Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

Future expansions planned by Blizzard, from late 2003.Follow

#102 Jul 01 2009 at 11:05 PM Rating: Decent
With two expansions worth of zones called out word-for-word (including all of the WotLK expansions a full year before the expansion came out)... I'd say we should consider this document legit.

Personally, I was hoping for the Emerald Dream (aka Planes set) as the next expansion... but it kind of makes sense to flesh out the remaining parts of Azeroth before delving into alternate dimensions and whatnot (especially with the Emerald Dream supposedly being a reflection of Azeroth without the "taint" of the intelligent races, per WoWWiki).

Although I can't help but wonder... if Cataclysm is indeed announced at BlizzCon... what does that mean for WotLK? After all... we're still waiting for Icecrown Citadel to be unlocked and God only knows what else (ala Sunwell). And if Blizzard holds true to it's previous track-record, if it's announced at BlizzCon, it'll probably be put into beta probably around April-May 2010 and released August-October 2010. That doesn't give Blizzard much time to finish out WotLK (again, given Blizzard's previous track-record with releasing a major content patch every 3 months).
____________________________
World of Warcraft - Khaz Modan Server
Neocron - Level 80 Fury (main spec) / Protection (off-spec) Warrior
Neodeath - Level 71 Frost (main spec) / Blood (off-spec) Death Knight
Neopriest - Level 65 Shadow Priest
Neohunter - Level 28 Beastmastery (main spec) Hunter

Ultima Online - Sonoma Shard
Neocron - Human Warrior

FFXI - Gilgamesh Server
Neocron - Taru 75BLM/51RDM/37WHM/17SCH (Retired)
#103Nathanyel, Posted: Jul 02 2009 at 1:53 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Reinjin, you need to return to clarify this list was made up after the announcement of the Northrend zones (which happened just before you posted this)
#104 Jul 02 2009 at 2:00 AM Rating: Default
*
118 posts
Quote:
Realized this post originated over a year ago. I thought I had seen this at least a couple times before.


That is what many people claim, but can never prove :)
#105 Jul 02 2009 at 2:10 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
*
190 posts
A photo that has been making it's way around mmo-champion. I say take it with a grain of salt. It may or may not be real. Who knows ?!

EDIT: I should point out the main significance of this shot is that Caydiem was a Blizzard CM from the beginning of beta till 2006. The date of the supposed post is 11/26/2004 2:39 44 PM PST.

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c32/arkain21/addons2004c600c.jpg

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 6:20am by Antius
#106 Jul 02 2009 at 2:51 AM Rating: Excellent
****
8,666 posts
Antius wrote:
A photo that has been making it's way around mmo-champion. I say take it with a grain of salt. It may or may not be real. Who knows ?!

EDIT: I should point out the main significance of this shot is that Caydiem was a Blizzard CM from the beginning of beta till 2006. The date of the supposed post is 11/26/2004 2:39 44 PM PST.

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c32/arkain21/addons2004c600c.jpg

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 6:20am by Antius


Likely shooped. As far as I know, Reinjin's OP was the origination of this now popular list, but I know for sure that a Blizzard employee would never give away that amount of information.
____________________________
Lolz
#107 Jul 02 2009 at 6:55 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,896 posts
In the next expansion there will be no green items of clothing so they can sell the game in Iran.

#108 Jul 02 2009 at 9:25 AM Rating: Excellent
neocronNV, Guardian of the Glade wrote:

Although I can't help but wonder... if Cataclysm is indeed announced at BlizzCon... what does that mean for WotLK? After all... we're still waiting for Icecrown Citadel to be unlocked and God only knows what else (ala Sunwell). And if Blizzard holds true to it's previous track-record, if it's announced at BlizzCon, it'll probably be put into beta probably around April-May 2010 and released August-October 2010. That doesn't give Blizzard much time to finish out WotLK (again, given Blizzard's previous track-record with releasing a major content patch every 3 months).


If you remember WotLK was announced at Blizzcon 2007 and was released Novemember 2008 if they keep a similiar time frame we still have 1 or two more major content patches to go before it's time to leave Northrend.
____________________________
Content Manager
torhead.com | teratome.com | twitter.com/fewyn
#109 Jul 02 2009 at 5:54 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
190 posts
Quote:
Likely shooped. As far as I know, Reinjin's OP was the origination of this now popular list, but I know for sure that a Blizzard employee would never give away that amount of information.


