Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

The winner is....Follow

#1 May 30 2012 at 5:34 PM Rating: Default
WOTLK, Panda are ok but Arthas was the best.

Edited, May 30th 2012 9:43pm by Fleven Lock Thread: Personal attacks.
#2 May 30 2012 at 6:03 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Award shows no longer use the phrase "and the winner is..." as having a winner implies there being losers, which is not politically correct.

You're supposed to say "and the award goes to..." now.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#3 May 30 2012 at 6:10 PM Rating: Default
Mazra wrote:
Award shows no longer use the phrase "and the winner is..." as having a winner implies there being losers, which is not politically correct.

You're supposed to say "and the award goes to..." now.


HOW TO SPEAK POLITICALLY CORRECT

She is not a BABE or a CHICK; she is a BREASTED AMERICAN.

She is not a SCREAMER or MOANER; she is VOCALLY APPRECIATIVE.

She is not EASY; she is HORIZONTALLY ACCESSIBLE.

She is not DUMB; she is a DETOUR OFF THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY.

She has not BEEN AROUND; she is a PREVIOUSLY ENJOYED COMPANION.

She is not an AIR HEAD; she is REALITY IMPAIRED.

She does not get DRUNK or TIPSY; she gets CHEMICALLY INCONVENIENCED.

She is not HORNY; she is SEXUALLY FOCUSED.

She does not have BREAST IMPLANTS; she is MEDICALLY ENHANCED.

She does not NAG YOU; she becomes ORALLY REPETITIVE.

She is not a ****; she is SEXUALLY EXTROVERTED.

She is not a TWO BIT *****; she is a LOW COST PROVIDER.

PC is BS!
#4 May 30 2012 at 6:11 PM Rating: Default
Mazra wrote:
Award shows no longer use the phrase "and the winner is..." as having a winner implies there being losers, which is not politically correct.

You're supposed to say "and the award goes to..." now.
You have something to say about Warcraft? Or +1 and trolling?


Edited, May 30th 2012 8:12pm by RAWDEAL
#5 May 30 2012 at 6:30 PM Rating: Excellent
***
1,996 posts
We don't really know how MoP will play. At best, we have some initial impressions from beta, with very little information about the Alliance/Horde conflict. I'm happy enough to see them take a break from the redemption/fall of yet another character that the average player may not even have much awareness of, but who was probably driven to the brink by personal tragedy, Old Gods, and/or the traumatic experience of discovering that chocolate milk doesn't come from chocolate cows. If they could manage to lay off the Titans for a bit, that would be a bonus.

For me, WOTLK was strained. I'm not interested in buying the books/comics/CCG and the last Warcraft RTS I played was Orcs v. Humans. "Hi! You are all just gnats and spear carriers who should be dead if the villain takes any notice of you. Instead he will torment you to goad you into becoming more powerful tools. BTW, have lots of dragons, that's foreshadowing for ya! Did we mention you're just gnats and spear carriers?"

For me, the perfect expansion would be one where any moping, angsty character that has ever been a major feature of a Warcraft book dies. Their deaths should accompany the mysterious real world deaths of every person in marketing who thinks I need to buy their books/comics/CCG in order to understand what the heck is going on in the current expansion. Struck with remorse, Blizzard would then get the lead out and move that movie along -- without making it a vehicle for rehashing any of the main figures that are routinely used to remind us that -- despite having downed the lieutenants and prime villains of multiple expansions -- we are just gnats and spear carriers who can barely keep up with the average grunt of either army.

Joe Player: OMG, Blizz has completely ignored lore. Jaina should be two cup sizes better endowed.
Rhode: Shut up. I is grinding for shinies to be able to see some of the content that you're carping about. Now, why the bleep does my plate armor have Agility?
#6 May 30 2012 at 6:43 PM Rating: Decent
Raw attempting to make sexist funnies... why am I not surprised? So, just to clarify, sexist jokes are fine, as long as they aren't "your mom" jokes?
#7 May 30 2012 at 6:46 PM Rating: Decent
Rhodekylle wrote:
We don't really know how MoP will play.
Mop feels like Blizzard is trying something different and the story doesn't matter as much. The theme is cool and new mini game is created but something is missing, Wotlk was a massive world with a bad guy and WINTERGRASP. The story was awesome.
#8REDACTED, Posted: May 30 2012 at 6:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Go away troll, we don't care about rejects in the Warcraft forum. Get a life! Go look for a job and stop using your parents for money, worthless...
#9 May 30 2012 at 7:18 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
Mazra wrote:
Award shows no longer use the phrase "and the winner is..." as having a winner implies there being losers, which is not politically correct.

You're supposed to say "and the award goes to..." now.
You have something to say about Warcraft? Or +1 and trolling?


Edited, May 30th 2012 8:12pm by RAWDEAL


I think you're reality impaired, but that might just be because I'm chemically inconvenienced at the moment.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#10 May 30 2012 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
**
554 posts
RAWDEAL wrote:
PigtailsOfDoom wrote:
Raw attempting to make sexist funnies... why am I not surprised? So, just to clarify, sexist jokes are fine, as long as they aren't "your mom" jokes?
Go away troll, we don't care about rejects in the Warcraft forum. Get a life! Go look for a job and stop using your parents for money, worthless...


Yea Pig's been far more helpful in this forum then you have. That said lets lay off the personal attacks We don't need them here :( (that means everyone)
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 205 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (205)