Forum Settings
       
This thread is locked

I support gil buying.Follow

#352 May 11 2006 at 4:08 PM Rating: Good
37 posts
different things are important to different people for their own reasons...
#353 May 11 2006 at 4:25 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
Do you put this much time and arguement into everything you do? If not, cancel your account and move onto something that isn't going to leave you in a state of mental psychosis when you are done.

It's a GAME. A GAME! Get that into your heads and realize there are more important things to worry about.


/sigh

Why do you care what we are talking about? If you don't want to read it, skip the thread.

Some people (like me) get bored at work and decide to come on here to talk about stuff. It's an honest debate, and I'm amazed at how little flaming there is in 8 pages.

Then you show up.

Why in the world to people have to post in a thread saying, "Stop talking about this, you're stupid for talking about this, I'm tried of hearing about this?" There's an EASY way to not hear about this. Don't open the thread. It's REAL easy. Why do you have to start insulting people just because they're enjoying a debate?
#354 May 11 2006 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
***
1,354 posts
Quote:
IMHO, all SE would have to do is go onto the sites, buy gil, and whoever contacts them in game gets a perma ban. Just randomly do this about a dozen times every month, and the sellers will get worried...

...Until they find a new way of doing business.



Very good plan but it would take a lot of banning and rebanning to work, ban one and they get a new account. But it would delete a lot of gil at once.

Police use the same tactic and it doesnt stop the crime completely, but even catching -some- sellers is a step in the right direction.
#355 May 11 2006 at 5:30 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Very good plan but it would take a lot of banning and rebanning to work, ban one and they get a new account. But it would delete a lot of gil at once.


Someone said that these sites have a disclaimer or something saying that SE employees cannot use their site...

But still, they could always have someone who doesn't work for them do it and turn the name over. :D

Heck, if they'd give me a few months free service or something, I'd do it for them.

I wonder what would happen if I did actually buy gil and then, when it was delivered, take a screenshot of the guy and turn them in to SE with me receipt for payment, and an offer to turn the gil back over to them...
#356 May 11 2006 at 6:26 PM Rating: Default
Personally, I agree with the OP. Much like her (I think?) I don't have money to buy gil. At the same time I don't much care where the person in my PT got their gil as long as they do their job well.

I've noticed a trend to pull out the almighty ToS and claim gilselling is wrong, because it is against the rules and therefore it is bad. Please. Simply because someone wrote down in a document somewhere that they do not want you doing something does not mean that what they think is automatically right. Do you not question anything that is in a book?

It's different to each person, I suppose. I won't berate anyone for being opposed to gilselling because I can see how a certain player would want an item that has been monopolized by gilsellers. Gilselling/buying exist and there isn't anything we can do to stop it. Sure, SE can attempt to combat it... but it won't stop. Look at the recent RMT measures that they took, undoubtedly the actions they took made a huge inconvience for IGE (as well as players such as myself who transfer large amounts of gil between mules) but the gilsellers are still here.

The only arguement I've seen against gilbuying is that fact that it helps keep the gilsellers around, which is true. However, you aren't going to get everyone to quit buying gil because you wave a piece of paper in their face that says "Hey! That's not allowed!"

The FFXI community, in my opinion, is much too large to use the arguement of "Don't buy gil, your hurting the community." I think this because in Gilgamesh (my server), there are probably 3000-5000 active players. Of those, I probably like/know 500 of them. I probably detest around the same amount. The other 4000 or so players I've never met and probably never will. If I were to buy gil, I wouldn't be thinking "Man, this will hurt those 4000 unknown people." If the communities were much smaller then I believe that community arguement would be feasble and in fact would be a good method of control for gilbuying.
#357 May 11 2006 at 6:42 PM Rating: Decent
Jack of All Trades
******
29,633 posts
Quote:
I've noticed a trend to pull out the almighty ToS and claim gilselling is wrong, because it is against the rules and therefore it is bad. Please. Simply because someone wrote down in a document somewhere that they do not want you doing something does not mean that what they think is automatically right. Do you not question anything that is in a book?


Yep, cheating is totally OK. I slip a few bucks to the banker for some $500s every time I play Monopoly, and I win every time! Nobody can step up to my leet skillz!

Everyone, listen to this person! Clearly knows what she's talking about.
#358 May 11 2006 at 6:42 PM Rating: Decent
**
330 posts
Here is why gilselling ins WRONG.

