Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Karma - a Suicide Mission.Follow

#27 Dec 05 2006 at 8:53 AM Rating: Decent
Back in the day after the move from the uBB forums I suggested an exponential decay for the value of karma on your overall rating (i.e. older posts would begin to have their impact on your overall ratings decay, making the new posts more valuable in determining where you stood) as well as a less severe status-quo mechanism (i.e. each post, as it stands now, counts for two ratings at whatever your current rating level is). Meh.
#28 Dec 05 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
If I hadn't acted like a complete ****** some two years ago in the place they call the Asylum, I probably would've been Sage or Guru by now. Lesson learned and I only post there if I feel I have something valuable to contribute with (valuable by normal forum standards, not Asylum standards). Sure, I can post in the OOT forum's CJ threads and probably grind my way up to Sage, but where's the fun in that? I want to be a Sage because of what I've contributed with, like my WoWReader/WoWSignature guide, my Hunter Macro Compilation and helping out newbies with whatever problems they might have, not because I spent an unhealthy amount of time playing LAST in the OOT forum.

That being said, I do go there to get my fix if I feel I've been unjustly rated down. I still have some karma stalkers who follow me outside of the WoW forum and basically rate down everything I post. Since trying to reason with them has proved to be ineffective, and messaging admins likewise, I do the only thing I can do to balance it out. The OOT and WoW forums are the only forums I can post in without being auto-downrated. Kinda sucks. Especially since some of the people who auto-downrate me out there are lurkers here. They're too afraid to karma camp me here though.

Yeah, don't think I don't know who you are.

As for rating others, I'll admit I've been slacking lately. Usually I rate people up if they provide useful information to a thread. However, sometimes I rate those up who have been rated down for no apparent reason (according to myself). I rarely rate down, but personal attacks, blatant trolling and RMT advertisement are all sure to receive a bashing.

I rarely rate up CJ threads, but there are two threads that get a pat on the shoulder everytime I see them and that's danieldakkak's Weekend Goals/Summary threads. It's a nice tradition and I want him to know it's appreciated. What other way than to rate the post up (except sending a PM, obviously)?

Finally, those who say that ratings don't matter, I'd like to claim otherwise. Your rating is like a summary of your achievements on these forums. It's also a major source of prejudice since a 'sub-default' poster might not be as bad as you would think. Ratings do matter and anyone who claims otherwise is 'scholar' or above, or has never been 'default'.

Edited, Dec 5th 2006 6:01pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#29 Dec 05 2006 at 8:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Mazra the Meaningless wrote:
I rarely rate up CJ threads, but there are two threads that get a pat on the shoulder everytime I see them and that's danieldakkak's Weekend Goals/Summary threads. It's a nice tradition and I want him to know it's appreciated. What other way than to rate the post up (except sending a PM, obviously)?


I rate those up as well, not because it's a tradition but because I feel it really brings a sense of community around here amidst the anger and sarcasm we often see when discussing things about the game.
#30 Dec 05 2006 at 1:08 PM Rating: Good
***
3,478 posts

I hate CJ threads, but the weekend thread is tolerable I suppose, unless I see someone post more than once. That bothers me, because it's a CJ thread, so why try to milk it shamelessly?


BTW, how do the admins feel about CJ threads? Honestly, because I just wandered over to the OOT forums to see what Mazra was talking about and it's @#%^ing ridiculous.

Karma abuse anyone?


edit: never mind me, I'm in a bad mood :(



Edited, Dec 5th 2006 4:18pm by Webjunky
#31 Dec 05 2006 at 1:25 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,588 posts
mooblareig the Pest wrote:
Siaon wrote:
Maybe we should limit rating to Scholars and up.


FAQ wrote:
In order to rate a post, you have to have a minimum rating of Scholar.



On topic: I've been downrated now - I know why; I made posts saying Mando's bow was for Rogues for the Agi (lol) and the like. I'm glad I was downrated - it made me stop and think before I did post. I now check my spelling, grammar and punctuation.