While the shot could very well be photo shopped "I doubt we'll ever know", I'd argue that Blizzard could have very well divulged the information. The fact that Blizzard supposedly sent out "the list" in an information packet to all the beta testers says that they weren't too concerned about knowledge of their future plans. Back when WoW was being developed, I'm sure the devs were more laid back about the info they shared before the game exploded into the fan base it has today.

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 9:55pm by Antius

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 10:09pm by Antius
#110 Jul 02 2009 at 6:18 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
4,684 posts
Quote:
Back when WoW was being developed, I'm sure the devs were more laid back about the info they shared before the game exploded into the fan base it has today.


Quite the contrary, actually. Since we got GC, we at least have somebody pointing out where Blizz wants to head with WoW. At WoW's release, there barely was any interaction with the fanbase. From what I've experienced, anyway.
____________________________
"My guildy Kasdaye" wrote:
Gearscore for raiders is like Goldshire for roleplayers.
#111 Jul 02 2009 at 6:59 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
*
190 posts
Quote:
Quite the contrary, actually. Since we got GC, we at least have somebody pointing out where Blizz wants to head with WoW. At WoW's release, there barely was any interaction with the fanbase. From what I've experienced, anyway.


I agree, there is a larger flow of information available to the player base today than there has been in the past. The only thing I'm saying is if Blizzard would "never give away that info" then they would have never included "the list" in the information packets where it supposedly came from. It is entirely possible that the CM could have posted it on the forum back in '04 before the game became such a huge success.

It's kind of like Lawry's Seasoning. Back in the day when he served the seasoning at his diner he could have told friends and family how he made the seasoning and told them what he else planned on making. Once it became a national success they started keeping all product recipes and future products under lock and key.

Forgive the poor analogy, but it's all I have at the moment.

EDIT: because I didn't pay enough attention in english class.

Edited, Jul 2nd 2009 11:17pm by Antius
#112 Jul 05 2009 at 4:02 AM Rating: Default
*
118 posts
Quote:
Stuffed inside the folder were a crapload of documents and stuff pertaining to the World of Warcraft alpha and beta, back before I even cared about the game. I had been sent the stuff from my friend, who was in the friends-and-family beta that preceded the general closed beta in early 2004. Most of the documents were plastered with '2003'.


Come on Reinjin, come back and admit it's all fake, for goodness sake. This "list" is really getting out of hand.
#113 Jul 05 2009 at 5:55 AM Rating: Good
*
78 posts
Quote:
With two expansions worth of zones called out word-for-word (including all of the WotLK expansions a full year before the expansion came out)... I'd say we should consider this document legit.

Except this thread wasn't posted until a month after WotLK was announced. If it turns out to match up with the next expansion, THEN I would safely say it can be considered legitimate.
____________________________
Keya
#114 Jul 05 2009 at 6:09 AM Rating: Excellent
PhedrePhoenix wrote:
Quote:
With two expansions worth of zones called out word-for-word (including all of the WotLK expansions a full year before the expansion came out)... I'd say we should consider this document legit.

Except this thread wasn't posted until a month after WotLK was announced. If it turns out to match up with the next expansion, THEN I would safely say it can be considered legitimate.


Very true.... the thread was indeed posted a month after WotLK was announced... except Blizzard didn't release very much information about WotLK at that time. I remember the WotLK teaser site Blizzard put up... it didn't have a detailed listing of the zones. I remember Blizzard's annoucement at BlizzCon... it didn't have a detailed listing of zones either. In fact, the general public didn't really get a feel for what WotLK had to offer zone-wise until the beta... which was about 7-8 months AFTER this thread was posted (the only zones Blizzard ever really showed off on the teaser site was some pics of Borean Tundra, Dragonblight, and Grizzly Hills if I remember correctly).
____________________________
World of Warcraft - Khaz Modan Server
Neocron - Level 80 Fury (main spec) / Protection (off-spec) Warrior
Neodeath - Level 71 Frost (main spec) / Blood (off-spec) Death Knight
Neopriest - Level 65 Shadow Priest
Neohunter - Level 28 Beastmastery (main spec) Hunter

Ultima Online - Sonoma Shard
Neocron - Human Warrior

FFXI - Gilgamesh Server
Neocron - Taru 75BLM/51RDM/37WHM/17SCH (Retired)
#115 Jul 05 2009 at 6:28 PM Rating: Default
2 posts
The Panderan can be WoW's first nuetral race. The Panderan have traded and exchanged with the night elves for a long time, Before the great Sundering. However in WC3 the panderan brewmaster was a mercanery. now in WoW you can find the kegs all around the barrens. No one knows where Pandaria is so it could possibly be just a myth. They also did establish a camp in stonetalon mountains which means a bit of old world reconstruction if it isnt already there.

