Shamanism was a BIG DEAL with Thrall leading the Orcs out of slavery. Obviously, they didn't just lose the warrior culture, but him being the first Shaman since their forefathers' time was a big deal to the Orcs, and they rallied around him.

Now? No one cares. All Blizz has focused on with the Orcs is the idea that they just want more war, more war, more war.

I don't so much care if that's the future they want of the Orcs, but get there by story means. Tell me the story of why the Orcs abandoned Shamanism again. Don't retcon the existing cannon - that's insulting to fans.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#22 Aug 16 2014 at 5:03 PM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
A few things:

That line, "Everything" could be interpreted as meaning anything. I think the most likely interpretation would be to take it as meaning "Be prepared to give everything for the Horde," especially since there was a lot of patriotism running through this newly formed Horde. "For the Horde!" was tossed around a lot in that book.

Second, of course the tone is different. By this point, Garrosh has been around for a while, and has informed all the orcs of the ancestor deception. At this point, the orcs are probably hostile to Gul'dan and his warlocks, though they are keeping it hidden in order to let things play out and for Mannoroth to reveal himself. They have been told what it would mean to drink the blood.

Garrosh changes everything. Of course things went differently than in the book.

Edited, Aug 16th 2014 7:05pm by IDrownFish
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#23 Aug 16 2014 at 9:40 PM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Despite my dislike for convoluted alternate timelines and such tomfoolery, I am not to put off by the cinematic.

Also, lets not bring the novel into the discussion. Christie Golden isn't even talented enough to be called a hack pulp novelist. She couldn't even capture a turn of phrase, let alone tone or character motivation. She makes Kevin J. Anderson seem good. Kil'jaeden did sweet talk them. However times had been changed, hell the Iron Horde get Nerzhul to turn on his ancestors

If anything the recent Guldan and the Stranger comic does a better job.

https://bnetcmsus-a.akamaihd.net/cms/template_resource/Z5EDRREGHRLM1406310705908.pdf

Garrosh turned Grommash to his side. Events changed. Motivations change. We can second guess how characters should react. Step back from that, and we have a solid cinematic. We get some WC3 references, some old favourites etc. It was alright.




____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#24 Aug 17 2014 at 5:13 AM Rating: Excellent
***
1,148 posts
IDrownFish of the Seven Seas wrote:
Garrosh changes everything. Of course things went differently than in the book.



That's how I understood it, too. Do we know how long he has been with Grom and his people before the cinematic takes place?
#25 Aug 17 2014 at 8:52 AM Rating: Good
****
5,599 posts
I haven't been able to find any amount of time listed myself. Maybe if says something about it in WoD, but I haven't seen it yet.

Edited, Aug 17th 2014 11:48am by IDrownFish
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist ****.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129
#26 Aug 17 2014 at 9:15 AM Rating: Good
Check the BeanX thread, if you have not yet. I'm listening to the long youtube post that is (currently) the last post. Seems to be doing an OK job at "setting" up what is going to take place.
Video was made a year ago tho.

Edited, Aug 17th 2014 10:25am by Sandinmygum
____________________________
Sandinmyeye | |Tsukaremashi*a |
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 477 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (477)