I now wish I'd made decent posts, because at times, I really wish I could've rated people up, and (Not as much) people down. The reason I can't is my fault, and I'm regret it, but there's nothing I can do about that.

Just my 2cents.

yes there is. post useful information in a friendly and legible manner. with your low postcount, you will be back on track in no time.
#32 Dec 05 2006 at 5:29 PM Rating: Decent
Weird... I say the same thing the OP just said in another thread and I never go above Decent, but he starts a topic about it and goes to Excellent in a matter of hours.

I normally get rated down just because someone doesnt get my humor and they take it personally... and if what I typed didnt offend the person then another person thinks that I should be rated down because I offended someone else who didnt even think it was offensive... What?

I try to post informative information in everything I type... or at least I try to be funny in a way that I wont make anyone upset.

And yet... I am still blue-coded when all I really want is to be green. :/

People just dont like me. I will have to level another alt now, because I have offended someone somewhere. =P
#33 Dec 05 2006 at 5:50 PM Rating: Excellent
I rate up posts that are interesting, informative, amusing, or some combination thereof.

My personal pet peeve (and what I will continue to downrate every single time I run across them for as long as I have the ability to downrate anything) are the smarmy, self-righteous posts, most notably those who have to take a poke at or make fun of someone asking a legitimate question. I don't care if the question has been asked a million times or the answer is in some sticky or FAQ. If someone can take the time to make a smart-alecky reply to someone's question, they could just as easily have simply said to read the FAQ/sticky whatever instead. Or they could have said nothing at all.
#34 Dec 05 2006 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
Take gbaji for example, most people do not agree with his opinions but just the way he organizes his thoughts has earned him the title of Sage. So, if you have an unpopular opinion try to give reasons for it, use great grammar and spelling, and you will be successful in this crazy game called kharma.
#35 Dec 05 2006 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
***
1,260 posts
In case if anyone else is curious, this post has so far attracted 28 scholar posters and 5 untitled posters.

And now a sage posting with a census :P

What does it say about how this forum views the karma system I wonder?
#36 Dec 05 2006 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
***
2,634 posts
I think people misuse the karma system, its not all that often, but often enough to be a problem.

I personally thought it was to weed out the people who are rude, post things that shouldnt be posted, or post things that are blatently wrong.

Or it was to rate up the people that have origional posts, contribute to the converstation, or help someone out.

If im wrong on this, then someone rate me down...

Either way, I rarely use the rate down button. Only when someone really gets my goat. Otherwise im a pretty positive person who trys to rate up at the hint of kindness, intelligence, or origionality.

#37 Dec 05 2006 at 7:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
We do try to keep a handle on the severe abusers.
____________________________

#38 Dec 05 2006 at 8:17 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,114 posts
The only time I noticed significant neg bombing was when I was arguing that forum search should be free.

Though, I don't really care, the system in theory is good, but in practise fails. Main forum I go to, the "elite" members made a topic in the elite area simply to spam +repping each other. Admittedly, I'm now No.2 rep on the site, but the system is flawed, especially when you have people leaving abusive messages along with the -rep/-kharma.
#39 Dec 05 2006 at 9:50 PM Rating: Excellent
*
233 posts
I'm fairly new to these forums, I get on whenever I'm stuck in a room sitting with patients at work because I'm extremely bored and don't feel like spending money on Ebay....(of course **** is off limits so I can do that, damn communists) :P

Anyhow, I rarely use the rate system at all. To me, here lately people just post away killing time or answer new people that come to the forum. Occasionally there will be an extremely well written post/reply on a topic that is genius and I will rate them up, or when someone goes out of their way to give us new information about that game that is great. I only rate down people that are arrogantly ignorant/mean which I've only had to do a couple of times i.e. -- Thread asking people to use their Wowreader and got angry flames about goldselling.

