Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

system requirements? game runs slow?Follow

#1 Nov 09 2010 at 10:52 AM Rating: Decent
cant seem to get EQ2X to run on my pc, its a few years old but it meets all requirements i can find for running EQ2
i ran the full download/install game still takes along time to launch and when it does it just drags all input takes forever to respond, cant adjust u i properly, ive got all graphics set to lowest possible, highest system performance settings
windows vista
intel celeron 3.33ghz
2 gb ram

any suggestions ideas?
#2 Nov 09 2010 at 12:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Empress of News
***
2,350 posts
What video card are you using? Also make sure you have the most recent video drivers for your card.. that can make a big difference! Only other thing I can think of is, if you run a lot of programs on your computer, try eliminating as many high performance background applications as you can.
____________________________
Cyliena Velnarin | @Cyliena on Twitter

#3 Nov 09 2010 at 4:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Special Snowflake
Avatar
****
6,786 posts
Windows Vista is a huge memory hog. While 2GB memory might be the bare minimum requirements, everyone I ever asked about it said you wouldn't want less that 4GB with Vista.

Turn down your video options as much as possible to get some of that back.
____________________________
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#4 Nov 09 2010 at 10:05 PM Rating: Good
your first problem is that you are running a celeron CPU. This line of processors is like intel lite!

your 2nd problem is that you only have 2GB of ram. By design, EQ2 wants to offload textures and other general video jobs from the vid card to ram and with only 2GB total you have no free space for the game to use.

your 3rd problem is that you are running Vista which is a huge resource hog. for the 32 bit version you should have at least 4GB and for the 64bit version you should have 8GB.

you never mentioned the specs on your vid card but I'm willing to bet they are in line with the rest of the system. For reference, to run EQ2 smoothly you would need at least an nvidia series 8000 or 9000 with a minimum of a half GB of dedicated vid ram.

The published minimums and recommended specs are kind of deceiving because when it was released, EQ2 required the best systems available to run at all and nothing on the market would let you play maxed out. It is only in more recent years that systems have caught up to the game enough to let folks run at the higher settings.

As a point of reference, I have the following system:

CPU: i7 920 (quad core) @ 2.67GHz
RAM: 12GB
VID: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 with 1GB vid ram
OS: Windows 7 64 bit professional

I run pretty much wide open with this rig and am getting well over 30 FPS all the time - even in zones with known issues (like Qeynos Harbor)
#5 Nov 10 2010 at 12:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Special Snowflake
Avatar
****
6,786 posts
OldBlueDragon wrote:

you never mentioned the specs on your vid card but I'm willing to bet they are in line with the rest of the system. For reference, to run EQ2 smoothly you would need at least an nvidia series 8000 or 9000 with a minimum of a half GB of dedicated vid ram.


I'm gonna disagree with that because I used to run it on a 6600 :) runs a heck of a lot better on my 8600 tho.
____________________________
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#6 Nov 10 2010 at 4:36 AM Rating: Good
Calthine wrote:
OldBlueDragon wrote:

you never mentioned the specs on your vid card but I'm willing to bet they are in line with the rest of the system. For reference, to run EQ2 smoothly you would need at least an nvidia series 8000 or 9000 with a minimum of a half GB of dedicated vid ram.


I'm gonna disagree with that because I used to run it on a 6600 :) runs a heck of a lot better on my 8600 tho.


So you're saying that although the game would work on a 6000 series card, it runs "a heck of a lot better" or smoother on an 8000 series card... hmmm :-)
#7 Nov 10 2010 at 10:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Special Snowflake
Avatar
****
6,786 posts
OldBlueDragon wrote:
So you're saying that although the game would work on a 6000 series card, it runs "a heck of a lot better" or smoother on an 8000 series card... hmmm :-)


What I'm saying is that card will run the system better than the OP is reporting! Never had to go to the lowest video settings, and I only had 4GB RAM.

The simplest upgrade for the OP's system would be 2GB memory. But I've no idea if that alone will make the game playable.
____________________________
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#8 Nov 10 2010 at 11:11 AM Rating: Good
Sage
Avatar
****
8,187 posts
I think it's simple, the OP specs has a better processor than I do (intel dual-core 2ghz), and I ran with 2gb of ram for many years before recently putting in another 2g. There was no mention of a video card, so go get a dedicated video card with 512 on it.

