Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Thinking about playing, but have one question...Follow

#1 Sep 03 2009 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
First of all I want to say that I am in no way possible a computer guru. With that said I'll get to the question. I am coming from EQOA on the PS2 console. I played EQOA for about 4 years. However, I have been unable to move on to EQ2 due to the fact I ddn't have a computer with the ability to run the game. My recent computer has gone down the toilet which has caused me to order a new one. It is being built as we speak and should be here in approximately 2 weeks. I was wondering if my new computer will have the ability to run EQ2. I would love to enter the world of Norrath once again. So here is my new computer's info...

Intel Core 2 Duo E8500 (3.16GHz, 6M, 1333MHz FSB)
256MB ATI Radeon HD 3450 supports DVI, HDMI Connections
320GB Serial ATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) w/DataBurst Cache
4GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM 800MHz - 2DIMMs
Genuine Windows Vista; Home Basic, Service Pack 1

Any help at all would be appreciated. Thanks again.
#2 Sep 03 2009 at 4:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Special Snowflake
Avatar
****
6,786 posts
Yep, you'll be fine. More memory wouldn't hurt anything, but it'll run fine.
____________________________
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#3 Sep 03 2009 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
*
171 posts
I would recomend getting a better video card actually, dosn't have to be top of the line but decent.

Nvidia makes a great line in my opinion try for something in the 9k series
#4 Sep 03 2009 at 5:44 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I recently got an Nvida 9400 GT 1 gig for 50 bucks on Newegg. It's working like a charm.
#5 Sep 03 2009 at 5:45 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Ok so your saying without a better video card it will have to run on really low settings or what? I mean I don't necessarily need everything on extremely high performace, but at least average would be okay with me. Do you think the video card would be able to run the game on like say normal or medium settings?
#6 Sep 03 2009 at 5:54 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I don't have as much memory as you (still running XP here) and I run my graphics on balanced, with flora on. You might be able to get away with that, or maybe one notch lower. Balanced looks pretty good, IMO. I don't use shadows, because that slows me down some, but they're working on a new shadow system that shouldn't be as taxing.
#7 Sep 03 2009 at 5:59 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Okay cool, this was exactly what I was looking for. Now I just have one more question. What server is a good one for a new player to start on? I mean I've played EQOA for 4 years, so I at least know what is going on such. However, I am new to the whole computer game and EQ2. So I was wondering which server is the friendliest and most helpful towards new players, without the normal harassing when asking a simple question in game that I may not know the answer to.
#8 Sep 03 2009 at 6:37 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Antonia Bayle is the most populated server, it's RP, but I don't think a whole lot of RP goes on there. And I think Crushbone is the second most populated.

I play on Blackburrow, as do a few other folks that post around here. It's not a heavy server, but it's not dead, either. Lots of chatter in the channels and plenty of grouping going on. If you decide to start there, you could give me a yell.
#9 Sep 04 2009 at 3:38 AM Rating: Decent
**
355 posts
If you're having 4GB of RAM, you'll only really benefit if you have a 64-bit copy of Windows. 32-bit Windows only supports up to 3GB. With a new PC, you won't have problems finding 64-bit drivers for everything. I've been running Vista 64-bit for a few months now with no problems at all.

Regarding your video card, EQ2 at the moment doesn't exactly hammer it - most of the rendering is currently done by the CPU. However, in December we are due (hopefully) a major graphics update that will offload a lot more of the shader work to the GPU instead. So the better the card, er ... the better.

BTW, I'm running an Athlon X4 quad-core system with 4GB RAM, and a GTS250 video card. Running in performance mode I get around 18-20 fps. One core of my CPU is maxed out all the time. I'm hoping the shader 3.0 update it going to see the fps figure rise substantially!
#10 Sep 04 2009 at 4:47 AM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Oh okay. Well I was actually thinking about upgrading to the Windows Vista 64-Bit. My roomate knows a guy who can update it for me for free. So will that really make that big of a difference? I was hoping to run the game on balanced or medium at a good frame rate. Will this be possible with my specs and if I had the 64-Bit Vista? I was thinking like 20-30 Frame Rates.
#11 Sep 04 2009 at 11:38 AM Rating: Good
*
171 posts
Honustly, I would look for a copy of windows XP 64 bit or try and get a copy of windows 7 and forget vista all together, it has a HORRABLE amount of background tasks and heavy system requirements.

I used vista for a time, i was playing on ballanced setting most of the time, and often chugged. After downgrading to windows xp I was able to play the game on high quality with very little chugging/lagging, infact its down right rare to have it happen.

Personaly I think that Windows Vista should be taken out to the ally and beaten with a baby seal.

Course if you cant find a copy of windows xp, i guess your stuck with vista till windows 7 ships.

#12 Sep 04 2009 at 11:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Empress of News
***
2,350 posts
You should be able to run the game on balanced settings with no issues. I would suggest, as others have, to stay away from shadows until they get updated later this year. A year ago I had a lesser system than what you're getting, and I was able to run EQ2 with mostly balanced settings, and a few things on high.