Company employs 10 employees to work on the game to generate money. These employees get high end items and begin to not only dominate the sale of that item but they scheme to make the item even more expensive.

Employee A gets a emp pin drop. He sends it to employee B and keeps hunting Vulk emperor.

Employee B posts the price as higher than going rate.

Employee C buys the item at higher rate, money goes to employee A.

Employee C places it back on the market at a higher rate, employee A sends the money to employee D.

Employee D buys the item at the higher rate.

Eventually after much laundering of the item the value has skyrocketed.

Eventually it is sold to someone for much more than the original going rate. Perhaps double, triple or more.

If it were not for gil sellers YOU WOULDNT NEED TO BUY GIL!!!!

By doing so not only do they ensure more money coming in than money going out but they are also and absolutely ensuring that casual players -HAVE- to pay thier prices to afford the items they want in the game.

This isn't a simple case of Services offered and accepted, Gil sellers are the underground black market of the gaming world. Thier tactics are underhanded and untraceable. Do you congratulate the Mafia for selling cheap DVD players which set a truck driver on fire to get ahold of the dvd players? Do you thank your local drug dealer for selling drugs cheaper because he wacked the local competition and payed off the cops?

AM I a bit stunned that when the site owner also owns a gil selling company that comments like, "I support gil selling", and "It seems a lot more people sell gil than we thought." start popping up in the forums? Not at all.

Shame on all of you. You make me sick.


Edited, Thu May 11 19:54:18 2006 by Jadeskies
#359 May 11 2006 at 7:38 PM Rating: Decent
Trinitee wrote:
I've noticed a trend to pull out the almighty ToS and claim gilselling is wrong, because it is against the rules and therefore it is bad.


I don't believe it's the "It's against the TOS" thing that has people upset.

It's the economy, and the inavailability of NM drops because the gil sellers (which wouldn't be around if there weren't gil buyers) not only camp them 24/7, but from what I understand they have found ways to get YOU suspended if you try to outclaim them. It seems to me that the growing trend is gil sellers who call a GM on YOU if it seems like you're going to hunt their NM and perfectly describe the "Third party hacks" that you are supposedly using.

If nothing else, you're teleported to their "jail" and questioned. You're not a problem to them for that particular spawn now.
#360 May 11 2006 at 7:45 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've noticed a trend to pull out the almighty ToS and claim gilselling is wrong, because it is against the rules and therefore it is bad. Please. Simply because someone wrote down in a document somewhere that they do not want you doing something does not mean that what they think is automatically right. Do you not question anything that is in a book?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

... I cant believe what ur saying, u should probably take a second to realize what u just posted...

Generally rules are laws that instruct people what they can and CANNOT do. The TOS is a list of RULES that instruct the players what they can and CANNOT do.

So by simple analogy... that makes the TOS law...

Plus since SE wrote, and its THEIR game, that sorta means that u have no right to argue with it. If u do have problems with their rules, please feel free to stop playing the game...

Oh! And also... CONGRATULATIONS! U probably just made the lamest excuse to gilsell (even the one about the third-world chinese workers was better than urs)...


#361 May 11 2006 at 8:45 PM Rating: Decent
Now that's alot of hum-dum posts.

On topic: So basically as long as you benefit you are happy, no matter what affect it has on the overall economy or to the people who spend their time earning money. K.

P.S. i didnt read the whole entire thing because i have better things to do than read a rant about senseless crap that isnt really a big part of my life, but i'd like to put my 2 cents in so that i feel special. K.
#362 May 11 2006 at 8:50 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,298 posts
Please people stop bumping this topic...
#363 May 11 2006 at 8:52 PM Rating: Decent
I'm going to address a couple things at once here.

1. First off, in relation to the idea where SE buys money from the gillsellers and then bans them. First off, nothing IGE does could prevent this. SE could just pay its employees to do this from their home credit cards etc. This leads to some of the reasons they dont do it. You do realize for every account they ban they'd have to bust out enough money to acctually make an order. Giving them enough money to just buy another account... Slowly decreasing the amount of available copies of FFXI in the world.

2. Stop saying "This is just a game" Thats the stupidest load of bullcrap I've ever heard. If you don't care about this thread, don't read it. I don't mind people arguing one side or the other. But when people come in here and say stupid BS like this its really aggrivating. Football is just a game, ok, so lets not make a big deal about steroids or anything. If its not important to you, then move on no ones forcing you to read 8 pages of this thread.
#364 May 12 2006 at 2:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Lumis wrote:
I'm amazed.

