Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

I support gil buying.Follow

#152 May 07 2006 at 3:51 PM Rating: Decent
**
809 posts
Quote:


Yes because everyone knows that buying gil is the same as mass murder.

Grow the hell up and realize there's a world outside FFXI.



He said I was like Hitler for daring to "look down my nose" at gilbuyers. So I guess I am...

EondarkCaitSith wrote:
Im sure you hate anyone that doesnt fit your ideals. Hitler was the same way.
#153 May 07 2006 at 10:11 PM Rating: Default
**
282 posts
How do you guys know which ones are the gil buyers, if I bought gil I wouldn't go advertise it to the whole wide world. So you look at the player that has better gears than you and then some how "judge" his playing skill and determine whether or not he buys gil?

How are they affecting your game play when the same pair of boot from the same Simurgh spawn will be claimed by another LS or say your self and put into circulation anyway?

You take it for granted that a person who just plunked down 100 dollars for some gil doesn't value it as much as you who farmed goobue for gil, therefore are willing to drive prices up. If I got 10 mil regardless if bought or earned, I will try to make the most of it.

OP said it right, Gill buying isn't affecting some people as much as other. There's plenty of other threads outthere about how the online economy works for you to look up instead of conjuring the big bad anti RMT wolf. Imagine if the gillbuyers starts going around giving people **** for NOT buying gil and spending all that time on a video game, aye there's a sore spot. Yes its illegal, just like how windower are illegal, most of you used it anyway yes? The illegal Card is the last one you should play here.

Morallity and ethics are subjective, Get off your high horse.

#154 May 07 2006 at 10:16 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
He said I was like Hitler for daring to "look down my nose" at gilbuyers. So I guess I am...


I was more or less implying you are close minded. Just because someone doesnt agree with you, hardly means they are wrong.
#155 May 07 2006 at 10:16 PM Rating: Default
Edit: Double Post.

Edited, Sun May 7 23:22:39 2006 by EonsdarkCaitsith
#156 May 07 2006 at 10:17 PM Rating: Decent
**
288 posts
It's not the actual buying or selling of gil that ruins an economy. You could than say because I farmed a million gil and gave it to a friend it hurt the economy. Not true. What does is that gilsellers farm mass amounts of gil daily through the use of speed hacks/cheats and others.

By bringing mass amounts of gil into the economy, it ruins it. Would be the same if cash started falling from the sky. Eventually that cash would be worthless..everyone would have as much as they want just by going outside with a basket.
____________________________
Nobleblade ╬ Remora

#157 May 07 2006 at 10:23 PM Rating: Good
**
417 posts
Quote:
How do you guys know which ones are the gil buyers, if I bought gil I wouldn't go advertise it to the whole wide world. So you look at the player that has better gears than you and then some how "judge" his playing skill and determine whether or not he buys gil?


You really can't. It's basically a witch hunt. The ones that do stick out, stick out badly.

The ones that have half a brain can slip under the radar, and usually think up some alibi if someone gets over-zealous.

Quote:
How are they affecting your game play when the same pair of boot from the same Simurgh spawn will be claimed by another LS or say your self and put into circulation anyway?


When gil prices on IGE and other sites dropped dramatically for a Christmas special, there were hordes of people that cashed in. Although this money wasn't 'created', it moved to hands that would readily circulate it into the economy. All of the classical wallet breaking items soared in price (SH, Hauby, Snipers, Okotes, Higher weapons, other stuff). Think if you had received money as a Christmas gift to buy a Haubergeon at the going price beforehand, to literally wake up one morning and find the price millions above normal.
#158 May 07 2006 at 10:31 PM Rating: Decent
**
809 posts
Quote:

Morallity and ethics are subjective, Get off your high horse.


I'd debate you on that...

(Edit: Whoops, hit enter too fast)

Subjectivism holds that no one is really responsible for their actions(it wasn't the kids fault he went on a killing spree, it was the fault of his bullies, who were made bullies by someone else's actions, and those actions were caused by....)

Under subjectivism, there is no evil, only differering points of view. However, there is evil, and failure to recognize that only leads to its proliferation.