link i got this from
http://www.wowwiki.com/Pandaria
#116 Jul 05 2009 at 6:33 PM Rating: Default
2 posts
Sorry for my double posting but i think i know where the Panderan are. Hiji is the level 10-20 area for the panderan so it must be close and i wowwikied it to find its a small island in the South Seas to the east of Kezan, south of the Broken Isles and Maelstrom, and southwest of Stranglethorn Vale. Is this where Pandaria is?

http://www.wowwiki.com/Hiji
Also a picture
#117 Jul 05 2009 at 10:06 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
5,459 posts
I really hope Pandaren isn't a playeable race. We really don't need everyone and their uncle rolling a panda.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist anus.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129

#118 Jul 05 2009 at 10:23 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
IDrownFish wrote:
I really hope Pandaren isn't a playeable race. We really don't need everyone and their uncle rolling a panda.


Panda rolling: ten times as fun as tauren tipping!
____________________________
Moon Guard (Alliance) & Wyrmrest Accord (Both Factions)
#119 Jul 05 2009 at 10:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
****
5,459 posts
Lady isyris wrote:
IDrownFish wrote:
I really hope Pandaren isn't a playeable race. We really don't need everyone and their uncle rolling a panda.


Panda rolling: ten times as fun as tauren tipping!


Well, it would give Gnome Punting a run for its money.
____________________________
idiggory, King of Bards wrote:
I have a racist anus.

Steam: TuxedoFish
battle.net: Fishy #1649
GW2: Fishy.4129

#120 Jul 07 2009 at 1:10 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,677 posts
PhedrePhoenix wrote:
Except this thread wasn't posted until a month after WotLK was announced. If it turns out to match up with the next expansion, THEN I would safely say it can be considered legitimate.

I could be mistaken, but I don't believe this is the original thread. There was one previous, very shortly after BC was released. Even so, do you really have much reason to distrust it? -- Maybe WotLK was announced, but there was zero public information on it until much later.




As for the Pandarens, I don't think they'll happen. Blizzard has too many accounts in China. Apparently China wasn't very happy with the bears when they were first created for WC3:TFT. This very well might have been what Blizzard planned to do back in 2003, before Chinese officials caught up to them. While the entire rest of the expansion information might be spot on, I have serious doubts we'll actually see Pandarens as a PC...after all, why haven't they shown up anywhere else in the world beyond a few vague mentions of Chen in Barrens quests? Chilton said in the interview we had linked on the front page earlier today that they want their player races "seeded" in the world and a known entity to players before they would become playable. Pandarens are *NOWHERE*...meaning, in all likelihood, players who haven't paid much attention and didn't play WC3 don't even know what they are. If space goats were a mistake, according to Chilton, and they were more visible than Pandaren, where does that put us?
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#121 Jul 07 2009 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
1) I agree this is not the original. The original was on the O-boards and was sometime shortly after BC was released. I remember seeing it when I was still a newbie to the game.

2) Don't try to guess where Hiji is from the map, remember what northrend looked like before WotLK? It didn't.
____________________________
Die! Die die die. die die die die, die die. - Scarlet Briar
#122 Jul 07 2009 at 2:15 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,590 posts
Quote:
Pandarens are *NOWHERE*


Not quite.
____________________________
Moon Guard (Alliance) & Wyrmrest Accord (Both Factions)
#123 Jul 08 2009 at 6:41 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,109 posts
Quote:
Blizzard has too many accounts in China. Apparently China wasn't very happy


And yet Perfect World - A Chinese MMORPG has Panda men as part of the "Untamed" race.

I'd rather accept the peripheral nature of them to WoW as a reason for non-occurrence than some imaginary Chinese aversion to seeing them.
____________________________
Wherever I go - there I am.
#124 Jul 08 2009 at 7:29 AM Rating: Good
46 posts
OK Pandaren putting to rest time.

In Blizzcon 2008 Blizzard executive J. Allen Brack said that "China did have issues with Pandaren, and they are an important part of their player base. Can't say it'll never happen, but it isn't on the horizon."

Now, unless anything has changed or is explained in Blizzcon 2009, it looks like Blizzard had planned to include Pandaren as playable races, but due to conflicts with China they were not added.

Unless the blizz exec was just talking out of his rear-end because he didn't have an answer to the person who posed the question.
____________________________
Here lies Uther the Lightbringer, First Paladin.

Uther lived and died to defend the kingdom of Lordaeron. Though he was betrayed by his most beloved student, we believe that his spirit lives on. He continues to watch over us, even as the shadows close in around our ruined land. His light is the light of all humanity - and so long as we honor his example, it shall never fade.