You people DO realize that this is a game, right?

Do you put this much time and arguement into everything you do? If not, cancel your account and move onto something that isn't going to leave you in a state of mental psychosis when you are done.

It's a GAME. A GAME! Get that into your heads and realize there are more important things to worry about.


Yes, it's a game, not unlike poker.
And like poker, there are more than one of us playing; and ALSO like poker, if I'm playing this game with you, you damn well better not pull spare cards out from under the table unless you want to leave the saloon on a gurney. They say cheaters never win, but you and I know that's only true as long as no one catches them, and I'll be damned if I see cheating condoned in this game at any rate.
This is indeed a game, thank you for the reality check, I sure needed that.
Games have rules, and if everyone broke the freaking rules there wouldn't be much 'game' left to it, would there?


Trinitee wrote:
Personally, I agree with the OP. Much like her (I think?) I don't have money to buy gil. At the same time I don't much care where the person in my PT got their gil as long as they do their job well.


The OP isn't saying that people should be allowed to do what they're going to do. That's ******** too, because cheating is only acceptable in solitaire (i.e. the rest of us don't want to put up with the consequences of cheaters, which is what gil-buying is), but what the OP is saying is that gil-buying is GOOD.
He's not being lassaiz-faire, or saying that people should regulate themselves. He's saying that people should NOT regulate themselves. He believes people ought to buy gil, because people who buy gil buy uber gear, and he likes uber gear in his parties because he gets exp faster.
In short, he's a self-centered and short-sighted fuzzball who wanted to start a flamewar and largely succeeded. In the old country we called them trolls, and shot them on sight before they could do this kind of harm.

Trinitee wrote:
The only arguement I've seen against gilbuying is that fact that it helps keep the gilsellers around, which is true.


:facepalm:




Edited, Fri May 12 03:21:48 2006 by Sioux
#365 May 12 2006 at 3:42 AM Rating: Decent
It really does hurt me to think about the clash in lifestyles and economies that spark the big problems in RMT morality. However, this is SE's game, they made it, their employies signes legitimate contracts to support their rules... and Vana'diel is their world, made by hand and sweat for OUR enjoyment, in trade for THEIR profit. Their rules go, and I feel that it is only polite to respect their hard work and right to exert their rules in support for the central aspects to our world and personal enjoyment.

We all come from different walks of life, and this thinking is crystal clear to me. Find what makes sense to you, and go with it, without worry of oppisition and closed mindedness.

Peace,
The Miracle
#366 May 12 2006 at 8:54 AM Rating: Default
*
171 posts
Ryouken wrote:
... I cant believe what ur saying, u should probably take a second to realize what u just posted...

Generally rules are laws that instruct people what they can and CANNOT do. The TOS is a list of RULES that instruct the players what they can and CANNOT do.

So by simple analogy... that makes the TOS law...


**** Germany had a ToS too. It ended up getting about 6 million jews killed.

But I guess since it was law it was okay, right?
#367 May 12 2006 at 9:02 AM Rating: Decent
**
334 posts
Quote:
**** Germany had a ToS too. It ended up getting about 6 million jews killed.

But I guess since it was law it was okay, right?

Godwin was a genius.

I hope that guy puts his powers of deduction to use in something more productive than internet flame-wars.
#368 May 12 2006 at 9:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
810 posts
Quote:
**** Germany had a ToS too. It ended up getting about 6 million jews killed.

But I guess since it was law it was okay, right?

Wait... are you compairing "NOT being allowed to buy gil" to "sending jews off to be killed"?


Edited, Fri May 12 10:17:30 2006 by avanent
#369 May 12 2006 at 9:21 AM Rating: Decent
This theads got everything ...

For the hockey fans:

"You can't put a Bounty on a girl's account!"
"I just did."


Now this is 100% pure unadulterated zealotry:

Quote:
"MonxDoT wrote:Something which reminded me of religious zealotry



Makes me want to go buy gil to spite him


All the iron ore mined by RMT bots just pales in comparison to the irony duped in this thread and on these boards.

Trinitee wrote:

Quote:
The only arguement I've seen against gilbuying is that fact that it helps keep the gilsellers around, which is true. However, you aren't going to get everyone to quit buying gil because you wave a piece of paper in their face that says "Hey! That's not allowed!"


