Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

War/mnk not a tank?!Follow

#1 Apr 18 2005 at 6:54 PM Rating: Excellent
First, I didn't post this in the warrior forums, cause they already know war/mnk tanks... but apparantly the rest of the FF community isn't aware of the fact that war/mnk can TANK!

A little background may help, eh? I'm currently leveling my sub for Dragoon, and I never though I'd run into the same problems with WAR. I can sit LFG for hours before being picked up for xp... and never as a tank (oh, btw... I'm the only tank type job seeking in a sea of whm, blm rdm.. etc). I've been in 3 PTs as a DD / SATA Partner. What is going on?

I got invited to a PT the other day and everyone immmediately wondered whether they needed another Tank. "Nope" I said, "I'm the only tank you need. Get a DD."

They ask if I have nin leveled. "Of course I do".
Can you sub it?
"Nope"
Why not?
"Cause war/mnk > war/nin until 50"

At which point I'm lauged at. WTF?! Apparantly, PLD. NIN. and WAR/NIN are the only viable tanks now?!

As I type this, I'm still LFG in Jeuno... and I'm not gonna switch my sub. I'm used to it... I'm a Dragoon!

So, the point of this /rant is... if you think war/nin is the only sub for war to tank with... post here.... please... lets have this discussion and end it.

Edit: Cause I can't sepll.

Edited, Mon Apr 18 19:57:02 2005 by AmbroseOdin
#2 Apr 18 2005 at 6:57 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,648 posts
/nin is used to reduce the dmg the war takes so the whm does not get hate from curing.

I stopped seeing war/mnk at lv 34 I think, then by 40 all the war tanks subbed nin. My memory is a little foggy though, so I am not sure about the exact lvs.
#3 Apr 18 2005 at 6:58 PM Rating: Decent
*
100 posts
I would kill to have people choose a WAR/MNK over a WAR/NIN. I have my NIN sub leveled properly, but the constant gil drain from shihei seriously hurts a player who gets on at random intervals like me. Not whining, since I always make up the dough somehow, but it gets frustrating.
#4 Apr 18 2005 at 7:01 PM Rating: Good
**
405 posts
A WAR/MNK can hold hate better than a WAR/NIN as you have more job abilites at your disposal to use. Ninja sub only really offers the ability to blink.

I guess its a matter of better hate holding vs. damage negation.

I prefer the first not the latter myself.
#5 Apr 18 2005 at 7:01 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,839 posts
xmasterpent wrote:
/nin is used to reduce the dmg the war takes so the whm does not get hate from curing.


A good WHM can keep from getting too much hate except in extreme situation in which they would get hate anyways with a WAR/NIN.

Actually, WAR/NIN's keep horrible hate. A simple Cure II still well into the fight can ***** everything up and get the healer hate, you have to make sure to plan things very carefully when healing a WAR/NIN. WAR/MNK on the other hand you have to heal more, but that's not really a problem since they seem to keep hate a little better (below 40 at least, don't know about above that since I haven't really seen many WAR/MNK's since then).
#6 Apr 18 2005 at 7:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,809 posts
war/mnk can tank. Hell I had a war/thf tanked the second tier lizards in the nest (the lvl 48-50 ones i think). Hell even I tank as a war/thf from 33-35 in dd gear with dd food cause the war/nin was so crappy that he just plainly sucks.

war/mnk just get no respect no more.
#7 Apr 18 2005 at 7:06 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,648 posts
I never said war/nin was better then war/mnk, just saying thats why they sub nin.

Just wanted to make sure that was clear.
#8 Apr 18 2005 at 7:09 PM Rating: Decent
WAR/MNK are great tanks. They can hold hate and do great damage with the GA. WAR/NIN is a good tank but is much better starting 50+
#9 Apr 18 2005 at 7:10 PM Rating: Decent
If you counter 6 times in a fight, you're pretty much beating a WAR/NIN's damage mitigation. And doing more damage to boot. And if you're shield breaking.. Gods, that's some sweet stuff.
#10 Apr 18 2005 at 7:12 PM Rating: Decent
I level as WAR/MNK because my main is MNK and I'm used to being a DD, not some weak little tank. I'll hold hate with my damage thank you very much.
#11 Apr 18 2005 at 7:15 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Yep, War/Mnk make pretty good tanks. Of course a PLD is going to be better...but you have to work with what's available.