Vangarde Human Paladin Uldum
#125 Jul 08 2009 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,677 posts
Isyris wrote:
Not quite.

You must have missed where I said...
Quote:
While the entire rest of the expansion information might be spot on, I have serious doubts we'll actually see Pandarens as a PC...after all, why haven't they shown up anywhere else in the world beyond a few vague mentions of Chen in Barrens quests?


And quite honestly, that's absolutely nothing to go on. There are no physical Pandarens. There are no mentions anywhere within Alliance subculture. One throwback to The Founding of Durotar doesn't really count for much.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#126 Jul 08 2009 at 10:25 AM Rating: Good
46 posts
Quote:
And quite honestly, that's absolutely nothing to go on. There are no physical Pandarens. There are no mentions anywhere within Alliance subculture. One throwback to The Founding of Durotar doesn't really count for much.


Well to be honest they have as likely a shot of getting to be the next alliance race as any other option. Plus, Blizzard knows people like them, and they might continue to get subscriptions and money from a well-liked race.

Beside the whole China thing. At which point they said it basically isn't going to happen yet. <_<

We will find out at BlizzCon '09, ladies and gents.
____________________________
Here lies Uther the Lightbringer, First Paladin.

Uther lived and died to defend the kingdom of Lordaeron. Though he was betrayed by his most beloved student, we believe that his spirit lives on. He continues to watch over us, even as the shadows close in around our ruined land. His light is the light of all humanity - and so long as we honor his example, it shall never fade.

Vangarde Human Paladin Uldum
#127 Jul 08 2009 at 7:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
***
1,956 posts
ArchVangarde wrote:
"China did have issues with Pandaren, and they are an important part of their player base. Can't say it'll never happen, but it isn't on the horizon."


Things have changed a lot since Pandaren were introduced, that was back in Warcraft III. The new license holder here (Netease) is said to have a better working relationship with the government and may be more able to steer new content through the local approval process. If they can get WotLK through, Pandaren should be a snap.

For that matter, there aren't really any mainland players right now (although quite a few transferred to Taiwan) and unless things get sorted out, there won't be. Servers have been closed since June 7 and will remain closed indefinitely as the various cases get sorted out. Polls show 20% or more of Chinese players are fed up and may not return to the game; WotLK is expected to be delayed beyond whatever time the servers might come up and that means we're going to continue to be wildly out of step with new content.

If things don't get worked out, Blizzard might have substantially less interest in what China has issues with and might even have an incentive to go with Pandaren to bring in new players. If things do get sorted out, Pandaren seemingly need to be addressed (according to OP) until the expansion after next -- giving plenty of time to work out any issues that might exist.

Azuarc wrote:
There are no physical Pandarens. There are no mentions anywhere within Alliance subculture.


True, but they were in WC III and there is some slight mention of them in Vanilla. The mention is slight, but it is placed in such a way that Horde players are almost certain to encounter it. Panda Express may be an old joke, but I thought it was interesting that it is still found in "underdev" rather than having been archived off; leaving it up keeps the rumors swirling. Granted, if wishes were horses then beggers would ride ... if the list is accurate and if the next expansion moves to the Maelstrom, that would put players in the right area to discover further signs of Pandaria.

Hey, look, they gave us squid faced space goats (who build spaceships, but use crossbows) on a lot less! Yes, they learned from that mistake, but that could explain why they didn't do more to seed Pandaren as a race. When Vanilla was released, they hadn't learned the lesson yet. Maelsrom is probably a more logical point to introduce Pandaren than WotLK would have been.

In practical terms, Pandaren also address some of the other problems that were mentioned in the interview: "I would worry that our classes would become less distinct and interesting, and the new stuff may not feel as cool." It opens the door to Brewmasters, but also to the whole range of oriental RPG stereotypes, even mo.... Urk! Maybe Pandaren are a really bad idea!
____________________________
In Chinese: glasses are yanjing; eyes are yanjing, and the beer of Beijing is Yanjing. When speaking, the difference is in the tones. Did I just order a glass of beer or a glass of eyes?
#128 Jul 09 2009 at 9:49 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,047 posts
Quote:
I could be mistaken, but I don't believe this is the original thread. There was one previous, very shortly after BC was released. Even so, do you really have much reason to distrust it? -- Maybe WotLK was announced, but there was zero public information on it until much later.


I thought I remembered reading about this before this thread as well.

Edit: It is difficult to remember after so much time has passed.