If you can get Vista 64-bit then you'll definitely benefit fully from your RAM. Honestly, if anything, I would consider getting a better video card before a 64-bit version of Windows. But as you are, you'll be fine. :)

As for server, I guess that ends up being a personal opinion. AB is the most populous, but if you prefer a lower population, I recommend checking out Everfrost. I ended up changing servers last year because I enjoyed the atmosphere much more than my original server (which was Oasis). If anything, try out characters on various servers during your primary playtime and see how the population is and what the people are like. :)
____________________________
Cyliena Velnarin | @Cyliena on Twitter

#13 Sep 06 2009 at 8:43 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Alright well I'm anxiously waiting for my computer to arrive now so I can once again enter the world of Norrath. This time; however, I believe I will be entering it approximately 500 years later. At least that's what I think the time difference was from EQOA to EQ2. Anyway, I figured since I don't have my computer left I would see what types of things have changed over the 500 years.

My first question is that from what I've read it seems everything is pretty much based off of Freeport and Qeynos. So does that mean towns such as Surefall Glade, Klick Anon, Darver Manor, or even Mordahim no longer exist?

What about Frontiers? Is Arcadin still in the game or did something happen?

Well, those are the main questions I can think of at the moment that I'm really curious about.
#14 Sep 07 2009 at 3:19 AM Rating: Decent
**
355 posts
Apparently, it's less '500 years later' than 'a later time on a parallel timeline', so SOE can still add new stuff to EQOA without having to put it into EQ2. /shrug

I've only played EQ2 though.
#15 Sep 07 2009 at 8:12 AM Rating: Decent
tmbpanthers wrote:
Ok so your saying without a better video card it will have to run on really low settings or what? I mean I don't necessarily need everything on extremely high performace, but at least average would be okay with me. Do you think the video card would be able to run the game on like say normal or medium settings?


With 256mb on the video card, you'll run into some area's that will lag. My old desktop had 512mb in it and was able to run perfectly on balanced settings.
____________________________
EQ1: Gooshy: http://eq.magelo.com/profile/1870652
EQ2: Gwenythe: http://u.eq2wire.com/soe/character_detail/468152233422
#16 Sep 07 2009 at 8:25 AM Rating: Decent
tmbpanthers wrote:
Alright well I'm anxiously waiting for my computer to arrive now so I can once again enter the world of Norrath. This time; however, I believe I will be entering it approximately 500 years later. At least that's what I think the time difference was from EQOA to EQ2. Anyway, I figured since I don't have my computer left I would see what types of things have changed over the 500 years.

My first question is that from what I've read it seems everything is pretty much based off of Freeport and Qeynos. So does that mean towns such as Surefall Glade, Klick Anon, Darver Manor, or even Mordahim no longer exist?

What about Frontiers? Is Arcadin still in the game or did something happen?

Well, those are the main questions I can think of at the moment that I'm really curious about.


When the game was released, it was indeed basically Qeynos and Freeport (some suburbs and sewers, other zones at release were: Commonlands, Antonica, Fallen Gate, Stormhold, Blackburrow,Thundering Steppes, Nektulos Forest, Zek, Everfrost, Lavastorm, Enchanted Lands, some instances more). But over the years they've added the city Maj'Dul (can't start here though, with zones Sinking Sands and Pillar of Flames, several instances), Kingdom of Sky (no starting place, just three large zones in the sky), Kelethin (Butcherblock mountains and Faydark, Unrest and several other places), Neriak (no expansion, it just got added, really fun starting place for the evil ones), Kunark expansion (best starting place at this time, but evil only, even if good guys can run around the beginning areas) added a whole bunch of new zones and the latest expansion added one very huge (and laggy, at first anyway) zone, the Moors of Ykesha with Guk as instance, amongst others. (several Guks actually)

You'll recognise the names but the zones themselves have little to do with the original ones, layout wise and content wise, although Blackburrow ofcourse still has gnolls. In EQI Blackburrow could be a lethal maze when things went bad, now it's a lot more tame.


I'm not sure about Surefall Glades, but Klick Anon is still around in some form if I'm not mistaken.


#17 Sep 07 2009 at 9:21 AM Rating: Good
Zieveraar wrote:
I'm not sure about Surefall Glades, but Klick Anon is still around in some form if I'm not mistaken

You are correct. There is no training zone for rangers & druids however there is a homeland for machines gone bad...

Shame really, the glades was one of my favorite zones in the original game...
#18 Sep 07 2009 at 11:24 AM Rating: Decent
OldBlueDragon wrote:
Zieveraar wrote:
I'm not sure about Surefall Glades, but Klick Anon is still around in some form if I'm not mistaken

You are correct. There is no training zone for rangers & druids however there is a homeland for machines gone bad...

Shame really, the glades was one of my favorite zones in the original game...


I've entered those glades once, purely by mistake with my paladin.

