Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

BashingFollow

#1 Nov 07 2005 at 9:37 AM Rating: Decent
*
139 posts
I noticed on my Pally that getting a better shield seems to affect the amount of damage done when Bash is used....was wondering what aspect of the shield influenced the damage dealt. Is it higher AC means more damage? Or is it simply the size of the shield? Anyone know?
#2 Nov 07 2005 at 9:45 AM Rating: Decent
I can't claim this as fact, but I have always heard the higher the AC of the shield, the harder the bash.

It's been way too long since I've played a bashing class.

My Smiley: twocents might give you change so let's see what others have to say.
#3 Nov 07 2005 at 11:04 AM Rating: Decent
**
429 posts
Never really watched the damage from Bashing playing an SK (No Stuns)I hold off on bashing till spells are being cast for a possible interupt. Do you get enough damage from bashing to make it worth the added possiblity of a spell getting through?
#4 Nov 07 2005 at 11:13 AM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Never really watched the damage from Bashing playing an SK (No Stuns)I hold off on bashing till spells are being cast for a possible interupt. Do you get enough damage from bashing to make it worth the added possiblity of a spell getting through?


Well if you're fighting melee only mobs, then you should be bashing everytime its available. Yes it can add a bit of extra dps (every little bit helps knights).
#5 Nov 07 2005 at 11:34 AM Rating: Good
**
615 posts
I bash whenever possible with my warrior even though I give up my offhand weapon for about 1-2 seconds with a bandolier macro.

The chance to stun a mob for a short time means I take less damage and it greatly increases aggro.

Plus, the offhand doesn't have the same kind of damage bonus as the main hand, so I don't feel like I'm losing too much DPS.

Even though I'm a large race that gets Slam, Bashing with a shield seems to me to stun more often and definately does a lot more damage. To answer the OP, sorry I'm not sure of the exact relationship between the shield and bash damage, but I bet bash skill has a lot to do with it.

Edited, Mon Nov 7 11:51:22 2005 by JoltinJoe
#6 Nov 07 2005 at 12:37 PM Rating: Decent
certianly not proof. But i tested this in burning woods I have the shield I got from the halloween God MM. it is ac 17 my other has ac 25. the halloween shield is way better in every other stat except Cha. The Ac 25 did consistantly more damage than the other. One more reason to carry the bazarr bought shield :( I was trying to justify the 80hp and 80m as a reason to switch the diference in hp and ac make them a wash now the diference in mana and bash damage kinda make this a tough choice)


Edited, Mon Nov 7 12:46:50 2005 by Trablin
#7 Nov 07 2005 at 12:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
As I recall, linking shield AC to bash damage was one of the changes made way back in the day when shields were slightly revamped to make them more viable.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Nov 07 2005 at 11:14 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,212 posts
My paladins at 51 and 55 respectively still use Mace of the Fallen crusader and shield. A well researched post from over a year ago on paladins stated that was the best combo until post 54. (I think that I saw it on Paladins of norrath board.) However there is a point when you will do more damage with a 2h weapon vs 1h and bash.

When to bash? Whenever it is available is my usual method. If I am fighting a caster I will usually try to Chain stun and use bash as well. With Winjon I can desist, holy might, bash and cast stun, the next one refreshing in turn. Sometimes even get two bashes in.
#9 Nov 08 2005 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
30 posts
I pretty much stick to 1HS and a shield with my Pally. I use bash everytime it is available. Yes, AC does affect bash damage. The high the AC the more damage you have the potential to inflict. If I'm in a group I'll switch to 2HS to keep the skill up but when I'm soloing I stick to 1HS and a shield for bash, unless I'm against a caster mob and then I prefer stuns over bash. My current combo is Blade of Disruption (with the DoN aug that adds a vampire claw proc) and Muramite's Shield. Hope this helps! :)
#10 Nov 08 2005 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
Quote:
As I recall, linking shield AC to bash damage was one of the changes made way back in the day when shields were slightly revamped to make them more viable.


/nod

I remember there being some parses on this back after this happened. I don't recall the actual stats, I don't think it was as simple as going from 26ac on a shield to 27ac giving that much more damage, but there were certain cut-off. The only thing I remember for sure was that it was recommended to have at least 25ac on the sheild. I'm pretty sure this was on the Paladin boards as well, but can't be bothered to try to find it.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#11 Nov 08 2005 at 11:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Jonwin wrote:
My paladins at 51 and 55 respectively still use Mace of the Fallen crusader and shield.
You may want to consider upgrading your 55 paladin to a Mace of Dark Glory. 27/25 ratio, 20AC and a 180hp self-heal proc. My lvl 56 Shadowknight uses one and I really like it though the heal is probably more important for a SK than for a paladin. Still, you can get one for about 2.5k-3k on Povar these days.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#12 Nov 09 2005 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,212 posts
Thanks Jophiel I may do that for Jonwin. But he is still on Elne's account and with her doing a lot of O game and Civ 4 her comp doesnt have a lot of free time on it.

OH an everyone else who doesn't look at the asylum section here take a gander at Jophiel's new title. <Grin>
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 188 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (188)