Edited, Jul 9th 2009 1:49pm by Karthal
____________________________
Karthal - Moon Guard - Warrior [A]
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
#129 Jul 09 2009 at 7:36 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
591 posts
I remember seeing this thread right around the time Bliz trademarked the name "Wrath of the lich king" I am going by the assumption that it is accurate.
____________________________
Shaowstrike wrote:
I'm looking forward to the thousands of LGBT shock troops storming Mormon Churches in rainbow camouflage.


Remorajunbao wrote:
SHUT THE @#%^ UP DARTHGEKKO.
<3


#130 Jul 10 2009 at 8:20 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,114 posts
Azuarc wrote:
Chilton said in the interview we had linked on the front page earlier today that they want their player races "seeded" in the world and a known entity to players before they would become playable.


Well as the list says, Hiji is one of the Pandarain areas, and it's "to the east of Kezan, south of the Broken Isles and Maelstrom"(wowwiki) Where's the next expansion? Right next door. It could be that this is where we'll see Pandarians for the first time in WoW, get used a lot and then expac #4, Pandarians enter the scene.
#131 Jul 12 2009 at 2:43 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
190 posts
I found an interesting article that was posted back in January on rumorfeed.blogspot.com. The article can be found here. For those that don't want to click, I have it posted below. I am in no way claiming any of this to be fact.

Quote:
This info comes straight from the mouth of three GM’s, so while I have no “official” statement from a Blizzard rep (I don’t have any sources inside Blizzard, just a few GM’s that work for them, looking after WoW and battle.net) it should still be considered solid information as all three have seen multiple new areas and are just part of a “plethora” of testers that Blizzard has in these new zones.

The first of these expansions has something to do with the Emerald Dream, as there are currently seven “rather large” zones that are related to the Emerald Dream. These are already “fairly fleshed out” with plenty of quest NPC’s and content. The zones themselves are a lot “greener” than anything previously found in WoW, with many “giant” flowers, trees and lakes. My sources said “think Zangarmarsh, but greener, and with much more foliage. The giant mushrooms are replaced with giant flowers, fields of green, and plenty of foliage.” The creatures in these zones are mostly "animal like" at the moment.

Next up there are a few zones that are in “very early” stages of development. The strange part is that they are in no way connected to either the Emerald Dream or the content that Blizzard is working on for the Lich King expansion. These zones are more “Waterworld themed” (Waterworld is an older movie starring Kevin Costner. Look it up.)

There is a zone that contains a “barely floating city, surrounded by a huge body of water”; there are quite a few more “graphics for ships, with big galleons here and there”; and finally there is a new “giant sea creature”. However nothing in these zones is scripted and they are just walked around in for the moment. The sea creature can already be spawned; then again it can be spawned in any zone as long as the command is known, even in good old Azeroth. There are also a few more “Waterworld” based zones out there, but they are not yet populated or finished.

My sources believe that Blizzard is working on the next two expansion packs to the game. One themed on the Emerald Dream, and the other on what looks like “Waterworld”. I have no release dates, however the three commented on how they “have to be done with a few zones by July 2009”. Which puts one expansion pack on track for late 2009, early 2010.

I have no other knowledge on what else comes with the expansion, but one can assume that we will get a higher level cap and more skills.


The one thing that I find interesting in the article is the quote from the supposed GM's. “have to be done with a few zones by July 2009”. This would put some footage in the hands of Blizzard for the upcoming Blizzcon. I say again this is all just speculation but it's fun to think about.


Edited, Jul 12th 2009 6:46am by Antius
#132 Aug 21 2009 at 6:26 PM Rating: Good
1 post
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.
#133 Aug 21 2009 at 6:45 PM Rating: Decent
Well it looks like if this was ever their outline for expansions they've changed their mind now.
____________________________
Die! Die die die. die die die die, die die. - Scarlet Briar
#134 Aug 21 2009 at 8:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
ZAM Administrator
Avatar
*****
1oooo posts
mcmagi wrote:
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.


You could have just linked it instead of necro posting it.
____________________________
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules | Mobile
DF: Twitter | FB
KnotKrazy: FB | Etsy
#135 Aug 21 2009 at 9:30 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,211 posts
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
mcmagi wrote:
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.


You could have just linked it instead of necro posting it.


I actually looked it up like a week ago to confirm if it was the next expac or not.
____________________________
How to beat a warlock 1v1 is simple, call a priest or paladin to come save you.
Manicshock - 80 Warlock
Riine - 80 Warrior
Paka - 80 Druid Zangarmarsh
Never argue with an idiot. They will just drag you down to their level and beat you with experience
#136 Aug 21 2009 at 9:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
mcmagi wrote:
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.


