I'm going to reply as best and as succinctly as I can so that your mutated brain will finally understand what I'm trying to say. I'll jump around a little because it's actually annoying me that there are people who are stupid enough to STILL think this is a hunter helm.

1) Just because you have played a 70 hunter does NOT mean you know all. I have jointly played that troll hunter I have mentioned (now 70) ALL THE WAY, and so I know EXACTLY what stats a hunter wants. You cannot disagree with me there - I am right.

2) Further...about 2 months or so ago, when I first posted my reply, you had no 60's or 70's whatsoever. Your highest was a 43 shaman, which over-exaggerated your idiocy at trying to argue with me (you obviously knew nothing at the time). I'm guessing that you bought all your higher level characters, because in that short amount of time I'm doubting you could have levelled that many characters to such higher levels. GG at pretending to know everything.

3) Ever heard of PvP? This is the main argument why many people think paladins/warriors shouldn't get this helm, because "We'll be getting plate in 3 levels time". Funnily enough, for Paladins/Warriors, level 30-39 is the BEST bracket for PvP. Perhaps they might actually ant this helm for PvP then, you douchebag. @#%^ I hate idiots like you.

4) Admittantly, not many people here have agreed with me, possibly because the people who have agreed with me have seen their/my arguments logically constructed from their/my point of view, and they felt no need to add their own. Obviously people who dissent with me will reply.

On a side note, I asked my guild if hunters should need on this item. Within 10 seconds, I had exactly 29 replies saying something along the lines of NO THEY @#%^ING SHOULDN'T, with 2 replies saying they should definitely need it. Those two people were, as you would have it, a shaman and a hunter, and in about another 10 seconds were kicked from the guild. You fail bigtime.

5) I said somewhere in my first post that those were the rules of looting...and indeed, in my opinion they are, and I kick anyone who disagrees with me. Which isn't very often now thankfully, because people at 70 have learnt what being in a group means. I probably used 'rules' because I couldn't be bothered writing out "ethics of looting" or "morals of looting", but nevertheless that's the general gist of that word's meaning.

6) I noticed most of your reply was simply dictionary definitions....and further, that you simply define the words without justifying why you've used them.

I'll explain to you what they really mean. Notice that I don't actually need a dictionary (funny that you actually needed one), and can define them straight off.

'Pompous' is a synonym for 'arrogant', and often has rather posh conotations. I was not being arrogant nor posh in any of my responses. You can't really call me 'ignorant' either, because I knew exactly what I was talking about.

'Self-righteous' is a synonym for narcissism, which means that I would be very full of myself. Quite on the contrary, as in my posts I'm more degrading your sh*t-house opinion as opposed to showing how awesome my own posts are.

You talk about being an adult...yet none of your argument showed any sign of maturity. I may have gone overboard with the swearing, but your arguments are worse than I would have expected from a 10 year old.

So Good Game, and please Shut the Fùck Up.

i agree with derelick and turtl.. just because its your opinion doesnt mean its right .. lol if some1 has a different opinion u have a breakdown. (yazarh guy)