Guess you missed my posts Tinitee. Answer this:

How is it ok, how is it fair, how does it not hurt the game but make the game better, how are people better equipped, and how do people get better xp when ...

an HNMLS member with 0 points outbids an HNMLS member with 100 points for a Kirin's Osode by using dollars? This is exactly what gil buying does for absolutely everything bought gil is used for, every single item from SH, O. Kote, to craft items, to everything. Nobody has been able to answer this argument. And guess what? They can't. It's absolutely damning to every pro gil buying argument.


Excellent poker analogy btw Sioux! "Top notch! Top notch!"

Edited, Fri May 12 10:26:04 2006 by MonxDoT
#370 May 12 2006 at 9:23 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:

**** Germany had a ToS too. It ended up getting about 6 million jews killed.

But I guess since it was law it was okay, right?


That is a very distasteful and not very apporiate comparison... There are no comparison between game rules (and no one makes you to play the game) with dictatorship.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#371 May 12 2006 at 9:51 AM Rating: Decent
**
873 posts
I haven't read all 8 pages of this thread O.o, but I'd like to throw in my $.02.

There are people who will use you for what they can get out of you, and people who will treat you as a unique person. Anyone who doesn't care what you have to do to be useful to them is someone that should be avoided.

Making yourself useful for that type of person to "like" you is kind of sad.

Your integrity has a value, and a price. If you're going to sell out in the video game you play, you're going to sell out in other parts of your life too.

Right before you do, ask yourself: Is my integrity worth this much and no more? Really?
#372 May 12 2006 at 11:19 AM Rating: Decent
**
997 posts
Quote:
Someone said that these sites have a disclaimer or something saying that SE employees cannot use their site...


This doesn't hold water. Warez sites use this disclaimer too. It doesn't stop them from getting shut down, and sued. Child **** sites use this. It doesn't stop them from getting shut down, and tossed into jail.

There is no legal basis for stopping a criminal investigation against you. In fact if you do enough to hinder it, it's called obstruction of justice, and is a felony.
#373 May 12 2006 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,543 posts
I could imagine one very effective sting method.

"Buyer" makes an order from (insert lousy RMT company here).

"Buyer" meets delivery guy (recording any communication with the RMT as he goes). When delivery guy opens trade window with Gil delivery, a GM is signaled and the delivery character is sent to GM jail. "Buyer" does NOT accept delivery before doing so.

"Buyer" then demands his Gil from RMT company, and if RMT refuses, reverses the charges for breach of contract/failure to deliver. Meanwhile, S-E traces the transactions back from the deliveryperson and hopefully deletes a portion (or more) of the RMT's gil reserve, possibly taking out some of the Gil production in the process. If the RMT company decides to attempt another delivery, repeat the process.

Combine this with aggressive attacks on RMT attempts to monopolize NM spawns, and you have a potential winning strategy to deal with the problem.
#374 May 12 2006 at 11:53 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,543 posts
(doubleposted, darn lag)

Edited, Fri May 12 17:23:27 2006 by Morgrist
#375 May 12 2006 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
6,631 posts
Quote:

This doesn't hold water. Warez sites use this disclaimer too. It doesn't stop them from getting shut down, and sued. Child **** sites use this. It doesn't stop them from getting shut down, and tossed into jail.

There is no legal basis for stopping a criminal investigation against you. In fact if you do enough to hinder it, it's called obstruction of justice, and is a felony.


Even thou there are no legal laws in FFXI, there is really no way before hand that sellers will know the buyer is from SE or not. And there is nothing seller can stopped being banned from SE if SE does try to entrap them -- because SE has the right to ban anyone with any reason. Just SE will probably not a got a refund from IGE.

I have never heard any player or groups try to take a MMORPG provider or Wizards of the Coast to court for denying them from their service. SE, Blizzard, Wizards of the Coast or any gaming companies have no obligations to allow you play their game or particiapte their events.
____________________________
Amanada (Cerberus-Retired) (aka MaiNoKen/Steven)
-- Thank you for the fun times in Vana'diel

Art for the sake of art itself is an idle sentence.
Art for the sake of truth, for the sake of what is
beautiful and good — that is the creed I seek.
- George Sand

A designer knows he has achieved perfection,
not when there is nothing left to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away.
- Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
#376 May 12 2006 at 12:41 PM Rating: Decent
**
678 posts
Monty Python - I like Chinese.
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 323 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (323)