You could have just linked it instead of necro posting it.
This thread lives to be necro posted. Smiley: grin
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#137 Aug 21 2009 at 10:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
27,424 posts
Sir Xsarus wrote:
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
mcmagi wrote:
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.


You could have just linked it instead of necro posting it.
This thread lives to be necro posted. Smiley: grin


While I normally have a problem with Necroposting, I have to agree. This thread is an exception.
____________________________
Someone on another forum wrote:
Wow, you've got an awesome writing style.! I really dig the narrator's back story, humor, sarcasm, and the plethora of pop culture references. Altogether a refreshingly different RotR journal (not that I don't like the more traditional ones, mind you).

#138 Aug 21 2009 at 10:37 PM Rating: Good
****
5,080 posts
Mistress Darqflame wrote:
mcmagi wrote:
Well it would seem with Worgen and Goblins announced as the next playable races that there is some authenticity to the original post after all.


You could have just linked it instead of necro posting it.


I think this thread should be stickied.

DF is awesome
____________________________
In Loving Memory of SatanWantsMe 2006-2008
SWM Wiki | Journal | What I am listening to right now
#139 Aug 22 2009 at 5:40 AM Rating: Decent
*
78 posts
It looks like Gilneas and Grim Batol are the only areas from the "maelstrom set" to make it in...and Gilneas is no longer high-level. In other words, it looks like they've abandoned this plan.
____________________________
Keya
#140 Aug 22 2009 at 7:55 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,677 posts
It's obvious there was a change in plans. However, I think that's completely understandable. Look at the state of the game right now. Old world needs an overhaul, game needs a mechanics overhaul. This is actually a brilliant way to do it. I antagonized MMO-champ's advanced info because I didn't think Blizzard was going balls to the wall changing everything, but because they are, it actually all works together. As long as they pull it off, of course, but that's topic for another thread.

I find it completely plausible that we may end up going back to the schedule for future releases. The level ranges might be different, however the expansion themes could remain. I'm not completely counting this file out, although obviously the info we have on Cataclysm does weigh against it considerably.
____________________________
Only the exceptions can be exceptional.
#141 Aug 22 2009 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
408 posts
It looks to me like they took some from the Maelstrom and Plane sets for this one. It sounds likely that they are setting up an Old Gods expansion in the future, and I doubt the Legion set will ever come out.

Edited, Aug 22nd 2009 1:23pm by Minoran
#142 Aug 23 2009 at 2:42 AM Rating: Good
Azuarc wrote:
It's obvious there was a change in plans. However, I think that's completely understandable. Look at the state of the game right now. Old world needs an overhaul, game needs a mechanics overhaul. This is actually a brilliant way to do it. I antagonized MMO-champ's advanced info because I didn't think Blizzard was going balls to the wall changing everything, but because they are, it actually all works together. As long as they pull it off, of course, but that's topic for another thread.

I find it completely plausible that we may end up going back to the schedule for future releases. The level ranges might be different, however the expansion themes could remain. I'm not completely counting this file out, although obviously the info we have on Cataclysm does weigh against it considerably.

Yeah. It was pretty clear that when flying was introduced in TBC, they'd eventually have to provide flight in the old world. Making a "reason" for the revamp was brilliant on Blizz's part.
____________________________
--- Mike ---
Old age and treachery will always overcome youth and enthusiasm!
Aside from the deep and complex parts, WoW is not deep and complex. Jordster
There are only 2 types of goldsellers in these parts. Dead ones, and dead ones that don't know it yet... Dread Lörd Kaolian
Stop hanging out with morons. That's probably impossible though because there are tons of morons out there. Mentalfrog

[wowsig]2577575[/wowsig]
#143 Aug 23 2009 at 3:50 PM Rating: Excellent
*
118 posts
Arguments for the authenticity of the "list":
  • "Memories" of a certain number of people, who state they have seen this and exactly this string of characters before September 2007 already, and not other, similar speculations based on the previous games or the RPG books, which have always floated around the net.