Another way to look at it is watching someone get mugged. A bystander sees the action, and if they were A) A subjectivist: Let the mugging continue. After all, it's probably some other event that caused the robber to be driven to such acts, and he needs to make a living too.
B) An objectivist: Stop the mugger, and punish him to prevent others from doing the same.





Edited, Sun May 7 23:46:10 2006 by MisterCookie
#159 May 07 2006 at 10:37 PM Rating: Decent
**
282 posts
Or we'll just let The wiki-ites battle it out

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_relativism#Cultural_Relativism_and_Moral_Relativism

Quote:
However, there is evil


Yes that's the sore spot in this argument, People all don't aggree that RMT is a bad thing like say, evil or what ever. How about you use something else that resemble our situation a bit more, like eating dogs. Some people find them cute, some find them delicious. Lets compared them to tasty puppies instead. Now from what moral high point are you judging others about RMT or eating dogs? Well I guessed those of us that haven't been affected too much by this whole thing are a little unsympathetic with those that are. I'll give you that much. I would say in the end. RMT = annoying to alot of people, some more so than others. OP made his points, we made ours, nothing really for me to add.


Edited, Sun May 7 23:58:03 2006 by Bowser
#160 May 07 2006 at 10:44 PM Rating: Decent
**
809 posts
Quote:
Or we'll just let The wiki-ites battle it out


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taco
#161 May 07 2006 at 11:06 PM Rating: Good
***
1,354 posts
Let me put it nice and simply. Gilsellers use exploits and cheats to make their money. They also intentionally hike prices and ruin ways for other people to make money INTENTIONALLY to make it more difficult to make money and thus encourage gil buying.

Gil sellers are parasites and gil buyers are failures in the game. RMT hurts the game for everyone, sure, casual players might not care and might sell their characters. But real gamers play because they enjoy it, not to leech from everyone else for a paycheck.

If I made a business going to sports games and stealing all the equipment to sell back at an inflated price, is that ok because its just a game?
#162 May 07 2006 at 11:39 PM Rating: Good
36 posts
Quote:
How do you guys know which ones are the gil buyers


Honestly it is pretty easy to figure out when someone has bought gil if you are say in an LS with that person or know them well enough to know what they do when they are in game.

Quote:
Let me put it nice and simply. Gilsellers use exploits and cheats to make their money. They also intentionally hike prices and ruin ways for other people to make money INTENTIONALLY to make it more difficult to make money and thus encourage gil buying.


Very true.
#163 May 07 2006 at 11:41 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
Subjectivism holds that no one is really responsible for their actions(it wasn't the kids fault he went on a killing spree, it was the fault of his bullies, who were made bullies by someone else's actions, and those actions were caused by....)

Under subjectivism, there is no evil, only differering points of view. However, there is evil, and failure to recognize that only leads to its proliferation.

Another way to look at it is watching someone get mugged. A bystander sees the action, and if they were A) A subjectivist: Let the mugging continue. After all, it's probably some other event that caused the robber to be driven to such acts, and he needs to make a living too.
B) An objectivist: Stop the mugger, and punish him to prevent others from doing the same.


Might be nice if you didn't pull **** out of your *** with no idea about the ideas behind a doctrine, just sayin'.

Subjectivism takes many, many forms, many of which hold personal responsibility to be the absolute pinnicale of life. In Sartreian existential subjectivism for instance, people even choose to be born, and must take accountability for every action that derives from that choice. That would include everything from their socioeconomic position, to the morals that the person develops. That's right kids, the mean ol' subjectivist told you that you chose to be poor! (Though Sartre does make a very compelling argument, that is neither here nor there).

If a kid went on a killing spree, subjective philosophy can't call it evil, but many of them would certainly not blame it on everyone else aside from the kid. A core belief of many subjectivists is that whatever the child does will bear its own reprecussions, and whether or not he is punnished depends not on the good or evil of the action, but on whatever the hell society chooses to do. On a side note, the reprecussions of society are also neither good nor evil; they just are.

If a subjectivist were to walk down the street and witness a mugging, the fact of being a subjectivist has absolutely no bearing on how he will choose to respond. If the subjectivist so wills, then he may very well whip out a knife and gouge the muggers liver out and eat them with some fava beans and a nice chianti. He may simply use equal force to disarm the mugger and save the person in distress, or, as stated, he may simply walk in a different direction.