A lot of the people here seem to have common sense and I guess that's why I've stuck around.....
#40 Dec 06 2006 at 1:15 AM Rating: Good
Karma has been discussed many times, and I really have nothing to add to the subject.

But I'd like to comment about the 2 weekend threads and their rating.

First of all, I agree that they encourage and strengthen the sense of belonging to a community. I, for one, read and try to keep up with every single post in there. I feel genuinely happy when someone has reached his goal, and pretty bummed out if something kept you from it. I rate up all relevant posts there, but rarely multiple posts by the same user (for obvious rate fishing I rate down, not up).

I wish for them to be a "1 post per person" thread, but I also rate up helpful answers to questions others have asked.

If you're curious about the ratings I give there, a well thought out post gets an Excellent, a 1 liner gets a Good if it's on topic, Awful if it's just spam or rate fishing.
#41 Dec 06 2006 at 1:21 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
danieldakkak wrote:
I wish for them to be a "1 post per person" thread, but I also rate up helpful answers to questions others have asked.


I myself am guilty of responding more than once in them and I wish people who rate up in that thread because it's a tradition or fosters a sense of community would only rate my one relevant post. If/when I make a second post in those, I do so for a reason(for instance, answering questions or responding to someone's comment, etc).

For those who like to rate up for people being helpful in there, I'd love to see you all do so more in the other threads around. Then again, you may be doing so and we just can't tell. Like I said above:

I wrote:
The problem with rateups is that they're not always noticeable. If you're not above a certain point, it takes 2 rateups to bring your post to "Good". By the same token, someone in the same position might only take one rate-down to go to "Default".
#42 Dec 06 2006 at 2:25 AM Rating: Decent
I say that this suicide mission failed.
#43 Dec 06 2006 at 3:36 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,846 posts
Webjunky wrote:
I hate CJ threads, but the weekend thread is tolerable I suppose, unless I see someone post more than once. That bothers me, because it's a CJ thread, so why try to milk it shamelessly?


BTW, how do the admins feel about CJ threads? Honestly, because I just wandered over to the OOT forums to see what Mazra was talking about and it's @#%^ing ridiculous.

Karma abuse anyone?


edit: never mind me, I'm in a bad mood :(



Edited, Dec 5th 2006 4:18pm by Webjunky


You want karma abuse? go make your own karma thread in the asylum toots. Smiley: lol Make sure to get a screenshot of your scholar title cus it will be the last you will ever see of it.
#44 Dec 06 2006 at 3:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Thanks for the responses- I know we get these threads intermittently, but I still keep seeing weird ratedowns, and it bothers me for whatever quirky reason. Hence, this thread. Anyway, it's good to see so many replies, even if it's the "already-converted", so to speak.

It's a really strange thing to be concerned about other people's karma and not my own, but meh- I'm weird.

And I also rate up the Weekend Goals thread, not for a general CJ, but just because it's people contributing to a positive tradition here, as people before me said.

The one thing I am dissapointed about, ironically enough, is that there are no dissenting opinions here- nobody came forward to say "I rate down whenever I want, it's my right, and you can't tell me when or how to rate down".

Like I said, I'm weird. Smiley: rolleyes

Edit: I started posting in OoT lately, because I felt I needed a change of pace... different topics et al... but I am hesitant to now because it seems to have devolved into a CJ emporium. I don't like gratuitous ratedowns, but I feel that gratuitous (ie, unearned) rateups are just as bad.

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 7:44am by Wondroustremor
____________________________
Longtail | Evilynne | Maevene | Kornakk | Steelbelly
#45 Dec 06 2006 at 3:55 AM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
Wondroustremor the Flatulent wrote:
The one thing I am dissapointed about, ironically enough, is that there are no dissenting opinions here- nobody came forward to say "I rate down whenever I want, it's my right, and you can't tell me when or how to rate down".