Arguments against the authenticity: (oh god where do I begin)
  • The most important thing: There is no factual evidence whatsoever that this very alignment of letters existed before September 2007. The earliest known reference is this very thread which was posted not even 2 weeks after the Northrend zones were officially announced.
  • There is also a screenshot of the supposed original post by Caydiem, but this only started to appear in 2009, too. It is likely based on this 2005 screenshot of several posts by Caydiem, the date in the first post is nearly the same as in the supposed 2004 screen, with differences just the year and the time.
  • Supposedly this list was known since 2003, but Blizzard had all topics mentioning it deleted - this can only be true for the official WoW forums, not for independent sites. If Blizzard had pressed those sites to also delete postings of the list, you can be sure as **** one rogue site admin would've taken this as a proof for the authenticity, and would've posted it even more, spreading it to everyone who would've wanted to read it. Plus, archive websites like Google or web.archive.org would be able to find even those deleted threads.
  • Strangely, the Northrend Set has 2 starting areas, a method which isn't really used in any other set - in fact, that Northrend has 2 entry zones came from the experience they made with Hellfire Peninsula, which was heavily overpopulated the first days and weeks after the release of BC.
  • Azjol-Nerub had always been planned as its own zone, up until somewhere mid-alpha, it wasn't mentioned anymore when they officially announced the Northrend zones. If the list had been from 2003, it would sure still list Azjol-Nerub as a zone.

Rather neutral points, which still should get you thinking:
  • Bloodmyst Isle is misspelled as "Bloodmyrk", suggesting that this zone was renamed during development, on the other hand this could be a deliberate misspelling.
  • "The Deadlands" appear to be the Bone Wastes as their own zone, which actually appeared in 2.0 as a subzone of Terokkar Forest, again you can't say whether this was a change of plans or a deliberate addition to confuse people.
  • All mentioned zones were well-known in 2007 through the previous RTS games and the RPG source books, every experience player could've produced a similar list on his own, with the expansions sorted by their possibility of being made - assuming Outland and Northrend are confirmed as expansions, the Maelstrom/South Sea is the next most possible expansion, rather closely followed by the Emerald Dream. The other "sets" might be too abstract for new players, WoW would need to gain a certain playerbase through "familiar" content/zones, close to known fantasy settings, before venturing into weird stuff as the Elemental Plane or the Legion-controlled nightmares of planets. This holds true for both years of origin, 2003 and 2007, but again it's a proof for neither.

#144 Aug 24 2009 at 6:41 AM Rating: Good
***
1,574 posts
Nathanyel’s case is compelling. Though it’s possible to still justify faith in this expansion list by saying Blizz’s plans changed, I tend to agree that it was not a leaked high-level devloper document, but rather a wish list by someone with strong game knowledge, but not necessarily inside knowledge.

#145 Aug 26 2009 at 7:54 AM Rating: Excellent
**
976 posts
Hello everyone. I'm the OP, if you haven't noticed.

With the announcement of Cataclysm, it seems the lifespan of my list has come to its end.

It's odd how this list, which I wrote myself out of boredom on a fall morning, has taken on a life of its own.

I wrote it in September of 2007, but some swear they saw it during the WoW beta in 2004. To boot, CMs on the official WoW forums deleted this list every time it popped up - at least until this year, when they suddenly stopped caring.

Some things I predicted came to pass. Others didn't.

I was sure I'd be proven right with a Maelstrom expansion, but it seems Blizzard has combined light elements of both the Elemental Planes and Maelstrom into one expansion. Gilneas and Grim Batol are in from the Maelstrom expansion, while the four elemental planes have been introduced - some only as raid dungeons, disappointingly. Why Blizzard has reduced the Firelands to a raid and expanded Uldum into a full zone is beyond me. If you ask me, they should have followed my lead.

Back in 2006, when we were struggling to figure out what race the Alliance would be getting, I started another rumor - the Worgen rumor!


"The people of Gilneas entombed themselves in their isolated peninsula at the outbreak of the Undead Scourge, erecting the Greymane Wall to keep out the demons and walking dead of the cursed army. To this day, refugees from the ravaged villages of Lordaeron gather at it, crying for safe haven from the Forsaken that now claim Silverpine Forest as their own.

Yet it is not much better behind the wall. For agents of the crazed wizard Arugal have infiltrated the once-prosperous land and spread a dark curse among the populace. As the first tainted moon climbed into the sky, screams rendered the countryside as the inhabitants of Gilneas changed forms and became the crazed Worgen. Few retained their minds. Many became wild and bloodthirsty.

Those who remained in control of their thoughts waged a war hidden from the eyes of the rest of the world, slaying former friends and family in an effort to preserve what little life still hoped for survival. Naming themselves the Nightcry after that first terrifying moonrise, they fought until they found themselves drained of resources and the will to continue the **** battles alone.

