Camiie wrote:
Afania wrote:
You are very biased, that's all I can say.
Yes I am. I'm under no obligation to be otherwise. I don't see a problem here.
You have right to be biased, but then your point won't convince me.
Quote:
I have no reason to "hate" ppl that's "unfit", and don't really care if my performance is better or worse than another, but I do believe using proper gear/food is being responsible for the role I'm playing, as part of the team. But they are plenty of players who doesn't care, and wasted 17 other ppl's time, that's the problem I was pointing out.
Camiie wrote:
Not having a legendary class weapon and not using proper gear/food are vastly different things. You were clearly talking about the former. If you meant the latter you should have said so.
I was addressing different issue, yes. Not having legendary weapon and not getting invite is the result of competition. Not using proper food/gear are just not being responsible for the role he/she is playing and not caring everyone else's time.
As I said before, it is pt lead's responsibility not to wipe to a VW and waste 18 ppl's time, if pt wiped, it's none other to blame but pt lead, since it's pt lead's fault to invite weaker DDs. I mostly made my own VW pt, and if I don't want to wipe and waste everyone's time, of course I invite strong DDs over weak ones. So if I'm making dragon pt, I got /tell from 3 Rag DRK, and I've seen parse that they're not gimp relic DRK either, and ally only had 3 spot for DRK(other spot filled with MNK WAR SAM etc).
Are you asking pt lead to invite none-relic DRK over relic DRK in such situations and put 18 ppl's time at risk? On a VWNM many PUG easily wiped due to lack of dmg? If one DRK is able to outparse Relic with none-relic, sure, I will gladly invite them. But as previously stated by other posts, the skill/attention to detail/fast reaction required to parse high with other weapon is much higher, and not a lot of player can try this hard. It's probably harder to find a DRK that can parse No.1 with a none-relic, and actually easier to find a Rag DRK parse No.1.
So far I haven't seen any none-rag DRK parse No.1 on dragon unless there are no relic/empy 99 in pt, or pt has death/miss stun, or DD doing proc(which caused the parse go inaccurate) I have no reason to kick relic DRK and replace it with none-relic ones for less dmg until someone can pop and prove that he can win with other weapons.
When you make pts, best DD gets DD spot, is that so unreasonable? Relic became a requirement is the result of competition, that other DDs have relic, so none-relic DDs are hard to compete without one unless you have extremely superb skill.
And certain weapon become requirement or not really depend on what everyone else have. I don't make Mythic GK being a requirement, even though it's the best. Why? If I make Mythic GK a requirement I'm not going to get anyone. But Rag is bandwagon, when 3+ ppl in pt has Rag, it's hard for other weapon user to compete and get that DD spot unless his/her player skill is vastly superior to relic owner. But that isn't the case either(some Rag owners I know just happened to be very skilled and doesn't gimp)
Now you're going to say I "hate" "unfit" player because I don't invite them as DD. Honestly, is it the end of the world that you don't get to do VW as DD? Come mage job, BLM, WHM or SCH. Those jobs has lower gear requirement and just need skill. But DD spot just has high requirement if you want to lower the chance of wiping, that's just the way it goes, ppl will try to make an event go as smoothly and as fast as possible, and avoid wasting hours of 18 ppl. Idk why you bring up "easy mentality" talk, If any pt lead purposely invite weaker DD due to wanting a challenge, I'd say this pt lead is retarded and not respecting other ppl's time. Inviting friend(who doesn't have other mage jobs) for clear may be acceptable as long as pt lead can let other DD spot fill with strong DDs, but nobody should ever purposely invite weaker DDs due to wanting a challenge. Hell even I don't invite friends to DD spot for harder VW if I know their DD is weak. Not that I'm being mean to friends, just that pt lead shouldn't let personal favoritism run over team efficiency when there's risk of wiping.
I've heard plenty of dragon PUG wipes, and the reason is none other but weak dmg. Weak dmg pt still has a chance to win with zombieing until 3 sec left, but any pt lead with sense of responsibility would try to avoid that as much as possible, and should try to make a pt with good dmg as much as possible(I'd rather not pop and risk everyone's time if pt isn't strong enough for dragon). You can see it as running a company. You want to use the best ppl you can get on that slot, and get as much profit as possible so everyone in the team earns more money. You fire any unfit members and should try to avoid favoritism. Purposely make less profit for the company and everyone else is just being a ******, nothing more.
Not to mention ppl have the option to make their own /shout pt if you really really want to play a job nobody want you to play and invite other hardcore DDs to cover the dmg? It is totally not the end of the world if a player has no legendary class weapon.
And not using proper gear/food is straight not responsible to the role you're playing. Not able to get in to the pt due to lack of legendary class weapon is one thing, you have the option to play other jobs and still be a good team member with good performance. Doing 36 ukko on Ocythoe with buff, or 117 avg resolution(with COR buff too) on Ganuab and do 1%~2% total, this is just not acceptable. Those ppl are making other DDs doing more work, cause higher chance to wipe when they leech a spot and get same chance as everyone else for loot.
Do I "hate" those "unfit" player? Probably not to the point to "hate". But when other DDs spent their time to skill up, spent millions on gear, spent money on RCB, and have same amount of chance to get drop as players that doesn't skill up, doesn't spend time to gear, doesn't eat food and just leech a spot. Do you think it's fair?
I don't think it's fair at all. Anyone who really value every pt member's time and take it seriously won't find it acceptable either. If you think inviting weaker DD over strong one for challenge, and not having proper food/gear and do 117 avg resolution and 1% on DRK is acceptable, then I have nothing to say. I value my pt's time, call me "hating unfit player" all you want. But all I know is everyone else who joined VW /shout pt is happy with an efficient pt that doesn't wipe and kill fast, and I've never met any player actually having fun with wiping to the dragon or spend longer time on BC+dragon, I'd say my POV largely matched most of the player base and just reflecting pt member's expectation, sorry if it doesn't fit your standard, but your standard isn't everything.
Pergatory wrote:
Afania wrote:
As I said, parse doesn't mean specific weapon is better. I've seen Rag(with average gear on other slot) outparse Hoarfrost(with better gear on other slot)+OAT GSon dragon zerg before, and that Hoarfrost and OAT GS DRK is by no mean gimp(they easily parse No1 on T3 if that Rag DRK isn't around).
I absolutely agree that winning a parse doesn't tell you that a weapon is better than another weapon. However, there are scenarios where it can tell you a lot, and indeed where it can tell you which weapon is better in a given scenario. I've done enough zergs with Ragnarok DRKs that I feel confident in asserting any damage a 99 Rag can do in a zerg, I can effectively match with Hoarfrost. Matching it in Voidwatch battles or Legion is a whole other story, though... that's where the difference becomes apparent.
Do you also mean dragon when you mention zerg? Last time when I did dragon zerg(fight lasted less than 3 min) Rag won by about 4%, and Hoarfrost DRK had better gear. Seems that white dmg is what made Rag pulled ahead.
Edited, May 23rd 2012 5:46pm by Afania Edited, May 23rd 2012 5:55pm by Afania Edited, May 23rd 2012 6:05pm by Afania Edited, May 23rd 2012 6:07pm by Afania