My pc:
OS: Vista 32 bit (har har, I know)
Ram: 3.25gb ram (only 64 bit users can use a full 4gb or higher)
Video Card: ATI HD Radeon 2400 Pro 512mb vram
Processor: Intel Pentium dual-core e2180


I run the game fine on balanced mode, and can play easily on the next higher (for more glitzy game play) setting in zones without a large population.

Before I added the extra ram I definitely did drop my settings to extreme performance on raids, and still ran fine...and now after I never have to change the setting. In fact I can play on higher quality with a bit of fps lag but nothing that makes the game unplayable in that situation.

Edited, Nov 10th 2010 11:51am by Dyadem
____________________________
Things I sometimes play...

"What do you want to be when you grow up?"
"I want to be a unicorn!"
"Awww, why's that?"........
"So I can stab people with my face."
#9 Nov 19 2010 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Another thing to remember on Vista, make sure to run EQ2 in administrator mode!

My old rig had vista 32 bit with 4 gigs memory and a decent vid card (don't remember which) and it simply would not run if I didn't start it in administrator mode.

If I remember correctly, you right click on the shortcut, and choose something along the lines of "Run as administrator". (Sorry, been using Windows 7 for a long time now... Don't remember exactly).
#10 Nov 27 2010 at 7:58 AM Rating: Good
*
71 posts
Back in the early days of EQ2 I used to live way out in the country, and only had dialup. Yes I played about 2 years of EQ2 on dialup, and did it on 1 gig of RAM. And I have to say, the lag wasn't that bad most of the time. The only time I really ever ran into problems is when I visited QH. My zoning load times were always long, but not too terrible. Little by little I starte to instal more and more RAM. And noticed a heck of a difference.

I play now on a much more powerful new PC, and about as fast of a cable connection as you can get. The game can be played on some minimal requirements as I can attest to that. But I wouldn't recommend it. If you can make any upgrade at all, RAM is one of the first places I'd start.

It would seem to me, your system should at least minimally run this game. I'm wonding if there isn't something else at play here like do you have the newest version of direct X downloaded maybe?

Also the above poster is correct, you got to run just about everything in Admin if you got VISTA. I used to have VISTA and upgraded to WIN 7 as soon as I could. Which was a definately good move on my part. WIN 7 rules compared to VISTA if your a gamer.

Edited, Nov 27th 2010 8:01am by blakkmantis
#11 Nov 29 2010 at 12:04 PM Rating: Good
**
251 posts
Calthine wrote:
OldBlueDragon wrote:
So you're saying that although the game would work on a 6000 series card, it runs "a heck of a lot better" or smoother on an 8000 series card... hmmm :-)


What I'm saying is that card will run the system better than the OP is reporting! Never had to go to the lowest video settings, and I only had 4GB RAM.

The simplest upgrade for the OP's system would be 2GB memory. But I've no idea if that alone will make the game playable.


Ya, I would think so as well.

Until recently upgrading my whole system...the game was running very well using an X800 XL 256mb (AGP) card on custom high settings. I used to run on 2GB ram as well though, and there was a huge jump in performance (never mind loading speeds as well) when I doubled my RAM (note: my OS was XP....it *should* make an even bigger diff with Vista). I'm not a Celeron fan (/dislike), but that processor is more than sufficient for EQ2.

I wouldn't have even bothered upgrading my card if a string of other components hadn't needed updating, forcing my hand :)
#13 Dec 03 2010 at 6:40 AM Rating: Good
*
71 posts
Vista is a resource hog in the first degree, a horrid OS for anyone who enjoys gaming online. XP on the otherhand is one of the best OS for folks who online game. Not sure where Windows 7 ranks compaired to XP, but it's darn good also. I recently have upgraded from Vista 32 bit, to Win 7 64 bit, and WOW what a difference!

Edited, Dec 3rd 2010 6:41am by blakkmantis
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 132 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (132)