What you said about War/Mnk being better than War/Nin until around 50 is absolutely right. Subbing NIN is just not worth it at low levels. Even at 24 when you would get Utsusemi...it's still not worth the VIT and HP you get from MNK (not to mention Counter...probably one of the coolest things when you tank as War/Mnk).

As for LFP...I feel for ya. I experienced similar pains when I brought my Warrior up to 30 as a sub for PLD. It sucks hardcore, but stick with it...you need the sub anyway right?
#12 Apr 18 2005 at 7:15 PM Rating: Default
***
1,285 posts
So then WAR/MNK sucks as a tank past 50?

Because seriously, I have yet to find a WAR/NIN that can hold hate for ****. Can't speak to the WAR/MNK experience, as I can never find them past like 35.
#13 Apr 18 2005 at 7:20 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,614 posts
Thank you for posting this. It's funny how NIN sub only gradually became accepted for WAR, then was suddenly the only viable option. Before Rampage, a WAR/MNK with a Great Axe is a far superior damage dealer, and their hate-holding abilities are incomparable. Even damage intake, the one apparent advantage of a /NIN sub, seems to me to be highly debateable. Between Counter, Dodge, and improved VIT, I would be very interested to see if the WAR/MNK in fact didn't do better in this area as well.

I'm also growing pretty suspicious of NIN sub being used over WAR for Thieves, but I suppose that's another discussion...
#14 Apr 18 2005 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
Quote:
So then WAR/MNK sucks as a tank past 50?


Not at all. WAR/MNK can tank all the way to 75. WAR/NIN actually becomes a viable sub at 50... before that imo, it doesn't rank high above say... WAR/RNG.
#15 Apr 18 2005 at 7:23 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Quote:
So then WAR/MNK sucks as a tank past 50?

Because seriously, I have yet to find a WAR/NIN that can hold hate for sh*t. Can't speak to the WAR/MNK experience, as I can never find them past like 35.


No they most certainly do not suck. Most WAR 50+ go for a NIN sub so they can have Dual Wield+2, Utsusemi, and Viking Axes eventually I believe.

Both are valid tank options...it's up to the player what to choose. Both subs have great advantages.
#16 Apr 18 2005 at 7:26 PM Rating: Decent
*
225 posts
Ooops. >.>" I leveled war from 25-36 on nin sub. Sorry main Warriors XD. And believe me, keeping hate is very tuff as war/nin, but I think its based on how good the player is and stuff >.>. I did pretty good holdin hate by using all my JA's, save 2hring, using ninjitsu for MBs(u have to **** off that mob as much as u can in between your long Delay), and dual weilding the fastest swds or axes I could that still have decent damage.

Lol, maybe I'll be war/mnk for my last 4k exp.....maybe not >.>
#17 Apr 18 2005 at 7:29 PM Rating: Decent
**
403 posts
Utsusemi continues to be a broken ability, regardless of one of the patches "nerfing" it so that your ninjitsu skill occasionally might matter.

Warriors have the advantage of having Double Attack and Berserk as main job abilities, something other jobs sub warrior for because they add an incredible amount of damage potential. Because the class does not have to rely on any one subjob, they choose ninja because it gives them the ability to get hate from the tank without taking hits, effectively the same reason Ranger subs ninja.

I would *love* to see Utsusemi: Ichi be reduced to a single shadow when used as a subjob. It would only provide the same one hit dodge security that Samurai's Third Eye ability grants, and might actually force us to see some variance in the subjobs we see for both Warrior and Ranger.