Because the Asylumites don't post here very often. They probably missed this thread.

They'd tell you: "I rate down whenever I want, it's my right and my duty, and you can't tell me when or how to rate down. Now, GFY and DIAF you cnut" and they'd bomb you to early medieval age.

It's reversed CJ effect over there, it's almost funny how the Asylum and Sandbox balance each other out. Smiley: lol

Like Polderan, I have a tendency to post multiple times in the WG/WS threads, but not because I'm farming karma. Honestly, I gave up caring when I saw my rating move 0.01 after a week of being rated up all the time. I'm just not a "fire and forget" kind of guy, if you know what I mean. I like to keep track of replies to my posts and provide additional advice if need be.

Oh, and Wondrous, I think we're all a bit weird. We have to be to survive here. Smiley: wink

Edited, Dec 6th 2006 1:00pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#46 Dec 06 2006 at 4:06 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
nobody came forward to say "I rate down whenever I want, it's my right, and you can't tell me when or how to rate down".


Most likely because the types who do rate down spitefully, arbatrairily(sp), or maliciously are doing so in spite of knowing it to be wrong (and so they would get in trouble for it), but because of the anonimity of the internet, can get away with it.

It's the same type of person who logs into the game and turns into a potty-mouthed, gansta-talking, offensive loser, but who if you ever met them in real life turns out to be some skinny 13 year old with glasses and weighs 90 lbs dripping wet who wouldn't say boo to a mouse. I met any number of those types of people back in the early days when message boards were local and they had occasional meetups. Some of the rudest nastiest people on the boards generally turned out to be shy and polite youngsters in real life. Now mind I'm not saying that type are always teens, just that all too often people who act the worst online are hiding their real selves behind some facade of "online wannabe machismo" that dies quickly when exposed to the light of reality or the scrutiny of their peers.
#47 Dec 06 2006 at 7:43 AM Rating: Good
***
3,202 posts
I haven't rated anyone mainly because I don't feel like I've been posting here long enough to have earned the right to do so.

While I am no stranger to internet forums, this is the first one I've been on that has a karma system of any sort. It seems to be a pretty good system for keeping most discussions on a civil level at least. The ability for raters to knock intentionally disruptive posts so far down that they cannot be read by most viewers seems to be a pretty effective deterrent to the behavior I've seen on occasion on other forums. The problem with such a visible rating system is that some people take rate-downs (or any sort of criticism) way too personally and spend way too much energy worrying about their rating. In some ways it's a lot like eBay's feedback system (I've spent years on the eBay forums) in that some people act like a negative feedback comment is the worst thing that could have ever happened to them. I've learned that you have to develop a fairly thick 'internet skin' to be able to get along in any sort of internet community whether it be a chat room, a forum or even just the in-game chat of WoW.

I don't know how most people are but when I first started reading these forums, it didn't take me long to decide which posters I felt were giving the best information and those decisions had nothing to do with the title behind the names. It's the content that really counts, not the pretty label on the outside.
#48 Dec 06 2006 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
Terrorfiend
*****
12,905 posts
I only rate people up who have at least 5 Xs in their names.
#49 Dec 06 2006 at 8:55 AM Rating: Decent
ha, you mean the karma system at this site is a joke? i never would have guessed that at all

you disagree with the 'popular' opinion/members here and you get rated down...been like that for almost two years...get used to it
#50 Dec 06 2006 at 1:20 PM Rating: Decent
I just thought about another reason I might rate someone down, and yes, it's about rating someone down for having opinions that differ from mine. I do it when someone's post differs so completely from my own values that the alternatives are a whopping big flame (and everybody knows I don't shy from those!) or a rate-down. So, I use rate downs as a control on my temper. Does it help? well it helps me, even though it harms the karma of that hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, Byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, abrasive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally Not Good person.
#51REDACTED, Posted: Dec 06 2006 at 1:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) ill sum up the karma system.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 219 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (219)