Unable to conceal their horrid existence from the world any longer, a new sun rises over Gilneas. The Alliance has opened its gates to the refugees and an effort is now underway to restore humanity to the Nightcry Worgen. As one of their number, you must prove yourself a capable ally to the Alliance's cause and master the powers granted to you against your will in order to free your land...no matter how much blood you must shed.
"


That was me as well. I didn't try and pass that one off as fact, though. Some people just ran with it. When you write speculative lore, you might as well pass it off as fact yourself and have a bit of fun with it. Otherwise a stranger will take what you wrote and start the rumor himself.

I can't think of any way I could have hurt anyone by starting this rumor, but it's within the realm of extreme possibility, so to them I apologize. To the rest of you, I've really enjoyed watching you all debate this. Hopefully you didn't spend too many sleepless nights pondering the ramifications of this leak.

I still intend on comparing future content to my list. Cataclysm looks rather fun but the way they're glossing over the Elemental Planes, which could have been four unique regions, bothers me.

Happy trails. Maybe I'll be around more often on 'Zam' now, unless you all don't want me, in which case I will accept my exile to the official forums. I will live in a mud hut and have many sharp sticks with which to jab the trolls who come through my windows demanding I play Aion.

Edited, Aug 26th 2009 9:55am by Reinjin
#146 Aug 26 2009 at 8:21 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,047 posts
Quote:
It's odd how this list, which I wrote myself out of boredom on a fall morning, has taken on a life of its own.


rofl

edit: rate up for epicness

Edited, Aug 26th 2009 12:21pm by Karthal
____________________________
Karthal - Moon Guard - Warrior [A]
Katran - Moon Guard - Warlock [A]
Taurun - Moon Guard - Shaman [H]
Stygius - Moon Guard - Death Knight [A]
Katekat - Moon Guard - Paladin [A]
Karthal(FFXI) - Seraph Server - Warrior 75, BeastMaster 70
#147 Aug 26 2009 at 8:35 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,975 posts
Quote:
I wrote it in September of 2007

I guess more than a few people who rated him into sub-default oblivion for calling the OP out owe Nathanyel an apology.

Another example of how people don't get down-rated for saying something nasty or insulting, or giving incorrect information, but for offering an opinion against the majority view. gogo conform or be ostracized.


As for the OP, how very narcissistic of you.
Quote:
I've really enjoyed watching you all debate this.



____________________________
One of my opinions is worth three of your facts.

#148 Aug 26 2009 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
**
976 posts
cynyck wrote:



As for the OP, how very narcissistic of you.



I think everyone enjoyed reading the discussions that came about from this.

I can't imagine anyone being upset or mad or sad about them.

It promoted discourse about the game lore, which I see as a good thing, since so much of the WoW playerbase doesn't even read quest text. Just look at all the people who have no idea who Deathwing is.
#149 Aug 26 2009 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
**
501 posts
Hats off to the OP for a truly epic ride. I'm speechless.
____________________________
for the
╔╗║║¤╔╗╔╗╔═╔╗
╠╣║║║╠╣║║║ ╠╝
║║╚╚║║║║║╚═╚═

(stolen from Kelnoen)
#150 Aug 26 2009 at 9:24 AM Rating: Default
Avatar
***
1,975 posts
Reinjin wrote:
cynyck wrote:

As for the OP, how very narcissistic of you.

I think everyone enjoyed reading the discussions that came about from this.

I can't imagine anyone being upset or mad or sad about them.

It promoted discourse about the game lore, which I see as a good thing, since so much of the WoW playerbase doesn't even read quest text. Just look at all the people who have no idea who Deathwing is.

You took advantage of people for your own amusement. The substance of the discussion was a sideshow for you - I don't see any posts from you anywhere in that discussion.

You don't think the people who defended your list feel used? You could have engendered the same discussion by being honest and posting the list as your own from the beginning. Lore threads are always lengthy and intense.

Maybe it's just me. Maybe honesty and integrity really don't mean anything anymore. I mean, it's just a dumb game board full of people discussing a dopey game, right?


____________________________
One of my opinions is worth three of your facts.

#151 Aug 26 2009 at 9:42 AM Rating: Excellent
**
976 posts
cynyck wrote:

it's just a dumb game board full of people discussing a dopey game, right?


I wouldn't go as far as saying it's a 'dumb game board full of people discussing a dopey game'.

WoW is far from dopey, and I've spent many hours educating people on the lore. I write about it, read about it, explain it to others. I'm a veritable expert.

This is just something that I expected would get four posts and sink off the front page. It got a bit out of hand.

I am surprised and amused by how popular it got, and how so many didn't even think it originated with me, but instead was posted by Caydiem in 2004.

I can't see how any harm has been done. I do apologize for offending you. It appears you have a very high moral standards, which is a good thing as long as things are kept in perspective.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 48 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (48)