The point is, subjectivism is not a donctrine about morality in itself, rather, it is a doctrine about reality (or at least what is most probable). The implications from the doctrine allow people to create their own morals from essentially a blank slate, which is where morality comes into play. How people decide to act, however, is not decided by what they think about reality.
#164 May 07 2006 at 11:43 PM Rating: Default
Caes wrote:

Yeah, and the last time you asked, was being selfish considered a virtue?


No one is required to be virtueous.

Caes wrote:
Do you really not get the concept of the MMORPG? Massively multiplayer. Does that compute?


Yes. It's an elaborate chat program. Nothing more. Nothing less. Does that compute? And when I feel like it, I do things that allows me to meet new people or do things in game with friends. That's it. I don't have to give or take anything unless I want to.

Do I help people in game? All the time. But the choice is mine to make. It shouldn't be expected of me.

Caes wrote:
I can't believe you can't separate a felony from a misdemeanor, either.


Actually, I can. But I understand you are using metaphor. So I'll use your metaphor and reply with "They are both crimes".

Caes wrote:
That's why CellyO's being so selfish. This isn't a crusade against gilselling, or a witch hunt over gilbuyers. Like you, when what's done is done, I could care less about who bought gil or not. My friend bought gil, but he at least had some form of a reason and I did not disown him. I am above a video game in that sense. But that doesn't mean I'll suddenly turn around and support it knowing it still ruins the experience for others; many, many, MANY, MANY, MANY, others. Hence the "massively multiplayer". Are you getting it yet?


LOL- You talk for a paragraph about how CellyO is selfish and then try go define "Massively multiplayer". That's like me giving you a seminar in pork prices and then tell you to buy oranges. It just made no sense whatsoever. So no, I guess I'm not getting it yet.

Caes wrote:
But at the point that how you play or the kind of playstyle you support ruins the experience for a large majority


BS. What I support or not doesn't ruin the game for the majority. I support sterilizing the stupid- does that affect your day in real life? No. Same principle.
Caes wrote:
Really, try to connect the dots from now on by yourself instead of spewing stuff you hear on TV.


Funny- I was about to say the same thing.
#165 May 07 2006 at 11:43 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
By: ArcadeOne
8 posts
Score: Decent


F*cken Christ, for the love of god.... THE SOCKS ARE DOING MY HEAD IN! I love the cowardice.
#166 May 07 2006 at 11:49 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,354 posts
Not every new poster is a sock. I remember posting a thread which started an interesting long argument when I first started and also remembered being acused of being a sock for not having many posts.

We all start somewhere.

Edited, Mon May 8 00:56:11 2006 by ScyanTheBlack
#167 May 07 2006 at 11:50 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
I have no morals.



i'm sure that's what you tell your "customers" at the corner. just another means to an end.

how about you post your character name, douchebag?

you say the economy doesnt effect you, yet you say that you party with gimps that are broke, therefore it does effect you.


open your eyes
#168 May 07 2006 at 11:52 PM Rating: Decent
**
809 posts
Pensive- I was referring to ethical subjectivism, which is a type of subjectivism(I believe you thought I was referring to metaphysical subjectivism, which is much different)
#169 May 08 2006 at 12:01 AM Rating: Default
RamseySylph wrote:

Very smooth of you GalkaAnimal you attempted to single handedly drive this into a Political Debat and a Windower debate at the same time. I got a good laugh out of your political stereotypes, the funniest part is you call your own group selfish bastards.


And what group is that? If you have me pegged so well. I'll bet you 1000 gil you can't guess my political preference.
By the way. I've actually saved 3 lives during the course of my career (going on 5 years now). I've treated several others for injuries. I've put thieves, sexual predators, stalkers, spousal abusers, and child molesters in jail and off the street where they can only harm, and be harmed, by others like them.

Not that I owe you an explanation. But my point is this. If that makes me selfish. What does that make you?
RamseySylph wrote:
But enough about that, whether or not your selfish or not does not change the fact that IGE is A. Making ALL of its profits off of other peoples work (the game developers.)
Let's start with this. You understand that the US (and Japan) is a free market economy, right?