That for me was the biggest joy of EQI, you could just wander around for hours, running through zones no one else was present (or only a few), just enjoying the scenery and npc's.

#19 Sep 08 2009 at 5:36 AM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Sounds like it will be pretty much a new start then for me. I will know about Qeynos and Freeport obviously but it sounds like other than that I'll be starting from scratch. Well since I'll be starting from scratch what is a good role to start with as you get accustomed to the game? My guess is that it would be melee. I used to tank all the time on EQOA, but I'm guessing it would probably be good to sit back and watch how it's done in EQ2 before I do it once again myself.

Also, in EQOA I would say that most of the game had to do with getting a group and just going out and xping at camps such as Blackburrow as you level up. Is EQ2 like that? Or is it more kind of like WoW where you can basically level the majority of the way by doing so many quests?
#20 Sep 08 2009 at 12:57 PM Rating: Decent
tmbpanthers wrote:
Sounds like it will be pretty much a new start then for me. I will know about Qeynos and Freeport obviously but it sounds like other than that I'll be starting from scratch. Well since I'll be starting from scratch what is a good role to start with as you get accustomed to the game? My guess is that it would be melee. I used to tank all the time on EQOA, but I'm guessing it would probably be good to sit back and watch how it's done in EQ2 before I do it once again myself.

Also, in EQOA I would say that most of the game had to do with getting a group and just going out and xping at camps such as Blackburrow as you level up. Is EQ2 like that? Or is it more kind of like WoW where you can basically level the majority of the way by doing so many quests?


EQII can be soloed all the way up to lvl 80 by doing quests, I've done so myself. You will miss out on a fair amount of content though, at least you will miss out on the thrill of beating it while it's profitable, while it's not greyed out. And there are a lot of great instances definitely worth checking out, for instance Nektropos Castle which for me has the best story in it in the entire game, really good job.

There are basic elements to any group: healing, tanking and DPS. I wouldn't chose anything just because it's popular in groups, try out all the different things and find the one you like. You'll play it better and that always helps for getting groups later on.

Melee is fairly varied. There's the pure tanks, and then there's the hybrids. I've played and loved (still do) my Monk. It's perfect for solo and adds something to a group, however I'm not a pure tank nor a healer nor a DPS, I'm in between and that can hurt my chances of getting a group. I don't mind much myself, I can add some good buffs to a group.

If you like melee, try out the tanks: guardian, berserker and the hybrids: monks, bruisers, shadowknight, paladin.

Just remember, a monk will give you invisibility and feign death. A magnificent combination. It can lead to a fairly sloppy playing style though, I've died more than once by misjudging the number of mobs hitting on me and just being too late to FD.

As for camping, well it's changed. You can set it up so that the mob you attack can not be attacekd by anyone else, problem ofcourse is that no one will be able to help you either when things go wrong, unless you break the confrontation. Respawning has been improved, although there are still quests that can drive a player mad by the scarcity of hte mob needed. A lot of the instances are not contested, although some sill are.

But to be honest, if it's not a very new instance, the competition for it is minimal.
#21 Sep 08 2009 at 1:29 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Oh alright, thanks for that helpful reply. My main in EQOA was a Bard, I really enjoyed it because I was able to DPS plus I had the ability to give power to the group. I'm excited that you say you could technically solo your way to 80. Now I don't plan on doing that necessarily but that means if I can't get a group I'm not stuck just sitting there since you can always get quests to work on while you wait. Sorry for asking all the questions, but I'm pretty excited about playing and my computer I guess isn't scheduled to arrive until the 18th so I thought I might as well pick up on as much as I can while I wait so I can jump right in and at least know a little about what's going on. So my next question is there a class that can increase the PoT of the group like a Bard used to be able to? Maybe the bard's still have that ability in EQ2? I know it used to be Enchanters and Bards that had the ability to give PoT buffs.
#22 Sep 08 2009 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent
I've never been a bard or enchanter, so you lost me I'm afraid, what's PoT?
#23 Sep 08 2009 at 2:10 PM Rating: Good
I'm guessing PoT = Power Over Time like a pulsed buff?
#24 Sep 08 2009 at 2:23 PM Rating: Decent
*
98 posts
Yeah PoT is Power over Time. It is exactly what you said. It's like a pulsed buff. It makes your power come back faster, so if the player is good enough nobody in the group should really even run out of power.
#25 Sep 08 2009 at 3:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Special Snowflake
Avatar
****
6,786 posts
Never heard it called PoT, lol. Yes, Bards have power regen songs :)

http://eq2.zam.com/wiki/Category:EQ2_Subclasses
____________________________
[img]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a230/calthine/EmptyMind-2.jpg[/img]
Community Manager | QA Lead
ZAM: Support FAQ | Forum FAQ | Forum Rules
Cook Ten Rats
#26 Sep 08 2009 at 5:29 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Yeah, in EQ2 a bard is just a mana battery. Smiley: grin

Ok, power, not mana... whatever.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 119 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (119)