Until then, no Warrior is going to tank after 50, and Rangers will continue to be the absolute masters of Damage Dealing because, unlike the Black Mage, they don't have to hold back from fear of death.
#18 Apr 18 2005 at 7:36 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Most parties gravitate nowadays to WAR/NIN tanks because they think "ooo Ninja tank...Ninja's are great tanks...so by association...a WAR/NIN must also be a great tank!"

This is not true.

They CAN be good tanks, but as said they will not equal the power of a WAR/MNK until later in the game. (Mind you, WAR/NIN are still good...but as was said..later).

Utsusemi: Ichi is great and all...but come on people...3 hits and it's gone. Ichi is nearly useless against MNK type mobs (ie. Mandies).

Utsusemi: Ichi is really meant for NIN's with a bunch of Evasion. The whole idea of a Ninja tank is to have a crapload of EVA so that you rarely get hit. But when you DO get hit, you've got shadows to take the hits.

A WAR/NIN is going to suck with EVA...so go for something that can take the hits that you WILL be recieving. Hell, a /MNK can freaking COUNTER the hits. You don't know how cool that is until you see it.
#19 Apr 18 2005 at 7:41 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,809 posts
Quote:
Hell, a /MNK can freaking COUNTER the hits. You don't know how cool that is until you see it.


The first time you counter the mandys both punches is just awesome.
#20 Apr 18 2005 at 7:44 PM Rating: Good
***
2,880 posts
Quote:
The first time you counter the mandys both punches is just awesome.


My favorite moment as WAR/MNK was hitting a Mandy with Double Attack (with a Great Axe no less), and then immediately Countering it's next hit.

Nearly 150 damage in about 2 seconds.
#21 Apr 18 2005 at 7:44 PM Rating: Good
*
181 posts
My main job is a war/mnk that is sitting at 61 atm because I have a damn hard time finding parties that will invite me, seems as though everyone prefers /nin. I don't mind being a SATA partner at all, and if thats what I am in the party to do, then thats fine by me, but I don't have a problem tanking either.

I am going to blow my own horn here for a minute, because I think that a lot of people tend to dismiss the abilities of a war/mnk (at least on my server anyway). I can effectivly hold hate against a nuke happy blm, and have taken hate away from both nin and pld tanks (unintentionally as I don't strive to tank unless it is what I am in party to do).
I have seen posts where people say that a war/mnk isn't even a good SATA partner because they lack the blink that /nin gives to midigate dmg until SATA goes off onto the tank. I personally think thats crap, cause I can regain the hps I lost waiting for SATA with a CureII and RegenII and be perfectly fine.

I am also fine with my role in the party going from tank (which I was tank up until my 50's) to DD. I think being a war is very versatile... just wish others thought the same way.
There are tons more option for subjobs for a war, such as thf or even sam. The gaming experience for war at 50+ doesn't begin and end with being /nin.

I must say, there is nothing wrong with being /nin if that is how you prefer to play the game. I just don't think it is fair to completely dismiss the war/mnk for dd or even tank.

Anywho, thats my opinion... a war/mnk is a good tank and a good DD. It would be awesome if we were given more chances to prove that we are an asset to the party wether we are a tank or not.

Thanks for reading ^^

#22 Apr 18 2005 at 8:12 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,678 posts
If WAR/NIN are so much better at tanking than WAR/MNK, how come I can peel hate off them just by firing off Warcry? Why can't they get it back, even with Provoke?

I only subbed /NIN once before 50 outside a Promyvian, and it was an absolutely horrible experience. The mob was running around all willy-nilly, I couldn't hit jack, and of course then there is that lovely little BLM expression:

{Provoke} plz!!!
{Provoke} plz!!!
{Provoke} plz!!!
{Provoke} plz!!!
{Provoke} plz!!!

HEY! @$$HOLE!!! I JUST DID FIVE SECONDS AGO, QUIT USING -GA SPELLS IN CN!!!