Since Graham Bell invented the phone, that means every phone-related product not owned by the Bell Company is using someone else's work to make money. Yes, you're arguement is that flawed.
RamseySylph wrote:
and B. Ruining an entire genre of games.
If it's ruined, there's no point in playing, right? If you don't play MMORPGs anymore, why are you even here?

RamseySylph wrote:
Also in regards to windower, they are both against the ToS you ar e correct. Lets take a look at that though. Is windower causing anyone to profit off of SE's work?


Possibly. I don't use windower, but my understanding is it does allow you to do certain things, like move faster. If this is the case then it allows you to collect gil/drops faster and potentionally help drive up the economy much in the same manner as gilsellers have. Hell, for all I know, gilsellers could just be riding the money wave generated by those using 3rd party programs.

RamseySylph wrote:
Is windower giving some players an unfair advantage -in- the game?(Plugins like TParty and Distance are not involved here, im just talking about running base windower?


Oh no you don't! Don't change the rules. I'm talking about the whole kit n' kaboodle. Don't try to throw icing on a **** and call it a cupcake. So let's answer the question "Is windower giving some players an unfair advantage -in- the game?" YES. Next.

RamseySylph wrote:
Is windower going to cause the decline of the MMO genre?


No more than any other violation of the ToS. Including gilselling/buying.
RamseySylph wrote:
Both of them are bad, but theres an entire level of difference. Windower is like jay walking and RMT is like stealing. There IS a difference.


No. They are both like violating the TOS. Period.
#170 May 08 2006 at 12:10 AM Rating: Good
***
1,354 posts
Quote:
Oh no you don't! Don't change the rules. I'm talking about the whole kit n' kaboodle. Don't try to throw icing on a **** and call it a cupcake. So let's answer the question "Is windower giving some players an unfair advantage -in- the game?" YES. Next.


You sir are an idiot. Windower gives no advantage, and it doesn t let you move faster.

Quote:
RamseySylph wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is windower going to cause the decline of the MMO genre?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



No more than any other violation of the ToS. Including gilselling/buying


Windower: Lets you do things like browse the web while playing. Plugins no longer work after an update.

Gilselling/Buying: Bots take money from legit players and cheat to get NMs and farm. The economy can be flooded. If you think windower hurts as much of that, go back to first grade.
#171 May 08 2006 at 12:43 AM Rating: Good
**
442 posts
Quote:
RamseySylph wrote:Is windower going to cause the decline of the MMO genre?

------------------------------------

No more than any other violation of the ToS. Including gilselling/buying.


Wow.

Have you never camped an NM against Gil-Farmers? Do you even play this game?

The existance of RMT is the reason why players have to camp against teams of Gil-farmers that don't sleep and never log off. While Mr. Legit is trying to make an honest dollar to improve his character, he has next to no chance of winning that NM claim because 6 Gil Farmers who are going to use the gil to make real life money are camping it 24/7. That legit player has almost 0 chance of getting that NM claim, and when he does he has to deal with the Gil-Sellers trying to MPK him and doing anything in their power to get him killed. After they've camped the NM 24/7 they eventually monopolize it and are able to completely control the price of the drop. Since they want to make as much money as possible AND have total control over the drops, they will hike the price to ridiculous amounts because players have no choice but to buy from them. Those players spend so much money on over-inflated items, they go broke. What's the solution when you're broke? Well many of them buy gil. Guess what that does? It keeps that Gil-Farming team at that NM and lets them know that they will be able to continue ******** other players for months to come.

You know what Windower does? It lets me check my email, browse the net when I'm on the airship, and talk to people on MSN. It lets me use my computer for other things and generally be a hell of a lot more productive while playing. Now tell me that Windower is just as bad as making hundreds of peoples game experience ****** because they have to deal with Gil-Farmers.
#172 May 08 2006 at 1:04 AM Rating: Decent
you know, when alla announced the merge with ige a bunch of ppl complained that we would begin seeing gil-buying threads with buyers posted in a positive light. i thought this was just paranoia, but man when you see scholars with 40 posts and a bunch of socks, you really have to wonder.
#173 May 08 2006 at 1:37 AM Rating: Good
This is exactly, precisely, on the nose, no doubt about it, the number one reason why this game is doomed.

