Info on blood elvesFollow

And your point is?

AND arrogant to boot!

You have no basis for your argument, you just don't like the idea, thus you protest for no real reason. All you did was lay down the law the way YOU see fit. Consider researching more than what you can come up with in your own head.

Linus, they added it after deciding this, so its not a factor.
And yes, that statement there is completly biased and I could've added IMHO to it, I just didnt feel like doing it, everything blizzard does underlines my points sorry.
Will I change my mind due to you guys? No.
Do you have to read and cry about my statements? No.
Do I care what you think? No, not that much.

What was the point of that post?
If I say warriors are spellcasters, then 2 weeks later give them fireball frostbolt and make them unable to equip weapons, will that make my first statement true? No. But after I decide that they are spellcasters, I can freely make them spellcasters.

Edited, Nov 12th 2006 at 10:30am PST by Noodkele

There is no spoon, you need to divide spoon by zero to get rogues wield magics.

GJ, I knew I can count on you, ***.

Ohh you suck so much.
"Only way of fighting?" Sorry but they ahd archers, always.
Where the @#%^ did you read "humans taught elves how to melee and bows"...lies.
Melee elves are rare?
Lets check this out, Poor Kael'thas is trapped in the human prison, their lieutants are stripped of their weapons, but they are freed, the lieutants take on their shiny golden looking plate armor, their big swords, and started fighting melee without even a bit of magic. Howz that? Oh sh*t...
As for Belves are:
They lie... when where why?
Relentless.... maybe, but nothing says so
heartless.... ofcourse they are, the love they've shown for their land, for their race, and the simple Mission when Arthas is fighting Sylvanas shows this. No they are not heartless.
Cold blooded killers... Now, where the @#%^ did you get that idea?

God you must be some mentally challenged ******.
Pls dont say that you stupid lies are "the WC3 TFT lore", because its not.

Edited, Nov 12th 2006 at 12:35pm PST by Noodkele

Im scaling my insults to the "level" of my "opponent".
And *** is very very low on my insult scale.

Do I have the right to say that your point contains ZERO good finds? Yes.
Do I have the right to say that your points are biased and you have very few smart followers? Yes.
Do I think that you are too busy grumbling about change and need to grow up? Yes.

You can ignore me all you want, but you lack credibility, thinking, and maturity. Don't expect to get much support on your elitist views.

Again, another post where the OP and one or two others seem to need to resort to insults and/or name calling to prove they are right or make a point. Seems to me OddVacado and Linus are being a little more "debate worthy" here. I can't say as I agree with any of you but in reading this thread, I don't see them calling someone "***" then following it up with Like that makes it so much better. If you want to debate the other posters, you might try actually debating and not being a grief poster about it. Just my opinion.

But then again, since you seem to think that anyone else's opinion is flawed or wrong since they don't agree with you, it's not likely to see a real debatable position without namecalling or insults. Of course, I base this on the thread thus far. Hell, even Gags had the cajones to ask why people rated him down and how he could correct that. Shows me he at least is willing to step up when he acts a little silly and approach other posters with some tact.

Obviously...
You know how hard it is not to switch Noodkele to Noobkele?!

You proved nothing wrong. You merely proved that you have an opinion. A very uneducated opinion.

You are not right, because you have no basis to form an argument.

You need to get out, because if you really don't care that much, and you're just THAT wise and all-knowing, you wouldn't really care about this forum to begin with I would think.