My answer to "can u sub nin?" after that little episode was always, "yeah, changing right now..." followed by going /anon and hanging out by the AH for a minute to make it look like I was changing subs ^^.

Anyways, I personally like /THF as a sub, but /MNK is a close second, especially when you're not sure of who the people you are pting with are. It's nice to be able to switch between DD and tank on the fly, in case the pt leader decides to invite a 'real' tank, or somebody leaves or something.

Hang in there, though! There is no better tank in the game than WAR/MNK until Flash and Utsusemi: Ni become available. If anybody doubts it, prove them wrong. Nothing humbles a pt leader like being shown they are wrong.

____________________________
Dooom wrote:
BG elitists <3 haste.

Allatards/uber casuals hate elitists.

Allatards/uber casuals hate haste, as valuing it would acknowledge that elitists are right


kerberoz wrote:
People don't hate emo kids because they're "misunderstood." People hate emo kids because they're useless.


Realix wrote:
PUP is an average to above average DD... when not in a zerg situation... or on particularly hard targets... and when properly configured... on windsday... with a RDM...
#23 Apr 18 2005 at 9:09 PM Rating: Good
***
1,689 posts
Quote:
If you counter 6 times in a fight, you're pretty much beating a WAR/NIN's damage mitigation.


Does this happen once in a blue moon? Nope.
Does this happen once every ten fights? Nope.
This happens once every three fights.

WAR/MNK rules.
#24 Apr 18 2005 at 10:17 PM Rating: Good
****
7,106 posts
Quote:
What you said about War/Mnk being better than War/Nin until around 50 is absolutely right. Subbing NIN is just not worth it at low levels

I dunno. I believe firmly that WAR/MNK is a perfectly capable tank, but when I was leveling WAR to 37 I subbed NIN, and most fights I wasn't hit very much. I'd say one fight on three I got through without a scratch.

I have no doubt that a WAR/MNK can keep hate better than I could, but Provoke, Warcry, a Great Axe, and the occasional Berserk left me keeping hate pretty well. I'm not convinced that better hate control but more damage taken necessarily makes for an enormously better tank.
#25 Apr 18 2005 at 10:39 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,839 posts
From a mages perspective, I personally don't care what you do, as long as you can keep hate. You can take all the damage in the world, and as long as you keep enough hate for me to intelligently cure you, that's cool, I can figure out how to manage my MP to suit you.

With WAR/MNK, I do have to cure quite a bit, but I can easily get away with it. Add into that that they do nice damage while tanking, I like being a healer with a WAR/MNK.

PLD's are great to party with. They keeo hate very well and they help me out some by curing themselves. I've been with Pally's who kept hate so well I could spam CureIII and Curaga(while in the 40's and low 50's) and not get hate at all.

WAR/NIN's are nice because they don't take a lot of damage and I don't have to cure them often, but when I do I have to be really careful. I've had them lose hate before when after telling my avatar to assault even right after he provoked. When you do have to cure them, you have to be pretty careful that you do it at the right times or be prepared to take a few hits. The only time I really like having a WAR/NIN tank is when I'm SMN and I can keep them alive with Stoneskin.
#26 Apr 18 2005 at 10:47 PM Rating: Decent
**
629 posts
WAR/NIN is equal to, if not better then ninja at 74-75. They deal more damage, hold better hate, and take (low) to no damage (unually no with a BRD, since BRD slow makes the thing attack REALLY slow)

Of course, a NIN/BLM will hold hate better with emnity+ gear through 170+ damage nukes every few seconds, but I dunno any NIN who can afford to do that personally. WAR/NIN really shines at 74-75, but WAR/MNK can tank perfectly fine through all levels (and with emnity++8 just from body AF, hate holding isnt a problem.) I have a friend who has around +80VIT on his WAR, and he takes a hell of a lot less damage per hit then the average PLD's his level, and has a good 200-400 more HP. So yes, WAR/MNK is a good tank, and so is WAR/NIN. Another thing to factor in though, is the situation.
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 710 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (710)