IGE owns it!
There is such a stigma against buying gil, but almost EVERYONE does it, especially at the endgame levels. There's no honest way around it, unless you spend your entire waking life in front of the screen, monotonously killing the same things over and over in an attempt to afford something useful.

It's a reasonable attitude; there are only about six useful items in the entire goddamn game. It's not that 'parties fight things they weren't intended to!'...it's that individual players are hopelessly underpowered, to the point where a raw character at level 75, without stat boosts and gear boosts, is worthless against anything even approaching his own level. Unless you buy one of the six existing items that are decent, you are, as the OP tacitly puts it, worthless.

Why? Oh, it keeps you playing.

Celly, this was a lovely novel about the results of never leaving one's chair. It's ALL brainless work; melee damage dealing isn't the beginning and end. Frustration does not equal mental difficulty; it's tempting to SAY so, especially when you've spent, oh, five years of your life doing nothing else, but nothing good comes of it. It's all brainless work, most especially the earning of hard-won gil in order to keep up with the asshat next door with more money than God, and fewer brains than the average housecat.

The OP is correct. Your merit = your credit card, the sellers control the market. If you think it isn't so, look at the sheer size of the RMT business, and the gear being sported by the average level 75 player, then traipse on over to the AH and check out the associated cost. It's not space engineering here, guys.
It really doesn't matter as to whether the OP buys gil or not: the tradeoff wasn't pretty, either. The gil she didn't buy, she wasted years of her life gaining. Crafting? Tell me about it. I had two characters with four maxed craft skills combined. Absolutely ridiculous amount of time spent, and I'd give an awful lot to have all that wasted time back, to spend doing something useful.

So, you have that choice: slowly yank twenty million gil out of FFXI's economy (I once spent three months mining for one goddamned pair of gloves. Oh was that fun or what!), or go buy the gil. Almost everyone picks the latter, you can hardly blame them: IGE has FFXI's userbase by the short hairs, and the game is doomed for it.

All of this could have been avoided if someone had left that truckload of **** retentiveness out when they were programming the game. But hey, if centuries spent killing the same mob over and over hoping for that extra-rare drop is what trips it for you...well, that's, ah...that's sad. Smiley: grin

Ever wonder how the survivors in the life boats felt as they watched Titanic go down? I'm kind of wondering why so many people are still on the boat, to be honest with you.

Good post.
#174 May 08 2006 at 1:48 AM Rating: Decent
**
809 posts
(
Quote:
IGE owns it!
There is such a stigma against buying gil, but almost EVERYONE does it, especially at the endgame levels. There's no honest way around it, unless you spend your entire waking life in front of the screen, monotonously killing the same things over and over in an attempt to afford something useful.


I'm tired of the "Everyone does it excuse"

I don't do it, and somehow I'm able to manage. I have an RL friend who has 3 75 jobs, and he's never bought any gil(I can confirm that he can't because he, believe it or not, didn't have a comp until a few months ago)

Nor do I do it. Nor do the dozens of competitors I have to deal with in Pashow Marshlands for beastman bloods do it(CGFs won't go after leeches because they don't have an efficient method of botting the crap out of them)
#175 May 08 2006 at 1:58 AM Rating: Default
ScyanTheBlack wrote:

You sir are an idiot. Windower gives no advantage, and it doesn t let you move faster.


No. Unlike you I'm an honest player. Which explains my ignorance as to how windower works.

I'm done with this thread. Seems like the ones responding to my posts aren't understanding my point. If that is my fault, then I apologize for my lack of articulation. May you find something more fulfilling in your lives other than a video game.
#176 May 08 2006 at 2:03 AM Rating: Default
**
288 posts
Quote:
No. Unlike you I'm an honest player. Which explains my ignorance as to how windower works.


Actually if it was a case about being ignorant of something that would have been different, I'm sure.

Quote:
Oh no you don't! Don't change the rules. I'm talking about the whole kit n' kaboodle. Don't try to throw icing on a **** and call it a cupcake. So let's answer the question "Is windower giving some players an unfair advantage -in- the game?" YES. Next.


That is you trying to prove a point about something which admitedly you knew nothing about. Which in my opinion is an idiot.
____________________________
Nobleblade ╬ Remora

This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 711 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (711)